The average enterprise spends $2.5 million annually just trying to understand what its own software does. In highly regulated sectors like banking, healthcare, and insurance, this "archaeology tax" is even higher. When 67% of legacy systems lack any meaningful documentation, every compliance audit or feature update becomes a high-stakes guessing game.
The traditional response—a "Big Bang" rewrite—is a proven path to failure. Statistics show that 70% of legacy rewrites fail or significantly exceed their timelines, often stretching into 18-24 month marathons that yield little ROI. The problem isn't the talent of the engineers; it's the black box of the legacy logic itself.
TL;DR: The Case for automated documentation lies in shifting from manual "code archaeology" to visual reverse engineering, reducing the time to document and modernize legacy screens from 40 hours to just 4 hours.
The Case for Automated Documentation in Regulated Industries#
In a regulated environment, "we don't know how this works" is not a valid answer for an auditor. Whether it's a COBOL-backed mainframe portal or a 20-year-old Java monolith, these systems represent the core business logic of the world’s largest institutions.
The $3.6 trillion global technical debt isn't just old code; it's undocumented intent. When you can't see the business rules hidden in the spaghetti code, you can't move to the cloud, you can't implement AI, and you certainly can't guarantee compliance.
The Cost of Manual Archaeology#
Manual documentation is the silent killer of enterprise velocity. An architect typically spends weeks interviewing retired developers, grepping through SVN repositories, and manually drawing diagrams in Visio that are obsolete the moment they are saved.
| Approach | Timeline | Risk | Cost | Documentation Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Bang Rewrite | 18-24 months | High (70% fail) | $$$$ | Often incomplete/new debt |
| Manual Archaeology | 6-12 months | Medium | $$$ | Subjective & Static |
| Strangler Fig | 12-18 months | Medium | $$$ | Variable |
| Replay (Visual Extraction) | 2-8 weeks | Low | $ | Precise & Automated |
💰 ROI Insight: By moving from manual documentation to Replay's automated extraction, enterprises reduce the per-screen modernization cost from 40 hours of manual labor to 4 hours of supervised automation.
Why "Modernize Without Rewriting" is the New Standard#
The future of enterprise architecture isn't rewriting from scratch—it's understanding what you already have and extracting it into modern primitives. Replay treats the user interface as the "source of truth." By recording real user workflows, we can reverse engineer the underlying business logic, API contracts, and state management without ever needing to read a line of the original legacy source code.
From Black Box to Documented Codebase#
When you record a flow in Replay, the platform doesn't just record a video; it captures the interaction layer, the network calls, and the DOM mutations. This data is then fed into the AI Automation Suite to generate:
- •Clean React Components: Typed, modular, and ready for your modern Design System.
- •API Contracts: Swagger/OpenAPI definitions derived from actual legacy traffic.
- •E2E Tests: Playwright or Cypress scripts that mirror the exact user path.
- •Technical Debt Audit: A clear map of what logic is redundant and what is critical.
⚠️ Warning: Attempting to modernize without a documented API contract is the leading cause of "regression hell" in financial services migrations.
Step-by-Step: Extracting Logic from a Legacy Healthcare Portal#
Let’s look at a practical example. Imagine a HIPAA-regulated claims processing portal built in 2008. There is no documentation, the original team is gone, and the business needs to move the "Submit Claim" flow to a modern React micro-frontend.
Step 1: Visual Capture and Flow Analysis#
Using Replay, a subject matter expert (SME) simply performs the task. They log in, fill out the claim, and hit submit. Replay records the "Flow." Unlike a standard screen recording, Replay captures the underlying metadata of every input field and button click.
Step 2: Generating the API Contract#
Regulated systems often have "ghost APIs"—endpoints that no one remembers creating but are vital for the system to function. Replay extracts these into a clean schema.
typescript// Example: Generated API Contract from a Legacy Claims Flow // Generated by Replay AI Automation Suite export interface ClaimSubmission { claimId: string; providerNPI: number; // Extracted from field validation patientData: { memberId: string; dob: string; // ISO 8601 format enforced }; serviceCodes: Array<{ code: string; modifier?: string; }>; totalAmount: number; } /** * Legacy Endpoint: /api/v1/claims/process_final_v3_deprecated * Method: POST * Security: HIPAA-compliant Bearer Token */ export async function submitClaim(data: ClaimSubmission) { const response = await fetch('/api/v1/claims/process_final_v3_deprecated', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, body: JSON.stringify(data), }); return response.json(); }
Step 3: Component Extraction and Design System Mapping#
Once the data layer is understood, Replay’s Blueprints editor allows you to map the legacy UI elements to your modern Design System (the Library). It generates a functional React component that preserves the business logic (like complex validation rules) while using modern syntax.
tsx// Example: Migrated React Component // This component replaces a legacy ASP.NET form while maintaining 100% logic parity. import React, { useState } from 'react'; import { Button, Input, Card, Alert } from '@/components/design-system'; import { submitClaim, ClaimSubmission } from '@/api/claims'; export const ModernClaimForm: React.FC = () => { const [status, setStatus] = useState<'idle' | 'pending' | 'success' | 'error'>('idle'); const handleLegacySubmit = async (formData: ClaimSubmission) => { setStatus('pending'); try { // Logic preserved from Replay Flow recording if (formData.totalAmount > 5000) { console.warn("High-value claim detected: Triggering secondary audit flow"); } await submitClaim(formData); setStatus('success'); } catch (e) { setStatus('error'); } }; return ( <Card title="Submit Healthcare Claim"> {status === 'error' && <Alert type="danger">Validation failed in legacy backend.</Alert>} <form onSubmit={(e) => { e.preventDefault(); // Automated mapping of legacy fields to modern state const data = new FormData(e.currentTarget); handleLegacySubmit(Object.fromEntries(data) as any); }}> <Input label="Provider NPI" name="providerNPI" required /> <Input label="Member ID" name="memberId" required /> <Button type="submit" loading={status === 'pending'}> Submit to Legacy Core </Button> </form> </Card> ); };
💡 Pro Tip: Use Replay's Technical Debt Audit feature before this step to identify which legacy fields are no longer being sent to the backend, allowing you to prune the UI during extraction.
The Case for Security and Compliance#
In target industries like Government and Telecom, data residency is non-negotiable. Replay is built for these environments.
- •On-Premise Availability: Run the entire extraction engine within your own VPC.
- •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Every recording and generated artifact follows strict audit logging.
- •PII Masking: Automatically redact sensitive patient or financial data during the recording phase, ensuring that the "Video as source of truth" never compromises privacy.
Documentation as a Living Artifact#
Manual documentation dies the moment the code changes. Automated documentation via Replay creates a "Living Blueprint." If the legacy system's behavior changes, a new recording updates the documentation, API contracts, and tests in minutes.
📝 Note: Replay doesn't just document the "happy path." By recording edge cases and error states, you capture the 20% of the code that handles 80% of the complexity.
Moving from 18 Months to 18 Days#
The Case for automated documentation is ultimately a case for business agility. When a major US insurer used Replay to modernize their claims portal, they didn't start with a 500-page requirements document. They started by recording 50 essential user flows.
- •Weeks 1-2: Recorded all core workflows across three departments.
- •Weeks 3-4: Replay generated the React component library and API contracts.
- •Weeks 5-6: Developers integrated the new UI with the existing backend.
The result? A modernized, documented system delivered in 45 days. The "Big Bang" estimate for the same project was 14 months.
Frequently Asked Questions#
How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#
While a manual rewrite takes 18-24 months, Replay typically reduces the timeline to 2-8 weeks. The documentation phase happens in real-time as you record flows, and component generation takes minutes per screen.
What about business logic preservation?#
This is Replay's core strength. Because we use "Video as source of truth," we capture the actual behavior of the system. Our AI Automation Suite analyzes the state changes and network traffic to ensure that even the most obscure business rules are represented in the generated React logic and E2E tests.
Does Replay require access to our legacy source code?#
No. Replay performs visual reverse engineering. It observes the system from the outside-in (UI and Network). This makes it ideal for systems where the source code is lost, obfuscated, or written in languages your current team doesn't support.
Is it compatible with our existing Design System?#
Yes. Replay's Blueprints editor allows you to map legacy elements to your specific React, Vue, or Web Component library. You aren't getting generic code; you're getting code that fits your enterprise standards.
Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.