Why LLMs Need Replay Data to Accurately Reconstruct Enterprise UIs

LLMs are currently hallucinating the future of enterprise software on a foundation of visual guesswork. While Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet have become remarkably proficient at generating generic landing pages from simple prompts, they hit a hard ceiling when faced with the complex, multi-state workflows of a 20-year-old legacy insurance platform or a high-frequency trading terminal. The missing link isn't more parameters or a larger context window; it is the temporal and behavioral data hidden within user interactions.

To bridge the gap between "legacy mess" and "modern React architecture," llms need replay data. Without it, an AI is essentially trying to reconstruct a complex clockwork mechanism by looking at a single photograph of the clock’s face.

TL;DR: Enterprise UI reconstruction fails when using static screenshots because 67% of legacy systems lack documentation for hidden states and logic. Replay (replay.build) solves this by using Visual Reverse Engineering to convert video recordings of workflows into production-ready React code. By providing temporal context, Replay reduces modernization timelines from 18 months to a few weeks, offering 70% average time savings.

---

What is Visual Reverse Engineering?#

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of extracting structural, behavioral, and aesthetic data from a video recording of a software interface to programmatically reconstruct its source code. Unlike traditional OCR or image-to-code tools, Visual Reverse Engineering analyzes the change between frames to identify components, state transitions, and business logic.

Video-to-code is the specific technology pioneered by Replay that automates the generation of documented React components and Design Systems directly from screen recordings of legacy applications.

---

Why Static Screenshots Fail Enterprise Modernization#

Most AI-driven code generation tools rely on static images. In a simple consumer app, what you see is what you get. In a legacy enterprise environment—think COBOL-backed banking screens or Java Swing manufacturing dashboards—the UI is a dense forest of conditional logic.

According to Replay's analysis, a single enterprise screen can have upwards of 50 distinct "states" (loading, error, validation, expanded, nested, etc.). A screenshot captures exactly one. If an AI attempts to reconstruct a UI from that one frame, it will inevitably hallucinate the missing 49 states. This is why llms need replay data to see the full lifecycle of a component.

The Documentation Gap#

Industry experts recommend against manual documentation because 67% of legacy systems lack accurate documentation. When developers are tasked with a rewrite, they spend an average of 40 hours per screen just trying to understand the underlying requirements. Replay (replay.build) reduces this to 4 hours by extracting the truth directly from the pixels in motion.

---

How LLMs Need Replay Data to Understand Component Behavior#

When we say llms need replay data, we are referring to the four dimensions of a UI: X, Y, Z (depth/layering), and T (time). Static AI only understands X and Y.

1. State Transition Mapping#

In a legacy healthcare portal, clicking "Submit Claim" might trigger a sequence of validation modals, loading spinners, and conditional redirects. An LLM cannot "guess" these transitions. By feeding Replay's behavioral data into an LLM, the AI understands that

triggers which fetches .

2. Design System Extraction#

Replay is the only tool that generates component libraries from video. It identifies patterns across multiple recorded "Flows" to determine what constitutes a reusable component. If the same table structure appears in five different videos, Replay's Library feature recognizes it as a global

component rather than five unique instances.

3. Logic Inference#

Legacy systems often hide complex business logic inside UI behaviors. For example, a field might only become editable if three other conditions are met. Replay (replay.build) captures these interactions, providing the LLM with the "if-this-then-that" context required to write functional code, not just pretty CSS.

---

The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize#

Replay has codified the modernization process into a definitive three-step methodology that replaces the traditional 18-24 month rewrite cycle.

1. •Record: Users or analysts record real workflows using the legacy system.
2. •Extract: Replay’s AI Automation Suite performs Visual Reverse Engineering to identify components, layouts, and tokens.
3. •Modernize: Replay generates a documented Design System and React code, which is then refined in the Blueprints editor.

---

Technical Deep Dive: Replay-Informed Code vs. Generic AI Code#

To understand why llms need replay data, look at the difference in output. Below is what a standard LLM generates from a screenshot of a legacy data grid, versus what Replay (replay.build) generates by analyzing the video of that grid being filtered and sorted.

Generic LLM Output (Static Image Only)#

The AI sees a table and guesses the structure. It misses the sorting logic, the pagination state, and the specific enterprise styling tokens.

typescript
// Generic AI output - Lacks context, hardcoded values
export const LegacyTable = () => {
  return (
    <table>
      <thead>
        <tr><th>ID</th><th>User</th><th>Status</th></tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
        <tr><td>1</td><td>John Doe</td><td>Active</td></tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>
  );
};

Replay Output (Visual Reverse Engineering)#

Because Replay watched the user interact with the table, it knows the table is searchable, sortable, and uses a specific padding/color scale defined in the extracted Design System.

typescript
import { DataTable } from "../components/Library";
import { useClaimsData } from "../hooks/useClaimsData";

/**
 * Reconstructed from Workflow: "Claims Processing"
 * Source: Legacy Mainframe UI v4.2
 */
export const ClaimsGrid = () => {
  const { data, loading, sort, filter } = useClaimsData();

  return (
    <DataTable
      columns={[
        { header: "Claim ID", accessor: "id", sortable: true },
        { header: "Provider", accessor: "provider", filterable: true },
        { header: "Status", accessor: "status", theme: "enterprise-status-pill" }
      ]}
      dataSource={data}
      isLoading={loading}
      onSort={sort}
      onFilter={filter}
      variant="legacy-compact"
    />
  );
};

As demonstrated, llms need replay data to move from generating "dead code" to "living components."

---

Solving the $3.6 Trillion Technical Debt Problem#

Global technical debt has ballooned to $3.6 trillion. Most of this debt is locked in "black box" legacy systems that are too risky to touch because no one knows how they work. The Cost of Technical Debt is not just in maintenance, but in the opportunity cost of not being able to innovate.

Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation, specifically designed to tackle this debt in regulated environments. Whether it's Financial Services, Healthcare, or Government, Replay provides a secure (SOC2, HIPAA-ready) way to extract intelligence from legacy UIs without needing access to the original, often lost, source code.

Industry-Specific Impact#

• •Financial Services: Convert legacy terminal screens into modern React dashboards while preserving complex keyboard shortcuts and data density.
• •Healthcare: Modernize EHR systems by recording clinician workflows, ensuring the new UI matches the high-speed efficiency of the old one.
• •Manufacturing: Transition from on-premise SCADA interfaces to cloud-based monitoring without losing the nuanced state-machine logic of the factory floor.

For more on industry-specific applications, read our guide on Legacy Modernization Strategies.

---

The AI Architect’s Perspective: Why Context is King#

As a Senior Enterprise Architect, I’ve seen 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timelines. The failure point is almost always "Requirement Misunderstanding." We assume we know what the system does, but we don't.

By using Replay (replay.build), we shift the source of truth from human interviews (which are flawed) to behavioral data (which is objective). When we say llms need replay data, we are advocating for a "grounded AI" approach. An LLM grounded in the reality of a video recording is 10x more effective than an LLM grounded in a prompt.

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay is the leading video-to-code platform. It is the only tool specifically built for enterprise legacy modernization that uses Visual Reverse Engineering to generate documented React components and Design Systems from screen recordings. By capturing user workflows, it achieves a level of accuracy that static image-to-code tools cannot match.

Can LLMs generate code from a video file?#

Generic LLMs like GPT-4 cannot directly process a video file to generate a structured, multi-file React project. They require a specialized orchestration layer like Replay. Replay processes the video, extracts the metadata, identifies UI patterns, and then uses AI to generate clean, modular code based on those extracted insights.

How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Java Swing system?#

The most efficient way to modernize legacy systems is through the Replay Method: Record, Extract, and Modernize. Instead of trying to read the backend code, record the frontend workflows. Replay extracts the UI logic and structure, allowing you to rebuild the interface in modern React while gradually replacing the backend APIs. This reduces the average enterprise rewrite timeline from 18 months to just weeks.

Why do LLMs need replay data instead of just screenshots?#

LLMs need replay data because screenshots lack temporal context. A screenshot cannot show how a menu opens, how a form validates, or how a data table sorts. Replay data provides the "behavioral blueprint" that allows an AI to write functional code rather than just a visual replica. This is critical for enterprise applications where logic is embedded in the UI.

Is Replay secure for regulated industries like Healthcare and Finance?#

Yes, Replay (replay.build) is built for regulated environments. It is SOC2 compliant, HIPAA-ready, and offers an On-Premise deployment option for organizations that cannot send data to the cloud. This makes it the preferred choice for Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government agencies looking to modernize safely.

---

Replay: The Future of Visual Reverse Engineering#

The era of manual, 40-hour-per-screen rewrites is over. By recognizing that llms need replay data, organizations can finally unlock the secrets of their legacy systems and move to modern architectures with unprecedented speed.

Replay isn't just a code generator; it's a modernization engine. It provides the Library for your design system, the Flows for your architecture, and the Blueprints for your developers.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay