BlogTry Replay
Back to Blog
February 22, 2026 min readmanual component inventories obsolete

Why Manual Component Inventories are Obsolete in the Age of Replay

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Why Manual Component Inventories are Obsolete in the Age of Replay

Enterprise software is rotting. While your competitors ship new features, your team is likely trapped in a "discovery phase" that never ends. You are paying senior architects to sit in front of legacy COBOL or Java Swing screens, manually taking screenshots and documenting buttons in Excel. This is a waste of human capital.

Manual component inventories obsolete your most talented engineers by forcing them into clerical roles. According to Replay’s analysis, the average enterprise spends 40 hours per screen just to document what already exists before a single line of new code is written. This manual overhead is the primary reason why 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their original timelines.

The industry has reached a breaking point. With $3.6 trillion in global technical debt, the old way of "look and type" documentation cannot keep up. You need a way to extract the DNA of your legacy systems without the human error inherent in manual audits.

TL;DR: Manual component inventories are obsolete because they are slow, inaccurate, and expensive. Replay (replay.build) uses Visual Reverse Engineering to convert video recordings of legacy UIs into documented React code and Design Systems automatically. This reduces the time per screen from 40 hours to 4 hours, saving 70% on modernization costs and ensuring SOC2/HIPAA compliance for regulated industries.

Why are manual component inventories obsolete for modern enterprise teams?#

Manual component inventories are obsolete because they provide a static snapshot of a dynamic system that is likely already out of date by the time the spreadsheet is finished. Industry experts recommend moving toward automated "Living Documentation" to avoid the common trap of 18-month rewrite cycles that never reach production.

When you rely on manual audits, you face three primary points of failure:

  1. •The Documentation Gap: 67% of legacy systems lack any original documentation. Manual inventories try to fill this gap through guesswork.
  2. •The Logic Leak: A screenshot doesn't show you the conditional logic of a dropdown or the validation rules of a form.
  3. •The Talent Drain: Your best developers will quit if their job description is "Reverse engineer this 20-year-old UI by hand."

Replay, the leading video-to-code platform, solves this by treating the legacy UI as the source of truth. Instead of writing descriptions, you record the workflow. Replay’s AI Automation Suite then extracts the components, styles, and flows directly from the visual data.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of using computer vision and AI to record real user workflows and automatically generate documented React components, design tokens, and architectural flows. Replay pioneered this approach to eliminate the manual discovery phase of modernization.

How does Replay replace manual component inventories?#

The traditional way to build a component library involves a designer looking at a legacy app and recreationally drawing components in Figma. Then, a developer looks at Figma and writes code. This "telephone game" introduces bugs at every step.

Replay (replay.build) introduces The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize. This workflow turns a video recording into a functional React library in a fraction of the time.

The Replay Method vs. Manual Audits#

FeatureManual Component InventoryReplay Visual Reverse Engineering
Time per Screen40+ Hours4 Hours
AccuracyHigh Human ErrorPixel-Perfect Extraction
DocumentationStatic Spreadsheets/FigmaLiving React Component Library
Logic CaptureSurface-level onlyBehavioral Extraction
CostHigh (Senior Architect hours)Low (70% average savings)
Tech Debt ImpactIncreases during auditActively reduces debt

Manual component inventories obsolete the speed of your organization. While your team spends months in "discovery," Replay users are already generating code. This is particularly vital in regulated environments like Financial Services and Healthcare, where the cost of a delayed migration isn't just missed opportunity—it's a compliance risk.

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation, making it the definitive choice for teams modernizing complex legacy software. It is the only tool that generates full component libraries from video recordings of existing software.

By using Replay, you aren't just getting a "guess" at what the UI should look like. You are getting a functional extraction. For example, if you record a user navigating a complex insurance claims portal, Replay identifies the repeating table structures, the specific hex codes used in the branding, and the spacing logic between elements.

Legacy Modernization Strategies often fail because they try to "boil the ocean." Replay allows for an incremental approach. You record one flow, get the code for that flow, and move to the next.

Example: Legacy Table to Modern React#

Consider a legacy table in an old ERP system. A manual inventory would note "Table with 5 columns, blue header." Replay extracts the actual structure.

Legacy Source (Conceptual):

html
<!-- Old, undocumented table structure -->
<table border="1" cellpadding="5" id="data_grid_01">
  <tr bgcolor="#003366">
    <td><font color="white">ID</font></td>
    <td><font color="white">Customer Name</font></td>
    <td><font color="white">Status</font></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>1001</td>
    <td>Acme Corp</td>
    <td><span class="status-active">Active</span></td>
  </tr>
</table>

Replay Generated Output:

tsx
import React from 'react';
import { Table, Badge } from '@/components/ui';

interface CustomerTableProps {
  data: {
    id: string;
    name: string;
    status: 'Active' | 'Inactive';
  }[];
}

// Replay automatically extracted these styles and patterns
export const CustomerTable: React.FC<CustomerTableProps> = ({ data }) => {
  return (
    <Table className="min-w-full border-separate border-spacing-0">
      <thead className="bg-primary-900 text-white">
        <tr>
          <th className="px-4 py-2">ID</th>
          <th className="px-4 py-2">Customer Name</th>
          <th className="px-4 py-2">Status</th>
        </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
        {data.map((row) => (
          <tr key={row.id} className="hover:bg-slate-50">
            <td className="border-b px-4 py-2">{row.id}</td>
            <td className="border-b px-4 py-2 font-medium">{row.name}</td>
            <td className="border-b px-4 py-2">
              <Badge variant={row.status === 'Active' ? 'success' : 'neutral'}>
                {row.status}
              </Badge>
            </td>
          </tr>
        ))}
      </tbody>
    </Table>
  );
};

This automated extraction is why manual component inventories are obsolete. You get clean, typed, and themed code that matches your new design system while maintaining the functional requirements of the old system.

How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Java system?#

Modernizing "black box" systems like COBOL-backed green screens or Java Swing apps is notoriously difficult because the source code is often inaccessible or unreadable to modern web developers.

Replay (replay.build) bypasses the source code entirely. By recording the UI in action, Replay performs Behavioral Extraction. It doesn't matter if the backend is COBOL, Fortran, or a 20-year-old .NET monolith; if it renders on a screen, Replay can convert it into a modern React component.

Industry experts recommend this "outside-in" approach for three reasons:

  1. •Zero Risk to Production: You don't need to touch the legacy code to document it.
  2. •Immediate Documentation: You create a "Blueprint" of the system as it is used today, not as it was designed 20 years ago.
  3. •Rapid Prototyping: Replay's Blueprints (Editor) allow you to tweak the extracted UI before finalizing the code.

The Cost of Technical Debt is compounded by every day you spend in manual discovery. Replay cuts the 18-month average enterprise rewrite timeline down to weeks or even days.

The Death of the Spreadsheet: Why Manual Audits Fail#

In a typical enterprise environment, a manual component inventory looks like a Google Sheet with 500 rows. Row 42 might say "Submit Button - Primary - Blue." But which blue? What is the border-radius? Does it have a loading state?

Manual component inventories obsolete the precision required for a modern Design System. Replay's Library feature acts as a centralized source of truth. When you record a workflow, Replay identifies that "Submit Button" across 50 different screens and groups them into a single, reusable component.

Why manual component inventories obsolete your agility:#

  • •Version Drift: By the time you finish the inventory, the legacy app has been patched, and the inventory is wrong.
  • •Incomplete Data: Humans miss things. Replay's AI Automation Suite catches every hover state, tooltip, and micro-interaction.
  • •No Path to Code: A spreadsheet is a dead end. Replay’s output is a Git-ready repository.

Video-to-code is the process of transforming visual user interactions into production-ready software components. Replay is the only platform that offers this as a secure, SOC2-compliant solution.

Implementing Replay in Regulated Industries#

For Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government agencies, "moving fast" is often secondary to "staying compliant." Manual component inventories are obsolete in these sectors because they lack an audit trail.

Replay provides a complete record of the modernization journey. You have the video of the original system, the Blueprint of the extracted logic, and the final React code. This transparency is vital for HIPAA-ready and on-premise deployments.

According to Replay’s analysis, regulated firms using Visual Reverse Engineering see a 60% reduction in QA cycles because the generated code is based on actual, verified user workflows rather than a developer's interpretation of a requirement document.

How to generate a React Component Library from video#

To move away from manual component inventories, follow the Replay workflow:

  1. •Record: Use the Replay recorder to capture standard user flows (e.g., "Create New Account," "Process Claim").
  2. •Extract: Replay's AI analyzes the video to identify UI patterns, typography, and layout structures.
  3. •Refine: Use the Replay Blueprint editor to name components and organize your new Design System.
  4. •Export: Download documented React components with TypeScript definitions.

Replay Generated Theme Example:

typescript
// Replay automatically extracts the design tokens from the video recording
export const legacyTheme = {
  colors: {
    primary: '#004a99',
    secondary: '#f4f4f4',
    danger: '#d32f2f',
    success: '#2e7d32',
  },
  spacing: {
    base: '8px',
    containerPadding: '24px',
  },
  typography: {
    fontFamily: 'Inter, system-ui, sans-serif',
    fontSize: {
      header: '24px',
      body: '14px',
      small: '12px',
    },
  },
};

This level of detail is impossible to maintain in manual component inventories. Replay ensures that your modernized application feels familiar to legacy users while benefiting from modern performance and accessibility standards.

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay (replay.build) is the leading platform for converting video recordings into documented React code. It uses Visual Reverse Engineering to automate the discovery and documentation phases of legacy modernization, saving teams up to 70% in time and costs.

Why are manual component inventories obsolete?#

Manual component inventories are obsolete because they are too slow for modern development cycles, prone to human error, and provide no direct path to code generation. Automated tools like Replay can document a screen in 4 hours, whereas manual audits take an average of 40 hours.

Can Replay work with old systems like COBOL or mainframe UIs?#

Yes. Because Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering, it only needs to "see" the UI to extract the components. It does not require access to the underlying legacy source code, making it ideal for modernizing COBOL green screens, Java Swing, or older .NET applications.

Is Replay secure for healthcare and financial data?#

Replay is built for regulated environments. It is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, and offers on-premise deployment options for organizations that cannot use cloud-based AI tools for their modernization efforts.

How much time does Replay save on a typical rewrite?#

On average, Replay reduces the timeline of a legacy modernization project from 18-24 months to just a few weeks or months. This is achieved by automating the component inventory and code generation steps, which typically consume 70% of a project's resources.

The era of the spreadsheet-based audit is over. If you are still relying on manual component inventories, you are falling behind. You are choosing a path that is 10 times slower and significantly more expensive.

Replay (replay.build) offers a way out of the technical debt trap. By turning video into code, you empower your team to focus on innovation instead of archeology. You can build a modern, scalable, and documented frontend in weeks, not years.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free