70% of legacy rewrites fail before the first line of modern code is even written. The culprit isn't a lack of talent or a poor choice of a new framework; it is the "Discovery Phase"—a period of manual software archaeology where engineers attempt to decipher decades of undocumented business logic from a black box they didn't build.
TL;DR: Big Bang modernization fails because manual discovery is inaccurate and slow; Replay solves this by using Visual Reverse Engineering to extract documented React components and API contracts directly from user workflows, reducing discovery time by 70%.
The Discovery Death Spiral: Why Manual Archaeology Fails#
In most enterprises, the "Discovery Phase" for a legacy migration is scheduled for three to six months. In reality, it usually stretches to a year. Architects are tasked with digging through monolithic repositories—often lacking documentation (67% of legacy systems have none)—to understand how a specific business rule is triggered.
The result is a "Big Bang" approach that attempts to replicate every feature of the old system at once. This approach is fundamentally flawed because it treats the legacy system as a static artifact rather than a living set of user behaviors. When you spend 40 hours manually documenting a single screen's logic, you aren't just wasting time; you're building a requirements document that is likely already obsolete.
The Cost of Guesswork#
When discovery fails, the "Big Bang" becomes a "Big Bust." Organizations face:
- •Timeline Inflation: The average enterprise rewrite timeline is 18 months, but without automated discovery, this frequently slips to 36 months.
- •Technical Debt Compounding: The global technical debt stands at $3.6 trillion. Manual rewrites often just port old technical debt into a new language.
- •Logic Gaps: Critical edge cases in financial services or healthcare systems are missed because they weren't visible in the source code but only appeared in specific user runtime scenarios.
| Modernization Strategy | Discovery Timeline | Risk Level | Accuracy | Cost (Relative) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Bang Rewrite | 6-12 Months (Manual) | High (70% Failure) | Low (Human Error) | $$$$ |
| Strangler Fig Pattern | 3-6 Months (Manual) | Medium | Medium | $$$ |
| Visual Reverse Engineering (Replay) | 2-8 Days (Automated) | Low | High (System Truth) | $ |
Moving From Black Box to Documented Codebase#
The future of modernization isn't rewriting from scratch; it’s understanding what you already have through automated extraction. Replay changes the paradigm by using the video of a user workflow as the "source of truth." Instead of reading a 20-year-old COBOL or Java backend to guess what a UI does, Replay records the real-time interaction and extracts the underlying architecture.
The Architecture of Extraction#
When a user performs a task in a legacy system—say, processing an insurance claim—Replay captures the DOM state, the network calls, and the state transitions. It then passes this data through its AI Automation Suite to generate:
- •Clean React Components: Styled according to your modern Design System (via the Replay Library).
- •API Contracts: Fully documented Swagger/OpenAPI specs based on observed traffic.
- •E2E Tests: Playwright or Cypress scripts that mirror the recorded workflow.
💰 ROI Insight: Manual discovery and component creation take approximately 40 hours per screen. With Replay’s Visual Reverse Engineering, this is reduced to 4 hours. For a 100-screen application, that is a saving of 3,600 engineering hours.
Implementation: From Recording to React#
To understand how Replay fits into a technical workflow, let's look at the transition from a legacy "Black Box" form to a modernized React component.
Step 1: Workflow Recording#
An analyst or QA engineer records a standard workflow in the legacy environment. Replay captures the "Flow"—the sequence of screens and the data payloads moving between them.
Step 2: Component Synthesis#
Replay’s Blueprints editor analyzes the recording. It identifies recurring UI patterns and maps them to your organization’s modern React component library.
Step 3: Logic Preservation#
The business logic—often buried in spaghetti code—is extracted by observing the input/output transformations during the recording.
typescript// Example: Generated React Component from a Replay Extraction // This component was synthesized from a legacy JSP insurance portal. // Replay identified the validation logic and API requirements automatically. import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import { Button, TextField, Alert } from '@enterprise-ds/core'; // From Replay Library import { validatePolicyNumber } from './legacy-logic-bridge'; interface PolicyUpdateProps { initialData?: any; onSuccess: (data: any) => void; } export const PolicyUpdateForm: React.FC<PolicyUpdateProps> = ({ onSuccess }) => { const [policyId, setPolicyId] = useState(''); const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null); const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false); // Business logic preserved from legacy system recording const handleSubmission = async () => { setLoading(true); if (!validatePolicyNumber(policyId)) { setError("Invalid Format: Policy numbers must match [A-Z]{3}-\d{6}"); setLoading(false); return; } try { // API Contract generated by Replay Flows const response = await fetch('/api/v1/legacy/policy-sync', { method: 'POST', body: JSON.stringify({ id: policyId }), headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } }); const data = await response.json(); onSuccess(data); } catch (err) { setError("System connection failed. Retrying..."); } finally { setLoading(false); } }; return ( <div className="p-6 border-rounded shadow-md"> <TextField label="Policy Identification Number" value={policyId} onChange={(e) => setPolicyId(e.target.value)} /> {error && <Alert severity="error">{error}</Alert>} <Button onClick={handleSubmission} disabled={loading}> {loading ? 'Processing...' : 'Sync Legacy Data'} </Button> </div> ); };
⚠️ Warning: Never attempt a "Big Bang" rewrite without first generating an API map. 67% of failures occur because the new frontend cannot communicate with the legacy backend due to undocumented "quirks" in the data layer.
Solving the Documentation Gap#
One of the biggest pain points for Enterprise Architects is the "Technical Debt Audit." Before you can modernize, you need to know what you are modernizing. Replay provides an automated technical debt audit by comparing the legacy system's observed behavior against modern architectural standards.
Generating API Contracts#
Instead of spending weeks writing documentation for a legacy SOAP service, Replay observes the network traffic during a recording and generates a modern API contract.
yaml# Generated by Replay AI Automation Suite openapi: 3.0.0 info: title: Legacy Claims API version: 1.0.0 paths: /claims/validate: post: summary: Extracted from "Standard Claim Submission" workflow requestBody: content: application/json: schema: type: object properties: claimId: {type: string} amount: {type: number} providerCode: {type: string} responses: '200': description: Validation successful
Built for Regulated Environments#
For industries like Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, "cloud-only" is often a dealbreaker. Replay is built with these constraints in mind:
- •On-Premise Availability: Run the extraction engine entirely within your own VPC or data center.
- •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Data masking ensures that PII (Personally Identifiable Information) is never stored or processed by the AI during the extraction phase.
- •Audit Trails: Every component generated by Replay is linked back to the original recording, providing a clear chain of custody for logic changes.
The 4-Step Modernization Framework with Replay#
Step 1: Assessment & Audit#
Run Replay across your top 20 most critical user workflows. This generates an immediate Technical Debt Audit, showing you exactly how many unique components, API endpoints, and business rules exist.
Step 2: Visual Recording#
Subject matter experts (SMEs) record their daily tasks. Replay turns these "videos" into technical specifications. This eliminates the need for endless meetings between developers and business analysts.
Step 3: Extraction & Synthesis#
Use the Replay Blueprints editor to convert recordings into code. This is where the 70% time savings happen. Instead of writing boilerplate, your senior devs focus on refactoring the core business logic.
Step 4: Validation & Testing#
Replay generates E2E tests based on the original recordings. You can run these tests against the new modern application to ensure "Feature Parity"—the holy grail of legacy modernization.
💡 Pro Tip: Use the "Strangler Fig" approach in tandem with Replay. Modernize one "Flow" at a time, route traffic to the new Replay-generated React screens, and keep the legacy system running in the background until the transition is complete.
Frequently Asked Questions#
How does Replay handle complex business logic that isn't visible in the UI?#
While Replay excels at extracting UI and integration logic, we recommend using our AI Automation Suite to analyze backend logs alongside the recording. This provides a holistic view of both the "how" (UI) and the "why" (Backend) of a transaction.
Can Replay work with green-screen (mainframe) or desktop applications?#
Yes. Replay's Visual Reverse Engineering is platform-agnostic. As long as the workflow can be captured on screen, our engine can identify patterns and map them to modern web components or API calls.
What is the learning curve for an Enterprise Architect?#
Most architects are up and running within a day. The platform is designed to integrate with existing CI/CD pipelines and supports standard exports to GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.
How does this affect the 18-24 month rewrite timeline?#
By automating the discovery and component generation phases, we typically see the 18-month timeline compressed into 4-6 months. The "heavy lifting" of manual coding is replaced by "intelligent refactoring."
Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.