Why Static Code Analysis Fails to Document Complex User Journeys

Static code analysis is a post-mortem tool being misapplied to a living problem. We spend millions on tools like SonarQube or Snyk to tell us our legacy code is "bad," yet we are no closer to understanding how a claims adjuster actually processes a mid-tier medical bill in a 20-year-old Delphi application.

The industry is currently obsessed with "understanding the code" when it should be obsessed with "understanding the journey." Reading 500,000 lines of undocumented COBOL or spaghetti jQuery to map a business process is not engineering; it is digital archaeology. It is slow, expensive, and has a 70% failure rate.

TL;DR: Static code analysis fails to document complex user journeys because it cannot account for runtime state, dynamic dependencies, and the "hidden" business logic that only exists when a user interacts with the system. Visual Reverse Engineering with Replay captures the actual execution path, reducing modernization timelines from years to weeks.

The Blind Spot of Static Code Analysis#

Static Code Analysis (SCA) looks at code at rest. It scans for syntax patterns, vulnerabilities, and code smells. However, in the context of legacy modernization, SCA is functionally blind to the "How" and "Why" of a system.

Legacy systems are rarely clean, modular monoliths. They are ecosystems of side effects, global state mutations, and hard-coded conditional logic that only triggers under specific production data scenarios.

1. The Dynamic Dispatch Problem#

In many legacy frameworks, the actual execution path is determined at runtime. Whether it’s a dynamic

in JavaScript, a reflection-based call in Java, or a pointer-heavy routine in C++, static analysis cannot predict which branch will be taken. If your documentation tool can’t see the branch, your documentation is incomplete.

2. The Data-Dependency Trap#

67% of legacy systems lack any form of up-to-date documentation. In these environments, the business logic is often "data-driven" but not in the modern sense. It’s driven by specific database flags or hidden state transitions that static scanners ignore.

3. The "Dead Code" Mirage#

SCA tools often flag large swaths of code as "reachable" when, in reality, no user has touched those features since 2012. Conversely, they might miss critical "shadow" workflows that users have hacked together to bypass broken UI elements.

⚠️ Warning: Relying solely on static analysis for modernization leads to "Feature Parity Traps"—where you spend months rebuilding features that your users no longer use or want.

Comparing Modernization Methodologies#

When we look at the $3.6 trillion global technical debt, it’s clear that traditional methods aren't scaling. We need to move from reading code to observing behavior.

Why "Video as Source of Truth" Changes Everything#

At Replay, we’ve shifted the paradigm. Instead of asking a developer to explain a black box, we record the black box in action. By capturing the actual user session, Replay’s engine maps the visual transitions to the underlying technical requirements.

This isn't just a screen recording. It’s a full-stack capture of:

• •DOM mutations and state changes
• •API requests and responses (generating automatic API contracts)
• •Component hierarchies
• •Business logic branches triggered by specific inputs

💰 ROI Insight: Manual documentation takes an average of 40 hours per screen in a complex enterprise environment. Replay reduces this to 4 hours by automating the extraction of React components and technical specifications directly from the recorded workflow.

From Legacy Spaghetti to Modern React#

When you use Replay to record a workflow, the platform doesn't just show you a video; it generates the scaffolding of your new system. It identifies repeated patterns across different screens and suggests entries for your new Design System (the Replay Library).

Example: Legacy Logic Extraction#

Consider a legacy form that handles complex insurance premium calculations. Static analysis sees a 2,000-line function. Replay sees the inputs, the specific branches taken during a real user session, and the output.

typescript
// Example: Replay-generated component from a captured legacy workflow
// This component preserves the business logic observed during the recording
// while utilizing a modern, typed React structure.

import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { Button, Input, Card } from '@/components/ui'; // From Replay Library

interface PremiumCalculationProps {
  initialData: any;
  onComplete: (data: any) => void;
}

export function PremiumCalculationMigrated({ initialData, onComplete }: PremiumCalculationProps) {
  const [coverageAmount, setCoverageAmount] = useState(initialData.amount || 0);
  const [riskFactor, setRiskFactor] = useState(1.0);

  // Logic extracted from observed legacy side-effects
  const calculatePremium = (amount: number, factor: number) => {
    const base = amount * 0.05;
    const adjusted = base * factor;
    // Replay identified this specific conditional branch during the "High Risk" workflow
    return factor > 2.0 ? adjusted + 500 : adjusted;
  };

  return (
    <Card title="Policy Premium Calculator">
      <Input 
        type="number" 
        value={coverageAmount} 
        onChange={(e) => setCoverageAmount(Number(e.target.value))} 
      />
      <div className="mt-4">
        <strong>Estimated Premium: ${calculatePremium(coverageAmount, riskFactor)}</strong>
      </div>
      <Button onClick={() => onComplete({ coverageAmount, riskFactor })}>
        Sync to Core System
      </Button>
    </Card>
  );
}

💡 Pro Tip: Don't try to refactor and modernize at the same time. Use Replay to extract the "As-Is" state into a clean React baseline first. Once you have a documented, running modern component, then begin your architectural refactoring.

The 3-Step Replay Workflow#

Modernization doesn't have to be an 18-month "Big Bang" rewrite. Using Replay, we follow a streamlined path from observation to deployment.

Step 1: Record and Map#

Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) or users perform their standard tasks while Replay records the session. This captures the "Golden Path" of the business process. Replay automatically identifies the screens, buttons, and data fields involved.

Step 2: Extract and Audit#

The Replay AI Automation Suite analyzes the recording. It generates:

• •API Contracts: What data is the legacy UI sending to the backend?
• •E2E Tests: Automatically generated Playwright or Cypress scripts based on the user's actions.
• •Technical Debt Audit: Identification of logic that is never triggered or is redundant.

Step 3: Generate and Deploy#

Using the Replay Blueprints (Editor), architects can review the generated React components and the Design System Library. These components are 70% feature-complete out of the box, including the complex state management logic that static analysis usually misses.

typescript
// Replay-Generated API Contract (OpenAPI/Swagger)
// Extracted from observed network traffic during the legacy session
paths:
  /api/v1/insurance/calculate:
    post:
      summary: "Extracted from Legacy Premium Screen"
      requestBody:
        content:
          application/json:
            schema:
              type: object
              properties:
                userId: { type: string }
                coverageLimit: { type: number }
                historicalClaims: { type: array, items: { type: object } }

Addressing Common Concerns#

"We have highly regulated data (HIPAA/SOC2)."#

Legacy systems in healthcare and finance often contain PII/PHI. Replay is built for these environments. We offer on-premise deployment options and PII masking during the recording phase, ensuring that while the logic is captured, the sensitive data is not.

"Our legacy app is a desktop thick-client (Citrix/Delphi)."#

Static analysis is particularly useless here because the source code is often lost or incompatible with modern scanners. Replay’s visual approach works regardless of the underlying technology. If it renders on a screen, we can reverse engineer it.

"What about the backend?"#

Modernization is often stalled by the frontend/backend "chicken and egg" problem. Replay solves this by documenting the API layer first. By extracting the contracts from the UI's behavior, your backend teams can build modern microservices that are guaranteed to support the UI's requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#

While a traditional rewrite takes 18-24 months, a Replay-driven project typically delivers a documented, functional React baseline in 2 to 8 weeks. The "discovery" phase is reduced from months of meetings to hours of recording.

What about business logic preservation?#

Static analysis misses logic hidden in UI state. Replay captures the state transitions. If a field only appears when "Option B" is selected and the user is in "Region 4," Replay records that conditional logic and includes it in the generated component's requirements and code.

Does Replay replace my developers?#

No. Replay replaces the 70% of the project that developers hate: documentation, "code archaeology," and manual UI scaffolding. It allows your senior talent to focus on high-value architecture and new feature development rather than playing detective in a 15-year-old codebase.

Can Replay handle mainframe or green-screen apps?#

Yes. By using our visual extraction engine, Replay can map terminal-based workflows into modern web-based flows, identifying the data fields and transition logic that define the legacy process.

---

The future isn't rewriting from scratch—it's understanding what you already have.

The $3.6 trillion technical debt crisis won't be solved by more manual audits or better linters. It will be solved by platforms that can look at a legacy system and automatically translate human intent into modern code.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.