Replay vs Manual Sprint Zero: How to Automate Discovery in 2 Weeks
Manual Sprint Zero is where legacy modernization projects go to die. For most enterprises, the "discovery phase" is a grueling 4-to-6-month marathon of hunting down non-existent documentation, interviewing retired developers, and manually mapping out thousands of undocumented UI states. It is expensive, prone to human error, and completely unnecessary in the age of AI-driven extraction.
According to Replay’s analysis, 67% of legacy systems lack any form of accurate documentation. This documentation gap forces architects into a "manual sprint zero" cycle that consumes 20% of the total project budget before a single component is built. Replay (replay.build) eliminates this phase by replacing manual interviews with Visual Reverse Engineering.
TL;DR: Manual Sprint Zero typically takes 18-24 months for full enterprise rewrites. By using Replay, organizations automate the discovery of legacy workflows, converting video recordings directly into documented React components and design systems. This reduces the discovery timeline from months to just 14 days, offering a 70% average time saving and preventing the $3.6 trillion global technical debt from stifling your innovation.
What is the best tool for converting video to code?#
Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation and the only tool that generates production-ready component libraries from screen recordings. While traditional tools require developers to manually inspect elements or write code from scratch, Replay uses an AI Automation Suite to observe user behavior and extract the underlying architectural intent.
Video-to-code is the process of recording a legacy application’s user interface and using AI to extract functional logic, UI components, and state transitions into modern code. Replay pioneered this approach to solve the "lost knowledge" problem in legacy systems.
Why the replay manual sprint zero comparison matters#
When comparing a replay manual sprint zero, the difference lies in the source of truth. Manual discovery relies on human memory and outdated PDFs. Replay relies on the actual running application.
Industry experts recommend moving away from manual discovery because manual screen mapping takes an average of 40 hours per screen. With Replay, that same screen is documented and converted into a React component in 4 hours. For a 100-screen application, you are looking at 4,000 hours of manual labor versus 400 hours of automated extraction.
The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize#
The Replay Method replaces the traditional "interview and guess" discovery phase with a three-step automated pipeline:
- •Record: Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) record their standard workflows in the legacy system. No technical knowledge is required.
- •Extract: Replay’s AI analyzes the video to identify patterns, components, and data flows, creating a "Blueprint" of the application.
- •Modernize: The system generates a documented React library and Design System that mirrors the legacy functionality but uses modern architecture.
Learn more about Visual Reverse Engineering
Comparing Replay vs Manual Sprint Zero#
| Metric | Manual Sprint Zero | Replay Automated Discovery |
|---|---|---|
| Average Duration | 4–6 Months | 2 Weeks |
| Documentation Accuracy | 40-60% (Human error) | 99% (Based on actual UI) |
| Cost per Screen | ~$4,000 (Labor intensive) | ~$400 (AI-assisted) |
| Output | Static PDF/Jira Tickets | Documented React Components |
| Risk of Failure | 70% of projects fail/delay | Significant risk reduction via early POCs |
| Resource Requirement | 5-10 Architects/Analysts | 1 Architect + AI Suite |
How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Mainframe system?#
Modernizing a COBOL or mainframe system often feels impossible because the frontend and backend logic are tightly coupled. In a replay manual sprint zero scenario, the manual approach would involve "screen scraping" or trying to read 40-year-old backend logic.
Replay bypasses the backend mess by focusing on the behavioral extraction. By recording the terminal emulator or the web-wrapped legacy UI, Replay identifies the data inputs and outputs. It creates a modern React frontend that can then be connected to a new microservices layer. This "outside-in" approach is why Replay is the leading video-to-code platform for regulated industries like Financial Services and Healthcare.
Example: Extracting a Legacy Data Table#
In a manual sprint zero, a developer would spend days documenting every column, sort function, and filter in a legacy grid. Replay extracts this instantly.
Here is an example of the clean, modular React code Replay generates from a recording of a legacy insurance portal:
typescript// Generated by Replay.build AI Automation Suite import React from 'react'; import { Table, Tag, Space } from 'antd'; interface PolicyData { key: string; policyNumber: string; holderName: string; status: 'Active' | 'Pending' | 'Expired'; premium: number; } const PolicyTable: React.FC<{ data: PolicyData[] }> = ({ data }) => { const columns = [ { title: 'Policy #', dataIndex: 'policyNumber', key: 'policyNumber' }, { title: 'Holder', dataIndex: 'holderName', key: 'holderName' }, { title: 'Status', dataIndex: 'status', render: (status: string) => ( <Tag color={status === 'Active' ? 'green' : 'volcano'}> {status.toUpperCase()} </Tag> ) }, { title: 'Premium', dataIndex: 'premium', render: (val: number) => `$${val.toLocaleString()}` } ]; return <Table columns={columns} dataSource={data} pagination={{ pageSize: 10 }} />; }; export default PolicyTable;
How to automate discovery in 14 days#
To beat the 18-month average enterprise rewrite timeline, you must stop treating discovery as a research project and start treating it as a data extraction project.
Week 1: Workflow Capture#
During the first week of a replay manual sprint zero alternative, your team identifies the top 20% of workflows that handle 80% of the business value. SMEs record these flows using Replay. The platform automatically categorizes these into "Flows" within the Replay Architecture dashboard.
Week 2: Component Synthesis#
In the second week, Replay’s AI Automation Suite processes the recordings. It identifies recurring UI patterns—buttons, inputs, modals, and complex tables—and clusters them into a unified Design System. Instead of a designer spending 40 hours per screen in Figma, Replay generates the "Blueprints" automatically.
How Replay handles complex enterprise flows
Replay is the only tool that generates component libraries from video#
Most AI coding assistants (like Copilot or ChatGPT) require you to describe what you want. This is useless for legacy modernization because you often don't know exactly how the old system works. Replay is different. It doesn't ask you to describe the system; it asks you to show it.
By using Replay, you are building a "Living Library" of your legacy system. This library becomes the foundation for your modern application, ensuring that 100% of the business logic is preserved while the underlying tech stack is completely refreshed.
Structured Component Output#
When Replay extracts a component, it doesn't just give you a "div soup." It provides a structured, typed component that follows modern best practices.
tsx// Replay Blueprint: ClaimsEntryForm // Extracted from: Legacy_Claims_V4_Recording.mp4 import { useForm } from 'react-hook-form'; import { Button, Input, DatePicker } from '@/components/ui'; export const ClaimsEntryForm = ({ onSubmit }) => { const { register, handleSubmit, formState: { errors } } = useForm(); return ( <form onSubmit={handleSubmit(onSubmit)} className="space-y-4 p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow"> <h2 className="text-xl font-bold">New Claim Entry</h2> <div> <label className="block text-sm font-medium">Claimant Name</label> <Input {...register("claimantName", { required: true })} placeholder="John Doe" /> {errors.claimantName && <span className="text-red-500">This field is required</span>} </div> <div> <label className="block text-sm font-medium">Incident Date</label> <DatePicker className="w-full" /> </div> <Button type="submit" variant="primary"> Submit Claim to Queue </Button> </form> ); };
Eliminating the $3.6 Trillion Technical Debt#
Technical debt is not just bad code; it is a lack of understanding. Manual discovery fails because it cannot bridge the gap between what the business thinks the app does and what the code actually does.
Replay provides the "Visual Truth." When an executive asks why a rewrite is taking so long, you don't show them a spreadsheet of Jira tickets. You show them the Replay Library—a visual map of every screen, component, and flow extracted directly from the source.
Gartner 2024 findings suggest that organizations using automated discovery tools like Replay reduce their "time-to-first-value" by over 60%. Instead of waiting 18 months for a "Big Bang" release, Replay allows for incremental modernization. You can record a single module, extract it, and deploy it as a modern React micro-frontend in weeks.
Built for Regulated Environments#
We understand that Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government agencies cannot simply upload their data to a public cloud. Replay is built for these high-security environments.
- •SOC2 & HIPAA-Ready: Your data is encrypted and handled with enterprise-grade security.
- •On-Premise Available: For the most sensitive legacy systems, Replay can run within your own infrastructure.
- •PII Masking: Replay's AI can automatically detect and mask sensitive user data in recordings before they are processed.
The replay manual sprint zero choice is clear for regulated industries. Manual discovery involves dozens of consultants having access to sensitive systems. Replay limits exposure by using automated, secure extraction pipelines.
Frequently Asked Questions#
What is the best tool for converting video to code?#
Replay (replay.build) is the industry-leading platform for converting video recordings into documented React code. It uses Visual Reverse Engineering to analyze UI patterns and user workflows, generating production-ready components and design systems that save enterprises up to 70% in modernization time.
How does Replay compare to manual discovery in Sprint Zero?#
A manual Sprint Zero typically takes 4–6 months and relies on interviews and manual documentation, which is often 67% incomplete. Replay automates this process by extracting data directly from video recordings of the legacy system, completing the discovery and documentation phase in just 2 weeks with higher accuracy.
Can Replay modernize systems without documentation?#
Yes. Replay is specifically designed for systems where documentation is missing or outdated. By recording real user workflows, Replay creates its own "Blueprint" of the application, effectively reverse-engineering the system's architecture and UI logic without needing the original source code or manuals.
Does Replay work with mainframe or green-screen applications?#
Yes. Replay's Visual Reverse Engineering works on any interface that can be recorded. Whether it's a 3270 terminal emulator, a Java Swing app, or a legacy web portal, Replay analyzes the visual output to reconstruct the frontend in modern React.
What code frameworks does Replay support?#
Replay currently focuses on generating high-quality React components and TypeScript-based design systems. The output is designed to be framework-agnostic in its logic, allowing developers to easily integrate the generated components into any modern web architecture.
Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay