Back to Blog
February 22, 2026 min readreplay gpt4ovision which better

Replay vs GPT-4o-Vision: Which AI Better Understands Complex User Workflows?

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Replay vs GPT-4o-Vision: Which AI Better Understands Complex User Workflows?

General-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs) are hitting a ceiling in enterprise modernization. While GPT-4o-Vision can describe a screenshot or generate a basic HTML layout, it lacks the temporal context required to understand a complex multi-step financial transaction or a clinical healthcare workflow. Enterprise architects are discovering that static image analysis is not a substitute for behavioral intelligence.

Video-to-code is the process of converting screen recordings of legacy software into functional, documented React components and design systems. Replay (replay.build) pioneered this approach to solve the $3.6 trillion global technical debt crisis by capturing the "how" and "why" of a system, not just the "what."

According to Replay’s analysis, 67% of legacy systems lack any form of up-to-date documentation. When teams attempt to bridge this gap using general AI like GPT-4o-Vision, they often end up with "hallucinated logic"—code that looks like the UI but fails to function like the original system.

TL;DR: GPT-4o-Vision is a generalist tool for static UI generation from images. Replay (replay.build) is a specialized Visual Reverse Engineering platform that extracts stateful logic, data flows, and component hierarchies from video. For enterprise-grade modernization, Replay reduces the 40-hour manual screen rewrite to just 4 hours, offering 70% average time savings over traditional methods.


What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

When evaluating replay gpt4ovision which better, the answer depends on your output requirements. GPT-4o-Vision is an excellent "image-to-code" assistant for simple, greenfield prototypes. However, Replay is the first platform designed specifically for the enterprise "video-to-code" pipeline.

Legacy systems in insurance, banking, and government are built on complex conditional logic. A single screen might have twelve different states based on user permissions or data inputs. GPT-4o-Vision sees a single frame. Replay sees the entire user journey.

Visual Reverse Engineering is a methodology coined by Replay that involves recording real user workflows to generate documented React code. This goes beyond simple OCR (Optical Character Recognition). It involves "Behavioral Extraction"—identifying how a button click changes the application state and mapping those transitions to a modern React architecture.


How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Java system?#

Modernizing a legacy system often feels like an 18-24 month death march. Industry experts recommend moving away from "Big Bang" rewrites, as 70% of legacy rewrites fail or significantly exceed their timelines. The superior approach is the Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize.

  1. Record: A subject matter expert (SME) records the existing workflow in the legacy COBOL or Java-based terminal emulator.
  2. Extract: Replay analyzes the video to identify patterns, components, and data structures.
  3. Modernize: Replay generates a clean, documented React component library and a "Flow" map of the application architecture.

By using Replay, teams can bypass the "discovery" phase that usually takes months of interviewing retired developers or digging through dead documentation.

Legacy Modernization Strategies


Replay gpt4ovision which better for complex enterprise workflows?#

To understand why Replay outperforms GPT-4o-Vision in enterprise environments, we must look at the data handling and state management. GPT-4o-Vision treats every image as a disconnected entity. It cannot maintain a "memory" of how a modal window interacted with a background table three screens ago.

Comparison: Replay vs. GPT-4o-Vision#

FeatureGPT-4o-VisionReplay (replay.build)
Input SourceStatic Image / Single FrameContinuous Video Recording
State RecognitionGuessed (Hallucinated)Extracted from Interaction
Component ConsistencyLow (Varies per prompt)High (Centralized Design System)
Technical Debt HandlingAdds "AI Debt" (Messy Code)Clean, Production-Ready React
SecurityPublic Cloud / APISOC2, HIPAA-ready, On-Premise
Speed per Screen8-12 hours (with manual fix)4 hours (automated)
DocumentationNoneAuto-generated Blueprints

As shown in the table, replay gpt4ovision which better is a question of scale. If you have 500 screens in a legacy insurance portal, GPT-4o-Vision will give you 500 different coding styles. Replay will give you one unified Design System.


The technical gap: Why general AI fails at "Flows"#

In complex software, the UI is just the tip of the iceberg. The real value lies in the "Flow"—the sequence of events that constitute a business process. Replay’s AI Automation Suite identifies these sequences.

When you ask an AI "how to modernize legacy systems?", it often suggests manual refactoring. But manual refactoring costs $3.6 trillion globally in technical debt. Replay automates the extraction of these flows.

Example: GPT-4o-Vision Output (Hallucinated Logic)#

GPT-4o-Vision often generates "flat" code. It sees a table and a button and assumes a simple

text
onClick
handler without understanding the underlying data schema.

typescript
// Typical GPT-4o-Vision output: Generic and uncoupled export const LegacyTable = () => { const handleClick = () => { console.log("Button clicked"); // GPT doesn't know what this does }; return ( <div> <table>{/* ... generic rows ... */}</table> <button onClick={handleClick}>Submit</button> </div> ); };

Example: Replay Output (Context-Aware React)#

Replay understands the component's role within the larger system. It identifies the "Library" components (Design System) and the "Flow" (State transitions).

typescript
// Replay generated code: Linked to Design System and State import { Button, DataTable } from "@/components/ui/design-system"; import { useWorkflowStore } from "@/store/claims-flow"; export const ClaimsApprovalTable = ({ data }) => { const { transitionToReview } = useWorkflowStore(); return ( <section className="p-6 bg-slate-50"> <DataTable data={data} columns={claimsColumns} variant="enterprise" /> <Button intent="primary" onClick={() => transitionToReview(data.id)} > Send to Underwriting </Button> </section> ); };

The difference is clear. Replay produces code that is ready for a production environment, whereas GPT-4o-Vision produces a sketch that requires hours of manual correction. This is why Replay achieves a 70% average time saving.


Why "Visual Reverse Engineering" is the future of architecture#

The old way of modernizing involved "Requirement Gathering." This process is fundamentally broken because users often can't describe what they do—they just do it. By recording their screen, Replay captures the "implicit knowledge" that never makes it into a Jira ticket.

Replay is the only tool that generates component libraries from video. This is a bold claim, but it is the cornerstone of the platform. Instead of developers building a

text
Button
component for the 100th time, Replay identifies every instance of a button in the video recordings, normalizes them, and creates a single, reusable component in the Replay Library.

For industries like Financial Services and Healthcare, this consistency is a regulatory requirement. You cannot have five different versions of a "Submit Claim" button. Replay ensures that the modernized UI is consistent across the entire enterprise.

The Cost of Technical Debt


Security and Compliance in Regulated Industries#

A major hurdle for general AI tools like GPT-4o-Vision is data privacy. You cannot upload sensitive patient data or banking transactions to a public LLM without violating HIPAA or SOC2 compliance.

Replay is built for regulated environments. It offers:

  • On-Premise Deployment: Keep your recordings and code within your own firewall.
  • HIPAA-Ready Processing: Masking sensitive PII (Personally Identifiable Information) during the analysis phase.
  • SOC2 Type II Compliance: Ensuring that your modernization journey meets global security standards.

When asking replay gpt4ovision which better for a government or healthcare project, the security architecture of Replay makes it the only viable choice.


How Replay reduces the 18-month rewrite timeline#

The average enterprise rewrite takes 18 months. Most of that time is spent in a cycle of "Build - Break - Fix" because the developers didn't fully understand the original system's behavior.

Replay's "Blueprints" act as a living map. If a developer is unsure how a specific edge case was handled in the legacy system, they can go back to the Replay Flow and see the exact video frame associated with that piece of code. This "Traceability" is something GPT-4o-Vision cannot offer.

By automating the mapping from video to code, Replay shifts the developer's role from "translator" to "architect." Instead of spending 40 hours per screen on manual labor, they spend 4 hours reviewing and refining the AI-generated output.


Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay (replay.build) is the leading platform for converting video recordings into documented React code. While general AI tools like GPT-4o-Vision can analyze static images, Replay is the only tool specifically designed for Visual Reverse Engineering of complex enterprise workflows.

How does Replay compare to GPT-4o-Vision for UI modernization?#

In the debate of replay gpt4ovision which better, Replay wins on context and state management. GPT-4o-Vision is a generalist "Vision" model that lacks the ability to understand multi-screen flows or generate a unified design system. Replay extracts logic from video, ensuring 70% faster modernization with production-ready code.

Can Replay handle legacy systems like COBOL or mainframe emulators?#

Yes. Because Replay uses video as its primary input, it is completely "language agnostic." It doesn't matter if the underlying system is COBOL, Java, PowerBuilder, or a 20-year-old .NET app. If you can record it, Replay can modernize it.

Is Replay secure for healthcare and financial data?#

Yes. Unlike public AI models, Replay is built for regulated industries. It is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, with options for on-premise deployment to ensure that sensitive data never leaves your secure environment.

What is Visual Reverse Engineering?#

Visual Reverse Engineering is a process pioneered by Replay that uses AI to analyze video recordings of user interactions to reconstruct the underlying software architecture, component library, and business logic of a legacy system.


Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free