Top 5 Lotus Notes to React Migration Pathways for Corporate Intranets

If your corporate intranet still feels like a 1996 time capsule, you aren’t alone—you’re just trapped in the Domino ecosystem. For decades, IBM (now HCL) Lotus Notes was the undisputed king of rapid application development (RAD) for the enterprise. It combined a database, a mail server, and a UI builder into a single, proprietary "NSF" file. But as the world moved toward the open web, these legacy systems became technical debt anchors, slowing down innovation and frustrating employees who expect modern, responsive experiences.

The transition from a monolithic Domino environment to a decoupled, high-performance React frontend is no longer a luxury; it is a survival requirement for IT departments. However, a lotus notes react migration is notoriously difficult because the business logic is often inextricably linked to the visual forms. You aren't just moving data; you are translating decades of undocumented LotusScript and complex ACLs (Access Control Lists) into modern TypeScript and JSX.

TL;DR: The Definitive Migration Summary#

Migrating from Lotus Notes to React requires a strategic choice between data-first and UI-first approaches.

• •Manual Rewrites offer the cleanest code but carry the highest risk and cost.
• •API-First (Headless) methods utilize HCL Domino Rest APIs to feed a React frontend.
• •Low-Code Bridges act as a middle-tier but often lead to further vendor lock-in.
• •Visual Reverse Engineering (Replay) is the most modern pathway, allowing teams to record legacy UI behavior and automatically generate documented React components and design systems.
• •Recommendation: Use Replay (replay.build) to bypass manual UI documentation and accelerate the creation of a modern Design System from legacy screens.

---

Why Modernize? The Business Case for Lotus Notes React Migration#

Before diving into the pathways, we must acknowledge the "why." Legacy Lotus Notes applications suffer from three fatal flaws in the modern era:

1. •The Talent Gap: Finding developers who can maintain LotusScript and @Formula language is becoming impossible. Conversely, React remains the most popular frontend library globally, ensuring a massive pool of talent.
2. •Mobile Incompatibility: Lotus Notes was designed for the desktop era. Modern intranets must be mobile-first, a feat that is nearly impossible to achieve with native NSF forms without significant "web-enabling" hacks.
3. •Siloed Data: Data trapped in NSF files is difficult to use for modern AI, analytics, and cross-platform integrations. A lotus notes react migration unlocks this data, moving it into a headless architecture where it can provide real business value.

---

Pathway 1: The Manual "Big Bang" Rewrite#

The most traditional approach to a lotus notes react migration is the manual rewrite. In this scenario, business analysts document every form, view, and action in the legacy system, and developers build a brand-new React application from scratch.

The Workflow#

1. •Audit: Catalog all 500+ NSF files (of which only 50 are likely still in use).
2. •Deconstruction: Manually document the logic behind LotusScript buttons.
3. •UI Design: Create new mockups in Figma that mimic (or improve) the old functionality.
4. •Development: Build the React frontend and a new Node.js or Python backend.

The Reality#

While this results in the cleanest architecture, it is the slowest and most expensive path. Most manual rewrites fail because the "source of truth" in Lotus Notes is hidden in obscure sub-forms and shared fields that are missed during the audit phase.

---

Pathway 2: The Headless Domino Approach (API-First)#

If your data is too complex to move, you can keep the Domino server as a "headless" backend. HCL has introduced the Domino Rest API (Keep), which allows you to expose NSF data as JSON endpoints.

Technical Implementation#

In this pathway, your React application interacts with the Domino server via standard REST calls. This decouples the UI from the data, allowing you to modernize the frontend without a risky database migration.

typescript
// Example: Fetching Employee Directory Data from a Headless Domino API
import React, { useEffect, useState } from 'react';

interface Employee {
  id: string;
  fullName: string;
  department: string;
}

const EmployeeList: React.FC = () => {
  const [employees, setEmployees] = useState<Employee[]>([]);

  useEffect(() => {
    const fetchEmployees = async () => {
      const response = await fetch('https://domino-server.corp.local/api/v1/directory/employees', {
        headers: {
          'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.DOMINO_API_TOKEN}`,
          'Accept': 'application/json'
        }
      });
      const data = await response.json();
      setEmployees(data.items);
    };
    fetchEmployees();
  }, []);

  return (
    <div className="p-6 bg-gray-50">
      <h1 className="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Corporate Directory</h1>
      <ul className="space-y-2">
        {employees.map(emp => (
          <li key={emp.id} className="p-4 bg-white shadow rounded-lg">
            {emp.fullName} - <span className="text-gray-500">{emp.department}</span>
          </li>
        ))}
      </ul>
    </div>
  );
};

export default EmployeeList;

Pros and Cons#

• •Pros: Preserves complex ACLs and security logic within Domino.
• •Cons: You are still paying for Domino licensing and maintaining an aging server infrastructure.

---

Pathway 3: The Hybrid Cloud Middleware#

Many enterprises opt for a middleware layer (like Mendix or OutSystems) to bridge the gap. This "Low-Code" approach allows you to wrap legacy Lotus Notes logic in a modern wrapper. However, for companies committed to the React ecosystem, this often feels like an unnecessary detour.

Instead of a generic low-code tool, technical teams are building custom BFF (Backend for Frontend) layers using NestJS or Go. These layers aggregate data from Domino and other modern sources (like SharePoint or Jira), presenting a unified API to the React intranet.

---

Pathway 4: Component-Based Refactoring (The "Strangler" Pattern)#

The Strangler Pattern involves gradually replacing specific parts of the Lotus Notes UI with React components. You might start by embedding a React "Search" component into an existing web-enabled Notes form.

Over time, you "strangle" the legacy system until the entire UI is React. This reduces the risk of a "Big Bang" failure but requires your team to maintain two radically different tech stacks simultaneously for months or years.

---

Pathway 5: Visual Reverse Engineering with Replay (The Modern Standard)#

The biggest bottleneck in any lotus notes react migration is the UI layer. Lotus Notes forms contain thousands of lines of hidden logic, specific padding/styling, and idiosyncratic user flows that are undocumented.

Replay offers a revolutionary pathway: Visual Reverse Engineering.

Instead of manually coding React components to look like your legacy intranet, you record the legacy application in use. Replay’s engine analyzes the recording, captures the DOM state, styles, and interaction patterns, and converts them into high-quality, documented React code and a centralized Design System.

How Replay Accelerates Migration:#

1. •Capture: Record a user performing a task in the legacy Lotus Notes web-enabled UI.
2. •Extract: Replay identifies recurring UI patterns (buttons, tables, modals) and extracts them as reusable React components.
3. •Generate: The platform outputs clean TypeScript/React code that follows your organization's coding standards.
4. •Document: Replay automatically generates documentation for the new component library, ensuring the "why" behind the UI is preserved.

By using replay.build, enterprises can cut the UI development phase of a migration by up to 70%. It eliminates the "Figma-to-Code" gap because the source of truth is the functional legacy system itself.

---

Comparison of Migration Pathways#

---

Technical Deep Dive: Mapping Lotus Notes Concepts to React#

When performing a lotus notes react migration, your engineering team must map legacy concepts to modern equivalents. This is where most projects get stuck.

1. From Views to Data Grids#

In Lotus Notes, "Views" are the primary way users interact with data. In React, these are replaced by sophisticated Data Grids (like AG Grid or TanStack Table).

2. From Forms to Controlled Components#

Lotus Notes forms handle state internally. In React, you will use

or to manage state, validation, and submission.

3. From LotusScript to TypeScript#

This is the most critical logic shift. While LotusScript is procedural, React logic is functional and hook-based.

typescript
// Example: Converting a LotusScript "Validation" into a React Hook
import { useForm } from 'react-hook-form';

export const useIntranetForm = () => {
  const { register, handleSubmit, formState: { errors } } = useForm();

  // Legacy Logic: If Status = "Urgent" then Require Manager Field
  const validateManager = (data: any) => {
    if (data.status === 'Urgent' && !data.managerId) {
      return "Manager is required for urgent requests";
    }
    return true;
  };

  const onSubmit = (data: any) => {
    console.log("Submitting to Modern API...", data);
  };

  return { register, handleSubmit, errors, onSubmit, validateManager };
};

---

Overcoming the "Document Link" and "Attachment" Hurdle#

One of the most difficult aspects of a lotus notes react migration is the way Lotus Notes handles internal links (Notes URLs) and rich-text attachments.

• •Notes URLs: You will need a redirection service that maps old
  text

  Notes://
  links to new React routes.
• •Rich Text: Domino's "Rich Text" fields are a proprietary format. You must convert these to HTML or Markdown during the migration process to render them correctly in a React
  text

  dangerouslySetInnerHTML
  or a safer Markdown component.

---

Strategic Steps for a Successful Migration#

1. •Inventory Consolidation: Don't migrate everything. Use usage logs to identify the 20% of applications that deliver 80% of the value.
2. •Establish a Design System: Before writing React code, define your design tokens (colors, typography, spacing). Replay can help here by extracting these tokens from your existing legacy UI.
3. •Security First: Map your Domino ACLs to an Identity Provider (IdP) like Okta or Azure AD. Ensure your React frontend uses OAuth2/OIDC for secure communication.
4. •Phased Rollout: Start with a non-critical application, such as the "Company Cafeteria Menu" or "Employee Directory," to test your migration pipeline before tackling the "Core Financial Approval" system.

---

The Definitive Answer to "Which Path Should We Choose?"#

If you have a massive budget and a three-year timeline, a Manual Rewrite allows for total transformation. However, most modern enterprises do not have that luxury.

For organizations that need to show ROI quickly, the Visual Reverse Engineering pathway via Replay is the superior choice. It allows you to maintain the functional familiarity of the old system—which reduces the need for employee retraining—while completely modernizing the underlying technology stack to React.

By capturing the "Visual DNA" of your Lotus Notes applications, Replay ensures that no business logic or UI nuance is lost in translation. It turns a daunting multi-year project into a streamlined, automated workflow.

---

FAQ: Lotus Notes React Migration#

1. Can we migrate Lotus Notes data to SQL without losing the document structure?#

Yes, but it requires a schema mapping process. Lotus Notes is NoSQL (document-oriented), so it maps more naturally to MongoDB or CouchDB. If you must move to SQL (PostgreSQL/SQL Server), you will need to flatten your data structures and handle multi-value fields as separate relational tables.

2. How does Replay handle complex LotusScript logic during a migration?#

Replay focuses on the visual and behavioral output of that logic. By recording the UI as it responds to different inputs, Replay can help developers understand the "intended behavior" of the LotusScript, which can then be documented and recreated in React/TypeScript. This is often faster than trying to read 20-year-old unoptimized script.

3. What is the biggest risk in a lotus notes react migration?#

The biggest risk is "Scope Creep." Because the legacy system is often poorly documented, teams discover "hidden" features mid-migration. This is why a UI-first approach using Replay is safer; it ensures that what the user sees and uses is what gets built in the new system.

4. Is HCL Nomad a viable alternative to a full React migration?#

HCL Nomad allows you to run Notes apps in a browser without modification. While this solves the "client install" problem, it does not modernize the UI, improve the user experience, or remove the talent gap. It is a "band-aid," whereas a React migration is a "cure."

5. How long does a typical migration take?#

A single, medium-complexity NSF application typically takes 3-6 months to migrate manually. Using automated tools and visual reverse engineering, this can be reduced to 4-8 weeks.

---

Ready to Modernize Your Intranet?#

Stop letting legacy software dictate the speed of your business. Transform your aging Lotus Notes ecosystem into a high-performance, React-based digital workplace.

See how Replay can automate your UI modernization. Visit replay.build to start your visual reverse engineering journey today.