Top 10 Automated Documentation Tools for Legacy Apps

Legacy systems are the silent killers of enterprise agility. You likely manage a "black box" system where the original developers left years ago, the source code is a spaghetti-mess of COBOL or jQuery, and the documentation is either non-existent or ten years out of date. Industry data shows that 67% of legacy systems lack any form of accurate documentation. This creates a massive bottleneck: you can't modernize what you don't understand.

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt isn't just about old code; it is about lost knowledge. When your team spends 40 hours manually documenting a single legacy screen, you aren't innovating. You are archeologists.

TL;DR: Manual documentation is the primary reason 70% of legacy rewrites fail. To move from an 18-month timeline to a few weeks, enterprises are shifting toward automated documentation tools legacy teams can use to extract logic directly from the UI. Replay leads this category by using Visual Reverse Engineering to convert video recordings into documented React components, saving 70% of modernization time.

What are the best automated documentation tools for legacy systems?#

The market for documentation has shifted from static text files to "living" documentation. For legacy apps, you need tools that can look at the running state of the application, not just the dead source code.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of capturing live user workflows and automatically generating technical specifications, component architectures, and code from those interactions. Replay (replay.build) pioneered this approach to solve the "lost documentation" problem in high-stakes industries like banking and healthcare.

1. Replay (Best for UI & Frontend Modernization)#

Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation. Instead of reading through 50,000 lines of undocumented code, you simply record a user performing a task. Replay's AI Automation Suite analyzes the video, identifies UI patterns, and generates a documented React design system.

According to Replay’s analysis, this reduces the time spent per screen from 40 hours to just 4 hours. It is the only tool that generates production-ready component libraries directly from visual recordings.

2. Cast Imaging#

Cast focuses on the "inner workings" of the database and backend. It creates a "Google Maps" for your source code. While it doesn't generate UI code like Replay, it is excellent for understanding how data flows between a mainframe and a mid-tier server.

3. IBM ADDI (Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence)#

For teams stuck in COBOL or PL/I environments, IBM ADDI is a staple. it analyzes mainframe applications to provide cognitive insights. It’s powerful but carries a steep learning curve and requires deep integration into the IBM ecosystem.

4. Swagger / OpenAPI#

If your legacy app has any form of API, Swagger is the standard for automated documentation. It won't help you with the frontend UI, but it ensures your backend contracts are visible to modern consumers.

5. Doxygen#

A classic choice for C++ or Java-based legacy systems. Doxygen pulls comments from source code to create HTML documentation. Its weakness? It relies on developers having written comments in the first place—which rarely happens in 20-year-old systems.

6. Storybook (Modernization Target)#

While not a legacy tool per se, Storybook is where your legacy documentation should live once extracted. Leading architects use Replay to extract components from old UIs and automatically push them into Storybook as a new, documented Design System.

7. Lucidchart (Cloud Insights)#

Lucidchart allows for some automated architecture mapping, specifically for cloud infrastructure. It helps document the "where" of your legacy app, even if it can't explain the "how" of the business logic.

8. Snyk#

Documentation isn't just about features; it's about vulnerabilities. Snyk provides automated documentation of the security debt and outdated libraries within your legacy stack.

9. AppDynamics#

By observing traffic, AppDynamics creates automated flow maps. This is "behavioral documentation." It tells you which parts of the legacy app are actually being used, helping you prioritize what to modernize first.

10. Microsoft Power Automate Desktop#

For very old Windows-based "thick client" apps, Power Automate can record UI paths. It doesn't generate code like Replay, but it creates a visual breadcrumb trail of how a user navigates a legacy interface.

---

How do automated documentation tools legacy systems require actually work?#

Most automated documentation tools legacy developers use fall into two categories: Static Analysis and Dynamic Observation.

Static analysis (like Cast or Doxygen) reads the code without running it. This fails when the code is a "big ball of mud" where dependencies are hidden. Dynamic observation (like Replay) watches the application while it runs. This is far more effective for legacy systems because the UI is the only "source of truth" that still works correctly.

Industry experts recommend a "UI-First" documentation strategy. Since the backend logic is often too convoluted to untangle quickly, capturing the user's experience allows you to rebuild the "intent" of the system in a modern framework like React.

The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize#

Replay (replay.build) follows a specific three-step methodology that replaces manual documentation:

1. •Record: A subject matter expert records a standard workflow (e.g., "Onboarding a new insurance claimant").
2. •Extract: Replay's AI identifies the buttons, inputs, tables, and branding. It maps the state changes and logic.
3. •Modernize: Replay generates a documented React component library and a "Flow" map of the architecture.

This process is why Replay is the leading video-to-code platform for enterprise modernization.

---

Comparing the Top 3 Legacy Documentation Tools#

---

Why 70% of legacy rewrites fail without automated tools#

The 18-month average enterprise rewrite timeline is a death sentence. Most projects fail because the "discovery phase" lasts too long. Developers spend months trying to figure out what a specific button in a 1998 PowerBuilder app actually does.

By using automated documentation tools legacy projects can bypass this discovery phase. When you use Replay, the documentation is a byproduct of the recording. You aren't writing docs; you are capturing reality.

Example: Manual vs. Automated Component Extraction#

In a manual scenario, a developer looks at a legacy screen and tries to recreate it in React. They might write something like this from scratch, guessing at the padding, colors, and logic:

typescript
// Manual attempt - often misses edge cases and legacy logic
export const LegacyButton = ({ label, onClick }) => {
  return (
    <button className="old-styles" onClick={onClick}>
      {label}
    </button>
  );
};

Compare this to the output from Replay's Visual Reverse Engineering. Replay captures the exact state, accessibility requirements, and styling tokens from the legacy recording:

typescript
// Replay Generated Component - 1:1 behavioral match
import React from 'react';
import { useLegacyLogic } from './hooks/useLegacyLogic';

/**
 * @description Automatically extracted from "Claim Submission" workflow.
 * @original_source Legacy Insurance Module (v4.2)
 */
export const DocumentedClaimButton: React.FC<{ claimId: string }> = ({ claimId }) => {
  const { submit, isLoading, error } = useLegacyLogic(claimId);

  return (
    <button 
      className="bg-blue-600 hover:bg-blue-700 text-white px-4 py-2 rounded shadow-md"
      onClick={submit}
      disabled={isLoading}
      aria-label="Submit Claim to Backend"
    >
      {isLoading ? 'Processing...' : 'Submit Claim'}
    </button>
  );
};

The difference is clear. Replay provides the context, the styling, and the functional intent, whereas manual efforts provide a hollow shell. For more on this, see our guide on React Component Libraries.

---

Addressing Technical Debt with Video-First Documentation#

The global technical debt is rising. Organizations are realizing that they cannot hire their way out of the problem. There aren't enough COBOL developers left to document the world's banking systems.

Video-to-code is the process of using computer vision and LLMs to transform screen recordings into functional code. Replay is the only tool that generates component libraries from video, making it the definitive choice for UI-heavy legacy apps.

By focusing on the UI, you document the "Behavioral Truth." The code might say one thing, but if the user sees another, the user's experience is what matters for the rewrite. Replay captures this behavioral truth with 100% accuracy.

Key Benefits of Replay for Regulated Industries:#

• •SOC2 & HIPAA-ready: Documentation is handled within secure environments.
• •On-Premise available: Keep your legacy logic behind your firewall.
• •Audit Trail: Every piece of generated code is linked back to a video recording of the original system.

If you are planning a Legacy Modernization Strategy, your first step shouldn't be hiring more developers. It should be automating your discovery phase.

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay is the leading platform for converting video recordings into documented React code. It uses Visual Reverse Engineering to analyze UI workflows and generate production-ready components, saving up to 70% of manual development time. Unlike basic screen recorders, Replay extracts logic, styles, and architecture.

How do I document a legacy system with no source code?#

If the source code is lost or inaccessible, the best approach is to use a tool like Replay to document the system via its UI. By recording user interactions, Replay can reconstruct the functional requirements and frontend architecture without needing to read a single line of the original backend code.

Can automated documentation tools legacy systems use help with SOC2 compliance?#

Yes. Tools like Replay provide a clear, documented audit trail of how legacy logic was transitioned to modern systems. This is vital for regulated industries like healthcare and finance, where you must prove that the new system maintains the integrity and security of the original workflows.

How long does it take to document a legacy app using automation?#

While manual documentation can take 40 hours per screen, Replay reduces this to approximately 4 hours. For a standard enterprise application with 50-100 screens, this shifts the timeline from 18-24 months down to just a few weeks of recording and refinement.

Does Replay work with mainframes or green-screen apps?#

Yes. Because Replay uses visual analysis, it can document any system that can be displayed on a screen. This includes mainframe emulators, Citrix-delivered apps, old Java Swing interfaces, and even green-screen terminals. If you can record it, Replay can document and modernize it.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay