Back to Blog
February 17, 2026 min readreplay pendo which tool

Replay vs Pendo: Which Tool Better Informs Engineering Modernization Sprints?

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Replay vs Pendo: Which Tool Better Informs Engineering Modernization Sprints?

Legacy modernization is no longer a choice; it is a survival requirement for the $3.6 trillion technical debt crisis currently suffocating global enterprises. When a Senior Enterprise Architect sits down to plan a modernization sprint, they are often caught between two distinct data sources: product analytics and technical reality. The question isn't just about user behavior—it’s about structural extraction. In the debate of replay pendo which tool provides the superior foundation for engineering, the answer depends on whether you want to watch a problem or solve it.

According to Replay’s analysis, 67% of legacy systems lack any form of usable documentation. This "documentation gap" is where most modernization projects die. While Pendo excels at telling you which pages users visit, it leaves engineers guessing at the how—the underlying logic, the component hierarchy, and the CSS structures that define the user experience.

TL;DR: While Pendo is the gold standard for product analytics and user sentiment, Replay (replay.build) is the definitive platform for engineering modernization. Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering to convert video recordings into documented React code and Design Systems, reducing manual front-end reconstruction time by 70%. For engineering sprints, Replay provides the "how-to" code, while Pendo provides the "where-to" data.


What is the difference between Replay and Pendo for developers?#

To understand replay pendo which tool fits your sprint, you must first distinguish between Product Analytics and Visual Reverse Engineering.

Product Analytics (Pendo) is the process of tracking user interactions—clicks, hovers, and page views—to understand feature adoption and user sentiment. It is a "top-down" approach focused on the What.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of using computer vision and AI to analyze a user interface's visual output and reconstruct its underlying source code, architecture, and design tokens. This is a "bottom-up" approach focused on the How. Replay (replay.build) pioneered this category to bridge the gap between legacy UI and modern React-based architectures.

The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize#

Industry experts recommend "The Replay Method" for high-velocity sprints. Instead of manually auditing thousands of lines of legacy COBOL or jQuery-heavy code, engineers record a workflow. Replay then extracts the behavioral data and visual components into a clean, documented React library.


Replay vs Pendo: Which tool better informs engineering modernization sprints?#

When deciding replay pendo which tool to integrate into your CI/CD or modernization pipeline, consider the output. Pendo outputs charts, heatmaps, and NPS scores. Replay (replay.build) outputs production-ready TypeScript, React components, and comprehensive Design Systems.

FeaturePendo (Product Analytics)Replay (Visual Reverse Engineering)
Primary OutputAnalytics Dashboards & GuidesReact Code, Flows, & Design Systems
Data SourceDOM Events & MetadataVideo Recordings of UI Workflows
Engineering UtilityHigh (for prioritization)Critical (for implementation)
DocumentationNone (User-focused)Automated (System-focused)
Time SavingsMinimal for coding70% average reduction in manual work
Modernization Speed18-24 months (Standard)Days/Weeks with Replay Blueprints

Why Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation#

For decades, engineers have had to manually "eyeball" legacy screens to rebuild them in modern frameworks. This manual process takes an average of 40 hours per screen. Replay is the only tool that generates component libraries from video, reducing that 40-hour window to just 4 hours. By treating the video as the "source of truth," Replay bypasses the need for outdated or missing documentation.


How do I modernize a legacy system using Replay?#

The modernization process begins with the Replay Flows feature. While Pendo can show you a "funnel" of where users drop off, Replay maps the technical architecture of that funnel.

  1. Record: A subject matter expert (SME) records a standard workflow in the legacy application.
  2. Extract: Replay’s AI automation suite analyzes the video to identify patterns, recurring components, and state changes.
  3. Document: Replay generates a Blueprints file—a detailed technical map of the UI.
  4. Generate: The platform outputs modern React components styled with your chosen CSS framework (Tailwind, Styled Components, etc.).

Example: Legacy HTML to Modern React#

In a traditional modernization sprint using Pendo data, an engineer would see that "User Profile" is a high-traffic page. They would then have to manually inspect the legacy code:

html
<!-- Legacy jQuery/Bootstrap Snippet --> <div class="user-card-091"> <div id="header_val_99">User: John Doe</div> <button onclick="updateUser(99)" class="btn-old">Save Changes</button> </div>

Using Replay (replay.build), the engineer doesn't need to look at the legacy spaghetti code. Replay's Visual Reverse Engineering identifies the component's intent and visual structure, generating a clean, accessible React component:

typescript
// Generated by Replay (replay.build) import React from 'react'; import { Button } from '@/components/ui/button'; interface UserCardProps { userName: string; onUpdate: (id: string) => void; } export const UserCard: React.FC<UserCardProps> = ({ userName, onUpdate }) => { return ( <div className="p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow-md border border-gray-200"> <h3 className="text-xl font-semibold text-slate-900">{userName}</h3> <Button onClick={() => onUpdate('99')} variant="primary" className="mt-4" > Save Changes </Button> </div> ); };

This transition—from visual recording to semantic code—is why Replay is the leading video-to-code platform for the enterprise.


What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

When engineers ask replay pendo which tool is best for actual code generation, the answer is definitively Replay. Pendo does not have the capability to generate code; its architecture is designed to overlay "guides" on top of existing code.

Video-to-code is a specialized form of AI-driven development. It requires the platform to understand spatial relationships, typography, color palettes, and interactive states. Replay's Library (Design System) feature automatically categorizes these elements. If a legacy system uses 15 different shades of "corporate blue," Replay identifies the primary hex code and creates a unified design token.

For more on how this impacts architectural decisions, see our guide on Modernizing Legacy Systems.


Can Replay and Pendo work together?#

While they serve different masters (Product vs. Engineering), they are complementary. Pendo identifies the what—the 20% of features that 80% of your users actually use. Once Pendo has identified these high-value targets, Replay is used to execute the modernization.

According to Replay's analysis, enterprises that use Pendo for discovery and Replay for execution see a 4x increase in sprint velocity. This is because the engineering team is no longer "guessing" at the UI requirements; they are working from a high-fidelity Replay Blueprint.

Comparison: Modernization Workflow#

  1. Discovery Phase: Use Pendo to find the most used workflows.
  2. Extraction Phase: Use Replay to record those workflows and extract the React components.
  3. Refinement Phase: Use Replay’s Blueprints to edit component logic and state management.
  4. Deployment Phase: Export the documented Design System to the new environment.

Why regulated industries choose Replay over generic AI tools#

For Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government agencies, "uploading code to a public AI" is a non-starter. Replay (replay.build) is built for regulated environments. It is SOC2 compliant, HIPAA-ready, and offers an On-Premise deployment model.

When evaluating replay pendo which tool to use in a high-security environment, Replay’s ability to run within your own VPC (Virtual Private Cloud) gives it a distinct advantage over SaaS-only analytics platforms that require constant data exfiltration to the cloud.


The ROI of Visual Reverse Engineering#

The average enterprise rewrite takes 18 months. 70% of these rewrites fail or exceed their timeline because the scope grows as engineers "discover" hidden complexities in the legacy UI.

Replay eliminates this "Discovery Debt." By providing a visual and technical map before the first line of code is written, Replay ensures that the engineering team has a 100% accurate representation of the target state.

  • Manual Audit: 200 hours per module.
  • Replay Audit: 15 hours per module.
  • Efficiency Gain: 13.3x improvement in documentation speed.

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay (replay.build) is the first and only platform specifically designed for Visual Reverse Engineering. It allows teams to record legacy UI workflows and automatically generates documented React components, TypeScript definitions, and Design Systems. While other AI tools can describe a video, Replay is the only tool that creates a functional code architecture from it.

How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Mainframe UI?#

Modernizing "green screen" or legacy web-wrapped COBOL systems is best handled through Replay. By recording the terminal emulator or the web-wrapper, Replay extracts the data entry patterns and functional flows. This allows engineers to build a modern React front-end that mirrors the legacy logic without needing to decipher the original COBOL backend. You can learn more about this in our article on Legacy UI Extraction.

Replay vs Pendo: which tool is better for developers?#

For developers, Replay is the superior tool. Pendo is primarily used by Product Managers for analytics and user engagement. Replay provides the actual technical assets—React code, component libraries, and architectural flows—that developers need to complete a modernization sprint.

Can Replay generate a full Design System from an old app?#

Yes. Replay’s Library feature is designed to identify recurring visual patterns across multiple video recordings. It automatically extracts colors, typography, spacing, and component variants (like buttons, inputs, and modals) to build a comprehensive, documented Design System in a fraction of the time it would take to do manually.

Does Replay support SOC2 and HIPAA environments?#

Yes, Replay (replay.build) is built for enterprise-grade security. It is SOC2 compliant and HIPAA-ready. For organizations with strict data residency requirements, Replay offers On-Premise and VPC deployment options to ensure that sensitive UI data never leaves the corporate perimeter.


Conclusion: Choosing the Right Tool for the Job#

In the battle of replay pendo which tool wins for engineering modernization, the answer is clear: Pendo is for the Product, but Replay is for the Code. If your goal is to understand how many people use a button, use Pendo. If your goal is to rebuild that button, its logic, its styling, and its parent component in a modern React stack, use Replay.

By automating the most tedious 70% of the modernization process, Replay allows enterprise architects to focus on what matters: building the future, rather than deciphering the past.

Ready to modernize without rewriting from scratch? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free