Visual Intent Capture: The Key to Understanding "Why" the Code Exists

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt isn't just a financial liability; it’s a failure of institutional memory. When a legacy system becomes a "black box," it’s not because the code stopped working—it's because the "why" behind the code has vanished. Most enterprise modernization projects fail because they treat software like a set of instructions to be translated, rather than a series of business intents to be understood.

TL;DR: Visual Intent Capture uses real-time user interaction as the primary source of truth to reverse-engineer legacy systems, reducing modernization timelines from years to weeks by bypassing the "documentation archaeology" phase.

The Archaeology Trap: Why Code Isn't Enough#

Most Enterprise Architects begin a modernization project with "Source Code Archaeology." They dive into 15-year-old Java or COBOL repositories, trying to map spaghetti code to business requirements that no longer exist in written form.

This approach is fundamentally flawed. Code tells you how a system currently functions, but it rarely tells you what the user actually needs to accomplish. This gap is why 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timelines. You aren't just fighting technical debt; you're fighting a lack of context.

The Cost of Manual Discovery#

⚠️ Warning: Relying solely on legacy source code for a rewrite often results in "bug-for-bug" compatibility, where you inadvertently port 20 years of technical debt into a modern React container.

Defining Visual Intent Capture#

Visual Intent Capture is the process of recording real user workflows to extract the underlying architecture, business logic, and state transitions. Instead of reading the code to guess the intent, we watch the intent to generate the code.

By using Replay, teams capture the "Source of Truth" directly from the browser or terminal. This isn't just a screen recording; it's a deep-packet inspection of the application's behavior. It captures:

1. •State Changes: What happens to the data when a user interacts?
2. •API Contracts: What endpoints are called, and what is the schema of the payload?
3. •UI Logic: Which fields are conditional? What validation rules are triggered?
4. •Component Hierarchy: How should this monolithic screen be broken down into reusable React components?

The Implementation Roadmap: From Recording to React#

Modernization shouldn't be a "Big Bang" event. It should be a structured extraction. Here is how we implement Visual Intent Capture using the Replay platform.

Step 1: Workflow Recording#

Instead of interviewing stakeholders about what they think the system does, we record them actually using it. Replay’s engine hooks into the DOM and network layer to capture every event.

Step 2: Intent Extraction (The "Blueprints")#

The captured data is processed through an AI Automation Suite that identifies patterns. If a user clicks "Submit" and the system validates a ZIP code against a specific regex, Replay identifies that as a "Validation Intent."

Step 3: Component Generation#

Replay generates documented React components that mirror the legacy behavior but utilize modern best practices (Tailwind CSS, TypeScript, Headless UI).

typescript
// Example: Generated component from Replay Visual Intent Capture
// Original: Legacy ASP.NET WebForms "CustomerPortal.aspx"
// Intent: Capture customer contact update with validation

import React, { useState } from 'react';
import { useForm } from 'react-hook-form';
import { Button, Input, Alert } from '@/components/ui';

interface ContactUpdateProps {
  initialData: {
    email: string;
    phone: string;
  };
  onSuccess: (data: any) => void;
}

export const ContactUpdateForm: React.FC<ContactUpdateProps> = ({ initialData, onSuccess }) => {
  const [serverError, setServerError] = useState<string | null>(null);
  
  // Replay extracted the validation logic from the legacy network trace
  const { register, handleSubmit, formState: { errors } } = useForm({
    defaultValues: initialData
  });

  const onSubmit = async (data: any) => {
    try {
      // Replay generated this API contract based on recorded legacy XHR calls
      const response = await fetch('/api/v1/customers/update-contact', {
        method: 'POST',
        headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
        body: JSON.stringify(data),
      });
      
      if (!response.ok) throw new Error('Update failed');
      onSuccess(await response.json());
    } catch (err) {
      setServerError('The legacy backend rejected this request. Check connectivity.');
    }
  };

  return (
    <form onSubmit={handleSubmit(onSubmit)} className="space-y-4">
      <Input 
        {...register("email", { required: "Email is required", pattern: /^\S+@\S+$/i })}
        label="Business Email"
        error={errors.email?.message}
      />
      <Button type="submit">Sync with Mainframe</Button>
      {serverError && <Alert variant="destructive">{serverError}</Alert>}
    </form>
  );
};

Step 4: API Contract Synthesis#

One of the biggest hurdles in modernization is the "Black Box" API. Replay observes the data flowing between the legacy frontend and the backend to generate a modern OpenAPI (Swagger) specification.

yaml
# Generated by Replay from recorded legacy workflow
openapi: 3.0.0
info:
  title: Legacy Insurance Core API
  version: 1.0.0
paths:
  /proc/claims/submit:
    post:
      summary: Extracted from "Submit Claim" workflow
      requestBody:
        content:
          application/json:
            schema:
              type: object
              properties:
                claimId: { type: string }
                policyNumber: { type: string, pattern: '^[A-Z]{2}-\d{6}$' }
                amount: { type: number }

💰 ROI Insight: By automating the generation of API contracts and E2E tests, Replay users report a 70% average time savings, moving projects from an 18-month roadmap to a matter of weeks.

Why "Understanding" Trumps "Rewriting"#

When you rewrite from scratch, you start at zero. You lose the nuance of edge cases handled by the legacy system over decades. Visual Intent Capture ensures those edge cases are documented.

The Library and the Flows#

In the Replay platform, captured intents are organized into two key areas:

• •The Library: A Design System of extracted React components. This ensures visual consistency across the new application.
• •The Flows: A visual map of the application's architecture. It shows how a user moves from "Login" to "Dashboard" to "Transaction History," including the state changes at each step.

💡 Pro Tip: Use Replay’s Technical Debt Audit feature during the capture phase to identify which legacy modules are actually being used. We often find that 30% of legacy codebases are "dead code" that doesn't need to be modernized at all.

Security and Compliance in Regulated Industries#

For Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, "cloud-only" is often a non-starter. Replay was built for these environments.

• •On-Premise Availability: Keep your sensitive data and legacy code within your firewall.
• •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Automated PII masking during the visual capture process ensures that developer environments remain compliant.
• •Audit Trails: Every extracted component and API contract is linked back to the original recording, providing a clear chain of custody for logic.

Overcoming the "Document Without Archaeology" Hurdle#

67% of legacy systems lack documentation. In a traditional setting, this means thousands of hours of developer time spent in "Discovery."

With Replay, the recording is the documentation.

If a developer 12 months from now asks, "Why does this form have a specific validation for the 'Tax ID' field?", they don't have to hunt down a retired COBOL programmer. They can simply open the Replay Flow, watch the original interaction, and see the exact data payload that triggered the requirement.

Step-by-Step: Extracting a Legacy Screen#

1. •Initialize Replay: Deploy the capture agent to your legacy environment (UAT or Staging).
2. •Execute Workflow: A subject matter expert (SME) performs the task (e.g., "Onboard a New Policyholder").
3. •Analyze Blueprint: Open the Replay Editor to see the extracted DOM, CSS, and Network activity.
4. •Export Component: Select the desired UI elements and click "Generate React Component."
5. •Verify: Use the auto-generated Playwright/Cypress tests to ensure the new component behaves exactly like the old one.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#

While a manual rewrite of a complex enterprise screen can take 40+ hours of discovery, development, and testing, Replay reduces this to approximately 4 hours. Most enterprise pilots see a fully functional, documented proof-of-concept within 48 to 72 hours.

What about business logic preservation?#

Replay doesn't just copy the UI; it captures the behavior. By monitoring the inputs and outputs (I/O) of the legacy system, Replay creates a functional map of the business logic. This allows you to recreate the logic in modern TypeScript or move it to a serverless function while maintaining 100% fidelity to the original business requirement.

Does Replay work with mainframe or terminal-based systems?#

Yes. Replay supports visual capture for web-based legacy systems (JSP, ASP.NET, PHP, Delphi) as well as terminal emulators used in banking and manufacturing. If a user can see it and interact with it, Replay can capture the intent.

How does this impact our existing CI/CD pipeline?#

Replay integrates directly with your modern stack. The generated components are standard React/TypeScript, and the generated tests are standard Playwright/Cypress. You own the code; Replay just helps you write it faster and with more context.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.