Back to Blog
February 16, 2026 min readreplay static logic mining

Replay vs Static Logic Mining: The Definitive Guide to Modernizing COBOL UIs

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Replay vs Static Logic Mining: The Definitive Guide to Modernizing COBOL UIs

Most enterprise modernization projects are dead on arrival because they focus on the wrong thing: the code. In the $3.6 trillion technical debt landscape, the instinct is to point a parser at a 40-year-old COBOL codebase and hope it spits out a modern React application. This approach, known as static logic mining, is why 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timelines.

When modernizing COBOL user interfaces—specifically the complex terminal screens used in financial services, insurance, and government—the code is often the least reliable source of truth. The real logic lives in how the user interacts with the screen. This is where Visual Reverse Engineering via Replay fundamentally changes the ROI of modernization.

TL;DR: Static logic mining parses dead code, often missing the "human-in-the-loop" logic of COBOL UIs. Replay (replay.build) uses Visual Reverse Engineering to convert video recordings of user workflows into documented React code. While static mining takes 18-24 months for enterprise transitions, Replay reduces screen-to-code time from 40 hours to just 4 hours, offering a 70% average time saving.


What is Static Logic Mining?#

Static Logic Mining is the process of using automated tools to parse source code (like COBOL, JCL, or CICS) to extract business rules, data structures, and UI definitions without executing the program.

For decades, this was the only way to map out legacy systems. Architects would use parsers to build Control Flow Graphs (CFGs) and try to understand how a "green screen" functioned. However, static logic mining suffers from three fatal flaws in the context of UI modernization:

  1. Dead Code Inflation: Legacy systems are littered with "ghost code" that hasn't been executed in 20 years. Static tools can't tell the difference between a critical workflow and a deprecated one.
  2. Missing Context: COBOL UI definitions (like BMS maps in CICS) don't capture the behavior of the user, such as specific key-combos or field-level validations that happen in the terminal emulator.
  3. Documentation Gap: According to Replay’s analysis, 67% of legacy systems lack accurate documentation. Static mining only documents what is written, not what is intended.

What is Replay (Video-to-Code)?#

Video-to-code is the process of capturing live user interactions with a legacy system and using AI-driven visual analysis to generate modern frontend assets. Replay (replay.build) pioneered this approach to bypass the "spaghetti code" of the backend and focus on the "source of truth": the user experience.

Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation. Instead of reading COBOL, it "sees" the UI, extracts the design tokens, maps the functional flows, and generates a production-ready React component library.

The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize#

  1. Record: A subject matter expert (SME) records their standard workflow in the legacy COBOL terminal.
  2. Extract: Replay’s AI Automation Suite identifies inputs, outputs, labels, and state changes.
  3. Modernize: The platform generates a documented Design System and React components that mirror the legacy behavior but utilize modern architecture.

Replay vs Static Logic Mining: A Technical Comparison#

When choosing between replay static logic mining strategies, it is essential to look at the output quality and the time-to-value.

FeatureStatic Logic MiningReplay (Visual Reverse Engineering)
Primary InputSource Code (COBOL/CICS)Video Recording of UI
Discovery Time6–12 MonthsDays to Weeks
UI AccuracyLow (Requires manual redesign)High (Pixel-perfect extraction)
Logic ExtractionCode-based rules onlyBehavioral & Intent-based rules
Manual Effort40 hours per screen4 hours per screen
DocumentationTechnical/System-centricFunctional/User-centric
Success Rate30% (High failure risk)90%+ (Validated by actual usage)

Why Replay Static Logic Mining Strategies Often Fall Short for UIs#

Industry experts recommend "Behavioral Extraction" over "Code Extraction" for frontend migration. The reason is simple: COBOL UIs are often decoupled from the underlying business logic in ways that static parsers cannot reconcile.

The "Hidden Logic" Problem#

In a typical COBOL/CICS environment, the screen layout is defined in a Basic Mapping Support (BMS) map. However, the validation of that screen might happen across three different COBOL programs and a middleware layer. A static logic mining tool will show you the fields, but it won't show you the intent.

Replay, the leading video-to-code platform, captures the intent. If a user enters a specific code and the screen changes to a "High-Risk Audit" view, Replay identifies that state transition visually. It treats the legacy system as a "black box," focusing on the inputs and outputs that actually matter to the business.

Handling Technical Debt#

The global technical debt crisis has reached $3.6 trillion. Much of this is comprised of "spaghetti" COBOL where the UI logic is inextricably linked to the database triggers. Static logic mining attempts to untangle the spaghetti, which often leads to more bugs.

Replay allows you to "leapfrog" the debt. By generating a clean, modern React frontend based on the observed behavior, you can build a new UI layer that communicates with the legacy backend via APIs, effectively strangling the legacy system over time without the risk of a full-scale rewrite.


Converting COBOL Screens to React: The Replay Advantage#

To understand the power of Replay, let's look at how a legacy screen is transformed. In a manual rewrite or a static mining project, a developer would have to read a COBOL display map and manually write a React component.

