Back to Blog
February 19, 2026 min readtechnical debt discovery workshops

The 3-Day Visual Audit: A Technical Debt Discovery Workshop Framework for VPs

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

The 3-Day Visual Audit: A Technical Debt Discovery Workshop Framework for VPs

Technical debt is no longer a "developer problem"—it is a balance sheet liability. With the global technical debt bubble reaching $3.6 trillion, VPs of Engineering are finding that traditional "code reviews" are insufficient for capturing the true scope of legacy rot. When 67% of legacy systems lack any form of documentation, your team isn't just fighting bad code; they are fighting the unknown.

The traditional approach to technical debt discovery workshops usually involves two weeks of whiteboarding, manual code exploration, and subjective guessing. It is slow, inaccurate, and leads to the 70% failure rate seen in enterprise legacy rewrites.

To break this cycle, we’ve developed a compressed, 3-day visual audit process. This framework moves away from "reading code" and toward "observing behavior," leveraging visual reverse engineering to generate a source of truth in hours, not months.

TL;DR: Most technical debt discovery workshops fail because they rely on outdated documentation. This 3-day framework uses Visual Reverse Engineering to audit legacy systems.

  • Day 1: Visual Inventory & Workflow Recording.
  • Day 2: Automated Component Extraction (using Replay).
  • Day 3: ROI Mapping & Modernization Roadmap. Key Result: Reduce manual discovery time from 40 hours per screen to 4 hours while creating a production-ready React component library.

Why Traditional Technical Debt Discovery Workshops Fail#

Before diving into the 3-day sprint, we must address why the status quo is broken. Most VPs authorize discovery phases that last 3-6 months. During this time, senior architects manually "spelunk" through 15-year-old Java or .NET monoliths, trying to map UI logic to backend services.

According to Replay's analysis, the average enterprise screen takes 40 hours to manually document, design, and prototype for a rewrite. In a system with 200+ screens, you’ve spent $1M in engineering salary before a single line of modern code is written.

The Documentation Gap#

Industry experts recommend a "visual-first" approach because code often lies, but user workflows don't. Legacy systems frequently contain "dead" code paths that developers spend weeks analyzing, only to realize no user has touched that feature since 2014.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of recording real user workflows in a legacy application and automatically converting those visual interactions into documented React code and design tokens.


The 3-Day Technical Debt Discovery Workshop Framework#

This workshop is designed for high-stakes environments—Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government—where "ripping and replacing" is too risky, but staying still is a competitive death sentence.

Day 1: Visual Inventory and Workflow Mapping#

The goal of Day 1 is to define the "Surface Area of Debt." Instead of looking at the database schema, we look at the user’s reality.

  1. Stakeholder Alignment: Identify the top 10 mission-critical workflows (e.g., "Claims Processing" or "Onboarding").
  2. The Recording Phase: Using Replay, subject matter experts (SMEs) record themselves performing these workflows in the legacy environment.
  3. The "Black Box" Audit: We identify where the UI logic is coupled with legacy business logic.

By the end of Day 1, you have a library of recordings that represent the actual state of the application, not the state described in a stale Confluence page from 2018.

Day 2: Automated Component Extraction#

This is where technical debt discovery workshops transition from "discovery" to "delivery." On Day 2, we use Replay’s AI Automation Suite to convert the recordings into a structured inventory.

Replay analyzes the DOM structure, styles, and state transitions of the recorded legacy UI. It then generates a modern React component library that mirrors the legacy functionality but follows modern architectural patterns.

Example: From Legacy "Spaghetti" to Modern React

In a typical legacy system, a simple button might be buried in 400 lines of procedural JavaScript. After a visual audit, Replay extracts the core intent into a clean, functional component.

Legacy Input (Conceptual):

javascript
// The "old way" - hard to test, hard to move, undocumented function initOldSubmitButton() { var btn = document.getElementById('submit-01'); btn.onclick = function() { if(validateForm()) { performLegacyAjax('/api/v1/save', {data: getFormValues()}); } }; // 200 more lines of DOM manipulation... }

Replay Output (Modern TypeScript/React):

typescript
import React from 'react'; import { Button } from '@/components/ui/button'; interface LegacyActionProps { onSuccess: (data: any) => void; isLoading: boolean; } /** * Extracted from "Claims Processing Workflow" via Replay Visual Audit. * This component decouples legacy UI from backend side-effects. */ export const ClaimsSubmitAction: React.FC<LegacyActionProps> = ({ onSuccess, isLoading }) => { return ( <Button variant="primary" size="lg" disabled={isLoading} className="shadow-sm hover:bg-blue-700 transition-colors" > {isLoading ? 'Processing...' : 'Submit Claim'} </Button> ); };

Day 3: ROI Mapping & Modernization Roadmap#

The final day focuses on the "VP View." We take the extracted components and flows to build a business case.

We categorize the debt into three buckets:

  1. Visual Debt: UI components that can be immediately replaced with a unified Design System.
  2. Logic Debt: Complex frontend state that needs to be refactored into React Hooks.
  3. Integration Debt: Legacy APIs that require a modern GraphQL or BFF (Backend-for-Frontend) layer.

Comparing Discovery Methods: Manual vs. Replay#

To understand the impact of technical debt discovery workshops, look at the data comparing traditional manual audits against a Visual Reverse Engineering approach.

MetricTraditional Manual AuditReplay Visual Audit
Time per Screen40 Hours4 Hours
Documentation Accuracy45% (Human Error)98% (DOM-based)
Output TypePDF/Static ImagesFunctional React Code
Architectural InsightSubjectiveData-Driven (Flows)
Cost (Avg. Enterprise)$250,000+$25,000 - $50,000
Timeline to Pilot6-9 Months2-4 Weeks

Deep Dive: The Role of "Flows" in Technical Debt Discovery Workshops#

In the context of modernization, a Flow is a sequence of UI states that complete a business objective. Most technical debt is hidden in the transitions between these states.

When conducting technical debt discovery workshops, VPs often find that their teams are stuck in "Component Hell"—they are modernizing buttons and inputs but failing to modernize the user's journey. Replay’s "Flows" feature allows you to visualize the entire architecture of a legacy workflow.

Implementing a Modern Component Library#

Once the discovery workshop is complete, the output isn't just a report; it's a Design System. This library becomes the foundation for the new application, ensuring that the modernization effort doesn't create new technical debt through inconsistency.

typescript
// Example of a standardized Design System component generated from a Replay Audit import { cva, type VariantProps } from "class-variance-authority"; const cardVariants = cva( "rounded-lg border p-4 transition-all", { variants: { intent: { legacy: "bg-gray-50 border-gray-200 opacity-80", // Flagging legacy items modern: "bg-white border-blue-500 shadow-md", }, }, defaultVariants: { intent: "modern", }, } ); export interface CardProps extends React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>, VariantProps<typeof cardVariants> {} export const AuditCard = ({ className, intent, ...props }: CardProps) => ( <div className={cardVariants({ intent, className })} {...props} /> );

Scaling the Workshop Across the Enterprise#

For VPs in regulated industries like Insurance or Telecom, the challenge is scaling these technical debt discovery workshops across hundreds of disparate teams. This is where the Replay Library and Blueprints come into play.

  • Blueprints: Act as the "Editor" for your modernization. Once a screen is recorded and analyzed, architects can tweak the generated code to match enterprise standards before it hits the repository.
  • On-Premise Deployment: For organizations with strict data residency requirements (HIPAA, SOC2), Replay offers an on-premise solution so that sensitive legacy data never leaves your firewall during the audit.

Industry experts recommend that VPs treat technical debt as a "Continuous Discovery" process rather than a one-time event. By integrating visual audits into your quarterly planning, you can prevent the $3.6 trillion debt bubble from expanding within your own organization.

Modernize your legacy stack without the risk of a total rewrite by focusing on high-value workflows first.


Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the primary goal of technical debt discovery workshops?#

The primary goal is to identify, quantify, and prioritize legacy code liabilities that hinder business agility. Unlike a standard code review, these workshops focus on the gap between current system behavior and desired business outcomes, resulting in a prioritized modernization roadmap.

How does Replay reduce the time spent on discovery?#

Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering to automate the documentation process. By recording user interactions, Replay automatically generates the underlying React components and architectural flows. This shifts the workload from manual "code spelunking" to automated extraction, reducing the time per screen from 40 hours to just 4 hours.

Is this process safe for highly regulated industries like Healthcare?#

Yes. Replay is built for regulated environments and is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready. For organizations that cannot use cloud-based tools for discovery, Replay offers an On-Premise deployment model, ensuring that all recordings and generated code remain within the organization's secure infrastructure.

What is the output of a 3-day visual audit?#

The output includes a comprehensive inventory of legacy workflows, a production-ready React component library (Design System), a visual map of application architecture (Flows), and a data-driven ROI report that helps VPs justify modernization budgets to the C-suite.

Can we use Replay if our legacy system is 20 years old?#

Absolutely. Because Replay operates on the "Visual" layer (the DOM and rendered UI), it is technology-agnostic. Whether your legacy system is built in Silverlight, JSP, ASP.NET, or ancient versions of Angular, Replay can capture the intent and convert it into modern React code.


Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay and turn your legacy debt into a modern asset in days, not years.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free