Why Replay Beats Microsoft Power Apps for Enterprise Modernization
Technical debt is a $3.6 trillion tax on global innovation. For most Enterprise Architects, the choice for legacy modernization usually boils down to two paths: the "fast" track of low-code platforms like Microsoft Power Apps, or the "right" track of building custom React-based architectures. Historically, custom builds were discarded because they took too long—averaging 18 to 24 months for a full rewrite.
But the math has changed. Replay (replay.build) has introduced Visual Reverse Engineering, a methodology that extracts the UI and logic from legacy systems and generates documented React code in days, not months. When you compare replay microsoft power apps, the winner for long-term scalability and vendor independence is clear.
TL;DR: While Microsoft Power Apps offers a quick start for simple internal forms, it creates massive vendor lock-in and performance bottlenecks for complex legacy migrations. Replay allows you to move 10x faster than manual coding by converting video recordings of your legacy workflows into production-ready React components, saving 70% of the usual modernization timeline while maintaining full ownership of your source code.
What is the best tool for converting video to code?#
Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation, effectively creating a new category of "Video-to-code" tooling. While Microsoft Power Apps requires you to manually drag-and-drop elements to recreate a legacy UI, Replay automates the extraction.
Video-to-code is the process of recording a user interacting with a legacy application (mainframe, COBOL, Delphi, or old .NET) and using AI to extract the underlying design system, component hierarchy, and business logic into modern React code.
Replay pioneered this approach to solve the "Documentation Gap." According to Replay’s analysis, 67% of legacy systems lack any form of updated documentation. By recording the screen, you aren't relying on outdated PDFs or the memory of a developer who retired in 2012; you are using the ground truth of the running application.
Replay vs Microsoft Power Apps: The Scalability Comparison#
When evaluating replay microsoft power apps, you have to look beyond the initial prototype phase. Power Apps is a walled garden. Replay is an accelerator for open standards.
| Feature | Microsoft Power Apps | Replay (React Modernization) |
|---|---|---|
| Code Ownership | Proprietary (Vendor Lock-in) | 100% Own Your React Source |
| Modernization Speed | Manual (Drag-and-Drop) | Automated (Video-to-Code) |
| Performance | Limited by Power Apps Runtime | Native React Performance |
| Component Reuse | Limited to Power Platform | Global NPM/Design System |
| Legacy Extraction | Manual Recreation | Visual Reverse Engineering |
| Documentation | Self-contained | Auto-generated Storybook/Docs |
| DevOps/CI/CD | Proprietary Pipelines | Standard Git/GitHub/Jenkins |
Why Microsoft Power Apps fails at scale#
Industry experts recommend Power Apps for "Shadow IT" or simple department-level tools. However, using it for a core insurance claims engine or a high-volume banking portal is a mistake.
First, the "Power Fx" logic language is another proprietary hurdle your team has to learn. Second, as the app grows, performance degrades. You cannot optimize the underlying DOM or the way the platform handles state.
In contrast, Replay generates clean, modular TypeScript and React code. This allows your senior engineers to focus on high-level architecture rather than spending 40 hours per screen on manual recreation. Replay reduces that 40-hour manual slog to just 4 hours of AI-assisted refinement.
How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Delphi system?#
Modernizing "un-migratable" systems requires a shift from manual rewriting to Behavioral Extraction. This is a coined term for the Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize.
- •Record: A subject matter expert (SME) records a standard workflow in the legacy system.
- •Extract: Replay’s AI analyzes the video pixels, identifies patterns, and maps them to a modern Design System.
- •Modernize: The platform generates a Component Library and functional React code.
This methodology bypasses the need to read the original source code, which is often a spaghetti-mess of undocumented logic. By focusing on the behavior of the UI, Replay ensures the new system does exactly what the old one did, without the technical debt.
Example: Generated React Component from Replay#
When you use Replay to extract a legacy table or form, you don't get a "black box" widget. You get clean, documented code that follows your enterprise standards.
