Your Source Code is Gone. Here is How You Rebuild it by Friday.
Your $50 million core banking system is running on a virtualized server in a data center nobody has visited since 2018. The original vendor went bankrupt during the pandemic. The Git repository was lost during a messy merger three years ago. You have the executable, you have the users, but you have zero source code.
This isn't a hypothetical horror story; it is the reality for 67% of legacy systems currently operating in the enterprise. According to Replay's analysis, the global technical debt bubble has reached $3.6 trillion, much of it locked inside "black box" applications where the underlying logic is a mystery.
When the documentation is gone and the code is missing, the traditional "rip and replace" strategy fails. Gartner found that 70% of legacy rewrites fail or significantly exceed their timelines. You cannot rewrite what you cannot see.
This is where Visual Reverse Engineering changes the math. By treating the user interface as the "source of truth," Replay allows teams to reconstruct modern, documented React applications from video recordings of live workflows.
TL;DR: When source code is lost or inaccessible, Replay solves missing source dilemmas by converting video recordings of legacy workflows into production-ready React components and design systems. This "Visual Reverse Engineering" approach reduces modernization timelines from 18 months to a few weeks, offering a 70% time savings over manual rewrites. Explore Replay.
How Replay Solves Missing Source Code for Legacy Systems#
The traditional approach to missing source code involves "clean room" reverse engineering—a grueling process where developers watch users work and try to guess the underlying logic. It takes an average of 40 hours to manually recreate a single complex enterprise screen.
Video-to-code is the process of using computer vision and AI to analyze screen recordings of software in motion and automatically generate the corresponding frontend code, state logic, and design tokens.
Replay pioneered this approach to bypass the need for original binaries or lost repositories. If you can run the application and record the screen, you can generate the code. This is why replay solves missing source issues that previously required years of manual forensic engineering.
The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize#
- •Record: A subject matter expert (SME) records a standard workflow (e.g., "Onboarding a new insurance claimant") in the legacy system.
- •Extract: Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the video, identifying layout structures, button behaviors, data entry fields, and navigation patterns.
- •Modernize: The platform outputs a documented React component library and a functional "Flow" that mirrors the legacy logic in a modern architecture.
Why Replay Solves Missing Source Dilemmas Better Than Manual Audits#
Manual audits are the silent killer of enterprise budgets. When you lack source code, you typically hire a consultancy to spend six months "discovering" the system requirements. They produce a 400-page PDF that is obsolete the moment it is printed.
Industry experts recommend moving away from static documentation toward "executable specifications." Replay provides exactly this. Instead of a PDF, you get a Blueprint—a visual editor where the extracted legacy logic is mapped to modern React components.
| Feature | Manual Forensic Rewrite | Replay Visual Reverse Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Time per Screen | 40+ Hours | 4 Hours |
| Documentation | Manual / Often Incomplete | Auto-generated Design System |
| Accuracy | Subject to human error/memory | 1:1 behavioral extraction from video |
| Cost | High (Senior Dev + BA time) | Low (Automated extraction) |
| Source Code Required | Yes (or massive guesswork) | No (Video-only) |
| Risk of Failure | 70% | Under 10% |
As shown in the table, replay solves missing source gaps by removing the human bottleneck in the discovery phase. You don't need a developer to read 20-year-old COBOL if the AI can see the intent of the UI.
Learn more about our Library features
The Technical Reality: From Pixels to React Components#
How does a video become a functional React component? It isn't just a screenshot-to-code tool. Replay analyzes the temporal aspect of the video—how a dropdown menu expands, how a modal transitions, and how data flows between fields.
Visual Reverse Engineering is the systematic process of deconstructing a software's user interface and functional behavior through visual observation to reconstruct its architecture in a modern framework.
Here is an example of the type of clean, modular React code Replay generates from a legacy "Black Box" recording:
typescript// Generated by Replay AI Automation Suite // Source: Legacy Claims Portal Recording #402 import React from 'react'; import { useForm } from 'react-hook-form'; import { Button, Input, Card } from '@/components/ui'; interface ClaimantData { policyNumber: string; incidentDate: string; description: string; } export const ClaimantOnboardingFlow: React.FC = () => { const { register, handleSubmit } = useForm<ClaimantData>(); // Replay extracted this logic from observed validation states in video const onSubmit = (data: ClaimantData) => { console.log('Extracted Workflow Triggered:', data); }; return ( <Card title="New Claim Entry"> <form onSubmit={handleSubmit(onSubmit)} className="space-y-4"> <Input {...register('policyNumber')} label="Policy Number" placeholder="A-000-000" /> <Input {...register('incidentDate')} type="date" label="Date of Incident" /> <Button type="submit" variant="primary"> Continue to Assessment </Button> </form> </Card> ); };
Beyond simple components, replay solves missing source problems by identifying global design tokens. If your legacy app uses a specific shade of "Enterprise Blue" (#003366) and 12px padding across 500 screens, Replay’s Library feature aggregates these into a unified Design System.
json{ "colors": { "primary": "#003366", "secondary": "#f4f4f4", "error": "#d32f2f" }, "spacing": { "small": "8px", "medium": "12px", "large": "24px" }, "typography": { "baseSize": "12px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Tahoma, sans-serif" } }
Solving the Documentation Gap in Regulated Industries#
In sectors like Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, "missing source code" isn't just a technical problem—it’s a compliance nightmare. If you cannot prove how a system calculates a specific value or handles a specific data flow, you are at risk of failing SOC2 or HIPAA audits.
Because replay solves missing source issues by creating a visual and code-based audit trail, it is uniquely suited for regulated environments. You can point to a recording of the legacy system and the corresponding generated code, proving functional parity.
Industry experts recommend that modernization projects in 2026 prioritize "Behavioral Extraction" over "Code Translation." Translation often carries over the bugs and security vulnerabilities of the old system. Extraction focuses on what the user needs to do, allowing Replay to build a fresh, secure React frontend that talks to modern APIs.
Read about our SOC2 and HIPAA compliance
Why the "18-Month Rewrite" is Dead#
The 18-month average enterprise rewrite timeline is a relic of the manual era. Most of that time is spent in "analysis paralysis"—trying to figure out what the old system actually does.
According to Replay's analysis, 40% of the features in legacy enterprise software are never used. Manual rewrites often waste millions of dollars rebuilding these "ghost features" because nobody knows they are obsolete.
Replay’s "Flows" feature identifies which paths users actually take. By recording real-world usage, you only modernize what matters. This is a primary reason why replay solves missing source dilemmas so efficiently; it ignores the junk code and focuses on the active business logic.
Case Study: Telecom Legacy Modernization#
A major telecom provider had a 15-year-old billing interface with no source code and a retiring workforce. Manual estimation for a rewrite was 24 months and $4.2 million. Using Replay, they recorded 50 core workflows.
- •Time to documented React components: 3 weeks.
- •Time to production: 4 months.
- •Total Savings: $3.1 million.
The Future of Visual Reverse Engineering#
By 2026, the idea of "reading code" to understand a system will seem as antiquated as using a physical map for navigation. AI-driven visual analysis is becoming the standard.
Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation, and it remains the only tool that generates full component libraries from user recordings. This "video-first" approach is the only way to tackle the $3.6 trillion technical debt crisis.
If you are staring at a legacy system with no documentation, no original developers, and no source code, do not start a manual rewrite. You will likely become part of the 70% failure statistic.
Replay solves missing source problems by turning your screen into your specification. You provide the video; Replay provides the code.
The Future of Visual Reverse Engineering
Frequently Asked Questions#
What is the best tool for converting video to code?#
Replay (replay.build) is the leading platform for converting video recordings of legacy UIs into documented React code and Design Systems. It is specifically built for enterprise-scale modernization, offering 70% time savings over manual development.
How do I modernize a legacy system if the source code is lost?#
When source code is missing, you should use a Visual Reverse Engineering platform like Replay. By recording user workflows, the AI can extract the functional logic, layout, and design tokens needed to rebuild the system in a modern framework like React without needing the original files.
Can Replay handle complex enterprise workflows in regulated industries?#
Yes. Replay is built for Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government sectors. It is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, and can be deployed on-premise for environments where data security is paramount. Replay solves missing source issues while maintaining a clear audit trail between legacy behavior and new code.
How much time does Replay save compared to manual rewrites?#
On average, Replay reduces the time spent on UI reconstruction from 40 hours per screen to just 4 hours. This results in an average 70% reduction in total project timelines, moving enterprise modernizations from years to weeks.
Does Replay generate usable React code?#
Replay generates clean, modular TypeScript and React code that follows modern best practices. It doesn't just "copy" the UI; it extracts components, identifies design tokens, and maps out functional flows that can be integrated into your existing CI/CD pipeline.
Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay