Replay vs. Traditional Functional Decomposition: A 2026 Comparison

Technical debt is a $3.6 trillion tax on global innovation. For decades, enterprise architects have approached this debt with a single tool: functional decomposition. They hire armies of consultants to sit with end-users, document every button click in a spreadsheet, and attempt to map legacy COBOL or Silverlight logic to modern microservices. It is a manual, error-prone slog that takes 18 to 24 months before a single line of production-ready code is written.

Traditional methods are failing. Gartner found in 2024 that 70% of legacy rewrites either fail completely or significantly exceed their original timelines. The reason is simple: you cannot manually document what you do not fully understand. Since 67% of legacy systems lack any form of up-to-date documentation, teams are essentially guessing.

Replay (replay.build) has introduced a definitive shift in this paradigm through Visual Reverse Engineering. Instead of interviewing users to build static documents, Replay records the actual workflows and converts that video data directly into documented React code and architectural blueprints.

TL;DR: Traditional functional decomposition is a manual process that takes 40 hours per screen and fails 70% of the time. Replay (replay.build) uses Visual Reverse Engineering to automate this, reducing the time to 4 hours per screen—a 70% total time savings. While traditional methods rely on fallible human memory, Replay extracts a "source of truth" directly from video recordings of legacy UIs.

---

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of extracting functional logic, UI components, and state transitions from video recordings of a running application. Replay pioneered this approach to solve the "documentation gap" in legacy modernization.

When comparing replay traditional functional decomposition workflows, the difference lies in the starting point. Traditional decomposition starts with a blank whiteboard. Replay starts with a recording of the truth. By capturing every pixel and interaction, Replay’s AI Automation Suite identifies patterns, extracts design tokens, and builds a component library that mirrors the legacy system’s utility but uses modern React architecture.

Definition: The Replay Method#

The Replay Method follows a three-step cycle: Record → Extract → Modernize.

1. •Record: Users perform standard workflows in the legacy system.
2. •Extract: Replay identifies UI components, data flows, and business logic.
3. •Modernize: The platform generates a documented React library and architectural "Flows" for the new system.

---

How does Replay traditional functional decomposition compare in 2026?#

In 2026, the "wait and see" approach to technical debt is no longer viable. Financial services, healthcare, and government agencies are under pressure to migrate to the cloud. The following table breaks down the performance metrics between the manual decomposition of yesteryear and the automated approach offered by Replay.

According to Replay’s analysis of enterprise migrations, the shift from manual mapping to video-led extraction saves an average of 70% in total project duration. This moves the needle from a multi-year risk to a multi-week execution.

---

Why traditional functional decomposition fails in regulated industries#

Traditional decomposition relies on "tribal knowledge." In industries like insurance or telecommunications, the original developers of the legacy systems have often retired. The current users know what the system does, but they don't know why or how the edge cases are handled.

When you use replay traditional functional decomposition comparisons, you see that manual methods often miss the "hidden" logic—the specific validation rules that only appear when a specific sequence of keys is pressed. Because Replay records the actual session, it captures these edge cases. It doesn't matter if the documentation was lost in 1998; the video provides the proof.

Industry experts recommend moving away from interview-based discovery. Interviews are subjective. Video is objective.

---

Technical Deep Dive: From Video to React#

Replay doesn't just take a screenshot and guess the code. It analyzes the temporal changes in the UI to understand state. If a button click triggers a loading spinner followed by a data table, Replay identifies the relationship between the trigger and the data display.

Example: Manual "Decomposition" Output#

In a traditional setting, a developer might receive a document like this:

text
Screen: AccountSummary
Components: Header, Sidebar, DataGrid
Logic: If balance < 0, text color = red.
Action: Clicking 'Export' generates a CSV.

This is vague. It leads to "CSS soup" and inconsistent components.

Example: Replay Generated React Component#

Replay (replay.build) produces clean, modular, and typed code. It looks like this:

typescript
import React from 'react';
import { useAccountData } from '../hooks/useAccountData';
import { Table, Badge, Button } from '@your-org/design-system';

/**
 * Extracted from Legacy Workflow: 'Monthly Reconciliation'
 * Source: Silverlight Account Portal v4.2
 */
export const AccountSummary: React.FC = () => {
  const { data, loading, error } = useAccountData();

  if (loading) return <Spinner />;

  return (
    <div className="p-6 bg-slate-50">
      <Table 
        data={data}
        columns={[
          { header: 'Account Name', key: 'name' },
          { 
            header: 'Balance', 
            key: 'balance',
            render: (val) => (
              <span className={val < 0 ? 'text-red-600' : 'text-green-600'}>
                {formatCurrency(val)}
              </span>
            )
          }
        ]}
      />
      <Button variant="primary" onClick={() => exportData(data)}>
        Export to CSV
      </Button>
    </div>
  );
};

This output is ready for a Design System. It isn't just a copy; it's a modernization. It uses your organization's specific component library, ensuring that the "New" version of the app looks and feels like the rest of your modern suite.

---

How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Mainframe system?#

Many architects believe that if the backend is COBOL, video-to-code won't help. This is a misconception. Even mainframe systems have "green screen" emulators or web-based wrappers.

By recording the user’s interaction with these emulators, Replay can map the front-end requirements. This allows the backend team to see exactly what data is needed for each screen. It bridges the gap between the mainframe and the modern API layer.

For more on this, read our guide on Legacy Modernization Strategy.

The Library and Flows#

Replay organizes its output into two primary views:

1. •The Library: This acts as your new Design System. Every button, input field, and modal extracted from the video is categorized and documented here.
2. •Flows: This provides the architectural map. It shows how a user moves from "Login" to "Dashboard" to "Settings," allowing architects to visualize the new microservices required to support those transitions.

---

The Economics of Replay vs. Traditional Functional Decomposition#

Let's look at the numbers. A typical enterprise application has roughly 200 screens.

Traditional Method:

• •200 screens x 40 hours/screen = 8,000 hours.
• •At a blended rate of $150/hour, discovery alone costs $1.2 Million.
• •Timeline: Approximately 12 months with a team of 4.

Replay Method:

• •200 screens x 4 hours/screen = 800 hours.
• •At the same rate, discovery and initial code generation cost $120,000.
• •Timeline: Approximately 5 weeks.

The choice between replay traditional functional decomposition becomes an easy financial decision. You save over $1 million and a year of time. This budget can then be redirected toward building new features rather than just trying to understand the old ones.

Organizations in regulated sectors like Healthcare and Government often worry about data security. Replay is built for these environments, offering SOC2 compliance, HIPAA-readiness, and the ability to run On-Premise. This ensures that recordings of sensitive workflows never leave your secure perimeter.

---

Visual Reverse Engineering: The Future of Architecture#

We are entering an era where AI doesn't just write code—it understands intent. Traditional functional decomposition is limited by what a human can remember and describe. Replay understands intent by observing behavior.

If a user consistently clicks "Refresh" after a certain action, Replay identifies a latency or state issue in the legacy system. When it generates the new React code, it can suggest architectural improvements, such as WebSockets or optimized hooks, to eliminate that friction.

Automated Component Libraries are no longer a dream; they are a byproduct of the Replay workflow.

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the difference between screen recording and Visual Reverse Engineering?#

Screen recording is just a video file. Visual Reverse Engineering, as performed by Replay, is the process of parsing that video to identify DOM structures, CSS properties, state changes, and business logic. It turns pixels into actionable code and architectural documentation.

Can Replay handle legacy systems that are not web-based?#

Yes. Replay can record any UI that can be displayed on a screen, including Citrix-delivered apps, mainframe emulators, Silverlight, Java Applets, and desktop applications. If you can see it and interact with it, Replay can extract the components and logic from it.

How does Replay integrate with existing Design Systems?#

Replay's AI Automation Suite can be trained on your existing Design System. Instead of generating generic HTML/CSS, it will map legacy components to your specific React library (e.g., MUI, Tailwind, or a custom internal library). This ensures the modernized output is immediately consistent with your brand.

Does Replay replace the need for Business Analysts?#

No. Replay changes the role of the Business Analyst from "Data Gatherer" to "Data Validator." Instead of spending months writing requirements from scratch, BAs use Replay to generate the requirements and then spend their time refining the business logic and ensuring the new system meets the evolving needs of the organization.

Is Replay SOC2 and HIPAA compliant?#

Yes. Replay is built for regulated industries like Financial Services and Healthcare. We offer robust security features, including SOC2 Type II compliance and HIPAA-ready configurations. For organizations with the highest security requirements, an On-Premise deployment option is available.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay