The most expensive phase of a legacy migration isn’t the coding—it’s the archaeology.
In the corridors of Fortune 500 enterprises, there is a recurring nightmare known as the "Discovery Phase." It is a period where highly-paid architects spend 12 to 18 months digging through undocumented COBOL, ancient Java Server Pages (JSP), or convoluted .NET monoliths just to understand what the system actually does. This is the Migration Paradox: the effort to plan a rewrite often consumes more time and budget than the rewrite itself, yet 70% of these projects still fail or exceed their timelines.
We are currently sitting on a $3.6 trillion global technical debt pile. Most organizations attempt to solve this by throwing more Jira tickets at the problem. They believe that if they just document the "as-is" state long enough, the "to-be" state will manifest. They are wrong.
TL;DR: The Migration Paradox occurs when manual discovery and documentation take longer than the actual migration; Replay breaks this cycle by using visual reverse engineering to turn user workflows into documented React code in days, not years.
The Archaeology Trap: Why 67% of Systems Lack Documentation#
The primary reason migrations stall is a lack of institutional knowledge. In industries like Financial Services and Insurance, the original authors of core systems have often retired or left. This leaves the current engineering team with a "black box."
When you attempt a "Big Bang" rewrite of a black box, you aren't just writing new code; you are performing a forensic investigation. You are trying to figure out why a specific validation rule exists on page 42 of a loan application. If you miss that rule, the new system is "broken" on arrival.
The Cost of Manual Discovery#
| Approach | Timeline | Risk | Cost | Documentation Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Bang Rewrite | 18-24 months | High (70% fail) | $$$$ | Often outdated by launch |
| Strangler Fig | 12-18 months | Medium | $$$ | Fragmented |
| Replay (Visual Extraction) | 2-8 weeks | Low | $ | Automated & Synchronized |
Manual reverse engineering takes an average of 40 hours per screen. This includes interviewing users, reading legacy code, mapping database schemas, and writing requirements. With Replay, that time is compressed to 4 hours per screen. We aren't just making developers faster; we are removing the need for them to be historians.
Breaking the Paradox with Visual Reverse Engineering#
The future of modernization isn't rewriting from scratch—it's understanding what you already have through the lens of the user.
At Replay, we advocate for Video as the Source of Truth. Instead of reading 10,000 lines of spaghetti code, we record a real user performing a workflow. Our AI-powered engine then deconstructs that recording into its constituent parts: the UI components, the business logic, the API contracts, and the state transitions.
From Black Box to Documented Codebase#
When we record a legacy workflow, Replay doesn't just "take a video." It captures the DOM state, the network calls, and the user interactions. It then generates a modern equivalent.
Here is an example of what Replay extracts from a legacy enterprise form—turning an undocumented mess into a clean, type-safe React component:
typescript// Example: Generated React component from Replay Visual Extraction // Source: Legacy Insurance Claims Portal (circa 2004) import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import { Button, Input, Alert } from '@/components/ui'; // From Replay Library interface ClaimData { policyNumber: string; incidentDate: string; claimAmount: number; } export function ModernizedClaimForm({ initialData }: { initialData?: ClaimData }) { const [formData, setFormData] = useState<ClaimData>(initialData || { policyNumber: '', incidentDate: '', claimAmount: 0 }); // Business logic preserved from legacy network trace: // Rule: Claims > $5000 require secondary adjuster ID (Field ID: 402) const requiresSecondaryApproval = formData.claimAmount > 5000; return ( <div className="space-y-4 p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow"> <h2 className="text-xl font-bold">Submit New Claim</h2> <Input label="Policy Number" value={formData.policyNumber} onChange={(e) => setFormData({...formData, policyNumber: e.target.value})} /> {requiresSecondaryApproval && ( <Alert variant="warning"> Note: This claim exceeds $5,000 and will require manual adjuster review. </Alert> )} <Button onClick={() => console.log("Submitting...", formData)}> Submit Claim </Button> </div> ); }
💡 Pro Tip: Don't try to fix business logic errors during the extraction phase. First, achieve functional parity by documenting the "as-is" state. Once you have a modern React component and a clean API contract, then you can optimize.
The Three Pillars of Modernization Without Rewriting#
To solve the Migration Paradox, we focus on three core outputs that traditionally take months to produce manually.
1. The Library (Design System)#
Most legacy systems have inconsistent UI. Replay identifies recurring patterns across your legacy screens and aggregates them into a unified Design System. This ensures that the modernized application isn't just a clone of the old one, but a consistent, accessible (WCAG compliant) experience.
2. The Flows (Architecture)#
Understanding how data moves from Page A to Page B is where most rewrites fail. Replay generates visual architecture maps based on actual user behavior. If a user consistently jumps from the "Customer Search" to the "Billing History," Replay documents that flow and generates the corresponding React Router paths and state management logic.
3. The Blueprints (AI Automation)#
This is where the heavy lifting happens. Replay’s AI Automation Suite generates:
- •API Contracts: Swagger/OpenAPI specs derived from legacy network traffic.
- •E2E Tests: Playwright or Cypress tests that mirror the recorded user path.
- •Technical Debt Audit: A clear report on which parts of the legacy logic are redundant.
⚠️ Warning: The "Lift and Shift" approach rarely works for the cloud. If you move a messy monolith to AWS, you just have an expensive, messy monolith in the cloud. You must extract the logic, not just the hosting.
Step-by-Step: The Replay Modernization Workflow#
We’ve seen enterprises move from a "frozen" state to a "deployed" state in weeks by following this structured approach.
Step 1: Record the Workflow#
A subject matter expert (SME) performs the task in the legacy system. No code access is required at this stage. Replay captures every click, hover, and data entry point.
Step 2: Visual Deconstruction#
Replay’s engine analyzes the recording. It identifies that a specific table is actually a "Data Grid" and a specific dropdown is a "Multi-select Search." It maps these to your target Design System.
Step 3: Contract Generation#
While the UI is being deconstructed, Replay listens to the "chatter" between the frontend and the backend. It generates a clean API contract.
json// Generated API Contract from Replay Extraction { "endpoint": "/api/v1/claims/validate", "method": "POST", "headers": { "Content-Type": "application/json", "X-Legacy-Session": "Required" }, "requestBody": { "policy_id": "string", "amount": "float", "date": "ISO-8601" }, "validationRules": [ "amount_must_be_positive", "date_cannot_be_future" ] }
Step 4: Component Export#
The developer receives a documented React component, complete with Tailwind CSS styling and logic hooks. What would have taken 40 hours of manual coding and testing is delivered in a ready-to-refine state.
Step 5: Technical Debt Audit#
Replay highlights "dead" logic—code paths that were never triggered during the recordings. This allows architects to prune the codebase, reducing the $3.6 trillion debt one module at a time.
💰 ROI Insight: One global bank reduced their modernization timeline for a core banking portal from 24 months to 4 months using Replay, saving an estimated $2.2M in developer hours and avoiding the "failed rewrite" trap.
Why the "Big Bang" is Dead#
The Big Bang rewrite is a relic of the waterfall era. In a regulated environment—be it Healthcare (HIPAA) or Government—you cannot afford to have a system "dark" for two years while you rebuild it.
The Migration Paradox proves that the longer you spend in the dark, the less likely you are to ever see the light. By using Replay to extract and document in real-time, you turn the modernization process into a continuous delivery stream. You can migrate one flow, one screen, or one service at a time, with full confidence that the business logic is preserved.
Frequently Asked Questions#
How does Replay handle complex business logic hidden in the backend?#
Replay captures the inputs and outputs of the legacy system. While it "sees" the frontend, it "infers" the backend logic by analyzing the API contracts and data transformations. For deep-tier logic, Replay provides a Technical Debt Audit that tells your developers exactly where to look in the legacy source code, saving them from "archaeology" and letting them focus on "engineering."
Is this just a "no-code" tool that generates messy code?#
No. Replay is built for Enterprise Architects. The code generated is clean, type-safe TypeScript/React that follows modern best practices. It is designed to be owned and maintained by your engineering team, not locked into a proprietary platform. It’s a jumpstart, not a cage.
Can Replay work with Citrix or older "Green Screen" terminal emulators?#
Yes. Replay’s visual engine can interpret visual patterns even in environments where DOM access is restricted. By analyzing the visual state changes, it can reconstruct the logical flow and help bridge the gap between mainframe systems and modern web architectures.
What about security and compliance?#
Replay is built for regulated industries. We offer SOC2 compliance, HIPAA-ready data handling, and the option for On-Premise deployment. Your sensitive data never has to leave your network.
Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.