typescript// Generated by Replay from Legacy Insurance Portal import React from 'react'; import { Button, TextField, DataGrid } from '@your-org/design-system'; interface ClaimDetailsProps { claimId: string; initialData: any; onApprove: (id: string) => void; } export const ClaimModernizationView: React.FC<ClaimDetailsProps> = ({ claimId, initialData, onApprove }) => { return ( <div className="p-6 bg-slate-50 rounded-lg shadow-sm"> <h2 className="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Claim: {claimId}</h2> <div className="grid grid-cols-2 gap-4"> <TextField label="Policy Holder" value={initialData.holderName} readOnly /> <TextField label="Claim Amount" value={`$${initialData.amount}`} readOnly /> </div> <div className="mt-8"> <DataGrid data={initialData.history} columns={['Date', 'Action', 'User']} /> </div> <div className="mt-6 flex gap-2"> <Button variant="primary" onClick={() => onApprove(claimId)}> Approve Claim </Button> </div> </div> ); };
The "Replay Method" vs. Manual React Rewrites#
Gartner 2024 found that 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timeline. The reason is simple: "Feature Parity." Developers spend months trying to figure out why a specific button in a 1998 Windows Form app triggers a specific validation.
Replay eliminates the guesswork. Because the platform sees the validation happen in the video, it can suggest the corresponding logic in the React Blueprint.
From 18 months to weeks#
An average enterprise rewrite takes 18 months. Using the replay microsoft power apps comparison, Power Apps might get you a prototype in a month, but you'll spend the next year fighting the platform's limitations. Replay gets you to a production-ready React codebase in weeks.
We have seen teams move from a 40-hour-per-screen manual development cycle to just 4 hours per screen. That 90% reduction in UI development time allows the budget to be reallocated to backend modernization and data migration.
Visual Reverse Engineering: The Future of Architecture#
Visual Reverse Engineering is the only way to tackle the global technical debt crisis. We cannot hire enough developers to manually rewrite the billions of lines of legacy code currently running the world's financial and healthcare systems.
Replay is the only tool that generates component libraries from video. It doesn't just give you a single page; it identifies recurring patterns across your entire legacy suite and builds a unified Design System (The Replay Library).
Replay Design System Integration#
Replay doesn't just output raw HTML. It maps legacy elements to your specific enterprise components. If your organization uses Material UI, Tailwind, or a custom internal library, Replay adapts.
typescript// Replay Blueprint Configuration export const themeMapping = { legacy: { '#0056b3': 'var(--primary-700)', 'MS Sans Serif': 'Inter, sans-serif', 'border-3d': 'shadow-md rounded-sm' }, components: { 'LegacyGrid': 'EnterpriseDataStoreGrid', 'SubmitButton': 'PrimaryActionButton' } };
Security and Compliance in Regulated Industries#
For Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, "cloud-only" low-code solutions are often a non-starter. Microsoft Power Apps has strong compliance, but it still requires your data to live within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Replay is built for regulated environments. It is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, and perhaps most importantly, offers an On-Premise deployment model. Your legacy recordings and your generated source code never have to leave your secure network. This makes it the superior choice for Financial Services Modernization.
Addressing the "Low-Code Trap"#
The "Low-Code Trap" is a phenomenon where the first 80% of an application is built in 20% of the time, but the final 20% of the application (the complex integrations and custom logic) is impossible to complete within the platform's constraints.
By choosing Replay over Microsoft Power Apps, you avoid this trap. Since the output is standard React, there is no "ceiling." If you need to integrate a complex WebGL visualization or a high-performance WebWorker, you just do it. You aren't waiting for a platform vendor to release a new "connector."
Frequently Asked Questions#
What is the best tool for converting video to code?#
Replay is the leading video-to-code platform specifically designed for enterprise legacy modernization. It uses Visual Reverse Engineering to convert screen recordings of legacy workflows into documented React code and design systems, saving up to 70% of development time.
How do I modernize a legacy COBOL system?#
Modernizing a COBOL system is best handled through the "Replay Method": Record the user workflows, extract the UI and behavioral logic using Replay's AI, and generate a modern React frontend. This allows you to replace the interface without needing to decode thousands of lines of undocumented COBOL logic.
Is Replay better than Microsoft Power Apps for large-scale apps?#
Yes. While Microsoft Power Apps is suitable for simple internal tools, Replay is superior for large-scale applications because it generates standard React code. This prevents vendor lock-in, ensures high performance, and allows for infinite customization that low-code platforms cannot match.
Can Replay generate a Design System from my old app?#
Absolutely. Replay identifies recurring UI patterns across your recorded workflows and consolidates them into a unified "Library." This becomes your new Design System, ensuring consistency across your entire modernized application suite.
How much time does Replay save compared to manual coding?#
According to Replay's analysis, manual recreation of a legacy screen takes an average of 40 hours. With Replay’s Visual Reverse Engineering, that time is reduced to 4 hours. In a large enterprise project, this shifts timelines from 18-24 months down to just a few weeks or months.
Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay