The Economic Case for Component Extraction vs Manual Porting

The most expensive mistake an Enterprise Architect can make is assuming that a legacy rewrite is a linear path from old to new. It isn’t. In reality, it is an archaeological dig through layers of undocumented business logic, abandoned edge cases, and "tribal knowledge" that left the building years ago. With a global technical debt mountain reaching $3.6 trillion, the traditional "Big Bang" rewrite is no longer a viable strategy—it is a fiscal liability.

70% of legacy rewrites fail or significantly exceed their timelines. Why? Because 67% of these systems lack any meaningful documentation. When you ask a developer to "manually port" a screen, you aren't just paying for code; you are paying for the weeks of forensic analysis required to understand what that code was supposed to do in the first place.

TL;DR: Manual porting costs 10x more than automated component extraction because it forces developers to perform "software archaeology" instead of engineering; Replay reduces this burden by using video as the source of truth to generate documented React components in hours, not weeks.

The Mathematical Failure of Manual Porting#

When we estimate a modernization project, we often look at the "happy path." We see a form with ten fields and assume a senior developer can recreate it in React in a few hours. This is a fallacy.

In an enterprise environment—specifically in Financial Services or Healthcare—that "simple form" hides complex validation logic, conditional rendering based on user roles, and legacy API quirks. On average, it takes 40 hours per screen to manually document, design, and code a legacy interface into a modern stack.

The Cost Comparison: Manual vs. Extraction#

💰 ROI Insight: For a mid-sized enterprise application with 100 screens, manual porting costs approximately $600,000 in labor alone. Using Replay's extraction methodology reduces that to $60,000—a 90% reduction in direct labor costs.

Why "Archaeology" is Killing Your Budget#

The hidden cost of modernization isn't the syntax—it's the discovery. When a team starts a manual port, they follow a predictable, expensive pattern:

1. •Discovery: Hunting for the original PRD (which doesn't exist).
2. •Deconstruction: Reading 15-year-old Java or .NET code to find validation rules.
3. •Reconstruction: Guessing the CSS/styling to match the brand.
4. •Validation: Asking a Subject Matter Expert (SME) if the new screen "feels right."

This process is why the average enterprise rewrite takes 18 months. Replay shifts this paradigm by using Visual Reverse Engineering. Instead of reading dead code, we record live user workflows. The video becomes the source of truth.

Technical Implementation: From Video to React#

Replay doesn't just "scrape" a UI. It records the interaction, maps the state changes, and generates clean, modular React components. It identifies patterns across screens to build a Library (Design System) automatically, ensuring you don't end up with 50 different versions of the same button.

Example: Generated Component from Replay Extraction#

When Replay processes a recorded workflow, it doesn't just produce "spaghetti code." It outputs structured, typed TypeScript components that are ready for a modern CI/CD pipeline.

typescript
// Generated via Replay Blueprint Editor
// Source: Claims_Entry_Workflow_v2.mp4
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { Button, Input, ValidationWrapper } from '@/components/ui-library';
import { useClaimsAPI } from '@/hooks/api';

interface ClaimFormProps {
  initialData?: ClaimRecord;
  onSuccess: (id: string) => void;
}

export const LegacyClaimEntry: React.FC<ClaimFormProps> = ({ onSuccess }) => {
  const [formData, setFormData] = useState<ClaimRecord>({});
  const { submitClaim, isLoading, error } = useClaimsAPI();

  // Replay extracted this logic from the legacy 'validate_on_blur' event
  const handleFieldValidation = (field: string, value: any) => {
    const rules = {
      policyNumber: /^[A-Z]{3}-\d{9}$/,
      amount: (val: number) => val > 0 && val < 1000000
    };
    // ... logic preserved from legacy behavior
  };

  return (
    <div className="p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow-md">
      <h2 className="text-xl font-bold mb-4">Claim Submission</h2>
      <form onSubmit={(e) => { e.preventDefault(); submitClaim(formData).then(onSuccess); }}>
        <Input 
          label="Policy Number"
          value={formData.policyNumber}
          onChange={(val) => setFormData({...formData, policyNumber: val})}
          onBlur={() => handleFieldValidation('policyNumber', formData.policyNumber)}
        />
        {/* State-driven UI extracted from recording */}
        {formData.amount > 5000 && (
          <ValidationWrapper severity="warning">
            Requires Manager Approval (Legacy Rule 402)
          </ValidationWrapper>
        )}
        <Button type="submit" disabled={isLoading}>
          {isLoading ? 'Processing...' : 'Submit Claim'}
        </Button>
      </form>
    </div>
  );
};

⚠️ Warning: Manual porting often results in "Logic Drift," where the new system behaves slightly differently than the old one, leading to catastrophic data integrity issues in production. Extraction preserves the behavioral contract.

The "Black Box" Problem in Regulated Industries#

In Financial Services and Healthcare, "knowing how it works" isn't a luxury—it's a regulatory requirement. Auditors don't care that your new UI looks modern; they care that the calculation engine for a mortgage or the privacy filter for a patient record remains intact.

Replay addresses this by generating API Contracts and E2E Tests as part of the extraction process.

Step 1: Workflow Recording#

A business analyst or SME performs the task in the legacy system. Replay records the DOM mutations, network requests, and state transitions.

Step 2: Visual Decomposition (Blueprints)#

Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the recording to identify reusable components. It flags technical debt—like inline styles or hardcoded strings—and suggests modern alternatives.

Step 3: Library Generation#

Components are consolidated into a centralized Design System. This prevents the "snowflake" problem where every developer creates their own version of a date picker.

Step 4: Logic Preservation#

The underlying business logic—the "if-this-then-that" captured during the recording—is converted into documentation and API specifications.

json
{
  "contractName": "SubmitClaim",
  "source": "Legacy_Insurance_Portal",
  "fields": [
    {
      "name": "policy_id",
      "type": "string",
      "required": true,
      "legacy_validation": "Regex: ^POL-[0-9]{6}$"
    },
    {
      "name": "claim_amount",
      "type": "decimal",
      "max_value": 1000000,
      "trigger_workflow": "HighValueApproval"
    }
  ]
}

Eliminating the "Documentation Gap"#

67% of legacy systems have no documentation. When you use manual porting, you are essentially asking your developers to write the documentation while they write the code. This never works. Documentation is always the first thing cut when the 18-month timeline starts to slip.

Replay treats documentation as a byproduct of engineering, not a separate task. Because the extraction is based on actual usage, the documentation is inherently accurate.

• •Technical Debt Audit: Replay automatically identifies which parts of your legacy UI are redundant or overly complex.
• •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: For organizations in regulated sectors, Replay offers On-Premise deployment. Your sensitive data never leaves your network; the reverse engineering happens behind your firewall.

📝 Note: Modernization is not just about moving from Angular 1.x to React. It’s about moving from an unmaintainable "black box" to a transparent, documented, and tested codebase.

The Economic Reality of the "Big Bang"#

The "Big Bang" rewrite—scrapping everything and starting over—is the most expensive way to modernize. It assumes the business can stand still for 18-24 months while IT "catches up." In reality, the business requirements evolve during those 18 months, leading to a "moving target" problem.

Component extraction via Replay allows for a Strangler Fig approach on steroids. You can modernize screen-by-screen, workflow-by-workflow, delivering value in weeks rather than years.

1. •Week 1: Record the top 10 most used workflows.
2. •Week 2: Generate the core component library and API contracts.
3. •Week 3: Deploy the first modernized module into production.
4. •Week 4: Sunset the first piece of the legacy monolith.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take compared to manual porting?#

Manual porting averages 40 hours per screen when accounting for discovery, CSS styling, logic recreation, and testing. Replay reduces this to approximately 4 hours per screen by automating the discovery and boilerplate generation phases.

What about business logic preservation?#

Replay captures the behavioral logic of the UI. While it doesn't "decompile" back-end COBOL, it documents exactly how the UI interacts with those back-end services, generating API contracts and validation rules that ensure the new front-end behaves identically to the legacy one.

Does Replay work with highly customized legacy systems?#

Yes. Because Replay uses visual reverse engineering (recording the rendered output and network traffic), it is agnostic to the underlying legacy framework. Whether it’s a 20-year-old JSP app, a Silverlight tool, or a complex Delphi interface, if it runs in a browser or a VM, we can extract it.

Is the generated code maintainable?#

Unlike "low-code" platforms that output proprietary XML or obfuscated JS, Replay generates standard React/TypeScript. The output follows your organization's linting rules and architectural patterns, making it indistinguishable from code written by your senior engineers.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.