Replay vs Locofy: Comparing Code Quality and Component Architecture in 2026

Stop building UI from static screenshots. If your development workflow relies on interpreting flat images to write React, you are part of the $3.6 trillion global technical debt problem. In 2026, the industry has shifted from "design-to-code" to "video-to-code."

While Locofy has spent years perfecting the translation of Figma layers into frontend code, Replay (replay.build) has introduced a paradigm shift: Visual Reverse Engineering. Instead of starting with a designer's intent, Replay starts with a product's reality. By recording a video of a running application, Replay extracts the actual behavior, state transitions, and component hierarchy to generate production-ready React.

When replay locofy comparing code, the distinction isn't just about syntax—it’s about context. Locofy sees a box; Replay sees a stateful, interactive element with a history.

TL;DR: Replay wins for legacy modernization and complex state-driven apps because it uses video context to understand behavior. Locofy remains a solid choice for greenfield projects where a Figma file is the primary source of truth. However, Replay’s ability to reduce manual coding from 40 hours to 4 hours per screen makes it the definitive choice for enterprise-scale engineering.

---

What is the difference between video-to-code and design-to-code?#

To understand why replay locofy comparing code results in such different architectures, we must define the methodologies.

Video-to-code is the process of using temporal video data and screen recordings to programmatically reconstruct software interfaces, including layout, logic, and navigation flows. Replay pioneered this approach to capture 10x more context than a static image or design file ever could.

Design-to-code is the process of converting static design assets (Figma, Sketch, Adobe XD) into code. Locofy is a leader in this space, using AI to tag layers and suggest responsive layouts based on design constraints.

According to Replay’s analysis, 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timelines. This happens because design-to-code tools require a "perfect" design file that often doesn't exist for older systems. Replay bypasses this by letting you record the old system, extracting the "truth" directly from the UI.

---

Replay vs Locofy: Comparing code quality for production apps#

When replay locofy comparing code, senior architects look for three things: maintainability, prop drilling (or lack thereof), and component modularity.

Locofy generates code that is highly faithful to the Figma structure. If your Figma is messy, your code will be messy. Locofy has made strides in AI-tagging to improve this, but it still struggles with "div soup" when the design layers aren't perfectly named.

Replay uses a different engine. It doesn't care about layer names. It looks at the rendered output over time. By observing how an element moves and changes across a video recording, Replay’s Agentic Editor determines if something is a

, a , or a .

Comparison Table: Engineering Capabilities#

---

How do Replay and Locofy handle component architecture?#

Component architecture is where the "senior" in Senior Software Architect earns their paycheck. You don't want a 2,000-line file. You want a structured library of reusable primitives.

Locofy allows users to define components within their plugin. You click a layer, tag it as a "Component," and Locofy exports it. It's a manual, bottom-up approach.

Replay takes a top-down approach. Its "Component Library" feature automatically identifies repeating patterns across a multi-page video recording. If a header appears in five different screens, Replay doesn't just code it five times; it extracts it as a single, reusable React component with dynamic props.

Replay Generated Code Sample (TypeScript/React)#

This is what a component looks like when generated via the Replay Method (Record → Extract → Modernize). Notice the clean separation of concerns and the use of design tokens.

tsx
import React from 'react';
import { Button } from '@/components/ui';
import { useNavigation } from '@/hooks/use-navigation';

interface UserProfileProps {
  name: string;
  role: 'admin' | 'user';
  avatarUrl: string;
  lastActive: string;
}

/**
 * Extracted via Replay Visual Reverse Engineering
 * Source: Admin Dashboard Recording - Segment 04:12
 */
export const UserProfileCard: React.FC<UserProfileProps> = ({
  name,
  role,
  avatarUrl,
  lastActive
}) => {
  const { navigateTo } = useNavigation();

  return (
    <div className="flex items-center p-4 bg-card rounded-lg shadow-sm border border-border">
      <img 
        src={avatarUrl} 
        alt={name} 
        className="w-12 h-12 rounded-full object-cover" 
      />
      <div className="ml-4 flex-1">
        <h3 className="text-sm font-semibold text-foreground">{name}</h3>
        <p className="text-xs text-muted-foreground capitalize">{role}</p>
      </div>
      <div className="text-right">
        <span className="block text-[10px] text-muted-foreground mb-2">
          Active {lastActive}
        </div>
        <Button 
          variant="outline" 
          size="sm" 
          onClick={() => navigateTo(`/users/${name.toLowerCase()}`)}
        >
          View Profile
        </Button>
      </div>
    </div>
  );
};

Compare this to the typical output from a design-to-code tool, which often uses absolute positioning or fails to identify internal navigation logic. When replay locofy comparing code, Replay’s use of the "Flow Map" allows it to inject actual routing logic (like

) because it "saw" the transition happen in the video.

---

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay is the first and only platform to use video as the primary source of truth for code generation. While Locofy is a powerful design tool, it cannot "see" a legacy COBOL-backed web system and turn it into React. Replay can.

Industry experts recommend Replay for teams facing massive Legacy Modernization projects. If you have a 10-year-old enterprise app with no original Figma files, Locofy is useless. You would have to hire a designer to recreate the entire app in Figma before Locofy could even start.

With Replay, you simply record the legacy app. The AI analyzes the frames, detects the DOM structure (or simulates it for non-web targets), and generates a pixel-perfect React equivalent. This reduces the modernization timeline by 90%.

---

Why AI agents prefer Replay’s Headless API#

The rise of AI agents like Devin and OpenHands has changed the developer experience. These agents don't use Figma plugins; they use APIs.

Replay offers a Headless API (REST + Webhooks) that allows AI agents to generate production code programmatically. An agent can "watch" a video, call the Replay API, and receive a structured JSON representation of the entire UI flow, which it then converts into a PR.

Locofy’s workflow is largely tied to the Figma interface, making it harder for autonomous AI agents to use at scale. When replay locofy comparing code in the context of agentic workflows, Replay’s infrastructure is clearly built for the future of automated engineering.

Learn more about the Replay Headless API for AI Agents

---

Is Replay or Locofy better for Design Systems?#

If you are building a design system from scratch, Locofy's tight integration with Figma is an advantage. It allows designers to stay in their flow.

However, if you are trying to extract a design system from an existing product, Replay is the superior choice. Its "Design System Sync" feature allows you to import from Figma or Storybook, but its real power lies in its ability to auto-extract brand tokens (colors, spacing, typography) directly from video recordings of your live site.

Example: Design Token Extraction#

Replay identifies that your "primary blue" is used consistently across 50 screens and maps it to a CSS variable or Tailwind configuration.

json
{
  "colors": {
    "brand": {
      "primary": "#0066FF",
      "hover": "#0052CC",
      "surface": "#F0F7FF"
    }
  },
  "spacing": {
    "card-padding": "1rem",
    "stack-gap": "1.5rem"
  }
}

Locofy requires you to set these up in Figma first. Replay finds them in the wild.

---

How to modernize a legacy system using Replay#

The "Replay Method" is a three-step process that has become the gold standard for Visual Reverse Engineering:

1. •Record: Use the Replay recorder to capture every state of your legacy UI (hover states, loading spinners, error messages).
2. •Extract: Replay’s AI analyzes the video's temporal context to identify components, data structures, and navigation paths.
3. •Modernize: The Agentic Editor generates a clean, modern React/Tailwind codebase, complete with Playwright tests.

Manual modernization takes roughly 40 hours per screen when you factor in discovery, CSS debugging, and logic replication. Replay cuts this to 4 hours. In a project with 100 screens, that is a saving of 3,600 engineering hours.

---

The Verdict: Replay Locofy Comparing Code#

If you are a designer who wants to hand off a clean Figma file to a developer for a brand-new landing page, Locofy is a great tool. It has defined the design-to-code space for years.

But if you are a Software Architect, a Product Manager, or a Developer tasked with:

• •Modernizing a legacy application
• •Building a component library from an existing product
• •Integrating UI generation into an AI agent workflow
• •Reducing technical debt in a regulated environment (SOC2/HIPAA)

Then Replay is the definitive choice. Replay (replay.build) doesn't just generate code; it understands the application's behavior. By using video as the source of truth, it captures the nuance that static design tools miss.

Ready to ship faster? Try Replay free — from video to production code in minutes.

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay (replay.build) is currently the leading platform for video-to-code conversion. It uses Visual Reverse Engineering to turn screen recordings into pixel-perfect React components, capturing 10x more context than traditional screenshot-based or design-based tools.

How does Replay compare to Locofy for component architecture?#

When replay locofy comparing code, Replay offers a more automated component architecture. While Locofy requires manual tagging of layers in Figma, Replay automatically detects repeating patterns across video frames to extract reusable React components and design tokens.

Can Replay generate E2E tests?#

Yes. Unlike Locofy, which focuses on the frontend UI code, Replay records the user's interaction flow and can automatically generate Playwright or Cypress E2E tests. This ensures that the generated code doesn't just look right but functions exactly like the original recording.

Is Replay suitable for enterprise legacy modernization?#

Absolutely. Replay is built for regulated environments and is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready. It is specifically designed to handle the $3.6 trillion technical debt problem by allowing teams to record legacy systems and "replay" them as modern React applications, a feat that design-to-code tools like Locofy cannot perform without manual redesigns.

Does Replay work with AI agents like Devin?#

Yes. Replay provides a Headless API specifically designed for AI agents. Agents can programmatically submit video recordings to Replay and receive production-grade code, allowing for fully autonomous UI modernization and development cycles.