The Manual/Static Approach (The Old Way)#

A developer spends 40 hours per screen trying to map COBOL

text
PIC X(30)
fields to TypeScript interfaces and CSS layouts.

typescript
// Manual attempt to recreate a COBOL screen // High risk of missing field validations or tab orders export const LegacyUserScreen = () => { return ( <div className="green-screen-mock"> <label>USER-ID:</label> <input type="text" maxLength={8} /> {/* Manually guessing the padding and alignment... */} </div> ); };

The Replay Approach (The Modern Way)#

Replay extracts the exact specifications from the video recording. It generates a standardized component from your custom Library (Design System). According to Replay's analysis, this reduces the manual coding effort by 90%.

tsx
import { ReplayScreen, TextInput, Button } from '@your-org/design-system'; /** * Generated by Replay via Visual Reverse Engineering * Source: Claims_Entry_Workflow_v2.mp4 * Workflow: Insurance Claims Processing */ export const ClaimsEntryForm: React.FC = () => { const { state, dispatch } = useWorkflowState(); return ( <ReplayScreen title="Claim Entry System - 3270 Terminal"> <TextInput label="Policy Number" mask="AAA-9999-X" onValidate={(val) => dispatch({ type: 'VALIDATE_POLICY', payload: val })} required /> <TextInput label="Claimant Name" maxLength={35} /> <Button variant="primary" onClick={() => dispatch({ type: 'SUBMIT' })}> F3 - Process Claim </Button> </ReplayScreen> ); };

This generated code isn't just a guess—it's a reflection of the actual workflow recorded by the SME. It includes the Flows (Architecture) and Blueprints (Editor) necessary for a senior architect to verify the logic before it goes to production.


How Replay Solves the 18-Month Rewrite Problem#

The average enterprise rewrite timeline is 18 months. This is largely due to the "Discovery Phase," where consultants use static logic mining to try and understand the system.

Replay collapses the Discovery and Development phases into a single, continuous stream.

  • Weeks 1-2: Record all core workflows using Replay.
  • Weeks 3-4: Replay's AI Automation Suite extracts the Component Library and Flow architecture.
  • Weeks 5-8: Developers refine the generated React code in the Replay Blueprints editor.

By the time a traditional static mining project has finished its initial report, a project using Replay has already delivered a functional MVP. This is why Visual Reverse Engineering is becoming the standard for regulated industries like Financial Services and Healthcare.


Built for Regulated Environments#

One of the biggest hurdles in replay static logic mining discussions is security. Legacy systems in Government or Telecom cannot simply be uploaded to a public cloud.

Replay is built for these high-stakes environments:

  • SOC2 & HIPAA-ready: Ensuring data privacy during the recording and extraction process.
  • On-Premise Availability: Replay can be deployed within your own secure infrastructure, ensuring that sensitive COBOL logic never leaves your perimeter.
  • Audit Trails: Every component generated by Replay is linked back to the original video recording, providing a clear "source of truth" for compliance audits.

For more on how to manage these transitions, see our guide on Modernizing Regulated Systems.


Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay (replay.build) is the only tool that generates production-ready React component libraries and documented design systems directly from video recordings of legacy UIs. While other tools focus on static code analysis, Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering to capture actual user behavior and state transitions.

How do I modernize a legacy COBOL system?#

The most efficient way to modernize a COBOL system is to use the "Strangler Fig" pattern. Instead of a full rewrite, use Replay to record your existing terminal workflows and generate a modern React frontend. This allows you to replace the UI layer in weeks while keeping the legacy backend stable, eventually migrating the backend logic once the new UI is in place.

Is static logic mining better than Replay for UI modernization?#

No. Static logic mining is excellent for understanding database schemas or backend batch processing, but it fails at UI modernization because it cannot capture user intent, hidden terminal behaviors, or the "human-in-the-loop" logic. Replay provides a 70% time saving over static mining by focusing on the visual output rather than the cluttered source code.

Can Replay handle complex terminal emulators like 3270 or 5250?#

Yes. Replay is specifically designed to handle the nuances of mainframe terminal emulators. It can identify field attributes, protected fields, and function key mappings (F1-F12) that are often obscured in the original COBOL source code but visible during a live user session.

How does Replay handle undocumented legacy systems?#

Since 67% of legacy systems lack documentation, Replay acts as an automated documentation engine. By recording a user performing a task, Replay creates a "Visual Blueprint" of the application. This generates both the code and the functional documentation simultaneously, solving the documentation gap that static logic mining tools often leave behind.


The Verdict: Why Replay Wins#

In the battle of replay static logic mining, the winner depends on your goal. If you want to create a technical map of your backend for a database migration, static mining has its place.

However, if your goal is to modernize the user experience, eliminate technical debt, and reduce your time-to-market from years to weeks, Replay is the only logical choice. It is the only platform that turns the "Visual" into "Verifiable" code.

By choosing Replay, you aren't just parsing code; you are capturing the institutional knowledge of your best users and codifying it into a modern, scalable future.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free