The Hidden Tax of Mainframe Refacing: Why Screen Scraping is a Cost Trap

The "green screen" is the most expensive interface in your enterprise. While your core business logic hums along on stable COBOL or PL/I backends, the interface layer is a massive bottleneck. When CIOs look at the mainframe refacing costs screen by screen, they often fall into the "Screen Scraping Trap"—a legacy solution that promises a quick fix but delivers long-term technical debt and fragile production environments.

According to Replay's analysis, the industry has spent decades trying to "skin" mainframe applications using HLLAPI (High-Level Language Application Program Interface) or terminal emulation wrappers. These projects have a notorious failure rate. In fact, 70% of legacy rewrites and refacing projects fail or significantly exceed their timelines because they attempt to bridge the gap between 1980s terminal protocols and 2024 web standards using brittle, coordinate-based scraping.

TL;DR: Manual screen scraping is a legacy approach that creates fragile, unmaintainable UI layers. Modern enterprise modernization requires Visual Reverse Engineering. By using Replay, organizations can reduce the mainframe refacing costs screen by screen from 40 hours of manual labor to just 4 hours, achieving a 70% average time savings while generating clean, documented React code instead of brittle wrappers.

---

The Economics of the $3.6 Trillion Technical Debt#

The global technical debt crisis has reached a staggering $3.6 trillion. For organizations in financial services, healthcare, and government, a significant portion of this debt is locked in mainframe UIs. When calculating the mainframe refacing costs screen by screen, most architects only look at the initial development hours. They ignore the "Maintenance Tax"—the cost of fixing the UI every time a mainframe field is moved or a new CICS region is updated.

Industry experts recommend moving away from "runtime translation" (scraping) toward "build-time extraction." 67% of legacy systems lack any form of up-to-date documentation. When you scrape a screen, you aren't documenting the system; you're just putting a mask on it.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of converting recorded user workflows into structured data, design tokens, and functional code components without requiring access to the underlying legacy source code.

---

Why Traditional Screen Scraping Fails#

Screen scraping relies on "positional logic." It looks for data at specific Row/Column coordinates on a 24x80 terminal screen. If a developer adds a single line of text to the mainframe header, every single scraping script breaks.

The Fragility of Positional Logic#

Imagine a legacy insurance claims screen. The "Policy Number" is at Row 5, Column 12. Your scraper is hardcoded to grab text from that coordinate. If the mainframe team updates the system to include a "Claim Status" field above it, the Policy Number moves to Row 6. Your modern web UI now displays the wrong data, or worse, crashes.

The Performance Bottleneck#

Screen scraping requires a "Stateful Connection." For every web request, the server must open a terminal session, navigate through several screens (login -> menu -> submenu -> data screen), scrape the data, and then translate it to JSON. This adds seconds of latency to every interaction.

Code Example: The Brittle Scraper#

This is what a typical "modernized" legacy wrapper looks like using older scraping methodologies. It is a nightmare to maintain.

typescript
// The "Old Way": Brittle Screen Scraping Logic
async function getPolicyData(terminalSession: any) {
  // Hardcoded navigation - if one screen changes, the whole flow breaks
  await terminalSession.sendKey('PF3'); 
  await terminalSession.waitForString('SELECT OPTION');
  await terminalSession.writeAt(22, 7, '12'); // Navigate to Policy Menu
  await terminalSession.sendKey('ENTER');

  // Positional scraping - the definition of technical debt
  const policyNumber = await terminalSession.readArea(5, 12, 10); // Row 5, Col 12, Length 10
  const effectiveDate = await terminalSession.readArea(6, 12, 8); 
  
  if (!policyNumber.trim()) {
    throw new Error("Scraping failed: Policy number not found at coordinates.");
  }

  return { policyNumber, effectiveDate };
}

---

Lowering Mainframe Refacing Costs Screen by Screen with Visual Extraction#

Instead of scraping at runtime, Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering to extract the "intent" of the UI. By recording a real user performing a workflow, Replay's AI Automation Suite identifies patterns, components, and data structures.

Video-to-code is the process of analyzing a video recording of a legacy application to automatically generate a functional React component library and documented design system.

According to Replay's analysis, manual refacing takes an average of 40 hours per screen when you account for discovery, design, component creation, and testing. Replay reduces this to 4 hours.

Comparison: Scraping vs. Visual Extraction (Replay)#

---

Implementation: From Recording to React#

The Replay workflow eliminates the guesswork. Instead of developers trying to interpret 30-year-old green screens, they record the workflow. Replay’s "Library" feature extracts the design tokens, while "Flows" documents the business logic.

Modernizing Legacy UI requires more than just a new coat of paint; it requires a structural shift to modern architecture.

Code Example: Modern React Component via Replay#

When you use Replay, you aren't getting a wrapper. You are getting clean, production-ready TypeScript code that follows your enterprise design system.

tsx
import React from 'react';
import { Card, Input, Label, Button } from '@/components/ui';
import { usePolicyData } from '@/hooks/usePolicyData';

interface PolicyViewProps {
  policyId: string;
}

/**
 * Component generated via Replay Visual Reverse Engineering.
 * Extracted from Legacy Insurance Module: POL-004
 */
export const PolicyDetails: React.FC<PolicyViewProps> = ({ policyId }) => {
  const { data, isLoading, error } = usePolicyData(policyId);

  if (isLoading) return <p>Loading Policy Details...</p>;
  if (error) return <p>Error retrieving policy information.</p>;

  return (
    <Card className="p-6 border-l-4 border-primary">
      <div className="grid grid-cols-2 gap-4">
        <div className="space-y-2">
          <Label htmlFor="policyNumber">Policy Number</Label>
          <Input id="policyNumber" value={data?.policyNumber} readOnly />
        </div>
        <div className="space-y-2">
          <Label htmlFor="effectiveDate">Effective Date</Label>
          <Input id="effectiveDate" value={data?.effectiveDate} readOnly />
        </div>
      </div>
      <Button className="mt-4" onClick={() => console.log('Initiate Claim')}>
        Start New Claim
      </Button>
    </Card>
  );
};

---

Why Visual Extraction is Essential for Regulated Industries#

For Financial Services and Healthcare, "mainframe refacing costs screen" calculations must include compliance and security. Screen scraping often requires opening insecure ports or maintaining persistent sessions that are hard to audit.

Replay is built for these high-stakes environments:

1. •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: The platform handles sensitive data with enterprise-grade encryption.
2. •On-Premise Availability: For government or highly regulated telecom environments, Replay can run entirely within your firewall.
3. •Auditability: Every generated component is mapped back to a "Blueprint," providing a clear audit trail of how the legacy logic was translated.

Check out our guide on Enterprise Design Systems to see how Replay integrates with your existing UI standards.

---

Reducing the 18-Month Rewrite Timeline#

The average enterprise rewrite takes 18 months. Most of that time is spent in "Discovery"—understanding what the current system actually does. Because 67% of legacy systems lack documentation, developers spend months just mapping out screens.

Replay's AI Automation Suite automates this discovery phase. By simply running through the workflows, Replay builds the Flows (Architecture) maps for you. This shifts the focus from "What does this screen do?" to "How can we make this workflow better for the user?"

Calculating the ROI of Replay#

If an enterprise has 500 screens to modernize:

• •Manual Approach: 500 screens x 40 hours = 20,000 hours. At $150/hr, that’s $3,000,000 and years of work.
• •Replay Approach: 500 screens x 4 hours = 2,000 hours. At $150/hr, that’s $300,000 and can be completed in a quarter.

The mainframe refacing costs screen by screen reduction is 90%, allowing your senior architects to focus on high-value business logic rather than pixel-pushing legacy fields.

---

Moving Beyond the Screen: Building a Component Library#

The end goal of any modernization project shouldn't be a web-based version of a green screen. It should be a reusable Component Library.

Replay’s "Library" feature automatically groups similar legacy elements. If you have a "Customer ID" field that appears on 50 different mainframe screens, Replay identifies it as a single reusable React component. This ensures consistency across your entire application suite and prevents the duplication of effort that plagues manual rewrites.

By using Replay, you aren't just refacing; you are re-architecting your front end for the next 20 years.

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the primary factor in mainframe refacing costs screen by screen?#

The primary cost driver is manual discovery and component creation. Developers spend hours identifying legacy fields, mapping them to modern data structures, and then manually coding React components to match the legacy logic. Replay automates this by extracting the visual and structural intent directly from user recordings, reducing the time required by up to 90%.

Why is screen scraping considered a high-risk strategy?#

Screen scraping is inherently fragile because it relies on the physical layout of the mainframe screen. Any change to the backend UI—even something as simple as moving a text label—can break the scraper. This leads to high maintenance costs and frequent production outages. Additionally, scraping provides no path toward true modernization or documentation.

Can Replay handle complex, multi-step mainframe workflows?#

Yes. Replay’s "Flows" feature is designed specifically for complex, multi-screen processes. By recording the entire sequence, Replay maps the transitions between screens and generates the corresponding navigation logic in React, ensuring that the business process is preserved while the UI is modernized.

How does Replay ensure security in regulated industries like Healthcare or Finance?#

Replay is built with security as a first-class citizen. It is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, and for organizations with strict data residency requirements, it offers an on-premise deployment model. Because Replay focuses on the visual layer, it can be used without exposing sensitive backend source code or opening risky terminal ports.

Does using Replay require me to change my mainframe backend?#

No. Replay is a "Visual Reverse Engineering" platform. It works by observing the UI layer. This allows you to modernize the user experience and create a modern React front end without touching the stable, mission-critical COBOL or PL/I code running on your mainframe.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay