Visual Logic Forensics: Detecting Undocumented Workarounds in Legacy Logistics Portals

Logistics managers have a secret. It’s usually written on a yellow sticky note stuck to the side of a CRT monitor or buried in a 40-page PDF "cheat sheet" created by a supervisor who retired three years ago. These are the undocumented workarounds—the "secret handshakes" required to make a 20-year-old COBOL-backed logistics portal actually process a modern manifest. When you decide to modernize, these workarounds are your biggest risk. If your new React-based system doesn't account for the fact that users have to click "Refresh" three times to bypass a ghost validation error, the entire $18 million migration will grind to a halt on day one.

This is where visual logic forensics detecting becomes the most critical phase of your architectural discovery. By observing how users actually interact with the legacy UI, rather than relying on outdated documentation, we can uncover the "shadow logic" that keeps your supply chain moving.

TL;DR: Legacy logistics portals are riddled with undocumented workarounds that manual documentation misses. Visual logic forensics detecting utilizes Replay to record real user workflows and automatically convert them into documented React components, reducing modernization timelines from 18 months to weeks and saving up to 70% in development costs.

---

The $3.6 Trillion Technical Debt in Supply Chain Portals#

The global technical debt has ballooned to a staggering $3.6 trillion. Nowhere is this more evident than in the logistics and manufacturing sectors. Many of the portals used for freight forwarding, warehouse management (WMS), and customs clearance were built in the late 90s or early 2000s.

According to Replay’s analysis, 67% of these legacy systems lack any form of accurate documentation. When an enterprise attempts a rewrite, they often find that the original source code is a "black box," and the original developers are long gone. This leads to the "Documentation Gap"—the space between how the system was designed to work and how it is actually used.

Visual logic forensics detecting is the process of closing this gap. Instead of reading dead code, we analyze living behavior.

Visual Logic Forensics is the methodology of using computer vision and AI to reconstruct the underlying business logic, state changes, and UI constraints of a software system based solely on its visual output and user interaction patterns.

---

Why Manual Discovery Fails in Logistics#

Traditional discovery involves business analysts (BAs) sitting next to operators, taking notes on how they process a Bill of Lading. This is slow, prone to human error, and expensive. Industry experts recommend a more automated approach because manual screen analysis takes an average of 40 hours per screen. With Replay, that same screen is documented and converted to code in just 4 hours.

The Comparison: Discovery Methods#

---

Implementing Visual Logic Forensics Detecting with Replay#

To successfully execute visual logic forensics detecting, you need to capture the "micro-interactions" that signal a workaround. For example, in many legacy logistics portals, a user might enter a weight in kilograms, but the system expects pounds without a toggle. The user knows to multiply by 2.204 in their head before typing. A standard code audit wouldn't catch this "mental middleware," but visual forensics does.

Video-to-code is the process of recording a user's screen as they perform a task and using AI to generate functional, styled React code that replicates the behavior and layout of that task.

Step 1: Recording the "Shadow Workflow"#

Using Replay, you record an operator performing a complex task, such as a "Split Shipment" maneuver that isn't officially supported by the legacy UI but is achieved through a specific sequence of clicks and field overrides.

Step 2: Extraction and Componentization#

Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the recording. It identifies the input fields, the validation triggers (those annoying red pop-ups), and the navigation flows. It then generates a modern React component that mirrors this logic but cleans up the technical debt.

Step 3: Formalizing the Logic#

Once the visual forensics are complete, you have a functional Blueprint. This isn't just a mock-up; it’s a documented piece of the new architecture.

typescript
// Example: A Modernized Logistics Input Component 
// Generated via Replay Visual Forensics to handle legacy 'Mental Middleware'

import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';

interface WeightInputProps {
  initialValue: number;
  unitType: 'KG' | 'LB';
  onValueChange: (val: number) => void;
}

/**
 * Replay detected a manual workaround in the legacy 'Portal_v2_Final'.
 * Users were manually converting KG to LB because the backend only accepted LB.
 * This component automates that forensics-detected requirement.
 */
export const LogisticsWeightInput: React.FC<WeightInputProps> = ({ 
  initialValue, 
  unitType, 
  onValueChange 
}) => {
  const [weight, setWeight] = useState(initialValue);
  const [displayUnit, setDisplayUnit] = useState(unitType);

  const handleConversion = (val: number, toUnit: 'KG' | 'LB') => {
    const converted = toUnit === 'LB' ? val * 2.20462 : val / 2.20462;
    setWeight(converted);
    onValueChange(converted);
  };

  return (
    <div className="p-4 border rounded-lg shadow-sm bg-white">
      <label className="block text-sm font-medium text-gray-700">
        Shipment Weight (Forensics-Corrected)
      </label>
      <div className="mt-1 flex gap-2">
        <input
          type="number"
          value={weight}
          onChange={(e) => handleConversion(parseFloat(e.target.value), displayUnit)}
          className="block w-full rounded-md border-gray-300 shadow-sm focus:border-indigo-500"
        />
        <select 
          value={displayUnit} 
          onChange={(e) => setDisplayUnit(e.target.value as 'KG' | 'LB')}
          className="rounded-md border-gray-300"
        >
          <option value="KG">KG</option>
          <option value="LB">LB</option>
        </select>
      </div>
      <p className="mt-2 text-xs text-gray-500 italic">
        * Logic extracted from legacy session recording #4421 (Carrier Portal)
      </p>
    </div>
  );
};

Learn more about modernizing legacy UIs

---

Detecting "Ghost Validation" in Logistics Portals#

One of the most common issues discovered during visual logic forensics detecting is "Ghost Validation." This occurs when a legacy system has hardcoded constraints that are no longer relevant but still block the UI.

For instance, a portal might prevent a shipment from being marked as "Delivered" if the "Carrier ID" field contains more than 8 characters—a rule from 1994. Modern Carrier IDs are 12 characters. Users have learned to truncate the ID manually.

If you simply "lift and shift" the backend logic, you migrate the bug. If you use Replay to perform visual forensics, the AI notices the user's truncation pattern and flags it as a "UI-level workaround."

Case Study: The 18-Month Failure#

A major North American freight forwarder attempted to rewrite their customs portal. They spent 12 months in discovery and another 6 months in development. When they launched, they realized that 30% of their "special handling" codes were missing because they weren't in the official database—they were "visual-only" flags that operators had been using via a specific browser extension.

70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timeline for exactly this reason. By implementing visual logic forensics detecting early, you ensure that these hidden requirements are baked into the new system from day one.

---

The Replay Workflow: From Recording to Design System#

Modernizing a logistics portal isn't just about code; it's about the Design System. Logistics apps are data-heavy, often requiring complex grids and multi-step forms.

1. •Flows: Record the end-to-end journey of a dispatcher.
2. •Library: Replay automatically extracts the buttons, inputs, and tables, creating a standardized Design System.
3. •Blueprints: Edit the extracted components in a low-code environment to remove the legacy "cruft."
4. •Export: Push clean, documented React code to your repository.

typescript
// Replay Generated: Shipment Grid Component
// Extracted from legacy 'Green Screen' terminal emulator via Visual Forensics

import { useTable } from 'react-table';

export const ShipmentManifestGrid = ({ data }: { data: any[] }) => {
  const columns = React.useMemo(
    () => [
      { Header: 'Manifest ID', accessor: 'manifest_id' },
      { Header: 'Origin', accessor: 'origin_port' },
      { Header: 'Destination', accessor: 'dest_port' },
      { 
        Header: 'Status', 
        accessor: 'status',
        Cell: ({ value }: { value: string }) => (
          // Forensic analysis showed users color-coded statuses manually
          <span className={`px-2 py-1 rounded ${
            value === 'Delayed' ? 'bg-red-200 text-red-800' : 'bg-green-200 text-green-800'
          }`}>
            {value}
          </span>
        )
      },
    ],
    []
  );

  return (
    <div className="overflow-x-auto">
      <table className="min-w-full divide-y divide-gray-200">
        {/* Table Implementation... */}
      </table>
    </div>
  );
};

---

Visual Logic Forensics Detecting in Regulated Environments#

Logistics often involves HIPAA-compliant medical shipments or SOC2-regulated financial data. Replay is built for these high-stakes environments. Whether you are in healthcare logistics or government contracting, the ability to perform visual logic forensics detecting on-premise ensures that sensitive data never leaves your firewall.

Industry experts recommend that enterprise architects prioritize "observability-driven development." Instead of guessing what the legacy system does, observe it. Replay provides the "Forensic Tape" that proves exactly how a transaction was handled, providing an audit trail that manual documentation can never match.

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is visual logic forensics detecting?#

It is the process of using AI and computer vision to analyze user interaction recordings of legacy software. The goal is to identify undocumented business logic, hidden UI constraints, and manual workarounds that are not present in the original source code or documentation.

Why is video-to-code better than manual rewriting?#

Manual rewriting takes an average of 40 hours per screen and has a 70% failure rate due to missed requirements. Video-to-code via Replay reduces this to 4 hours per screen by automatically capturing the "as-is" state of the application and converting it into "to-be" React components.

Can Replay handle complex logistics workflows like EDI mapping?#

Yes. While EDI is a backend protocol, the visual representation of how users resolve EDI errors in a portal is a goldmine for discovery. Replay captures how users interact with error states, allowing architects to build better error-handling logic in the modernized version.

Is Replay SOC2 and HIPAA compliant?#

Yes. Replay is built for regulated industries including Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government. It offers On-Premise deployment options to ensure that sensitive logistics data remains within your secure environment during the visual logic forensics detecting process.

How does Replay save 70% of modernization time?#

By automating the discovery and initial coding phases. Instead of starting with a blank IDE, developers start with a library of React components that already mirror the required business logic and layout of the legacy system, effectively skipping the most labor-intensive parts of the SDLC.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay