The Executive’s Guide to Application De-risking: Turning User Workflows into React Components

70% of legacy modernization projects fail or significantly exceed their timelines. This isn't a failure of talent; it is a failure of visibility. Most enterprise systems are "black boxes" where the original architects have long since departed, leaving behind a $3.6 trillion global technical debt mountain and a codebase that lacks even basic documentation.

When a VP of Engineering or CTO greenlights a "Big Bang" rewrite, they are essentially betting their career on the hope that their team can perform manual archaeology on millions of lines of undocumented COBOL, Java, or legacy .NET code. The math doesn't add up: at an average of 40 manual hours required to document and recreate a single complex enterprise screen, a 500-screen application requires 20,000 man-hours before a single line of modern React is even written.

TL;DR: Application de-risking replaces manual code archaeology with Visual Reverse Engineering, using Replay to extract React components and business logic directly from user workflows, reducing modernization timelines by 70%.

The Architecture of Uncertainty: Why Rewrites Fail#

The primary reason for failure is the "Documentation Gap." Our data shows that 67% of legacy systems lack any form of up-to-date technical documentation. This forces developers into a cycle of trial and error, where changing a single CSS rule or API endpoint in a legacy monolith triggers a cascade of regressions.

The traditional "Strangler Fig" pattern is the standard recommendation, but even it struggles with the UI layer. Mapping legacy state management to modern hooks is a manual, error-prone process.

Comparing Modernization Strategies#

Visual Reverse Engineering: A New Paradigm#

The future of modernization isn't rewriting from scratch—it's understanding what you already have. Visual Reverse Engineering treats the running application as the "source of truth" rather than the decaying source code. By recording real user workflows, Replay captures the DOM mutations, state changes, and API calls in real-time.

This process moves the needle from "archaeology" to "extraction." Instead of guessing how a legacy insurance claim form handles conditional logic, you record a claims adjuster using the system. Replay then analyzes that recording to generate a documented React component that mirrors the exact behavior of the original, but in a modern, maintainable stack.

💰 ROI Insight: Manual screen recreation takes 40 hours per screen. Replay reduces this to 4 hours. For a 100-screen application, this saves 3,600 engineering hours—approximately $540,000 in direct labor costs at enterprise rates.

From Black Box to Documented Codebase#

When we talk about "de-risking," we are talking about visibility. Replay's AI Automation Suite doesn't just copy HTML; it generates the scaffolding required for a production-grade frontend. This includes:

1. •API Contracts: Automatically inferred Type definitions based on actual network traffic.
2. •E2E Tests: Playwright or Cypress scripts generated from the recorded user path.
3. •State Logic: React hooks that encapsulate the business rules observed during the session.

Example: Extracted Component Architecture#

Below is a simplified example of what Replay extracts from a legacy workflow recording. Notice how it separates the UI from the business logic preserved from the legacy system.

typescript
// Generated by Replay Visual Reverse Engineering
// Source: Legacy Claims Portal - Workflow: "Submit_Claim_Internal"

import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { Button, Input, Alert } from '@/components/ui'; // From Replay Library
import { useLegacyValidation } from './hooks/useLegacyValidation';

interface ClaimData {
  policyId: string;
  incidentDate: string;
  claimAmount: number;
}

export const MigratedClaimForm: React.FC = () => {
  const [formData, setFormData] = useState<ClaimData>({
    policyId: '',
    incidentDate: '',
    claimAmount: 0,
  });

  // Replay extracted the exact regex and conditional logic from the legacy JS heap
  const { validate, errors, isSubmitting } = useLegacyValidation();

  const handleSubmit = async () => {
    const isValid = await validate(formData);
    if (isValid) {
      // Replay mapped the legacy SOAP endpoint to a modern REST/GraphQL proxy
      await fetch('/api/v2/claims/submit', {
        method: 'POST',
        body: JSON.stringify(formData),
      });
    }
  };

  return (
    <div className="p-6 space-y-4 shadow-lg rounded-xl border">
      <h2 className="text-xl font-bold">Submit New Claim</h2>
      {errors.length > 0 && <Alert type="error" messages={errors} />}
      
      <Input 
        label="Policy ID" 
        value={formData.policyId} 
        onChange={(e) => setFormData({...formData, policyId: e.target.value})} 
      />
      
      {/* Logic preserved: Claim amount field only shows for specific policy types */}
      {formData.policyId.startsWith('PRM-') && (
        <Input 
          label="Estimated Amount" 
          type="number"
          value={formData.claimAmount}
          onChange={(e) => setFormData({...formData, claimAmount: Number(e.target.value)})}
        />
      )}

      <Button onClick={handleSubmit} disabled={isSubmitting}>
        {isSubmitting ? 'Processing...' : 'Submit Claim'}
      </Button>
    </div>
  );
};

⚠️ Warning: Attempting to modernize without preserving business logic leads to "feature regression," the #1 reason users reject new systems.

The Replay Implementation Roadmap#

Modernization shouldn't be a multi-year dark period. We recommend a phased approach that delivers value in weeks, not years.

Step 1: Visual Assessment & Inventory#

Using Replay's Flows, we map out every user path in the legacy system. This creates a visual architecture map. You cannot modernize what you cannot see. This step identifies dead code and redundant screens that don't need to be migrated, often reducing the project scope by 20-30%.

Step 2: Recording the "Source of Truth"#

Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) or QA testers record themselves performing standard tasks in the legacy environment. Replay captures the interaction layer, the data layer, and the visual layer.

Step 3: Extraction via Blueprints#

The Blueprints editor takes these recordings and generates clean, modular React components. These aren't "spaghetti code" exports; they are structured according to your organization's specific Design System (managed in the Replay Library).

Step 4: Technical Debt Audit & Validation#

Replay automatically generates a Technical Debt Audit for the extracted code, highlighting areas where the legacy logic is inefficient or insecure. This allows architects to refactor during the migration rather than after.

Step 5: E2E Test Generation#

Before the legacy system is decommissioned, Replay generates a suite of End-to-End tests. This ensures that the new React component behaves exactly like the legacy screen, providing a "safety net" for the final cutover.

Built for Regulated Environments#

For executives in Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, "cloud-only" is often a non-starter. Replay was built with these constraints in mind:

• •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Data privacy is baked into the extraction process.
• •On-Premise Deployment: Run the entire Replay suite within your own VPC or air-gapped environment.
• •PII Scrubbing: Automated masking of sensitive data during the recording and extraction phases.

💡 Pro Tip: When modernizing in banking or healthcare, use Replay to generate your compliance documentation automatically. The "Flows" feature provides a visual audit trail of how data moves through the system.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take?#

While a manual rewrite of a complex enterprise module takes 18-24 months, Replay typically completes the extraction and documentation phase in 2-8 weeks. The total time to production depends on your integration requirements, but the "understanding" phase is reduced by 90%.

Does Replay support legacy technologies like Mainframe or Silverlight?#

Yes. Because Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering (recording the rendered output and network traffic), it is technology-agnostic. If a user can interact with it in a browser or terminal emulator, Replay can extract the workflow.

What about business logic preservation?#

This is Replay's core strength. By analyzing the state changes during a recording, Replay identifies the underlying business rules (e.g., "If Field A is > 100, Field B must be mandatory"). These rules are then codified into the generated React hooks and TypeScript interfaces.

Can we use our own Design System?#

Absolutely. Replay's Library feature allows you to import your existing React component library (Tailwind, MUI, or custom). The extraction engine will then map legacy UI elements to your modern components.

The Cost of Inaction#

The $3.6 trillion technical debt problem isn't going away. Every day spent on manual archaeology is a day your competitors spend on innovation. By turning user workflows into documented, modern React components, you de-risk the most dangerous project on your roadmap.

Stop guessing what your legacy code does. Start recording it.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.