Validation Rule Recovery: Capturing Complex Input Constraints from Legacy Banking UIs

The most dangerous part of a banking modernization project isn't the data migration—it’s the hidden validation logic buried in 30-year-old green screens and undocumented PowerBuilder forms. When an enterprise attempts to rewrite a core banking module, they often discover that the "simple" account number field actually has seventeen conditional validation rules that no living employee remembers. These rules were never documented, the original developers are retired, and the source code is a labyrinth of spaghetti logic.

If you miss a single rule—like a specific checksum for SWIFT transfers or a legacy routing constraint for regional branches—you don't just get a bug; you get a compliance failure or a multi-million dollar reconciliation nightmare. This is where validation rule recovery capturing becomes the difference between a successful launch and a $100 million write-off.

TL;DR: Legacy banking systems harbor "shadow logic"—undocumented validation rules that are nearly impossible to extract via manual code review. Manual recovery takes roughly 40 hours per screen. By using Replay for visual reverse engineering, teams can automate validation rule recovery capturing by recording real user workflows. This reduces the modernization timeline from years to weeks, achieving a 70% reduction in development time while ensuring 100% parity with legacy constraints.

---

The $3.6 Trillion Technical Debt Crisis in Banking#

The global financial sector is currently sitting on a $3.6 trillion mountain of technical debt. According to Replay’s analysis, 67% of these legacy systems lack any form of usable documentation. For a Tier-1 bank, a typical enterprise rewrite timeline averages 18 to 24 months, with 70% of these projects either failing outright or significantly exceeding their original timelines.

The bottleneck is almost always the "discovery phase." Architects spend months performing manual forensic analysis on legacy UIs, trying to map out every "if/then" statement that governs user input.

Video-to-code is the process of using computer vision and AI to transform screen recordings of legacy software into functional, modern source code, effectively bypassing the need for manual documentation.

By utilizing Replay, organizations can move from a "guess-and-test" methodology to a deterministic "observe-and-extract" model. Instead of reading 50,000 lines of COBOL, you record a subject matter expert (SME) entering valid and invalid data. Replay captures the UI’s response—the error toasts, the red borders, the blocked submission buttons—and translates those behaviors into modern React validation schemas.

---

The Methodology of Validation Rule Recovery Capturing#

To successfully migrate a legacy banking UI, you must capture three layers of validation:

1. •Syntactic Validation: Format checks (e.g., "Must be 8 digits").
2. •Cross-Field Validation: Dependencies (e.g., "If Account Type is 'Savings,' then Minimum Balance must be > $500").
3. •State-Based Validation: Rules that change based on user roles or previous transaction history.

Step 1: Visual Recording of Edge Cases#

Industry experts recommend that the first step in validation rule recovery capturing is the recording of "Negative Workflows." A developer or SME records themselves intentionally triggering every possible error state in the legacy application. Replay’s AI Automation Suite watches these recordings, noting exactly which input combinations trigger specific error messages.

Step 2: Extracting the "Shadow Logic"#

Legacy systems often use "silent" validation—where the UI doesn't show an error but simply prevents the user from proceeding. Replay’s Flows (Architecture) feature maps these navigational blockers. It identifies that the "Next" button remains disabled until the "Tax ID" field matches a specific regex pattern, even if no tooltip explains why.

Step 3: Generating the Modern Validation Schema#

Once the behavior is captured, Replay’s Blueprints (Editor) converts these visual cues into code. Instead of a developer manually writing Zod or Yup schemas, Replay generates the TypeScript definitions directly from the observed behavior.

---

Comparison: Manual Recovery vs. Replay Automation#

---

Implementing Validation Rule Recovery Capturing in React#

Once Replay has analyzed the legacy recording, it outputs a structured component library and the associated validation logic. Below is a technical example of how a captured legacy validation rule (for a complex International Wire Transfer) is transformed into a modern, type-safe React component using Replay’s output.

Legacy Logic Extraction (The "Before")#

In the legacy system, the "IBAN" field had a hidden rule: if the country code was "DE," the length must be exactly 22, but if "FR," it must be 27. This was buried in a 1994 C++ DLL.

Modern React Implementation (The "After")#

Replay extracts this and generates a Design System compatible component.

typescript
import React from 'react';
import { useForm } from 'react-hook-form';
import { zodResolver } from '@hookform/resolvers/zod';
import * as z from 'zod';

// Captured via Replay Validation Rule Recovery Capturing
const wireTransferSchema = z.object({
  countryCode: z.enum(['DE', 'FR', 'GB', 'US']),
  iban: z.string().min(15),
}).refine((data) => {
  if (data.countryCode === 'DE') return data.iban.length === 22;
  if (data.countryCode === 'FR') return data.iban.length === 27;
  return true;
}, {
  message: "IBAN length does not match country standards captured from legacy system",
  path: ["iban"],
});

type WireTransferForm = z.infer<typeof wireTransferSchema>;

export const BankingInput: React.FC = () => {
  const { register, handleSubmit, formState: { errors } } = useForm<WireTransferForm>({
    resolver: zodResolver(wireTransferSchema),
  });

  const onSubmit = (data: WireTransferForm) => {
    console.log("Modernized Transaction Data:", data);
  };

  return (
    <form onSubmit={handleSubmit(onSubmit)} className="p-6 bg-slate-50 rounded-lg">
      <div className="mb-4">
        <label className="block text-sm font-bold mb-2">Country Code</label>
        <select {...register("countryCode")} className="border p-2 w-full">
          <option value="DE">Germany (DE)</option>
          <option value="FR">France (FR)</option>
        </select>
        {errors.countryCode && <p className="text-red-500">{errors.countryCode.message}</p>}
      </div>

      <div className="mb-4">
        <label className="block text-sm font-bold mb-2">IBAN</label>
        <input {...register("iban")} className="border p-2 w-full" placeholder="Enter IBAN" />
        {errors.iban && <p className="text-red-500">{errors.iban.message}</p>}
      </div>

      <button type="submit" className="bg-blue-600 text-white px-4 py-2 rounded">
        Execute Transfer
      </button>
    </form>
  );
};

This code isn't just a "guess." It is the direct result of Replay observing the legacy UI reject a 23-character German IBAN during the recording phase. By modernizing without rewriting from scratch, you preserve the institutional knowledge embedded in the UI.

---

Scaling Validation Rule Recovery Capturing Across Enterprise Portfolios#

For large-scale operations, like mainframe modernization, the challenge is volume. A typical retail bank might have 400+ internal applications. Manually analyzing each for validation parity is impossible.

According to Replay's analysis, the "Library" feature allows architects to create a centralized repository of these captured rules. If a "Currency Conversion" validation rule is captured in the Wealth Management app, it can be instantly applied as a Blueprint to the Retail Banking app.

Handling Regulated Environments#

Banking is a highly regulated industry. Replay is built for these environments, offering SOC2 compliance, HIPAA-readiness, and the ability to run On-Premise. This ensures that when you are performing validation rule recovery capturing, sensitive PII (Personally Identifiable Information) never leaves your secure perimeter. The AI analyzes the structure and behavior of the UI, not the actual customer data being entered.

The Component Library Advantage#

When Replay processes a recording, it doesn't just give you a script; it builds a full Component Library. This library includes:

• •Stateful Components: Buttons that know when to be disabled.
• •Validation Hooks: Reusable logic for complex financial math.
• •Visual Parity: CSS/Tailwind styles that mimic the "trusted" look of the legacy system to reduce user retraining costs.

---

Technical Deep Dive: From Video Frames to Zod Schemas#

How does validation rule recovery capturing actually work under the hood? Replay uses a multi-stage pipeline:

1. •Temporal Analysis: Replay analyzes the video at 60fps to detect the exact millisecond an error state appears.
2. •DOM/OCR Mapping: If the legacy app is web-based, Replay maps visual changes to DOM mutations. If it's a desktop/Citrix app, it uses OCR (Optical Character Recognition) to read error messages.
3. •Inference Engine: The AI Automation Suite looks for patterns. If the user types "ABC" and the field turns red, but "123" stays green, it infers an
   text

   isNumeric
   constraint.
4. •Code Synthesis: The inferred rules are passed to the Blueprints engine, which generates the TypeScript code.

typescript
// Example of an AI-generated Blueprint for a Credit Limit Field
export const CreditLimitBlueprint = {
  id: "credit-limit-input",
  legacyRef: "SCR-402-FIELD-9",
  validation: {
    type: "number",
    min: 0,
    max: 50000,
    step: 100,
    conditional: {
      dependsOn: "accountTier",
      rules: [
        { value: "Gold", max: 100000 },
        { value: "Platinum", max: 500000 }
      ]
    }
  },
  visualStates: ["default", "error", "disabled", "loading"]
};

By providing these blueprints, Replay allows developers to focus on high-level architecture rather than the minutiae of input constraints.

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

What if the legacy UI has inconsistent validation rules?#

Inconsistent rules are a common finding during validation rule recovery capturing. Replay flags these inconsistencies in the "Flows" view, allowing architects to decide whether to replicate the legacy quirk for the sake of parity or "cleanse" the rule for the modern version. This visibility is something manual code review often misses.

Does Replay require access to the legacy source code?#

No. Replay operates on Visual Reverse Engineering. It treats the legacy application as a black box, capturing rules based on how the UI behaves. This is ideal for systems where the source code is lost, obfuscated, or written in obsolete languages like Smalltalk or early versions of COBOL.

How does Replay handle multi-step forms with inter-page dependencies?#

Replay’s "Flows" feature is designed specifically for complex, multi-page workflows. It tracks state across the entire recording session, ensuring that a validation rule on Page 5 that depends on an input from Page 1 is accurately captured and reflected in the modern React context or Redux store.

Is the generated code maintainable?#

Yes. Replay generates clean, human-readable TypeScript and React code using industry-standard libraries like Tailwind CSS and React Hook Form. It avoids proprietary frameworks, ensuring that your team can maintain the code long after the initial modernization is complete.

---

Conclusion: The Future of Legacy Recovery#

The era of 24-month manual rewrites is ending. As technical debt continues to grow, the ability to rapidly extract and implement legacy logic is becoming a core competency for enterprise IT. Validation rule recovery capturing through Replay provides a bridge between the reliable (but rigid) past and the agile (but complex) future.

By automating the discovery of complex constraints, banks can reduce their risk profile, save millions in development costs, and finally retire the mainframes that have been holding them back.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay