Back to Blog
February 17, 2026 min readsigns enterprise architects modernization

Your Enterprise Architect’s Modernization Roadmap is Based on Fictional Data: Here’s How to Tell

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Your Enterprise Architect’s Modernization Roadmap is Based on Fictional Data: Here’s How to Tell

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt crisis isn't caused by a lack of talent; it’s caused by a lack of truth. Most enterprise modernization roadmaps are works of fiction—beautifully rendered Gantt charts and Visio diagrams built on "tribal knowledge" that hasn't been updated since 2014. When 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timelines, it’s rarely because the developers couldn't code. It’s because the enterprise architects were navigating a forest using a map of a different continent.

If your roadmap assumes your legacy COBOL or Delphi system follows a clean MVC pattern, or if it ignores the thousands of "undocumented features" that users rely on every day, you aren't modernizing. You're hallucinating.

TL;DR: Most modernization roadmaps fail because they rely on outdated documentation (67% of systems lack it entirely). If your EA’s plan doesn't account for "as-is" reality through automated discovery, you're looking at an 18-24 month delay. Replay eliminates this "discovery debt" by converting recorded user workflows directly into documented React components, cutting modernization timelines by 70%.


The 5 Warning Signs Enterprise Architects Modernization Strategies are Failing#

1. The "Documentation Gap" is Hand-Waved Away#

According to Replay's analysis, 67% of legacy systems lack any form of reliable documentation. If your architect presents a roadmap that skips the "Discovery and Extraction" phase, they are assuming your developers can read the minds of the people who left the company a decade ago.

A roadmap built on fiction assumes that the "Requirement Documents" are the source of truth. In reality, the source of truth is the running application. Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of capturing that running reality and turning it into actionable code. Without it, your "signs enterprise architects modernization" efforts are just expensive guesses.

2. Manual Screen Estimation is Unrealistic#

Industry experts recommend budgeting at least 40 hours per screen for manual reverse engineering—this includes discovery, state mapping, CSS extraction, and React component creation. If your roadmap suggests your team can modernize 50 screens in a month without automated tooling, the math doesn't add up.

MetricManual ModernizationReplay-Driven Modernization
Time per Screen40 Hours4 Hours
Documentation Accuracy30-40% (Human Error)99% (Visual Extraction)
Cost per Component~$4,000~$400
Timeline for 100 Screens18-24 Months4-6 Weeks
Risk of RegressionHighLow (Validated by Flows)

3. Lack of a "Design System First" Approach#

Modernization isn't just about moving from Old Tech to New Tech. It’s about creating a sustainable ecosystem. If the roadmap treats the UI as a series of one-off pages rather than a unified Component Library, you are simply building tomorrow's legacy system today.

Replay solves this by automatically identifying recurring patterns across your legacy UI and grouping them into a standardized Design System.

4. The Roadmap Ignores "Edge Case" Workflows#

Legacy systems are often "organic." Over 20 years, they have evolved to handle weird tax laws, specific insurance edge cases, or regulatory requirements that aren't in any Jira ticket. If your architect hasn't accounted for the "Flows"—the actual paths users take—the new system will fail on Day 1.

5. No Strategy for "Architectural Drift"#

Architectural drift occurs when the implemented code deviates from the intended design. In a modernization project, this happens within the first three weeks. Without a way to bridge the gap between "what we saw" and "what we built," the project loses its way.


Moving from Fiction to Fact: The Replay Approach#

To fix the signs enterprise architects modernization roadmaps often show, we need to stop relying on manual interviews and start relying on hard data. We call this "Visual Reverse Engineering."

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of recording real user workflows and automatically converting those recordings into documented React code, Design Systems, and Component Libraries.

Instead of an architect spending three months drawing diagrams, they spend three days recording the legacy application. Replay’s AI Automation Suite then parses those recordings to generate a "Blueprint" of the entire system.

How it Works: From Video to Production-Ready React#

When you record a session in an old mainframe or a legacy web app, Replay doesn't just "take a screenshot." It captures the DOM state, the CSS computed styles, the data structures, and the user intent.

Here is an example of what a "fictional" legacy state might look like in an architect's head versus the clean, modernized TypeScript component Replay helps generate.

The Legacy Mess (Conceptual)

typescript
// What the architect thinks the data looks like interface LegacyUser { ID: number; Name: string; Status: string; // "A", "I", "P" - No one remembers what these mean } // What the reality actually is (The "Hidden" Logic) // The system actually relies on global window objects and // undocumented CSS classes to determine business logic.

The Replay Modernized Component

Using Replay, we extract the exact visual state and transform it into a functional, documented React component.

tsx
import React from 'react'; import { Button, Card, Badge } from '@/components/ui'; interface MemberProfileProps { id: string; fullName: string; accountStatus: 'Active' | 'Inactive' | 'Pending'; lastLogin: string; onStatusChange: (newStatus: string) => void; } /** * Modernized from Legacy Insurance Portal - "MemberDetailView" * Extracted via Replay Visual Reverse Engineering */ export const MemberProfile: React.FC<MemberProfileProps> = ({ id, fullName, accountStatus, lastLogin, onStatusChange }) => { const statusColorMap = { Active: 'bg-green-100 text-green-800', Inactive: 'bg-red-100 text-red-800', Pending: 'bg-yellow-100 text-yellow-800', }; return ( <Card className="p-6 shadow-md border-l-4 border-blue-500"> <div className="flex justify-between items-center"> <div> <h3 className="text-lg font-bold text-slate-900">{fullName}</h3> <p className="text-sm text-slate-500">Member ID: {id}</p> </div> <Badge className={statusColorMap[accountStatus]}> {accountStatus} </Badge> </div> <div className="mt-4 pt-4 border-t border-slate-100"> <p className="text-xs text-slate-400">Last accessed: {lastLogin}</p> <div className="mt-4 flex gap-2"> <Button variant="outline" onClick={() => onStatusChange('Inactive')}> Deactivate </Button> <Button variant="primary">Edit Profile</Button> </div> </div> </Card> ); };

By generating code like this directly from observed behavior, you eliminate the "telephone game" between architects, business analysts, and developers.


Why Your Current "Signs Enterprise Architects Modernization" Strategy is Costing You Millions#

The global technical debt is currently estimated at $3.6 trillion. A significant portion of that is "Discovery Debt"—the money spent just trying to figure out what the current system does.

When you follow a traditional roadmap, you spend the first 6 months in "Discovery." This usually involves:

  1. Hunting down 15-year-old PDFs.
  2. Interviewing "SMEs" (Subject Matter Experts) who have forgotten 40% of the logic.
  3. Manually mapping database schemas to UI fields.

According to Replay's analysis, this phase is where 80% of the fictional data enters the roadmap. Architects make assumptions to fill the gaps. Those assumptions become requirements. Those requirements become bugs in the new system.

The Power of "Flows"#

In Replay, we use a feature called Flows. Instead of a static diagram, a Flow is a living map of how data moves through your application.

Understanding Modernization Flows

If your enterprise architect’s modernization plan doesn't include a visual flow of every mission-critical process (e.g., "Onboard New Policyholder" or "Process Claim"), they are flying blind. Replay allows you to record these flows, which then serve as the "Blueprints" for the new React architecture.


Implementation Details: From Legacy UI to Modern Design System#

Modernization isn't a "big bang" event. It’s an extraction and transformation process. To avoid the signs enterprise architects modernization pitfalls, you need to build a bridge.

Step 1: Record the Reality#

Use Replay to record users performing their daily tasks. This captures the "unwritten rules" of the application.

Step 2: Extract the Library#

Replay’s AI Automation Suite identifies the buttons, inputs, tables, and modals used across the recordings. It then generates a standardized Design System. This ensures consistency and prevents the creation of "Component Soup."

Step 3: Map the Logic#

Each recording is mapped to a "Blueprint." This Blueprint includes:

  • State Management: How the data changes as the user interacts.
  • Validation Rules: What happens when a user enters "ABC" into a "Date" field.
  • API Contracts: What the frontend expects from the backend.

Step 4: Generate the Code#

Finally, Replay generates documented, type-safe React code. This isn't "spaghetti code" generated by a generic AI; it's structured code based on your specific enterprise standards.

typescript
// Example of an extracted API Contract from a Legacy Workflow export interface ClaimSubmissionPayload { claimId: string; // Extracted from hidden field #hdn_claim_id policyNumber: string; // Extracted from input[name='txtPolicy'] incidentDate: string; // Formatted from legacy MM-DD-YYYY to ISO claimAmount: number; // Parsed from string with currency symbols isUrgent: boolean; // Derived from the "Red Flag" icon state in the legacy UI }

Regulated Environments: SOC2, HIPAA, and On-Premise#

For industries like Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, "cloud-only" tools are often a non-starter. This is why many architects stick to "fictional" manual roadmaps—they don't think they can use modern automation tools.

However, Replay is built for these environments. With SOC2 compliance, HIPAA-readiness, and On-Premise deployment options, you can modernize your most sensitive systems without compromising security.

Modernizing Healthcare Systems with Replay


Comparing the Roadmaps: Fiction vs. Fact#

If you are seeing these signs enterprise architects modernization issues, compare your current plan against a fact-based roadmap.

FeatureFictional Roadmap (Traditional)Fact-Based Roadmap (Replay)
Source of TruthOld Docs & InterviewsLive Application Recordings
Discovery Time3-6 Months1-2 Weeks
Component CreationManual (40 hrs/screen)Automated (4 hrs/screen)
DocumentationOutdated by completionAuto-generated & Linked to Code
Cost PredictabilityVariable (+50-100% overrun)Fixed (Based on Screen Count)
User AcceptanceHigh risk of missing featuresLow risk (Validated against recordings)

Frequently Asked Questions#

What are the most common signs enterprise architects modernization plans are inaccurate?#

The most common signs include a lack of "as-is" state documentation, timelines that don't account for discovery debt, and a "bottom-up" approach that ignores actual user workflows. If the roadmap relies heavily on 5+ year old documentation, it is likely based on fictional data.

How does Visual Reverse Engineering differ from standard AI code generation?#

Standard AI (like ChatGPT or Copilot) generates code based on patterns it has seen in the public domain. Visual Reverse Engineering, as performed by Replay, generates code based on the actual visual and functional state of your specific legacy application. It doesn't guess how your system works; it records it and translates it.

Can Replay handle legacy systems with no source code available?#

Yes. Because Replay works through Visual Reverse Engineering, it only needs to "see" the application running. This makes it ideal for modernizing "black box" legacy systems where the original source code is lost, obfuscated, or written in obsolete languages like older versions of PowerBuilder or Delphi.

How much time can we really save using Replay?#

On average, Replay users see a 70% reduction in modernization timelines. What typically takes 18-24 months can often be completed in weeks or a few months. This is achieved by reducing the manual labor of screen recreation from 40 hours per screen to approximately 4 hours.

Is Replay suitable for highly regulated industries like Banking or Government?#

Absolutely. Replay offers SOC2 compliance and is HIPAA-ready. For organizations with strict data residency requirements, we offer On-Premise and Private Cloud deployment options to ensure your data never leaves your secure perimeter.


Conclusion: Stop Guessing, Start Recording#

The "signs enterprise architects modernization" roadmaps are failing aren't hard to spot. They are written in the delays, the budget overruns, and the "unexpected" complexities that arise three months into a project.

Don't let your modernization project become another statistic. By moving from a manual, interview-based discovery process to an automated, visual-based one, you can turn your architectural fiction into a production-ready reality.

With Replay, you aren't just rewriting code—you're capturing the institutional knowledge embedded in your legacy systems and transforming it into a modern, scalable future.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free