Back to Blog
February 10, 20269 min readvb6 modern

VB6 Modernization in Pharma: Rescuing Legacy Laboratory Information Systems (LIMS) with 100% Accuracy

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timeline, yet the pharmaceutical industry remains anchored to Laboratory Information Systems (LIMS) built on Visual Basic 6.0 (VB6). In a sector where a single data integrity error can trigger an FDA Warning Letter or a multi-million dollar batch rejection, the "Big Bang" rewrite isn't just risky—it’s a liability.

The global technical debt currently sits at a staggering $3.6 trillion, and nowhere is this more visible than in the aging Windows XP-era terminals still running critical LIMS workflows in sterile manufacturing environments. These systems are black boxes; the original developers are retired, the documentation is non-existent (67% of legacy systems lack any formal documentation), and the source code is often a spaghetti-mess of COM components and direct memory manipulation.

The choice has historically been binary: stay on a dying, insecure platform or risk an 18-24 month rewrite that will likely fail. We are here to provide a third option: Visual Reverse Engineering.

TL;DR: Modernizing a vb6 modern LIMS architecture no longer requires manual code archaeology; by using Replay to record user workflows, pharma enterprises can extract 100% accurate React components and business logic, reducing modernization timelines from years to weeks.

The High Cost of the "Archaeology" Approach to VB6 Modernization#

When a VP of Engineering decides to modernize a legacy LIMS, the first instinct is to hire a team of consultants to perform "code archaeology." They spend months digging through

text
.vbp
files and
text
.frm
files, trying to map out how a sample's "Chain of Custody" was calculated in 1998.

This manual approach is the primary reason why the average enterprise rewrite takes 18 months and frequently fails. In pharma, the stakes are higher. You aren't just moving buttons; you are moving GxP-critical logic that governs patient safety.

Why Manual Rewrites Are a Terminal Risk#

  1. The Documentation Gap: With 67% of systems lacking documentation, your developers are guessing. In a LIMS, a "guess" about a rounding algorithm in a titration calculation is a compliance failure.
  2. The Time Sink: Manual extraction of a single complex screen takes an average of 40 hours. With Replay, that same screen is documented and converted in 4 hours.
  3. The Talent Gap: Finding engineers who understand both modern React/TypeScript and the idiosyncrasies of VB6's event loop is nearly impossible.
ApproachTimelineRiskLogic AccuracyCost
Big Bang Rewrite18-24 monthsHigh (70% fail)Low (Manual errors)$$$$
Strangler Fig12-18 monthsMediumMedium$$$
Replay (Visual Reverse Engineering)2-8 weeksLow100% (Observed)$

The path to a vb6 modern architecture in pharma requires more than just a language swap. It requires a fundamental shift in how we understand the "Source of Truth." In legacy systems, the source code is often lying. It contains dead paths, unused libraries, and "ghost logic" that never actually executes.

The only true source of truth is the running application.

Replay changes the paradigm by recording real user workflows. When a lab technician checks in a sample or validates a result, Replay captures the UI state, the data transitions, and the underlying business rules. It doesn't matter if the VB6 code is undocumented; if it happens on the screen, Replay understands it.

💰 ROI Insight: By shifting from manual documentation to Replay’s AI-driven extraction, enterprises save an average of 70% on total project time. For a mid-sized LIMS with 100 screens, this represents a saving of 3,600 engineering hours.

Technical Debt Audit: The Silent Killer#

Before writing a single line of React, you must understand the depth of your technical debt. Replay’s AI Automation Suite performs a technical debt audit during the recording phase. It identifies:

  • Hardcoded database strings.
  • Deprecated COM+ dependencies.
  • Non-standard UI patterns that break accessibility.
  • Security vulnerabilities in the legacy data layer.

From Black Box to Documented React Codebase#

The goal of a vb6 modern project is to arrive at a clean, maintainable, and SOC2-compliant architecture. Replay doesn't just "copy" the UI; it generates structured React components and API contracts based on the observed behavior of the legacy system.

Example: Migrating a LIMS Sample Entry Form#

In the legacy VB6 system, the sample entry form likely handles complex validation logic across multiple sub-forms. Here is how that logic is preserved and modernized when extracted via Replay:

typescript
// Example: Generated React Component from Replay Video Extraction // Logic preserved from Legacy LIMS Sample Entry Workflow import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import { SampleValidationSchema } from './schemas/lims-validation'; import { ModernInput, ModernCard, ModernButton } from '@replay-library/ui'; export const SampleEntryModernized: React.FC = () => { const [sampleData, setSampleData] = useState({ batchId: '', timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), purityLevel: 0, operatorId: '' }); // Business logic extracted from observed VB6 Event Handlers const handlePurityCheck = (value: number) => { if (value < 98.5) { // Replay identified this specific threshold from legacy workflow alert("Warning: Purity below USP standard. Secondary verification required."); } setSampleData(prev => ({ ...prev, purityLevel: value })); }; return ( <ModernCard title="LIMS Sample Entry"> <form className="space-y-4"> <ModernInput label="Batch ID" value={sampleData.batchId} onChange={(e) => setSampleData({ ...sampleData, batchId: e.target.value })} /> <ModernInput label="Purity (%)" type="number" value={sampleData.purityLevel} onChange={(e) => handlePurityCheck(parseFloat(e.target.value))} /> <ModernButton variant="primary" onClick={() => {/* API Contract generated by Replay */}}> Submit to Lab Queue </ModernButton> </form> </ModernCard> ); };

This isn't just a UI clone. Replay generates the API Contracts and E2E Tests required to ensure that the new system behaves exactly like the old one, satisfying the strict validation requirements of the pharmaceutical industry.

⚠️ Warning: Many "low-code" modernization tools promise quick results but create vendor lock-in. Ensure your modernization path produces standard, human-readable React/TypeScript that your team can own.

The 3-Step Modernization Blueprint for LIMS#

We have refined the process of rescuing legacy laboratory systems into a repeatable, low-risk workflow.

Step 1: Visual Recording & Assessment#

Instead of reading code, your subject matter experts (SMEs) simply perform their daily tasks while Replay records the session. This captures the "Flows"—the actual architecture of the user’s journey. This eliminates the 67% documentation gap instantly.

Step 2: Extraction and Design System Mapping#

Replay’s "Blueprints" editor takes the recorded video and identifies UI patterns. These patterns are mapped to your new Design System (Library). If the legacy VB6 app used a non-standard grid, Replay maps it to a modern, accessible React DataGrid.

Step 3: Logic Generation and Technical Debt Audit#

The AI Automation Suite analyzes the data flow between the UI and the backend. It generates:

  • API Contracts: Defining how the new frontend will talk to the legacy or modernized database.
  • E2E Tests: Ensuring that a "Success" in the new system matches the data state of a "Success" in the old system.
  • Documentation: Automatically generated technical docs that describe the business logic for future audits.
typescript
// Example: Replay-Generated API Contract for LIMS Integration // This ensures the modernized frontend communicates correctly with legacy SQL backends export interface LimsSampleRequest { /** @description Unique Batch Identifier extracted from legacy DB schema */ batch_id: string; /** @description ISO Timestamp for GxP Audit Trail */ entry_timestamp: string; /** @description Observed range: 0.00 - 100.00 */ purity_reading: number; } export const submitSampleToLegacyDB = async (data: LimsSampleRequest) => { // Replay generates the bridge logic to maintain data integrity const response = await fetch('/api/v1/lims/samples', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, body: JSON.stringify(data), }); return response.json(); };

Why Pharma CTOs Choose Replay for VB6 Modern Projects#

Pharma is a highly regulated environment. You cannot afford the "move fast and break things" mentality. Replay is built for these constraints:

  • SOC2 & HIPAA-Ready: Your data and workflows are protected by enterprise-grade security.
  • On-Premise Availability: For highly sensitive laboratory environments, Replay can run entirely within your firewall.
  • Audit Trails: Every extraction and code generation step is logged, providing a clear "paper trail" for compliance officers.
  • Preservation of Business Logic: In a LIMS, the logic is the asset. Replay ensures that 20 years of refined business rules are not lost in translation.

💡 Pro Tip: Don't try to modernize the entire LIMS at once. Use Replay to extract the most critical workflows first—like Sample Receiving or COA (Certificate of Analysis) generation—to show immediate ROI.

The Future Isn't Rewriting—It's Understanding#

The "Big Bang" rewrite is a relic of the past. It belongs to an era where we had the luxury of time and the tolerance for failure. In the modern pharmaceutical landscape, where speed-to-market and compliance are everything, you cannot wait 24 months for a vb6 modern transition that might not even work.

Replay offers a way out of the technical debt trap. By using video as the source of truth, we turn the "black box" of legacy VB6 into a documented, modern, and scalable React codebase. We don't just move you off VB6; we move you into a future where your systems are finally as agile as your science.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How does Replay handle complex COM/ActiveX controls in VB6?#

Replay focuses on the visual and data output of these controls. By observing how the ActiveX control interacts with user input and what data it sends to the backend, Replay can recreate the functional equivalent in React without needing to decompile the original binary.

Is the generated code maintainable, or is it "spaghetti code"?#

Replay generates clean, idiomatic TypeScript and React. The components are structured according to modern best practices, using your organization's design system and state management patterns. It is indistinguishable from code written by a senior frontend engineer.

How do you guarantee 100% logic accuracy during a vb6 modern migration?#

Accuracy is guaranteed through Replay’s "Flows" feature. By recording the same workflow multiple times with different variables, the AI identifies the underlying logic branches. We then generate E2E tests that run against both the legacy and modern systems to ensure the outputs match exactly.

Can Replay work with air-gapped laboratory systems?#

Yes. Replay offers an on-premise deployment model specifically for regulated industries like Pharma and Government, ensuring that no sensitive workflow data ever leaves your secure environment.

What is the typical timeline for a LIMS screen extraction?#

While manual extraction takes roughly 40 hours per screen (including documentation and testing), Replay reduces this to approximately 4 hours. A standard LIMS module with 20 screens can often be documented and extracted in less than two weeks.


Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free