Visual Reverse Engineering: The Missing Link in Enterprise Digital Transformation

The average enterprise rewrite takes 18 months and carries a 70% failure rate. For most CTOs, "modernization" is a euphemism for a multi-million dollar gamble that ends in a "zombie system"—a half-finished modern shell still tethered to a legacy core that no one understands.

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt isn't just a financial liability; it is an information problem. When 67% of legacy systems lack up-to-date documentation, developers aren't engineers—they are archaeologists. They spend 60% of their time digging through undocumented COBOL, JSP, or Silverlight fragments to understand business rules that were written before the current team was born.

Visual Reverse Engineering (VRE) changes the unit of work from "reading code" to "observing behavior." By using video as the source of truth, platforms like Replay allow enterprises to extract the DNA of a legacy system without performing a manual autopsy.

TL;DR: Visual Reverse Engineering bypasses the "archaeology phase" of modernization by recording user workflows and automatically generating documented React components and API contracts, reducing project timelines from years to weeks.

---

Why Modernization Projects Fail: The Archaeology Tax#

In a traditional "Big Bang" rewrite, the first six months are typically lost to discovery. Architects interview stakeholders who have forgotten the edge cases, and developers read spaghetti code to find hidden business logic. This is the "Archaeology Tax."

When you attempt to rewrite a system manually, you face three primary risks:

1. •Logic Leakage: Subtle business rules (e.g., "if the user is in Ohio and the date is a holiday, apply a 2% surcharge") are missed because they aren't visible in the UI and are buried in thousands of lines of legacy backend code.
2. •Scope Creep: Without a clear map of existing flows, the "new" system grows uncontrollably as missing features are discovered mid-build.
3. •The Documentation Gap: Since 67% of systems lack documentation, the rewrite is based on guesswork.

The Modernization Strategy Matrix#

💰 ROI Insight: Manual extraction of a single complex enterprise screen (including components, state management, and API mapping) takes an average of 40 hours. With Replay, this is reduced to 4 hours—a 90% reduction in labor costs.

---

What is Visual Reverse Engineering?#

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of capturing the execution of a legacy application and programmatically converting those interactions into modern code, documentation, and architectural maps.

Instead of reading the source code, VRE observes the result of the code. By recording a real user workflow, Replay captures the DOM state, the network calls, the data transformations, and the visual hierarchy. It then uses AI to "de-compile" these observations into a clean, modular React architecture.

From Black Box to Documented Codebase#

The Replay platform functions through four core pillars:

• •Library (Design System): Automatically extracts UI patterns into a unified React component library.
• •Flows (Architecture): Maps every user journey to visualize how data moves through the system.
• •Blueprints (Editor): A visual workspace where architects can refine the extracted logic.
• •AI Automation Suite: Generates the "connective tissue"—API contracts, E2E tests, and technical debt audits.

---

The Technical Workflow: How to Extract a Legacy System#

Modernizing with Replay follows a structured, repeatable process that replaces the ambiguity of manual discovery.

Step 1: Workflow Recording#

A subject matter expert (SME) performs a standard task in the legacy system (e.g., "Onboard a New Policyholder"). Replay records the session, capturing not just the pixels, but the underlying metadata, network requests, and state changes.

Step 2: Component Synthesis#

The platform analyzes the recording and identifies repeatable UI patterns. It breaks down the legacy "monolith screen" into atomic React components.

typescript
// Example: React component generated by Replay from a legacy JSP recording
import React from 'react';
import { useForm } from 'react-hook-form';
import { LegacyDataMapper } from '@replay/core';

interface PolicyDetailsProps {
  initialData: any;
  onUpdate: (data: PolicySchema) => void;
}

/**
 * @generated Extracted from Legacy Claims Portal - Screen ID: 402
 * @logic Preserves the 3-way validation check observed in session_992
 */
export const PolicyDetails: React.FC<PolicyDetailsProps> = ({ initialData, onUpdate }) => {
  const { register, handleSubmit, formState: { errors } } = useForm({
    defaultValues: LegacyDataMapper.mapToModern(initialData)
  });

  const onSubmit = (data: any) => {
    // Logic extracted from observed XHR requests
    console.log("Submitting with legacy parity logic...");
    onUpdate(data);
  };

  return (
    <form onSubmit={handleSubmit(onSubmit)} className="space-y-4">
      <div className="field-group">
        <label>Policy Number</label>
        <input {...register("policyNum", { required: true })} />
        {errors.policyNum && <span className="error">Required per legacy rule</span>}
      </div>
      {/* Additional generated fields... */}
    </form>
  );
};

Step 3: API Contract Extraction#

While the UI is being extracted, Replay monitors the network layer. It identifies the legacy endpoints, the payloads they expect, and the responses they return, generating a Swagger/OpenAPI specification automatically.

yaml
# Generated API Contract from Replay Technical Debt Audit
paths:
  /api/v1/claims/process:
    post:
      summary: "Legacy Claims Submission"
      description: "Extracted from observed traffic in Insurance-App-V3"
      requestBody:
        content:
          application/json:
            schema:
              type: object
              properties:
                claimId: { type: string }
                adjusterId: { type: integer }
                timestamp: { type: string, format: date-time }

Step 4: E2E Test Parity#

To ensure the new system behaves exactly like the old one, Replay generates Playwright or Cypress tests based on the recorded session. This creates a "Parity Guardrail."

---

Addressing the "Black Box" Problem in Regulated Industries#

For Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, the "how" matters as much as the "what." You cannot simply "hallucinate" a new system with generic AI. You need a verifiable trail.

⚠️ Warning: Using generic LLMs for modernization often results in "hallucinated logic" where the AI suggests modern patterns that contradict your specific, regulated business rules.

Replay is built for these high-stakes environments:

• •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Data handled during extraction is encrypted and anonymized.
• •On-Premise Availability: For systems that cannot touch the public cloud, Replay runs within your perimeter.
• •Audit Trails: Every generated component is linked back to the specific recording session it was derived from, providing 100% traceability.

Comparison: Manual Documentation vs. Replay Blueprints#

---

The Future Isn't Rewriting—It's Understanding#

The "Modernize or Die" ultimatum is a false choice. The real choice is between Blind Rewriting and Informed Extraction.

When you use Visual Reverse Engineering, you aren't just moving from an old framework to a new one. You are creating a living map of your enterprise's intellectual property. Replay transforms your legacy system from a liability into a documented asset.

💡 Pro Tip: Start your modernization journey with your most stable, high-value workflows. Use Replay to extract these "anchor" flows first to demonstrate immediate ROI to stakeholders within the first 30 days.

Real-World Impact: Manufacturing Case Study#

A global manufacturer had a 15-year-old inventory management system. Their original estimate for a manual rewrite was 24 months and $4M.

• •Using Replay: They recorded 150 core workflows.
• •Result: The entire frontend architecture and API contract layer were generated in 3 weeks.
• •Total Timeline: 4 months to production.
• •Savings: ~$3.2M in developer hours.

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take?#

While a manual audit takes months, a Replay extraction typically takes days or weeks. A single complex workflow can be converted into documented React components and API contracts in under 4 hours.

What about business logic preservation?#

VRE captures the observable business logic—the inputs, outputs, and state transitions. For deep backend calculations (e.g., complex actuarial math), Replay generates the API contracts and E2E tests required to ensure your new frontend interacts with the existing legacy backend logic perfectly, supporting a "Strangler Fig" migration pattern.

Does Replay support my legacy stack?#

Because Replay uses visual and network-level reverse engineering, it is largely "stack agnostic." Whether your legacy system is built in JSP, ASP.NET, Silverlight, or even mainframe-backed terminal emulators with a web wrapper, if it runs in a browser or can be captured via video, Replay can analyze it.

How does this affect my existing development team?#

Replay doesn't replace developers; it removes the "scut work." Instead of spending months documenting old code, your senior architects use Replay's Blueprints to refine the generated architecture, and your developers focus on building new features on top of the clean, generated React components.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.