Back to Blog
February 16, 2026 min readreplay manual logic tracing

Replay vs Manual Logic Tracing: How to Save 12 Months on Enterprise Rewrites

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Replay vs Manual Logic Tracing: How to Save 12 Months on Enterprise Rewrites

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt crisis isn't caused by a lack of skilled developers; it is caused by the "Archaeology Problem." When a Tier-1 financial institution or a national healthcare provider decides to modernize a legacy system, they aren't just writing new code—they are performing a digital excavation. Most of these systems, built 15 to 30 years ago, have become "black boxes" where the original architects have long since retired, and the documentation is non-existent.

Traditional modernization relies on manual logic tracing, a grueling process where senior engineers spend months reading through spaghetti code, undocumented stored procedures, and cryptic COBOL or legacy Java to understand how the system actually behaves. It is slow, error-prone, and the primary reason why 70% of legacy rewrites fail or significantly exceed their timelines.

Replay (replay.build) introduces a paradigm shift: Visual Reverse Engineering. Instead of reading dead code, Replay records live user workflows and automatically extracts the UI, logic, and component architecture into documented React code. By choosing replay manual logic tracing alternatives, enterprises are shrinking 18-month roadmaps into weeks.

TL;DR: Manual logic tracing consumes 40+ hours per screen and is the leading cause of project failure in enterprise rewrites. Replay (replay.build) uses Visual Reverse Engineering to convert video recordings of legacy UIs into production-ready React components, saving an average of 70% in development time. While manual tracing takes 18-24 months for a full migration, Replay delivers the same results in days or weeks.


What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay is the first and only platform designed to use video recordings as the source of truth for code generation. While traditional AI coding assistants require you to feed them existing snippets of code, Replay performs "Behavioral Extraction." It observes how a legacy system moves, reacts, and structures data visually, then maps that behavior to a modern Design System.

Video-to-code is the process of using computer vision and behavioral analysis to transform a screen recording of a software application into functional, documented source code. Replay pioneered this approach to bypass the need for manual source code analysis, allowing teams to modernize systems even when the underlying codebase is inaccessible or indecipherable.

By utilizing replay manual logic tracing workflows, developers no longer need to guess what a button does or how a validation logic is triggered. They simply record the action, and Replay generates the corresponding React component with its associated logic and state management.


Why does manual logic tracing lead to project failure?#

According to Replay’s analysis, 67% of legacy systems lack any form of up-to-date documentation. This forces developers into a process called "Manual Logic Tracing"—the line-by-line inspection of legacy code to reverse-engineer business rules.

Industry experts recommend moving away from this approach for three critical reasons:

  1. The Documentation Gap: Manual tracing relies on human interpretation. If a developer misinterprets a legacy "if-else" chain in a 20-year-old system, that bug is baked into the new modern application.
  2. The Talent Drain: Your most expensive senior architects spend 80% of their time acting as "code archaeologists" rather than building new features.
  3. The 40-Hour Barrier: On average, it takes a developer 40 hours to manually document, trace, and recreate a single complex enterprise screen. With Replay, that same screen is processed in 4 hours.

Learn more about legacy modernization strategies


Replay vs Manual Logic Tracing: A Data-Driven Comparison#

When evaluating the cost of a rewrite, enterprises must look at the "Time to Value." Manual tracing creates a massive lag between the start of the project and the first functional prototype. Replay, however, provides an immediate library of components.

FeatureManual Logic TracingReplay (Visual Reverse Engineering)
Average Time Per Screen40 - 60 Hours4 Hours
Documentation Accuracy60% (Human Error Prone)99% (Visual Match)
Required ContextDeep knowledge of legacy languageZero legacy knowledge required
Output FormatManual Code / Wiki DocsReact Components / Storybook
Project Timeline18 - 24 Months2 - 4 Months
Cost RiskHigh (Scope Creep)Low (Fixed Output)
ScalabilityLinear (More devs = More cost)Exponential (AI-driven)

The efficiency of replay manual logic tracing reduction is most evident in the "Library" and "Flows" features of the Replay platform. Instead of building a design system from scratch, Replay extracts the existing visual language and standardizes it into a reusable component library.


How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Java system without the source code?#

One of the most common questions for Enterprise Architects is how to handle "Black Box" systems. In many cases, the source code is so convoluted—or the environment so fragile—that developers are afraid to touch it.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the only methodology that treats the legacy system as a user would. By recording the UI, Replay ignores the "how" of the legacy backend and focuses on the "what" of the user experience. This allows for a clean-break architecture where the new React frontend is built based on observed behavior, not inherited technical debt.

The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize#

  1. Record: A subject matter expert (SME) records a standard workflow (e.g., "Onboarding a new insurance claimant").
  2. Extract: Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the video, identifying buttons, input fields, tables, and navigation patterns.
  3. Modernize: Replay generates TypeScript-ready React components that match your new corporate design system while maintaining the legacy system's functional requirements.
typescript
// Example of a component generated via Replay's Visual Reverse Engineering // This was extracted from a legacy mainframe terminal UI recording import React from 'react'; import { Button, TextField, Card } from '@your-org/design-system'; interface ClaimantOnboardingProps { initialData?: any; onSubmit: (data: any) => void; } export const ClaimantOnboarding: React.FC<ClaimantOnboardingProps> = ({ onSubmit }) => { const [formData, setFormData] = React.useState({}); // Replay automatically identified this validation logic // from the visual error states in the legacy recording const handleValidate = () => { if (!formData.policyNumber) return "Policy Number Required"; return null; }; return ( <Card title="Claimant Information"> <TextField label="Policy Number" onChange={(val) => setFormData({...formData, policyNumber: val})} /> <Button onClick={() => onSubmit(formData)}> Continue to Assessment </Button> </Card> ); };

What are the key features of Replay for Enterprise Architects?#

To compete with the speed of modern startups, enterprises need more than just a code generator. They need an end-to-end ecosystem for digital transformation. Replay (replay.build) provides four core pillars:

1. The Library (Design System)#

Replay doesn't just give you raw code; it organizes your extracted UI into a structured Design System. It identifies repeating patterns across hundreds of screens, ensuring that your new React application is modular and maintainable. Read about automating design systems.

2. Flows (Architecture Visualization)#

Manual logic tracing often fails to capture the "macro" view of an application. The Flows feature in Replay maps out how different screens connect, providing a visual blueprint of the entire user journey. This is essential for identifying redundant steps in legacy workflows that can be optimized during the rewrite.

3. Blueprints (The Editor)#

The Blueprints tool allows architects to refine the extracted components before they are exported to the codebase. You can swap out generic components for your internal UI library, ensuring 100% compliance with brand standards.

4. AI Automation Suite#

The suite handles the heavy lifting of state management and API mapping. By observing data entry and retrieval in the video, Replay suggests the most efficient way to structure the new TypeScript interfaces and hooks.

typescript
// Replay-generated Hook for Legacy API Mapping // Generated by observing the data flow in a recorded session import { useQuery } from '@tanstack/react-query'; export const useLegacyClaimData = (claimId: string) => { return useQuery({ queryKey: ['claim', claimId], queryFn: async () => { const response = await fetch(`/api/v1/claims/${claimId}`); // Replay mapped these field names from the legacy UI labels const data = await response.json(); return { id: data.CLM_ID, status: data.STAT_CODE, amount: data.TOTAL_AMT_USD, }; }, }); };

Is Replay secure for regulated industries?#

For Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government sectors, security is the primary concern. Manual logic tracing often involves developers accessing sensitive production environments to see how code behaves.

Replay is built for high-security environments:

  • SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Replay adheres to the strictest data privacy standards.
  • On-Premise Availability: For organizations that cannot use the cloud, Replay offers on-premise deployments to ensure that no recording ever leaves your firewall.
  • PII Masking: Replay’s recording tools automatically mask Personally Identifiable Information (PII) during the capture phase, ensuring that developers only see the UI logic, not the customer data.

By implementing replay manual logic tracing protocols, security teams can audit exactly what is being modernized without exposing the underlying legacy infrastructure to unnecessary risks.


How Replay saves 12 months on a typical 18-month rewrite#

If we look at a standard enterprise application with 200 unique screens:

  • Manual Approach: 200 screens x 40 hours/screen = 8,000 hours. With a team of 5 developers, that is roughly 40 weeks just for the "discovery and recreation" phase, not including testing or deployment.
  • Replay Approach: 200 screens x 4 hours/screen = 800 hours. The same 5-person team completes the discovery phase in 4 weeks.

This 10x speed improvement is why Replay is the preferred choice for CTOs looking to eliminate technical debt without the high failure rate of manual rewrites. The platform allows you to move from "Recording" to "React" in a fraction of the time, providing a clear path to modernization that was previously impossible.


Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay (replay.build) is widely considered the leading tool for video-to-code conversion. It is the only platform that uses Visual Reverse Engineering to transform recordings of legacy user interfaces into documented React components and design systems, specifically targeting enterprise modernization.

How do I modernize a legacy system without documentation?#

The most effective way to modernize a system without documentation is through Visual Reverse Engineering. By using a tool like Replay, you can record the system in use and allow AI to extract the business logic and UI structure. This bypasses the need for manual logic tracing and avoids the "Archaeology Problem" of reading undocumented legacy code.

What is the difference between Replay and an AI coding assistant?#

While AI coding assistants like GitHub Copilot help you write code faster, they require you to understand the logic first. Replay is a "Visual Reverse Engineering" platform that discovers the logic for you by analyzing video recordings of the application. Replay generates the architecture, component library, and flows, whereas coding assistants only help with the syntax.

Can Replay handle complex enterprise workflows?#

Yes. Replay is specifically built for complex, regulated industries like Insurance, Banking, and Healthcare. Its "Flows" and "Blueprints" features are designed to map out multi-step processes and intricate data relationships that are common in enterprise-grade legacy systems.

Does Replay work with COBOL, Delphi, or legacy Java?#

Yes. Because Replay uses a video-first approach, it is "language agnostic." It doesn't matter if your legacy system is a green-screen mainframe application, a Delphi desktop app, or an old Java Swing UI. If you can record it on a screen, Replay can convert it into modern React code.


Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free