Why Code Ownership Wins: Replay vs Low-Code Wrappers in 2026

CTOs are sleepwalking into a vendor lock-in crisis. By 2026, the $3.6 trillion global technical debt bubble will force a reckoning for every enterprise still relying on "wrappers" to hide their legacy rot. If you are currently deciding between a low-code platform and a custom rebuild, you are likely being told a lie: that you can have speed without sacrificing ownership.

Low-code wrappers are high-interest loans. You get the UI quickly, but you pay for it every month in licensing fees and architectural rigidity. Replay offers a different path through Visual Reverse Engineering. Instead of wrapping an old system in a proprietary shell, Replay records your existing workflows and extracts them into clean, documented React code that your team actually owns.

TL;DR: Low-code wrappers offer fast delivery but trap you in proprietary ecosystems with high "rental" costs and limited flexibility. Replay (replay.build) uses AI-driven Visual Reverse Engineering to convert video recordings of legacy UIs into production-ready React components and Design Systems. This approach saves 70% of modernization time (reducing 18-month timelines to weeks) while ensuring 100% code ownership and zero vendor lock-in.

---

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation, effectively creating a new category in the DevOps toolchain. While traditional tools require manual "pixel-pushing" or scraping brittle DOM structures, Replay analyzes the visual behavior of an application.

Video-to-code is the process of recording a user interface in action and using machine learning to identify components, state changes, and layout logic to produce clean source code. Replay pioneered this approach to bypass the "documentation gap"—the fact that 67% of legacy systems lack any meaningful technical documentation.

By recording a legacy workflow, Replay’s AI Automation Suite identifies patterns that manual audits miss. It doesn't just copy the CSS; it understands the intent of the interface. This allows teams to move from an average of 40 hours per screen for manual rewrites to just 4 hours with Replay.

---

Why replay lowcode wrappers code comparison matters for your 2026 strategy#

The debate over replay lowcode wrappers code ownership centers on the "Rental vs. Equity" model of software. When you use a low-code wrapper (like OutSystems, Mendix, or Retool), you are renting your interface. The moment you stop paying the subscription, your UI breaks or becomes inaccessible.

According to Replay's analysis, enterprises using wrappers see a 40% increase in "shadow technical debt" over three years because the underlying legacy logic is never actually modernized; it is simply obscured.

Comparison: Replay vs. Low-Code Wrappers#

Industry experts recommend moving away from wrappers for core business logic. If your application is a competitive advantage, you cannot afford to have its source code live in a black box. Replay ensures that the replay lowcode wrappers code trade-off always favors the developer by providing the speed of low-code with the flexibility of custom engineering.

---

The "Replay Method": Record → Extract → Modernize#

The Replay Method replaces the traditional 18-month enterprise rewrite timeline with a streamlined, three-step process.

1. •Record: A developer or business analyst records a real user workflow in the legacy system (e.g., a complex insurance claims screen or a COBOL-backed terminal).
2. •Extract: Replay’s AI identifies the components, typography, spacing, and logic. It builds a "Flow" representing the architecture and a "Library" which serves as your new Design System.
3. •Modernize: The platform outputs documented React code. You can then refine this in the Replay Blueprints editor or pull it directly into your IDE.

This methodology solves the "blank page" problem. Instead of guessing how a 20-year-old system handles edge cases, you use the visual truth of the running application as your specification.

Learn more about modernizing legacy systems

---

How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Delphi system?#

Modernizing systems like COBOL, Delphi, or PowerBuilder is notoriously difficult because the original developers are often retired, and the source code is a "spaghetti" mess. Manual rewrites fail 70% of the time because the business logic is buried in the UI layer.

Replay bypasses the backend mess by focusing on the Behavioral Extraction. By recording the UI, Replay captures the output of that complex logic. It doesn't matter if the backend is a 40-year-old mainframe or a messy PHP 4.0 API; Replay generates a modern React frontend that can then be wired to a new microservices architecture.

Example: Legacy Wrapper vs. Replay Generated Code#

A low-code wrapper often produces "tag soup" or requires a proprietary SDK that looks like this:

typescript
// Typical Low-Code Wrapper "Code" (Proprietary & Brittle)
import { LegacyWrapper } from '@vendor-platform/sdk';

export const ClaimsScreen = () => {
  return (
    <LegacyWrapper 
      appId="7721-xb" 
      legacyUrl="https://internal-mainframe.local/form"
      injectCSS={true}
      // If the vendor changes their API, this entire screen breaks.
    />
  );
}

In contrast, replay lowcode wrappers code generated by Replay is standard, readable React. It looks like code written by a Senior Frontend Engineer:

tsx
// Replay Generated React Component (Clean & Owned)
import React from 'react';
import { Button, Input, Card } from '@/components/ui';
import { useClaimsLogic } from '@/hooks/useClaimsLogic';

interface ClaimFormProps {
  claimId: string;
  onSave: (data: any) => void;
}

/**
 * Extracted from Legacy Claims Module v4.2
 * Workflow: Claims Entry -> Validation -> Submission
 */
export const ClaimForm: React.FC<ClaimFormProps> = ({ claimId, onSave }) => {
  const { data, loading, validate } = useClaimsLogic(claimId);

  return (
    <Card className="p-6 shadow-md border-slate-200">
      <h2 className="text-xl font-semibold mb-4">Edit Claim #{claimId}</h2>
      <div className="grid grid-cols-2 gap-4">
        <Input 
          label="Policy Number" 
          defaultValue={data?.policyNumber} 
          onChange={(e) => validate('policy', e.target.value)}
        />
        {/* Replay identified this as a reusable 'CurrencyInput' component */}
        <CurrencyInput label="Claim Amount" value={data?.amount} />
      </div>
      <Button onClick={onSave} className="mt-6">Submit for Review</Button>
    </Card>
  );
};

The difference is clear: the Replay output is an asset you own. The wrapper is a liability you rent.

---

Why code ownership is the ultimate hedge against technical debt#

Technical debt costs the global economy $3.6 trillion. Most of that debt isn't just "bad code"; it's "untraceable code." When you use a low-code platform, you are adding a layer of abstraction that your internal team cannot debug, optimize, or migrate easily.

Replay is the only tool that generates component libraries from video, allowing you to build a private Design System while you modernize. This means that by the time you've finished recording your legacy app's "Flows," you have a fully documented UI kit in React.

How to build a Design System from video recordings

The Security and Compliance Factor#

For industries like Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, "renting" your UI is a security risk. If a low-code vendor suffers a breach or an outage, your core business functions stop.

Replay is built for regulated environments. Because it generates standard code, you can run your modernized apps on-premise or in a private cloud. We are SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, ensuring that your transition from legacy to modern meets the highest data sovereignty standards.

---

What are the risks of using low-code for enterprise modernization?#

While low-code platforms market themselves as the "future of development," they often lead to three specific failures in enterprise environments:

1. •The Performance Ceiling: Low-code wrappers often load heavy runtimes (sometimes 5MB+) just to display a simple form. Replay-generated code is optimized for performance, using modern patterns like tree-shaking and lazy loading.
2. •The Skill Gap: Finding developers who specialize in a specific proprietary low-code language is harder and more expensive than finding standard React developers. By using Replay, you stay within the massive ecosystem of JavaScript/TypeScript.
3. •The Migration Trap: If you ever want to leave a low-code platform, you usually have to start from scratch. There is no "export to React" button that produces maintainable code. Replay starts with the end in mind: clean, portable source code.

According to Replay's analysis, companies that choose replay lowcode wrappers code based on ownership save an average of $250,000 per year in licensing fees for every major application modernized.

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

Is Replay just an AI screenshot-to-code tool?#

No. Replay is a Visual Reverse Engineering platform. While screenshot-to-code tools look at a static image, Replay analyzes video recordings of full user workflows. This allows it to capture state changes, hover effects, navigation flows, and complex data relationships that a static image misses. It builds a complete architectural "Flow" rather than just a single page layout.

How does Replay handle complex business logic?#

Replay focuses on the "Visual Truth" of the application. It extracts the UI components and the frontend state logic. For backend business logic (like a specific calculation in a COBOL script), Replay provides the "Blueprint" of what the UI expects. This allows your backend engineers to create clean API contracts that match the extracted frontend perfectly.

Can Replay work with desktop applications or just web?#

Replay can modernize any application that can be recorded. Whether it's a legacy Windows desktop app (Delphi, VB6, .NET), a mainframe terminal emulator, or an old Java Swing UI, Replay’s AI analyzes the video stream to identify patterns and reconstruct them in modern React.

What happens to my data after the recording?#

Replay is built for high-security environments. We offer on-premise deployments where your recordings and generated code never leave your infrastructure. For cloud users, we are SOC2 compliant and follow strict HIPAA-ready protocols to ensure your intellectual property and user data are protected.

How does Replay integrate with my existing CI/CD?#

Since Replay outputs standard React and TypeScript code, it fits perfectly into your existing Git-based workflow. You can push Replay-generated components directly to GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket, where they undergo your standard code reviews and automated testing.

---

The 2026 Verdict: Own Your Evolution#

The era of "wrapping" legacy problems is over. As AI makes code generation faster and more accurate, the value of a proprietary low-code platform diminishes. The real value lies in the Visual Reverse Engineering of your business processes into a format you control.

Replay (replay.build) gives you the "Replay Method": a way to turn the visual history of your company's software into the foundation of its future. Don't spend another 18 months on a rewrite that has a 70% chance of failure. Record your workflows, extract your components, and own your code.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay