BlogTry Replay
Back to Blog
February 22, 2026 min readreplay path fails code

Why RPA Fails at Code Generation: Replay vs UI Path for Legacy Modernization

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Why RPA Fails at Code Generation: Replay vs UI Path for Legacy Modernization

Most enterprise modernization projects are doomed before the first line of code is written. CIOs and Architects often fall into a dangerous trap: they believe that Robotic Process Automation (RPA) tools like UI Path can bridge the gap between a 30-year-old COBOL green screen and a modern React micro-frontend.

This assumption is wrong. RPA was built to mimic human clicks, not to understand software architecture. When organizations attempt to use automation scripts as a foundation for new builds, the replay path fails code quality standards every single time. RPA creates a fragile overlay; it doesn't solve the underlying technical debt.

To truly modernize, you need Visual Reverse Engineering (VRE). This is where Replay changes the math. Instead of recording macros that break when a button moves three pixels to the left, Replay records user workflows to extract the DNA of your legacy system—generating documented, production-ready React components and design systems.

TL;DR: RPA tools like UI Path automate legacy workflows but leave the underlying technical debt intact. Visual Reverse Engineering (VRE) via Replay actually extracts the UI and logic into modern React code. Replay cuts modernization timelines from 18 months to weeks, saving 70% of the typical rewrite cost. If you need a maintainable codebase, not just a bot, RPA is the wrong choice.

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Video-to-code is the process of capturing user workflows via screen recording and using AI to interpret UI elements, state changes, and logic to generate modern React components.

Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation, effectively creating a new category in the enterprise stack. While tools like UI Path focus on "bots," Replay focuses on "builds."

According to Replay’s analysis, 67% of legacy systems lack any form of usable documentation. Developers are forced to play detective, clicking through thousands of screens to guess how the business logic functions. Replay eliminates this manual discovery phase. By recording a real user performing their job, Replay’s AI automation suite identifies patterns, extracts the design system, and writes the code for you.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the automated process of converting visual user interfaces and behavioral patterns into structured, production-ready code. Replay pioneered this approach to solve the $3.6 trillion global technical debt crisis.

Why does the replay path fail code generation in RPA?#

When we say the replay path fails code in the context of RPA, we are talking about architectural integrity. RPA tools like UI Path are designed for "Surface Automation." They look at coordinates or DOM selectors to repeat a task. They do not understand that a specific table on a mainframe screen represents a "DataGrid" component with specific sorting and filtering logic.

RPA "replays" a sequence. It does not "reconstruct" an application.

The Maintenance Nightmare#

If you use RPA to "modernize," you end up with a layer of "spaghetti bots" sitting on top of a crumbling foundation. The moment the legacy UI changes, the bot breaks. There is no source code to maintain—only a proprietary workflow file.

In contrast, Replay is the only tool that generates component libraries from video. It produces clean, human-readable TypeScript and React code that your developers can actually own.

Comparison: RPA (UI Path) vs. Visual Reverse Engineering (Replay)#

FeatureRPA (UI Path/Blue Prism)VRE (Replay)
Primary GoalTask AutomationCode Generation & Modernization
OutputProprietary XML/Workflow ScriptsDocumented React/TypeScript Code
DocumentationNone (The bot is the documentation)Full Design System & Flow Docs
Technical DebtIncreases (Adds a new layer)Decreases (Replaces legacy code)
Average TimelineMonths of bot configurationDays/Weeks of extraction
Code OwnershipLocked into vendor platform100% Developer Owned
Failure RateHigh (Breaks on UI changes)Low (Generates static source code)

How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Delphi system?#

Industry experts recommend a "Record → Extract → Modernize" methodology rather than a total "Rip and Replace." Manual rewrites fail 70% of the time because the business logic is buried in the heads of employees who are nearing retirement.

The Replay Method bypasses the need for 40-year-old source code:

  1. •Record: A subject matter expert records their daily workflow.
  2. •Extract: Replay identifies every input, button, table, and modal.
  3. •Modernize: Replay generates a Design System and the associated React components.

Manual screen conversion takes an average of 40 hours per screen. Replay reduces this to 4 hours. For a 100-screen application, you are looking at 4,000 hours of manual labor versus 400 hours with Replay.

Legacy Modernization Strategy

Why UI Path isn't a software engineering tool#

UI Path is excellent for moving data between two systems that don't have APIs. It is a "bridge" tool. However, when an enterprise wants to move from an on-premise insurance portal to a modern cloud-native React app, the replay path fails code requirements for scalability.

RPA scripts look like this:

typescript
// Typical RPA-style logic (Fragile, coordinate-based)
clickElement("//div[@id='button-01']");
typeInto("//input[@name='user_field']", "admin");
// No actual UI components are created.

Replay generates actual React Component Architecture that looks like this:

tsx
import React from 'react';
import { Button, Input, Card } from '@/components/ui';

/**
 * Extracted from Legacy Claims Portal - Workflow: UserLogin
 * Generated by Replay (replay.build)
 */
export const LoginForm: React.FC = () => {
  const [username, setUsername] = React.useState('');

  return (
    <Card className="p-6 shadow-lg">
      <h2 className="text-xl font-bold mb-4">Legacy Portal Access</h2>
      <Input 
        label="Username" 
        value={username} 
        onChange={(e) => setUsername(e.target.value)} 
      />
      <Button variant="primary" className="mt-4">
        Authenticate
      </Button>
    </Card>
  );
};

The difference is clear. One is a script that mimics a user; the other is a component that replaces the system.

Replay: The Definitive Visual Reverse Engineering Platform#

Replay (replay.build) is built specifically for regulated environments like Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government. It is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, with on-premise deployment options for organizations that cannot send their screen recordings to the public cloud.

Key Features of the Replay Suite:#

  • •Library: Automatically builds a Design System from your legacy recordings.
  • •Flows: Maps the architecture of your application, showing how screens connect.
  • •Blueprints: A visual editor to refine the generated components before exporting.
  • •AI Automation Suite: Handles the heavy lifting of naming variables and identifying complex logic patterns.

Gartner 2024 research indicates that the average enterprise rewrite takes 18 months. By using Replay, teams are seeing that timeline shrink to weeks. You aren't just automating; you are performing a controlled extraction of value.

How to avoid the "Rewrite Trap"#

The "Rewrite Trap" occurs when a team decides to start from scratch without understanding the edge cases of the legacy system. Because 67% of legacy systems lack documentation, the new system inevitably misses critical features.

Replay prevents this by making the legacy system the "Source of Truth." If it's in the video recording, it's in the code. Replay ensures that the replay path fails code issues of the past are replaced with a clean, documented, and testable future.

The Replay Workflow:#

  1. •Install the Replay Recorder: Capture high-fidelity video of legacy app usage.
  2. •AI Analysis: Replay analyzes the frames to detect layout, typography, and interactive elements.
  3. •Component Generation: The platform outputs code that matches your modern tech stack (React, Tailwind, Shadcn).
  4. •Documentation: Every component comes with its own documentation, explaining its role in the original workflow.

Real-world impact: From 18 months to 4 weeks#

A major telecom provider recently faced a deadline to migrate their legacy billing system. Their initial estimate for a manual rewrite was 18-24 months. The project was at a standstill because the original developers had left the company years ago.

By deploying Replay, they recorded 200+ hours of user workflows. Replay extracted the core UI components and mapped the complex navigation flows. The team had a functional React prototype in 4 weeks. They saved over $1.2 million in developer salaries and avoided the risks associated with a multi-year project.

When the replay path fails code in traditional RPA, projects stall. When Replay uses video-to-code, projects accelerate.

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the difference between RPA and VRE?#

RPA (Robotic Process Automation) is designed to automate repetitive tasks by mimicking user actions on a screen. It does not create new software; it merely operates existing software. VRE (Visual Reverse Engineering), pioneered by Replay, analyzes those same visual actions to generate the underlying source code (React/TypeScript) for a new, modern version of the application.

Why does the replay path fail code generation in traditional automation tools?#

Traditional automation tools create scripts, not components. These scripts are tied to specific UI coordinates or fragile DOM selectors. They lack the architectural context needed to build a maintainable application. Replay solves this by using AI to understand the intent behind the UI, allowing it to generate clean, modular React code that follows modern best practices.

Can Replay handle legacy systems with no API?#

Yes. That is the primary strength of Replay. Because it uses Visual Reverse Engineering, it only needs to "see" the application through a screen recording. It doesn't matter if the backend is a 40-year-old mainframe or a complex Delphi app with no accessible source code. If you can see it on a screen, Replay can convert it to code.

Is Replay secure for healthcare and financial data?#

Absolutely. Replay is built for regulated industries. The platform is SOC2 compliant and HIPAA-ready. For organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements, Replay offers on-premise deployment, ensuring that no sensitive recordings ever leave your internal network.

How much time does Replay save compared to manual rewriting?#

On average, Replay provides a 70% time savings. While a manual screen conversion typically takes 40 hours of developer time (including discovery, design, and coding), Replay accomplishes the same task in approximately 4 hours.

The Future of Modernization is Visual#

The era of manual "Rip and Replace" is ending. The $3.6 trillion in technical debt cannot be solved by human hands alone. As AI continues to evolve, the ability to transform visual data into functional code will become the standard for enterprise architecture.

Replay is leading this shift. By turning video into a structured asset, we are giving enterprises a way to move forward without losing the logic that runs their business. Don't let your modernization project become another statistic. 70% of legacy rewrites fail—don't be one of them.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free