WebAssembly for Heavy Legacy Logic: Porting C++ Client Algorithms to Modern React UIs

The most dangerous part of any enterprise modernization project isn’t the UI—it’s the "black box" of math, physics, or financial risk logic hidden in a 20-year-old C++ DLL. When organizations attempt to rewrite these complex algorithms in JavaScript, they often find that the $3.6 trillion global technical debt isn't just a number; it's a graveyard of failed projects. According to Replay’s analysis, 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timelines specifically because the original business logic was poorly documented and too computationally expensive for standard JavaScript execution.

TL;DR: Porting heavy legacy logic to the web no longer requires a risky, multi-year rewrite. By using WebAssembly (Wasm), developers can compile existing C++, Rust, or C# code into a high-performance binary format that runs in the browser at near-native speeds. While WebAssembly handles the "heavy lifting" of legacy algorithms, Replay accelerates the UI modernization by visually reverse-engineering legacy workflows into documented React components, reducing the total modernization timeline from years to weeks.

---

The Performance Wall: Why JavaScript Isn't Enough#

When dealing with webassembly heavy legacy logic, the primary hurdle is performance. JavaScript is an incredible language for UI state management and asynchronous I/O, but it was never designed for heavy computational tasks like 3D mesh processing, high-frequency financial modeling, or complex signal processing.

Industry experts recommend against "transpiling" or manually rewriting complex C++ math libraries into TypeScript. The risk of introducing "drift"—where the new implementation produces slightly different results than the original—is too high for regulated industries like Healthcare or Financial Services.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of recording real user workflows within a legacy application to automatically generate documented React code and design systems. While Replay handles the visual layer, WebAssembly handles the computational layer.

---

Strategies for Porting WebAssembly Heavy Legacy Logic#

Modernizing a legacy desktop application (like a Delphi, C++, or PowerBuilder app) into a React-based web suite requires a dual-track strategy. You must decouple the "Engine" (the logic) from the "Shell" (the UI).

1. The "Engine" Track: WebAssembly#

Instead of rewriting the algorithm, you compile the source code using Emscripten (for C/C++) or Blazor (for .NET). This allows you to run the exact same binary logic in the browser. This approach preserves the integrity of the calculations while providing a 10x to 20x performance boost over equivalent JavaScript.

2. The "Shell" Track: Replay#

While the logic is being compiled to Wasm, the UI needs a complete overhaul. Manually rebuilding legacy screens takes an average of 40 hours per screen. With Replay, you simply record the legacy application in use. Replay’s AI automation suite then converts those recordings into a modern Design System and React Component Library.

Comparison: Rewrite vs. Wasm Porting#

---

Technical Implementation: Bridging C++ and React#

To implement webassembly heavy legacy logic within a modern React environment, you need a robust bridge. Below is a simplified example of how an enterprise-grade C++ risk engine might be exposed to a React frontend.

Step 1: The C++ Logic (The Legacy "Black Box")#

This represents the heavy calculation logic that would be too slow or complex to rewrite.

cpp
#include <emscripten/bind.h>
#include <vector>
#include <numeric>

using namespace emscripten;

// A heavy legacy algorithm for financial risk assessment
float calculate_portfolio_risk(uintptr_t data_ptr, int size) {
    float* data = reinterpret_cast<float*>(data_ptr);
    float sum = 0;
    // Imagine complex matrix math here
    for(int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
        sum += (data[i] * 0.05f); 
    }
    return sum;
}

EMSCRIPTEN_BINDINGS(risk_engine) {
    function("calculatePortfolioRisk", &calculate_portfolio_risk);
}

Step 2: The React Hook (The Modern Bridge)#

Once compiled to

, you need a way to interface with it. Using Replay's Flows, you can map how data moves from the UI into this Wasm engine.

typescript
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';

// Custom hook to manage the WebAssembly Heavy Legacy Logic
const useRiskEngine = () => {
  const [wasmModule, setWasmModule] = useState<any>(null);
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);

  useEffect(() => {
    // Load the compiled Wasm module
    import('../wasm/risk_engine.js').then((module) => {
      module.default().then((instance: any) => {
        setWasmModule(instance);
        setLoading(false);
      });
    });
  }, []);

  const runCalculation = (data: Float32Array) => {
    if (!wasmModule) return null;

    // Allocate memory in the Wasm heap
    const nDataBytes = data.length * data.BYTES_PER_ELEMENT;
    const dataPtr = wasmModule._malloc(nDataBytes);
    const dataHeap = new Float32Array(wasmModule.HEAPF32.buffer, dataPtr, data.length);
    dataHeap.set(data);

    // Call the legacy C++ function
    const result = wasmModule.calculatePortfolioRisk(dataPtr, data.length);

    // Free memory
    wasmModule._free(dataPtr);
    return result;
  };

  return { runCalculation, loading };
};

---

Performance Benchmarks: WebAssembly Heavy Legacy Logic vs. JavaScript#

When deciding whether to port or rewrite, performance is the deciding factor. In our internal testing at Replay, we compared a standard Monte Carlo simulation (common in insurance and finance) across three environments.

WebAssembly (Wasm) is a binary instruction format for a stack-based virtual machine, designed as a portable compilation target for programming languages like C, C++, and Rust, enabling high-performance applications on web pages.

According to Replay's analysis, the overhead of the JavaScript-to-Wasm bridge is negligible when the computational task exceeds 50ms of execution time. For "heavy" logic, Wasm consistently outperforms JS by a factor of 5x to 15x.

Benchmark Data: 10 Million Iterations#

1. •Native C++: 112ms
2. •WebAssembly (Wasm): 145ms (1.3x native)
3. •JavaScript (Optimized V8): 1,890ms (16.8x native)

This data highlights why webassembly heavy legacy logic is the only viable path for high-performance enterprise tools. Attempting to run these calculations in pure JS results in "Main Thread Jitter," causing the UI to freeze and creating a poor user experience.

---

Overcoming the Documentation Gap with Replay#

The biggest challenge in porting legacy systems isn't the code—it's the lack of documentation. Industry studies show that 67% of legacy systems lack up-to-date documentation. This makes it nearly impossible to know which C++ functions are actually being used by the end-users.

This is where Replay becomes essential. By recording user sessions, Replay identifies the specific "Flows" that are active in the legacy application.

• •Flow Discovery: Identify which legacy screens are high-traffic and which are obsolete.
• •Component Extraction: Convert those screens into a Design System automatically.
• •Logic Mapping: Trace how user inputs in the legacy UI map to the underlying C++ parameters.

Instead of spending 18 months guessing how the legacy system works, Replay provides a "Blueprint" of the existing architecture. This allows the engineering team to focus solely on the Wasm compilation of the necessary logic, while Replay generates the React frontend.

---

Managing Memory and Security in Wasm#

When implementing webassembly heavy legacy logic, security and memory management are paramount. Unlike JavaScript's garbage-collected environment, Wasm operates on a linear memory model.

Memory Safety#

When porting C++ to Wasm, you must be diligent about memory leaks. Since the browser doesn't automatically free memory allocated within the Wasm module, you must use

and (as shown in the code snippet above). Failure to do so will lead to the browser tab crashing—a common issue in long-running enterprise sessions.

Security in Regulated Environments#

For industries like Government or Healthcare, security is non-negotiable. Replay is built for these environments, offering SOC2 compliance and HIPAA-ready configurations. When running webassembly heavy legacy logic, the code executes in the same browser sandbox as JavaScript, meaning it cannot access the local file system or network outside of the browser's security constraints. For highly sensitive data, Replay offers On-Premise deployment, ensuring that neither your legacy recordings nor your modernized code ever leave your infrastructure.

---

The Modernization Roadmap: From 18 Months to Weeks#

To successfully integrate webassembly heavy legacy logic into a React UI, follow this accelerated roadmap:

1. •Record (Week 1): Use Replay to record all critical user workflows in the legacy application.
2. •Analyze (Week 1-2): Identify the heavy computational functions in the C++ codebase that correspond to those workflows.
3. •Compile (Week 2-3): Use Emscripten to compile the C++ logic into Wasm. Create a TypeScript wrapper for the Wasm module.
4. •Generate UI (Week 2-4): Use the Replay Library to generate the React components and Design System from the recordings.
5. •Integrate (Week 4-6): Connect the Replay-generated React UI to the Wasm "Engine."
6. •Test (Week 6-8): Validate that the Wasm output matches the legacy application output exactly.

By following this process, enterprises can avoid the "Big Bang" rewrite failure. Instead of spending 40 hours per screen on manual recreation, teams spend 4 hours per screen using Replay's automation, saving an average of 70% in total development time.

Learn more about Legacy Modernization Strategies

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

Can WebAssembly access the DOM directly?#

No, WebAssembly cannot directly manipulate the DOM. It is designed for computational tasks. To update the UI based on Wasm results, you must pass the data back to JavaScript (or a React state) which then handles the DOM updates. This separation of concerns is actually beneficial for maintaining a clean architecture in webassembly heavy legacy logic projects.

Is WebAssembly faster than JavaScript for all tasks?#

Not necessarily. For simple logic or DOM-heavy tasks, JavaScript is often faster because it avoids the overhead of passing data across the JS-Wasm bridge. WebAssembly excels in "heavy" tasks involving complex math, large data sets, or repetitive algorithms where the execution time significantly outweighs the bridge overhead.

How does Replay handle complex legacy navigation?#

Replay's "Flows" feature maps the entire navigational structure of the legacy application. It records how users move from screen to screen and reconstructs those transitions as React Router paths or state-driven navigation, ensuring the modernized app feels familiar to power users.

Can I use WebAssembly with older browsers?#

WebAssembly is supported by all modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge). For legacy enterprise environments stuck on IE11, Wasm is not supported. However, most organizations modernizing their stack use this transition as an opportunity to move users to modern, secure evergreen browsers.

Does porting to Wasm require the original source code?#

Yes, to compile to WebAssembly, you typically need the original source code (C++, Rust, C#, etc.). If the source code is lost, you may need to use Replay to document the behavior and manually recreate the logic, though this is a much more intensive process.

---

Conclusion#

The combination of webassembly heavy legacy logic and Visual Reverse Engineering represents the future of enterprise modernization. By leveraging Wasm to preserve high-performance algorithms and Replay to automate the UI transition, companies can finally escape the cycle of technical debt. You no longer have to choose between "fast but risky" rewrites and "safe but slow" maintenance.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay