Back to Blog
February 6, 20269 min readVisual Reverse Engineering

Visual Reverse Engineering vs Code Crawlers: Solving the "Black Box" Problem

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt crisis isn't a coding problem; it's a translation problem. Every year, enterprises pour billions into "Big Bang" rewrites, only to watch 70% of those projects fail or exceed their timelines. The reason is simple: you cannot modernize what you do not understand, and 67% of legacy systems lack any meaningful documentation.

For decades, the industry has relied on "Code Crawlers"—static analysis tools that scan dead source code to map dependencies. But code is not the system. The system is the interaction between the user, the business logic, and the data. When you look at a 20-year-old COBOL or JSP codebase, you aren't looking at a blueprint; you’re looking at archaeology.

Visual Reverse Engineering flips the script. Instead of digging through the "black box" of the backend, we record the "source of truth"—the actual user workflow—and translate those visual interactions directly into modern, documented React components and API contracts.

TL;DR: Visual Reverse Engineering replaces manual code archaeology by using runtime user workflows to generate modern code, reducing migration timelines from 18 months to a matter of weeks.

The Archaeology Trap: Why Code Crawlers Fail#

Traditional modernization starts with a "Discovery Phase." Architects spend months using code crawlers to generate massive, unreadable UML diagrams. These tools tell you that

text
Class A
calls
text
Function B
, but they can’t tell you why. They can’t tell you that a specific sequence of clicks represents a high-value mortgage approval process or a complex healthcare claims adjudication.

Code crawlers provide a map of the plumbing, but they don't show you how the house is lived in. This leads to the "Black Box" problem: developers are afraid to touch the code because they don't know which "dead" lines are actually keeping the business afloat.

The Cost of Manual Extraction#

When you rely on manual reverse engineering, your senior engineers become expensive historians. They spend an average of 40 hours per screen just to document the logic, state changes, and UI requirements before a single line of modern code is written.

ApproachTimelineRiskCostPrimary Output
Big Bang Rewrite18-24 monthsHigh (70% fail)$$$$New Bugs
Strangler Fig12-18 monthsMedium$$$Partial Parity
Code Crawling6-12 monthsHigh$$Static Maps
Visual Reverse Engineering (Replay)2-8 weeksLow$Production React & Docs

Visual Reverse Engineering: The New Source of Truth#

Visual Reverse Engineering with Replay treats the running application as the ultimate specification. By recording a real user performing a specific task—like onboarding a new insurance client—Replay captures the DOM state, the network calls, the business logic triggers, and the visual styling.

This isn't just a screen recording. It’s a deep-packet inspection of the front-end. Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the recording to reconstruct the application's intent.

From Black Box to Documented Codebase#

The transition from a legacy "black box" to a modern architecture happens in three distinct layers within the Replay platform:

  1. The Library (Design System): Replay identifies recurring UI patterns across the legacy system and extracts them into a standardized React component library.
  2. The Flows (Architecture): Instead of static diagrams, Replay generates "Flows"—interactive maps of user journeys that link UI components to backend API calls.
  3. The Blueprints (Editor): This is where the extraction is refined. Architects can see the generated API contracts and E2E tests side-by-side with the legacy recording.

💰 ROI Insight: Manual documentation and component creation take approximately 40 hours per screen. Replay reduces this to 4 hours per screen, a 90% reduction in labor costs.

Technical Deep Dive: Generating the Modern Stack#

When Replay extracts a workflow, it doesn't just "scrape" the UI. It generates clean, type-safe TypeScript code that follows modern best practices. It identifies the state management logic and isolates it from the presentation layer.

Consider a legacy form in an old Java Applet or a thick-client .NET app. A code crawler would struggle with the proprietary event handlers. Replay observes the data entry and the resulting network payload to generate a modern equivalent.

typescript
// Example: Generated React component via Replay Visual Reverse Engineering // Source: Legacy Claims Portal (Workflow: Submit New Claim) import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import { Button, TextField, Alert } from '@replay-ui/core'; import { useClaimsAPI } from '../api/claims'; /** * @description Automatically generated from Replay recording #8821 * @legacy_source Claims_Module_v4_Final.jsp * @business_logic Preserves validation for ICD-10 code formats */ export const ClaimsSubmissionForm: React.FC = () => { const [formData, setFormData] = useState({ patientId: '', claimAmount: 0, diagnosisCode: '' }); const { submitClaim, loading, error } = useClaimsAPI(); // Business logic extracted from legacy runtime behavior const validateDiagnosis = (code: string) => { const icd10Regex = /^[A-Z][0-9][0-9A-Z](\.[0-9A-Z]{1,4})?$/; return icd10Regex.test(code); }; const handleSubmit = async () => { if (!validateDiagnosis(formData.diagnosisCode)) { return; } await submitClaim(formData); }; return ( <div className="p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow-md"> <TextField label="Patient ID" value={formData.patientId} onChange={(val) => setFormData({...formData, patientId: val})} /> {/* Logic preserved: Claim amount must be > 0 */} <TextField label="Amount" type="number" onChange={(val) => setFormData({...formData, claimAmount: Number(val)})} /> <Button onClick={handleSubmit} disabled={loading}> Submit to Legacy Backend </Button> {error && <Alert severity="error">{error.message}</Alert>} </div> ); };

