Back to Blog
February 17, 2026 min readsource code truth fallacy

The "Source Code is Truth" Fallacy: Why Runtime Behavior is the Only Reliable Metric

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

The "Source Code is Truth" Fallacy: Why Runtime Behavior is the Only Reliable Metric

Your source code is lying to you. In the world of enterprise modernization, there is a dangerous assumption that the original repository—often a sprawling monolith of COBOL, JSP, or Silverlight—contains the definitive blueprint for how a system functions. This is the source code truth fallacy.

The reality is that for any system older than five years, the source code is often a historical record of intent, not a map of current reality. Between undocumented patches, environment-specific hacks, and dead code paths that haven't been triggered since 2012, relying solely on static analysis to guide a rewrite is the fastest way to join the 70% of legacy modernization projects that fail or exceed their timelines.

TL;DR: The source code truth fallacy is the mistaken belief that a legacy system's static code is the ultimate authority for modernization. In reality, 67% of legacy systems lack accurate documentation, and the code often contains "dark logic" that never runs. To modernize efficiently, architects must shift focus to runtime behavior—what the user actually sees and does. Replay automates this by converting video recordings of user workflows into production-ready React components, reducing the average time per screen from 40 hours to just 4 hours.

The Anatomy of the Source Code Truth Fallacy#

Enterprise architects frequently fall into the trap of thinking that if they just have the source, they have the requirements. This is a foundational error. According to Replay's analysis, static source code in legacy environments is often decoupled from actual business logic due to years of "drifting."

The source code truth fallacy ignores three critical factors:

  1. Dead Code Bloat: Large portions of the codebase may be entirely unreachable, yet developers spend weeks trying to port it to a new architecture.
  2. External Dependencies: Legacy systems often rely on undocumented side effects from database triggers or OS-level configurations that aren't visible in the application code.
  3. The Documentation Gap: With 67% of legacy systems lacking documentation, the "why" behind specific code blocks is lost to time.

When you attempt to rewrite based on these "lies," you inherit the technical debt of the past without the context of the present. This contributes heavily to the $3.6 trillion global technical debt crisis facing modern enterprises.

Why Runtime Behavior is the Only Reliable Metric#

If the code is a lie, the runtime is the truth. What a user sees on their screen and how the system responds to their inputs represents the actual business value of the software. This is where Visual Reverse Engineering comes into play.

Video-to-code is the process of capturing the live execution of a legacy application and programmatically translating those visual states and interactions into modern code structures. By focusing on the runtime, you bypass the source code truth fallacy entirely. You aren't modernizing what the developer wrote twenty years ago; you are modernizing what the user needs today.

Comparing Modernization Approaches#

FeatureManual Static AnalysisAutomated Rewrite ToolsReplay (Visual Reverse Engineering)
Primary Data SourceDead Source CodeAbstract Syntax TreesLive Runtime Behavior
Documentation Accuracy33% (Estimated)50% (Code-only)100% (Visual Truth)
Average Time Per Screen40 Hours15-20 Hours4 Hours
Risk of RegressionHighMediumLow
Timeline for Enterprise18-24 Months12-18 MonthsWeeks/Months

Industry experts recommend that instead of a "lift and shift" of old code, teams should adopt a "capture and recreate" model. This is where Replay excels, turning 18-month timelines into mere weeks.

The Technical Debt of Static Analysis#

When you follow the source code truth fallacy, you are essentially performing an archeological dig. You find a function like the one below in an old JSP or .NET WebForms application:

typescript
// Legacy "Truth" - A mess of global state and undocumented conditions function processOrder_Final_v2_DEPRECATED(order: any) { if (globalConfig.isLegacyMode && order.status === 'PENDING') { // Why is this here? Nobody knows. if (new Date().getDay() === 7) return; doLegacyCalculation(order); } // 500 lines of spaghetti follow... updateDatabase(order); }

If you try to port this manually, you might spend days trying to understand if

text
globalConfig.isLegacyMode
is even still used. In contrast, by recording the runtime behavior, Replay identifies that in 10,000 real-world sessions, that specific block never executes. The resulting modern React component is clean, functional, and focused solely on what matters.

Transforming Runtime into Modern React#

By observing the runtime, we can generate clean, modular code. Here is an example of what a component looks like when generated via the Replay AI Automation Suite:

tsx
import React from 'react'; import { useOrderProcessing } from './hooks/useOrderProcessing'; import { OrderDetails } from './components/OrderDetails'; /** * Modernized Order Component * Generated via Replay Visual Reverse Engineering * Focuses on runtime-validated business logic. */ export const OrderProcessor: React.FC<{ orderId: string }> = ({ orderId }) => { const { data, loading, error, submitOrder } = useOrderProcessing(orderId); if (loading) return <SkeletonLoader />; if (error) return <ErrorMessage message="Failed to load order logic." />; return ( <div className="p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow-sm"> <h2 className="text-xl font-bold mb-4">Order Review</h2> <OrderDetails order={data} /> <button onClick={() => submitOrder(data)} className="mt-4 px-4 py-2 bg-blue-600 text-white rounded hover:bg-blue-700" > Complete Transaction </button> </div> ); };

This shift from "reading the past" to "recording the present" is the cornerstone of Modernizing Legacy Systems.

Breaking the Fallacy in Regulated Industries#

The source code truth fallacy is particularly dangerous in sectors like Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government. In these environments, compliance is everything. If you rewrite a system based on old code and miss a "hidden" runtime validation that was added directly to the production environment years ago, you risk massive regulatory fines.

Replay is built for these high-stakes environments. It is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, offering on-premise deployment options. By capturing the actual UI behavior, you ensure that the modernized version maintains the exact compliance guardrails present in the legacy runtime, even if those guardrails were never properly documented in the original source.

The Cost of the Fallacy#

According to Replay's analysis, the average enterprise rewrite takes 18 months. During that time:

  • $1.2M is spent on developer salaries per team.
  • The business loses 18 months of feature parity.
  • Technical debt continues to accrue at the edges.

By using Replay's Flows and Blueprints, teams can document their architecture as they record it. This eliminates the "black box" problem of legacy systems. Instead of guessing how a multi-step insurance claim form works by reading 10,000 lines of COBOL, you simply record a claims adjuster completing the task. Replay then generates the documented React components and the architectural flow.

Implementing a Runtime-First Strategy#

To move past the source code truth fallacy, enterprise architects should follow a three-step implementation plan:

1. Identify the "Critical Path" Workflows#

Don't try to modernize everything at once. Use runtime data to identify the 20% of screens that handle 80% of the user traffic. These are your candidates for Visual Reverse Engineering.

2. Record, Don't Read#

Stop assigning senior developers to read old code. Instead, have subject matter experts (SMEs) record themselves performing standard business operations. Use Replay to turn these recordings into a documented Design System and Component Library.

3. Validate Against Reality#

Compare the output of your new React components against the legacy runtime. Because Replay uses the visual state as the source of truth, the parity between the old and new systems is virtually guaranteed.

The Future of Modernization: Beyond Static Analysis#

The source code truth fallacy is a relic of an era where we lacked the compute power to analyze runtime behavior at scale. Today, with AI-driven automation and visual processing, we no longer need to be historians to be developers.

By focusing on the runtime, we address the $3.6 trillion technical debt problem head-on. We move from an average of 40 hours per screen to 4 hours. We move from 18-month timelines to a few weeks of recording and refinement. We move from guessing to knowing.

Visual Reverse Engineering isn't just a shortcut; it's a more accurate way to build software. It acknowledges that the ultimate "truth" of any application isn't what is sitting in a Git repository—it's what happens when a user clicks a button.

Frequently Asked Questions#

Does Replay require access to my legacy source code?#

No. Replay operates on the runtime behavior of your application. By recording the UI and the data flows during a live session, Replay can generate modern React code and design systems without ever needing to see your original, often messy, source code. This bypasses the source code truth fallacy entirely.

How does Replay handle complex business logic that isn't visible in the UI?#

While Replay focuses on the visual runtime, it also captures the network requests and state changes that occur during a session. This allows the AI Automation Suite to infer the underlying logic. For extremely complex back-end calculations, Replay provides a clean interface to hook into your existing APIs or microservices.

Is Replay secure enough for Healthcare or Financial Services?#

Yes. Replay is built for regulated industries. We are SOC2 compliant and HIPAA-ready. For organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements, we offer on-premise deployments that ensure your data never leaves your secure environment.

What is the learning curve for a team using Replay?#

Most teams are productive within days. Since Replay generates standard React code and uses popular libraries like Tailwind CSS or Material UI, your developers can immediately begin working with the output. The shift is primarily in the workflow: recording sessions instead of manually auditing old codebases.

Can Replay generate a full Design System from my legacy app?#

Yes. One of Replay's core features is the Library. As you record different parts of your legacy application, Replay identifies recurring UI patterns and automatically organizes them into a centralized Design System and Component Library, ensuring consistency across your new modern stack.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free