The $3.6 trillion global technical debt bubble is not a hypothetical risk—it is a tax on every feature you ship and every market you fail to enter. For the Enterprise Architect, the "The High Cost" of legacy systems isn't just the maintenance budget; it’s the 70% of legacy rewrites that fail to meet their original timeline or objective.
When leadership demands modernization, the default reflex is often a "Lift and Shift" or a "Big Bang" rewrite. Both are catastrophic. Moving a mess from an on-premise data center to the cloud just gives you an expensive, cloud-native mess. Meanwhile, manual rewrites turn into multi-year "archaeology" projects because 67% of legacy systems lack any meaningful documentation.
TL;DR: Modernizing legacy systems through "Lift and Shift" or manual rewrites is a high-risk gamble that usually fails; intelligent visual extraction via Replay reduces modernization timelines from 18 months to weeks by using video as the source of truth.
The High Cost of the "Lift and Shift" Illusion#
In financial services and healthcare, the pressure to modernize is often met with the "Lift and Shift" strategy. The logic seems sound: get it off the mainframe or the legacy VM and into the cloud. However, this ignores the fundamental decay of the application architecture.
"Lift and Shift" preserves technical debt. It encapsulates the "black box" without opening it. You end up paying cloud premiums for inefficient code, unoptimized database queries, and monolithic bottlenecks. The cost isn't just operational; it's the opportunity cost of being unable to implement modern CI/CD, automated testing, or AI-driven features because the underlying structure is still a 20-year-old mystery.
The Archaeology Problem#
The average enterprise rewrite takes 18 to 24 months. Why? Because developers spend 60% of their time performing "software archaeology"—digging through undocumented COBOL, Java, or .NET codebases to understand business logic that was written by people who retired a decade ago.
| Approach | Timeline | Risk | Cost | Documentation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Bang Rewrite | 18-24 months | High (70% fail) | $$$$ | Manual/Incomplete |
| Lift and Shift | 3-6 months | Low (but debt remains) | $$ | None |
| Strangler Fig | 12-18 months | Medium | $$$ | Partial |
| Visual Extraction (Replay) | 2-8 weeks | Low | $ | Automated & Visual |
Beyond the Black Box: How Intelligent Visual Extraction Works#
The future of modernization isn't rewriting from scratch—it's understanding what you already have. Replay shifts the paradigm from code-first analysis to behavior-first extraction. By recording real user workflows, Replay treats the running application as the "source of truth," capturing the UI state, the business logic transitions, and the API interactions in real-time.
Instead of a developer spending 40 hours manually recreating a single complex screen, Replay performs the extraction in 4 hours. It generates documented React components and API contracts directly from the recording.
From Video to React: A Technical Reality#
When we talk about "recording," we aren't talking about a simple .mp4 file. We are talking about capturing the DOM mutations, state changes, and network payloads. Replay’s AI Automation Suite then parses this data to generate clean, modular code.
typescript// Example: Legacy Insurance Claim Form Migrated via Replay // This component was extracted from a 15-year-old ASP.NET screen import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import { Button, TextField, Alert } from '@/components/ui'; // From Replay Design System Library interface ClaimData { policyNumber: string; incidentDate: string; claimAmount: number; } export const MigratedClaimForm: React.FC<{ claimId: string }> = ({ claimId }) => { const [data, setData] = useState<ClaimData | null>(null); const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true); // Business logic preserved: Validation rules extracted from legacy network trace const validateClaim = (amount: number) => { return amount > 0 && amount < 1000000; }; const handleSubmit = async (values: ClaimData) => { if (!validateClaim(values.claimAmount)) { console.error("Validation failed: Logic extracted from legacy trace."); return; } // API Contract generated by Replay Blueprints await fetch(`/api/v1/claims/${claimId}`, { method: 'POST', body: JSON.stringify(values), }); }; return ( <div className="p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow-md"> <h2 className="text-xl font-bold mb-4">Legacy Claim Processing (Modernized)</h2> <form onSubmit={(e) => { e.preventDefault(); /* handle */ }}> <TextField label="Policy Number" name="policyNumber" /> <TextField type="date" label="Incident Date" name="incidentDate" /> <Button type="submit">Submit Claim</Button> </form> </div> ); };
💰 ROI Insight: Manual modernization costs approximately $25,000 - $40,000 per screen in developer hours and QA. Replay reduces this to under $5,000 by automating the scaffolding and logic discovery.
The 4-Step Intelligent Extraction Workflow#
Modernizing a legacy monolith in a regulated environment (like a bank or a hospital) requires a surgical approach. You cannot afford to "break the world."
Step 1: Visual Recording & Flow Mapping#
Using Replay, subject matter experts (SMEs) record themselves performing standard business processes—opening a claim, processing a trade, or updating a patient record. Replay’s Flows feature maps these recordings into a visual architecture, showing exactly how data moves through the system.
Step 2: Blueprint Generation#
The recording is processed by the AI Automation Suite. It identifies repeatable UI patterns and creates a Blueprint. This blueprint is a technical audit of the screen, identifying every input, button, and hidden logic branch.
Step 3: Component Extraction & API Synthesis#
Replay generates the React components (using your organization's Design System from the Library) and synthesizes API contracts. If your legacy system uses a proprietary XML format, Replay identifies the structure and generates a modern JSON schema.
json// Generated API Contract from Legacy SOAP Trace { "contractName": "PatientRecordUpdate", "endpoint": "/services/patient_v2", "method": "POST", "payload_mapping": { "legacy_field_01": "patientFirstName", "legacy_field_02": "patientLastName", "legacy_field_09": "insuranceProviderId" }, "validation_rules": [ { "field": "patientFirstName", "required": true, "max_length": 50 } ] }
Step 4: E2E Test Generation#
One of the highest costs of modernization is regression testing. Replay uses the original recording to generate End-to-End (E2E) tests. This ensures that the modernized component behaves exactly like the legacy version, providing a "safety net" for the migration.
⚠️ Warning: Never attempt a legacy migration without automated E2E parity tests. Without them, you are guaranteed to miss edge-case business logic hidden in the legacy UI.
Why Technical Decision Makers are Abandoning "Big Bang" Rewrites#
The "The High Cost" of failure is too great for the modern CTO. When a 24-month project is cancelled at month 18 with nothing to show for it, heads roll.
- •Predictability: Replay turns an "unknown-unknown" project into a "known-known" project. You see the progress screen-by-screen.
- •Security & Compliance: For government and healthcare, Replay offers On-Premise deployment. Your sensitive data never leaves your network, and the platform is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready.
- •Design Consistency: By using the Replay Library, every extracted component automatically follows your modern design system, eliminating the "Frankenstein UI" common in piecemeal migrations.
📝 Note: Replay doesn't just generate code; it generates a technical debt audit. It identifies which parts of your legacy system are actually used, allowing you to decommission unused features rather than migrating them.
Case Study: Financial Services Modernization#
A Tier-1 bank had a legacy portfolio management tool with 400+ screens. Their internal estimate for a manual rewrite was 30 months and $12 million.
By using Replay, they:
- •Recorded all 400 screens in 3 weeks.
- •Used the AI Automation Suite to generate 80% of the frontend code.
- •Reduced the total project timeline to 5 months.
- •Saved $8.5 million in developer costs.
Frequently Asked Questions#
How does Replay handle complex business logic that isn't visible in the UI?#
Replay captures network requests, state transitions, and DOM changes. While it cannot "see" code inside a backend database trigger, it documents the inputs and outputs of those triggers, allowing architects to replicate the logic in a modern microservice with 100% accuracy.
Can we use our own internal component library?#
Yes. The Replay Library can be seeded with your existing React/Tailwind/MaterialUI components. The AI will then attempt to map legacy UI elements to your specific library components during extraction.
What is the learning curve for a development team?#
Most teams are productive within 48 hours. Because Replay outputs standard React and TypeScript, your developers don't need to learn a proprietary language—they just need to review and refine the generated code.
How does this fit into a SOC2 or HIPAA compliant workflow?#
Replay is built for regulated industries. We offer an on-premise version where the recording, processing, and code generation happen entirely within your VPC. No data is ever sent to a third-party LLM or external cloud unless specifically configured.
Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.