⚠️ Warning: Most modernization failures occur because the new system misses "hidden" business logic—those edge cases buried in 10,000 lines of spaghetti code. Visual Reverse Engineering captures these because it records how the system actually behaves when those edge cases are triggered.

The 3-Step Replay Modernization Workflow#

Modernizing an enterprise system shouldn't feel like an 18-month march toward a cliff. Replay breaks the process down into manageable, high-velocity sprints.

Step 1: Record and Map#

Instead of reading code, your subject matter experts (SMEs) or QA testers simply use the legacy application. They perform the core business functions—opening an account, processing a refund, generating a report. Replay records these sessions, capturing the "DNA" of the application.

Step 2: Extract and Audit#

Replay’s AI Automation Suite processes the recording. It generates:

  • API Contracts: Defining exactly what the frontend sends to the backend.
  • Technical Debt Audit: Identifying which parts of the legacy logic are redundant or broken.
  • E2E Tests: Automatically creating Cypress or Playwright tests that mirror the recorded workflow.

Step 3: Refine and Deploy#

Using the Blueprints Editor, architects review the generated React components. Since Replay has already done the heavy lifting of UI recreation and state mapping, the team focuses on refining the code and integrating it with new microservices.

💡 Pro Tip: Start with your most "mysterious" screen—the one no one wants to touch. Use Replay to extract it. Once the team sees the "black box" turned into documented React code in a single afternoon, the momentum for the rest of the project will shift.

Security and Compliance in Regulated Industries#

For our clients in Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, "cloud-only" is often a non-starter. The $3.6 trillion in technical debt is disproportionately concentrated in these highly regulated sectors.

Replay was built with these constraints in mind:

  • On-Premise Availability: Run the entire extraction engine within your own VPC or air-gapped environment.
  • SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: We ensure that PII/PHI is masked during the recording and extraction process.
  • Audit Trails: Every component generated by Replay includes a link back to the original recording, providing a clear chain of custody from legacy behavior to modern code.

Challenging the "Rewrite Everything" Dogma#

The "Big Bang" rewrite is a vanity project that enterprises can no longer afford. When you decide to rewrite from scratch, you are betting that your current team understands the business requirements better than the people who built the original system 20 years ago. Data shows this is rarely true.

The future of enterprise architecture isn't rewriting; it's understanding.

By using Visual Reverse Engineering, you preserve the institutional knowledge embedded in your legacy systems while shedding the technical debt of the underlying stack. You move from a state of "archaeology" to a state of "engineering."

typescript
// Example: Generated API Contract from Replay extraction // This allows the backend team to build the new microservice // while the frontend team works on the extracted UI. interface LegacyPayload { transaction_id: string; // Map to new UUID format user_auth_token: string; payload: { amount_cents: number; currency_code: "USD" | "EUR" | "GBP"; metadata: Record<string, string>; }; } /** * @generated Generated by Replay AI Suite * @source Recording ID: tx_9920-alpha * @target Service: PaymentGatewayV2 */ export async function processExtractedTransaction(data: LegacyPayload) { // Replay identified this specific endpoint mapping // from the legacy network traffic. return await fetch('/api/v2/payments/process', { method: 'POST', body: JSON.stringify(data), }); }

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take?#

While a manual rewrite of a complex enterprise screen takes 40+ hours, Replay reduces the initial extraction to minutes. With architectural review and refinement, most teams move from a legacy screen to a production-ready React component in under 4 hours.

What about business logic preservation?#

Code crawlers often miss logic that is triggered by specific UI states. Because Replay records the runtime environment, it captures the results of the business logic. If a specific input triggers a specific UI change or API call, Replay documents that relationship as a requirement for the new system.

Does this work with "thick clients" or just web apps?#

Replay is designed for the modern enterprise. While we excel at web-based legacy systems (JSP, ASP.NET, Silverlight, Angular.js), our visual extraction methodology can be applied to any system where a user interface can be recorded and analyzed.

Can we use Replay for documentation only?#

Yes. Many of our clients in the Insurance and Government sectors use Replay to solve the "67% lack of documentation" problem. They use the platform to create a living, visual library of their legacy systems before they even decide on a modernization strategy.


Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free