Back to Blog
January 31, 20268 min readWhy Senior Architects

Why Senior Architects are Pivoting to Extraction-Based Modernization

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt bubble is no longer a "future problem"—it is an active inhibitor of enterprise velocity. For decades, the standard response to aging infrastructure was the "Big Bang" rewrite: a high-stakes, 24-month gamble that, statistically, fails 70% of the time. Senior architects are now abandoning these high-risk maneuvers in favor of extraction-based modernization.

The shift is pragmatic. Why spend 18 months performing "software archaeology" on undocumented jQuery or Silverlight monoliths when you can extract the exact business logic and UI patterns directly from the runtime?

TL;DR: Senior architects are pivoting to extraction-based modernization using tools like Replay to bypass the "archaeology" phase of legacy migration, reducing project timelines by 70% and eliminating the risk of "Big Bang" rewrite failures.

The Failure of Manual Archaeology#

Most legacy systems are black boxes. Statistics show that 67% of legacy systems lack any meaningful documentation. When a VP of Engineering mandates a modernization, the first six months are typically wasted on discovery—senior engineers digging through thousands of lines of spaghetti code to understand business rules that were written by people who left the company a decade ago.

This manual approach is the primary driver of the 18-24 month average enterprise rewrite timeline. It is inefficient, error-prone, and demoralizing for high-level talent.

The Cost of Discovery#

The industry standard for manually documenting and rebuilding a single legacy screen is approximately 40 hours. This includes discovery, state mapping, API contract definition, and UI development. In a 500-screen enterprise application, that represents 20,000 man-hours—a cost and timeline that most CFOs can no longer justify.

💰 ROI Insight: Extraction-based modernization with Replay reduces the time per screen from 40 hours to just 4 hours. For a 100-screen application, this saves over 3,600 hours of senior engineering time.

Why Senior Architects are Choosing Extraction#

Extraction-based modernization treats the legacy system as a functional specification. Instead of reading the code, we record the behavior. By using Replay, architects can record real user workflows and automatically generate documented React components and API contracts.

Comparison of Modernization Strategies#

ApproachTimelineRiskDocumentationCost
Big Bang Rewrite18-24 MonthsHigh (70% fail)Manual/Post-hoc$$$$
Strangler Fig12-18 MonthsMediumIncremental$$$
Lift & Shift3-6 MonthsLowNone (Debt remains)$$
Extraction (Replay)2-8 WeeksLowAutomated/Visual$

Moving from Black Box to Documented Codebase#

The goal isn't just to move to the cloud; it's to understand what you have. Extraction-based modernization uses the Video as the Source of Truth. By recording a user performing a task in the legacy system, Replay’s AI Automation Suite identifies the UI patterns, the underlying data structures, and the state transitions.

⚠️ Warning: Attempting a rewrite without a technical debt audit is the leading cause of "scope creep" in modernization projects. Never start coding until you have mapped the existing "Flows."

Technical Deep Dive: The Extraction Workflow#

The pivot to extraction is powered by a shift in how we handle the "translation" layer between old and new. Rather than manual translation, we use automated visual reverse engineering.

Step 1: Visual Recording and Flow Mapping#

Architects use Replay to record critical business workflows (e.g., "Onboard New Patient" or "Process Insurance Claim"). These recordings are not just videos; they are data-rich captures of the DOM, network calls, and user interactions.

Step 2: Component Extraction#

Replay analyzes the recording and identifies reusable UI patterns. It then generates clean, production-ready React components that mirror the legacy functionality but utilize a modern design system.

typescript
// Example: Replay-Generated React Component from Legacy Extraction // Source: Legacy ASP.NET WebForms Insurance Portal // Target: Modern React + Tailwind import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import { Button, Input, Card } from '@/components/ui'; interface ClaimData { claimId: string; policyNumber: string; incidentDate: string; status: 'Pending' | 'Approved' | 'Rejected'; } export const ClaimReviewModule: React.FC<{ id: string }> = ({ id }) => { const [data, setData] = useState<ClaimData | null>(null); const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true); // Business logic preserved from legacy network state analysis const handleApproval = async () => { const response = await fetch(`/api/v1/claims/${id}/approve`, { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } }); if (response.ok) { // Logic extracted from legacy event handler console.log("Claim successfully processed"); } }; if (loading) return <div>Analyzing Legacy State...</div>; return ( <Card className="p-6"> <h2 className="text-xl font-bold">Claim ID: {data?.claimId}</h2> <div className="grid grid-cols-2 gap-4 mt-4"> <Input label="Policy #" value={data?.policyNumber} readOnly /> <Input label="Incident Date" value={data?.incidentDate} readOnly /> </div> <div className="flex gap-2 mt-6"> <Button onClick={handleApproval} variant="primary">Approve Claim</Button> <Button variant="outline">Flag for Review</Button> </div> </Card> ); };

Step 3: API Contract Generation#

One of the most difficult parts of modernization is matching the new frontend to legacy backend services. Replay extracts the network traffic during the recording to generate precise API contracts (OpenAPI/Swagger).

yaml
# Generated API Contract from Replay Extraction openapi: 3.0.0 info: title: Legacy Insurance API (Extracted) version: 1.0.0 paths: /api/v1/claims/{id}/approve: post: summary: Extracted approval logic from legacy workflow parameters: - name: id in: path required: true schema: type: string responses: '200': description: Success

Addressing the "Regulated Industry" Constraint#

For architects in Financial Services, Healthcare, or Government, the "rewrite" is often stalled by compliance. Manual rewrites introduce the risk of missing edge-case validation logic that was implemented to satisfy specific regulatory requirements.

Extraction-based modernization mitigates this because it doesn't rely on a developer's interpretation of the code. It captures the actual behavior of the system. Replay is built for these environments, offering:

  • SOC2 & HIPAA-ready architecture
  • On-Premise deployment for air-gapped systems
  • Technical Debt Audits that provide a paper trail for auditors

💡 Pro Tip: When modernizing in regulated sectors, use Replay's "Blueprints" to maintain a visual link between the legacy screen and the new component. This simplifies the UAT (User Acceptance Testing) process significantly.

The Architecture of Replay: Library, Flows, and Blueprints#

To achieve a 70% time saving, Replay utilizes a three-pillar architectural approach:

1. The Library (Design System)#

Instead of building components from scratch, Replay identifies recurring UI elements across the legacy system. These are extracted into a centralized Library. This ensures that the new system has 100% visual consistency and follows a modern Design System from day one.

2. Flows (Architecture Mapping)#

Modernization isn't just about screens; it's about the journey. The "Flows" feature allows architects to see the entire application map visually. This exposes dead code—screens that are in the codebase but never actually hit by users—allowing you to reduce the migration scope by up to 30%.

3. Blueprints (The Editor)#

The Blueprint editor is where the actual "extraction" happens. It allows developers to refine the generated code, adjust state management, and ensure the new React components are optimized for performance.

The Future Isn't Rewriting—It's Understanding#

The "Big Bang" rewrite is a relic of an era where we had more time than technical debt. In the current market, speed to value is the only metric that matters. Senior architects are pivoting to extraction because it honors the complexity of the legacy system while providing a fast-track to modern infrastructure.

By moving from "archaeology" to "extraction," enterprises can finally address their $3.6 trillion debt without the 18-month wait time. The future of enterprise architecture isn't in writing more code; it's in better understanding the code we've already written.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#

While a manual rewrite of a complex module can take 4-6 months, extraction typically takes 2 to 8 weeks. The primary variable is the number of unique workflows and the complexity of the underlying state transitions.

What about business logic preservation?#

Replay captures the runtime behavior, meaning the exact business logic executed during a user session is documented. This includes hidden validation rules, API call sequences, and conditional UI rendering that are often missed during manual code reviews.

Does Replay work with desktop or mainframe applications?#

Yes. Replay's Visual Reverse Engineering can be applied to any system where a user interface exists. For web-based legacy (Silverlight, Flash, jQuery, ASP.NET), the extraction is highly automated. For desktop-based systems, Replay uses advanced computer vision to map workflows and generate modern web equivalents.

Can we host Replay on our own infrastructure?#

Absolutely. For organizations in highly regulated sectors like Government or Telecom, Replay offers an On-Premise version to ensure that sensitive data and source logic never leave your secure environment.


Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free