UI Extraction vs Code Refactoring: Why the Frontend-First Approach Wins in 2025

70% of legacy modernization projects fail before they ship a single line of production code. In the enterprise, the "Big Bang" rewrite is no longer a viable strategy—it is a career-ending risk. As global technical debt swells to $3.6 trillion, the bottleneck isn't a lack of developers; it's the "archaeology" required to understand undocumented, decades-old systems.

The traditional choice has been between a high-risk rewrite or a slow, painful refactor. In 2025, a third path has emerged: UI Extraction vs Code Refactoring. By treating the user interface as the source of truth rather than the decaying source code, architects are slashing modernization timelines from years to weeks.

TL;DR: UI Extraction bypasses the "archaeology" phase of legacy modernization by using video as the source of truth, reducing screen migration time from 40 hours to 4 hours while maintaining 100% functional parity.

The Archaeology Trap: Why Refactoring Fails at Scale#

Most enterprise systems are "black boxes." 67% of legacy systems lack any form of up-to-date documentation. When a VP of Engineering orders a refactor, they are essentially asking developers to become historians. They must dig through layers of jQuery, proprietary frameworks, and "spaghetti" logic to understand what a button actually does.

This manual discovery process is the primary reason the average enterprise rewrite takes 18 to 24 months. You aren't just writing new code; you are reverse-engineering the intent of developers who left the company a decade ago.

The Cost of Manual Reverse Engineering#

Manual extraction is a linear, expensive process. To move a single complex screen from a legacy JSP or Silverlight app to modern React, the workflow typically looks like this:

1. •Discovery (10 hours): Clicking every button, checking network logs, and finding the source file.
2. •Logic Mapping (15 hours): Deciphering state management and hidden business rules.
3. •UI Reconstruction (10 hours): Manually writing CSS and HTML to match the original look and feel.
4. •Testing (5 hours): Ensuring the new screen behaves exactly like the old one.

Total: 40 hours per screen. For an enterprise app with 200 screens, that’s 8,000 man-hours—nearly four years of work for a single developer.

💰 ROI Insight: Replay reduces this 40-hour process to 4 hours. By automating the visual and logical extraction, organizations realize a 70% average time saving on the total project lifecycle.

UI Extraction vs. Traditional Modernization Approaches#

When comparing UI Extraction vs traditional methods, the primary difference is the starting point. Traditional methods start with the code (which is often wrong or outdated). UI Extraction starts with the behavior (which is always the truth).

⚠️ Warning: The "Strangler Fig" pattern is often cited as the safest route, but it frequently leads to "Frankenstein Architectures" where the legacy and modern systems must be maintained simultaneously for years, doubling your maintenance overhead.

The Technical Shift: How Visual Reverse Engineering Works#

UI Extraction, powered by platforms like Replay, treats the running application as a live data source. Instead of reading the code, Replay records real user workflows. It captures the DOM mutations, the API calls, and the state changes in real-time.

Step 1: Recording the Source of Truth#

An engineer or subject matter expert (SME) simply performs the task in the legacy application while Replay records the session. This isn't just a video; it's a deep-packet capture of the frontend's behavior.

Step 2: Component Extraction#

Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the recording to identify patterns. It sees a table, a date picker, and a multi-step form. It then maps these to your organization's modern Design System.

Step 3: Generating the Modern Stack#

The platform generates clean, production-ready React components. It doesn't just copy the HTML; it reconstructs the logic.

typescript
// Example: Replay-generated React component from a legacy JSP extraction
// This component preserves business logic while utilizing modern hooks.

import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { Button, TextField, Alert } from '@your-org/design-system';
import { legacyApiBridge } from '../middleware/bridge';

export const InsuranceClaimForm = ({ claimId }) => {
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
  const [error, setError] = useState(null);

  // Replay extracted this specific validation logic from the legacy runtime
  const validatePolicy = (data) => {
    return data.policyType === 'PREMIUM' && data.amount > 5000;
  };

  const handleSubmit = async (formData) => {
    if (!validatePolicy(formData)) {
      setError("High-value claims require manual supervisor override.");
      return;
    }
    
    setLoading(true);
    try {
      await legacyApiBridge.post('/submit-claim', formData);
      // Success logic...
    } catch (err) {
      setError(err.message);
    } finally {
      setLoading(false);
    }
  };

  return (
    <div className="p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow-md">
      {error && <Alert severity="error">{error}</Alert>}
      <TextField label="Policy Number" required />
      {/* ... rest of the extracted UI ... */}
      <Button onClick={handleSubmit} disabled={loading}>
        Submit Claim
      </Button>
    </div>
  );
};

💡 Pro Tip: When using UI Extraction, focus on "High-Value Flows" first. Instead of migrating alphabetically, migrate the 20% of screens that handle 80% of your user traffic.

Beyond the UI: Generating API Contracts and E2E Tests#

The most significant pain point in UI Extraction vs manual refactoring is the "Integration Gap." Even if you build a beautiful new frontend, connecting it to a 20-year-old COBOL or Java backend is a nightmare.

Replay solves this by automatically generating API Contracts during the recording phase. As the user interacts with the legacy app, Replay intercepts the network traffic and generates a Swagger/OpenAPI specification.

yaml
# Generated API Contract from Replay Flow Recording
openapi: 3.0.0
info:
  title: Legacy Claims API
  version: 1.0.0
paths:
  /api/v1/claims/{id}:
    get:
      summary: Extracted from 'View Claim' workflow
      parameters:
        - name: id
          in: path
          required: true
          schema:
            type: string
      responses:
        '200':
          description: Successful response
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/Claim'

By generating these contracts, your backend team can build modern wrappers (BFF - Backend for Frontend) while the frontend team works with mocked data. This parallelization is what shrinks an 18-month timeline into weeks.

Security and Compliance in Regulated Industries#

For Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, "cloud-only" is often a dealbreaker. Modernization tools must respect the data gravity of these industries.

Replay is built for these constraints:

• •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Ensuring that even during extraction, PII/PHI is handled according to federal standards.
• •On-Premise Availability: In highly secure environments (like defense or core banking), Replay can run entirely within your VPC, ensuring no code or metadata ever leaves your perimeter.
• •Technical Debt Audit: Replay provides a comprehensive audit trail of what was moved, what was changed, and why, satisfying internal compliance and risk departments.

The Future: From Black Box to Documented Codebase#

The goal of modernization isn't just to have a "new" app—it's to ensure you never end up in the "legacy trap" again.

When you use Replay, the output isn't just code; it's an entire ecosystem of documentation. The Library (Design System) ensures UI consistency, Flows provide a visual map of your architecture, and Blueprints allow for rapid iteration in a visual editor.

You are effectively moving from a "Document-lite" culture to a "Document-by-default" culture.

Step-by-Step: Your First 30 Days with Replay#

Step 1: Inventory & Assessment#

Identify your most problematic legacy application. Use Replay’s technical debt audit to find screens with the highest complexity and lowest documentation.

Step 2: Workflow Recording#

Have your power users record the core business processes. This creates the "Source of Truth" in the Replay Library.

Step 3: Component Extraction & Mapping#

Use the Replay AI to map legacy elements to your modern React component library. If a component doesn't exist, Replay generates it.

Step 4: API & Test Generation#

Export the generated OpenAPI specs and Playwright/Cypress E2E tests. This ensures that your new system is functionally identical to the old one.

Step 5: Deployment & Validation#

Deploy the modernized screens using a side-by-side or Strangler Fig approach. Use the extracted E2E tests to validate that no regressions were introduced.

📝 Note: UI Extraction doesn't mean you ignore the backend. It means you decouple the frontend modernization from the backend migration, allowing you to deliver value to users months earlier.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take?#

While a manual rewrite takes roughly 40 hours per screen, Replay reduces this to approximately 4 hours. For a standard 50-screen enterprise module, you can move from discovery to a functional React prototype in less than 15 business days.

What about business logic preservation?#

This is the core advantage of UI Extraction vs manual coding. Because Replay records the runtime behavior, it captures the "hidden" logic—the validation rules, the conditional formatting, and the state transitions—that are often missed in a code-level refactor.

Does Replay work with "thick client" or terminal apps?#

Replay is optimized for web-based legacy systems (ASP.NET, JSP, Silverlight, GWT, Flex, jQuery). For terminal-based systems, we recommend a two-stage approach: first exposing the terminal as a web-view, then using Replay for extraction.

Can we use our own Design System?#

Yes. Replay’s AI Automation Suite can be trained on your specific library (Material UI, Tailwind, or a custom internal system). It will attempt to map extracted legacy components to your existing library components first before generating new ones.

Conclusion: Understanding Over Rewriting#

The future of enterprise architecture isn't about writing more code; it's about better understanding the code you already have. The "Big Bang" rewrite is a relic of an era where we had more time than technical debt. In 2025, speed is the only currency that matters.

By choosing UI Extraction over traditional refactoring, you aren't just modernizing a system—you are future-proofing your organization. You are turning a black box into a documented, componentized, and tested codebase in a fraction of the time.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.