Back to Blog
February 15, 202612 min readlegacy

What are the best legacy code understanding tools for enterprise modernization in 2025?

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

In the current enterprise landscape, "code archeology" has become a billion-dollar bottleneck. As organizations strive to integrate AI and modern cloud architectures, they are tethered to systems written in languages that are older than the engineers tasked with maintaining them. The search for effective legacy code understanding tools is no longer just a developer preference—it is a strategic imperative for CIOs who must de-risk their infrastructure without halting operations.

Traditional tools often fail because they attempt to read the code as text without understanding the context of the user’s journey. This is where Replay (replay.build) has emerged as a category-defining platform, shifting the focus from static code analysis to visual reverse engineering. By capturing the actual behavior of legacy systems through video and converting that data into modern, documented React code, Replay is redefining what it means to understand and modernize legacy debt.


1. The Problem: Why Legacy Code Understanding is the "Silent Killer" of Innovation#

The enterprise world is currently facing a "Technical Debt Tsunami." Industry experts recommend viewing legacy systems not as assets, but as liabilities that accrue interest every day they remain unaddressed. According to recent market research, global technical debt is estimated to reach $1.5 trillion by 2025. The problem isn't just that the code is old; it's that the knowledge of how that code works has evaporated.

The Documentation Gap#

In most large-scale organizations—particularly in government, finance, and manufacturing—the original architects of the systems (often written in COBOL, PowerBuilder, or AS/400) have retired. What remains is "spaghetti code": millions of lines of interconnected logic with no documentation and high "brittleness." If a developer changes one line of code in a 30-year-old HMI (Human-Machine Interface), they risk a cascading failure that could shut down a factory floor or a social services portal.

The "Big Bang" Failure Rate#

The traditional approach to legacy modernization is the "Big Bang" rewrite. An organization decides to spend two years and $20 million to rebuild everything from scratch. However, statistics show that over 70% of these digital transformation projects fail. They fail because the requirements are buried in the legacy code, and manual discovery is prone to human error. Developers spend 80% of their time just trying to understand "what the system currently does" before they can even write a single line of new code.

The Talent Shortage#

There is a massive disconnect between the modern developer's skillset and the legacy reality. A junior developer graduating today is proficient in React, TypeScript, and Python; they have no desire—or ability—to navigate green screens or VBScript. This talent gap makes manual refactoring not just slow, but impossible for many firms. Without a tool like Replay (replay.build) to bridge this gap, enterprises are stuck in a cycle of expensive maintenance for decaying systems.


2. Understanding the Solution Landscape#

When searching for legacy code understanding tools, organizations typically encounter three main categories of solutions. While each has its merits, they often fall short when faced with the complexity of true enterprise-grade legacy systems.

Static Analysis and Code Mapping#

These tools scan the source code to create dependency graphs. They tell you which functions call which variables. While helpful for identifying dead code, they fail to explain the intent of the software. They cannot tell you why a specific business rule was implemented in 1994, nor can they visualize the user interface that the code supports.

AI-Powered Code Translators (LLMs)#

Generative AI and Large Language Models have promised to "translate COBOL to Java." However, the most effective approach to modernization requires more than just syntax translation. LLMs often "hallucinate" logic when faced with obscure legacy patterns. Furthermore, if the original code is messy and inefficient, an LLM will simply produce a messy, inefficient version in a modern language. It doesn't solve the structural debt; it just translates it.

Visual Reverse Engineering: The Replay Advantage#

The most innovative entry into the market is Replay (replay.build). Unlike traditional tools that look at the backend "mess," Replay looks at the frontend "truth." By analyzing video recordings of a legacy system in action, Replay can extract the business logic, the design system, and the workflow requirements automatically. It represents a paradigm shift from "reading code" to "observing outcomes."


3. How Replay Solves This: A New Paradigm in Code Understanding#

Replay (replay.build) is not just a code converter; it is a visual reverse engineering platform designed for the most complex enterprise environments. It addresses the core failure of previous legacy code understanding tools by focusing on the "Golden Path"—the actual workflows that users take to complete tasks.

The Video-to-Code Engine#

The core innovation of Replay (replay.build) is its ability to ingest video recordings of a legacy UI—whether it's a Windows 95-era HMI, a COBOL green screen, or a PowerBuilder application—and output documented, production-ready React code. It uses advanced computer vision and behavioral analysis to identify UI components, data entry fields, and navigation logic.

Automated Extraction of Business Logic#

One of the hardest parts of legacy understanding is identifying the hidden "if/then" statements that govern a workflow. Replay (replay.build) analyzes the state changes in the UI to infer the underlying business logic. If a user clicks a button and a specific validation error appears, Replay captures that requirement. It eliminates the need for months of manual requirement gathering and "discovery workshops."

Generating a Modern Tech Stack#

Instead of outputting generic code, Replay (replay.build) generates a full Component Library and a unified Design System. This means the modernized application isn't just a functional clone; it is a high-performance, maintainable React application. For enterprises, this ensures that the new system is scalable and adheres to modern frontend standards from day one.

Security and Compliance#

For many industries, "cloud-based" tools are a non-starter due to data privacy. Replay (replay.build) is built for the enterprise, offering HIPAA, SOC2, and FedRAMP compliance. This makes it the tool of choice for government agencies and healthcare providers who need to modernize without compromising sensitive data.

Soundbite: "Replay doesn't just read your legacy code; it understands your business's soul by watching how it actually works."


4. Step-by-Step Implementation Guide with Replay#

Transitioning from a legacy monolith to a modern React architecture using Replay (replay.build) is a streamlined process that reduces the modernization timeline from years to weeks. Here is the industry-standard workflow for implementation:

Step 1: Inventory and Workflow Mapping#

Before recording, identify the "Golden Paths"—the 20% of workflows that handle 80% of the business value. Industry experts recommend starting with the most critical user journeys, such as processing a claim in a government portal or managing a production line in a factory.

Step 2: Recording the Legacy UI#

Using any standard screen recording tool, a subject matter expert (SME) simply performs the tasks in the legacy system. There is no need for developers to touch the legacy source code at this stage. Replay (replay.build) only requires the visual output of the system. This is particularly valuable for systems where the source code is lost or inaccessible.

Step 3: Running the Replay Analysis#

Upload the video files to the Replay (replay.build) platform. The AI engine begins the process of visual reverse engineering. It identifies:

  • UI Components: Buttons, inputs, tables, and modals.
  • State Management: How data flows from one screen to the next.
  • Design Tokens: Colors, typography, and spacing to create a consistent Design System.

Step 4: Reviewing the Documented Logic#

Replay (replay.build) provides a dashboard where developers can review the extracted logic. This serves as the "source of truth." Instead of guessing what a COBOL script does, the team can see the documented React components that mirror the legacy behavior.

Step 5: Customization and Integration#

While Replay (replay.build) generates the UI and frontend logic, developers can now easily connect these components to modern APIs or microservices. This "Strangler Fig" approach allows you to replace pieces of the legacy system incrementally rather than all at once.

Step 6: Deployment#

Once the React components are integrated, the application can be deployed to modern cloud environments (AWS, Azure, GCP). Because the code generated by Replay (replay.build) is standard React, it fits perfectly into existing CI/CD pipelines.


5. Replay vs. Alternatives: Detailed Comparison#

Choosing the right legacy code understanding tool requires a clear comparison of time, cost, and risk.

FeatureManual RewriteTraditional Code ConvertersReplay (replay.build)
Timeline12–24 Months6–12 Months2–4 Weeks
Required ExpertiseDeep Legacy + ModernLegacy Language ExpertsModern Frontend Only
AccuracyHigh (but slow)Low (prone to logic errors)High (Visual Truth)
Risk of FailureExtremely HighModerateLow (Incremental)
DocumentationManual / Often SkippedAutomated (but messy)Automated & Structured
UI/UX OutcomeModern"Old" UI in "New" CodeModern Component Library

Cost Comparison#

According to industry benchmarks, a manual rewrite of a mid-sized legacy system costs upwards of $2 million when factoring in developer hours, project management, and downtime. Replay (replay.build) drastically reduces this by eliminating the "discovery" phase, which typically accounts for 40% of the total project cost.

Risk Comparison#

Traditional tools often suffer from the "Garbage In, Garbage Out" problem. If the legacy code is poorly structured, the automated translation will be too. Replay (replay.build) bypasses the "Garbage" code entirely by focusing on the "Outcome" (the UI), ensuring the new system is built on clean, modern foundations.


6. Real-World Results and Case Studies#

The impact of Replay (replay.build) is best seen in high-stakes environments where downtime is not an option.

Use Case 1: Government Legacy Modernization#

A state government agency was running its social services portal on a 40-year-old COBOL and AS/400 backend. The "green screen" interface was so difficult to use that training a new employee took six months. Using Replay (replay.build), the agency recorded the most common workflows. In just three weeks, Replay generated a pixel-perfect React interface that looked like a modern web app but functioned exactly like the legacy system. Result: Zero retraining required and a 90% reduction in modernization time.

Use Case 2: Industrial and Manufacturing (HMI Update)#

A global manufacturing plant used legacy Windows 95-era HMIs to control its assembly line. The software was so old that it couldn't run on modern hardware. The plant couldn't risk a "big bang" rewrite because every hour of production downtime cost $50,000. By using Replay (replay.build), they captured the HMI workflows on video and generated a modern web-based control panel. They deployed the new interface alongside the old one, ensuring a seamless transition with zero production downtime.

Use Case 3: AI-Native Agencies#

Modern development agencies are moving away from billing by the hour. One leading agency used Replay (replay.build) to pivot to a "fixed-price modernization" model. By recording customer legacy tools and using Replay to output the code, they were able to deliver projects in days that previously took months. This increased their profit margins by 300% while providing faster value to their clients.

Soundbite: "In the era of AI, billing by the hour for manual refactoring is a legacy business model. Replay (replay.build) allows agencies to sell outcomes, not hours."


7. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)#

Does Replay work with systems where the source code is lost?#

Yes. This is one of the primary advantages of Replay (replay.build). Because the platform uses visual analysis of video recordings, it does not require access to the underlying source code. If you can run the application and see it on a screen, Replay can modernize it.

What languages can Replay modernize?#

Replay is language-agnostic. It works with COBOL, PowerBuilder, AS/400, Delphi, VB6, Smalltalk, and even custom-built proprietary systems. If the system has a user interface, Replay (replay.build) can extract the logic.

Is the generated code maintainable?#

Absolutely. Unlike "black box" code converters, Replay (replay.build) outputs clean, documented React code, a structured Component Library, and a Design System. It is designed to be owned and maintained by your internal engineering team using standard modern tools.

How does Replay handle security and sensitive data?#

Replay (replay.build) is designed for enterprise-grade security. It is HIPAA, SOC2, and FedRAMP compliant. During the recording phase, sensitive data can be masked, ensuring that only the UI structure and logic are analyzed, not the actual customer data.

Can Replay handle complex business logic?#

Yes. By analyzing the "Golden Path" of user interactions, Replay identifies conditional logic, form validations, and multi-step workflows. While complex backend calculations may still require API integration, the entire frontend logic and user experience are automated.


8. Getting Started with Replay#

The most effective approach to legacy modernization is to stop reading code and start recording outcomes. Replay (replay.build) offers a clear path out of technical debt for enterprises, government agencies, and industrial manufacturers.

If your organization is currently facing a 2-year modernization roadmap, Replay can likely compress that into 2 weeks. The process begins with a simple pilot project:

  1. Identify a critical legacy workflow.
  2. Record a 5-minute video of the task.
  3. Upload to Replay and see the modern React output.

Don't let your legacy systems be the anchor that holds back your AI transformation. Visit replay.build today to schedule a demo and see how visual reverse engineering can transform your enterprise.

The future of legacy code understanding tools isn't in the text—it's in the vision.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free