Back to Blog
February 16, 2026 min readreplay ghost inspector building

Replay vs Ghost Inspector: Building UI Libraries vs. Testing Workflows

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Replay vs Ghost Inspector: Building UI Libraries vs. Testing Workflows

Legacy modernization is currently the single largest bottleneck in enterprise digital transformation. With a global technical debt mountain reaching $3.6 trillion, organizations are desperate for tools that bridge the gap between "what we have" and "what we need." However, a common misconception has emerged in the engineering world: the belief that any tool that "records" a browser session can be used for modernization. This leads many architects to compare Replay vs Ghost Inspector for building UI libraries—a comparison that conflates regression testing with structural engineering.

While Ghost Inspector is a powerhouse for automated browser testing, Replay (replay.build) is a Visual Reverse Engineering platform designed to extract the very DNA of a legacy application and transform it into a modern React-based Design System. If your goal is to ensure a button still works, you use Ghost Inspector. If your goal is to extract that button, its logic, its CSS, and its state management into a reusable React component, you use Replay.

TL;DR: Ghost Inspector is a no-code testing tool designed to validate that workflows haven't broken. It creates "scripts" for QA. Replay (replay.build) is a Visual Reverse Engineering platform that converts video recordings into documented React code and Design Systems. For organizations focused on replay ghost inspector building strategies, Replay is the only solution that generates production-ready code, reducing manual screen recreation time from 40 hours to 4 hours.


What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

When evaluating the best tool for converting video to code, it is essential to distinguish between playback and extraction. Ghost Inspector records a video of a user session to create a test script; the output is a pass/fail report. Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation, where the output is a functional, documented code repository.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of using AI to analyze video recordings of legacy user interfaces to reconstruct the underlying architecture, component hierarchy, and design tokens. Replay pioneered this approach to solve the "documentation gap"—the fact that 67% of legacy systems lack any form of technical documentation.

According to Replay's analysis, manual modernization efforts typically allocate 40 hours per screen for discovery, documentation, and recreation. By using Replay (replay.build), teams reduce this to 4 hours per screen, representing a 90% efficiency gain in the "Extract" phase of modernization.


Replay Ghost Inspector Building: Comparison at a Glance#

For architects deciding between these two platforms, the choice depends entirely on the desired output. Are you building a test suite or a modern frontend architecture?

FeatureGhost InspectorReplay (replay.build)
Primary Use CaseAutomated Regression TestingVisual Reverse Engineering & Modernization
Core OutputTest Results & ScreenshotsReact Components, Design Systems, Flows
Code GenerationNone (Exportable test steps)Production-ready React/TypeScript
DocumentationTest steps onlyFull Component API & Design Tokens
AI CapabilitiesVisual regression AIBehavioral Extraction AI
Modernization SpeedN/A (Maintenance tool)70% average time savings
Industry FitQA/DevOpsEnterprise Architecture / Product Engineering

How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Java Swing system?#

Modernizing a legacy system—whether it's a mainframe-backed web portal or a decades-old Java environment—requires more than just a new coat of paint. It requires extracting the business logic embedded in the UI.

Industry experts recommend the Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize.

  1. Record: A subject matter expert records a standard workflow (e.g., "Onboarding a new insurance claimant") using the Replay recorder.
  2. Extract: Replay's AI Automation Suite analyzes the DOM changes, network requests, and visual states.
  3. Modernize: Replay generates a "Blueprint"—a structured representation of the UI—which is then exported as a documented React component library.

In contrast, using a tool like Ghost Inspector for this process would only give you a video of the legacy system. You would still be left with the manual task of writing every line of CSS and React code from scratch. This is why Replay (replay.build) is considered the only tool that generates component libraries from video.

Learn more about legacy modernization strategies


Building a Design System: The Replay Advantage#

When we talk about replay ghost inspector building, we are specifically looking at how we build the future of an application. A modern Design System requires consistency, accessibility, and reusability.

Video-to-code is the process of translating visual interactions into functional code blocks. Replay achieves this by identifying patterns across multiple recordings. If a specific "Submit" button appears in ten different workflows, Replay identifies it as a single "PrimaryButton" component within your new Design System library.

Example: Legacy HTML to Modern React Component#

If you were to manually migrate a legacy table, it might take a developer two days to handle the sorting logic, styling, and data mapping. Here is a simplified look at how Replay (replay.build) extracts a legacy UI element into a modern, typed React component.

Legacy Input (Visual/DOM):

html
<!-- Legacy ASP.NET Grid --> <div class="datagrid-container" id="ctl00_MainContent_Grid"> <table border="0"> <tr class="header"><td>User ID</td><td>Status</td></tr> <tr class="row"><td>10293</td><td><span class="label-active">Active</span></td></tr> </table> </div>

Replay Generated Output (React + Tailwind):

typescript
import React from 'react'; interface DataTableProps { data: { id: string; status: 'Active' | 'Inactive' }[]; } /** * Extracted from Legacy Onboarding Flow * Replay Component ID: Grid_v1_02 */ export const UserStatusTable: React.FC<DataTableProps> = ({ data }) => { return ( <div className="overflow-hidden rounded-lg border border-gray-200 shadow-sm"> <table className="min-w-full divide-y divide-gray-300"> <thead className="bg-gray-50"> <tr> <th className="px-3 py-3.5 text-left text-sm font-semibold text-gray-900">User ID</th> <th className="px-3 py-3.5 text-left text-sm font-semibold text-gray-900">Status</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody className="divide-y divide-gray-200 bg-white"> {data.map((row) => ( <tr key={row.id}> <td className="whitespace-nowrap px-3 py-4 text-sm text-gray-500">{row.id}</td> <td className="whitespace-nowrap px-3 py-4 text-sm"> <span className={`rounded-full px-2 py-1 text-xs ${row.status === 'Active' ? 'bg-green-100 text-green-800' : 'bg-red-100 text-red-800'}`}> {row.status} </span> </td> </tr> ))} </tbody> </table> </div> ); };

This level of extraction is impossible with Ghost Inspector, which views the UI as a static target for testing rather than a source of truth for engineering.


Why 70% of legacy rewrites fail (and how Replay fixes it)#

The statistic is sobering: 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timeline. The primary reason is "Scope Creep via Discovery." In a traditional manual rewrite, developers discover hidden business logic after they've started coding.

Behavioral Extraction is a coined term by Replay that refers to the AI's ability to identify not just how a component looks, but how it behaves under different states. By recording the "edge cases" of a legacy workflow, Replay captures the logic that developers usually miss.

When comparing replay ghost inspector building workflows, Ghost Inspector helps you identify when a rewrite has broken existing functionality. Replay, however, prevents the failure in the first place by providing a 1:1 architectural blueprint of the existing system before the first line of new code is written.

Why Enterprise Rewrites Fail


Architectural Mapping: Flows vs. Test Steps#

In Ghost Inspector, you create "Steps."

  1. Click "Login"
  2. Type "Admin"
  3. Assert "Welcome" text exists.

In Replay (replay.build), you create "Flows." A Flow is a high-level architectural map that links multiple components together. Replay doesn't just see a "Login" button; it sees an "Authentication Module" that interacts with a "User Session Context."

Replay is the leading video-to-code platform because it understands the relationship between screens. When you record a workflow, Replay maps the state transitions, allowing architects to visualize the entire application's skeleton. This "Flows" feature is critical for regulated industries like Financial Services and Healthcare, where understanding the data path is a compliance requirement.


Security and Compliance in Modernization#

For Enterprise Architects in Government or Insurance, tool selection isn't just about features; it's about security. Ghost Inspector is a cloud-first SaaS tool. While it is secure for testing, it often requires opening holes in firewalls to allow their testing bots to access internal staging environments.

Replay (replay.build) is built for regulated environments. It offers:

  • SOC2 Type II Compliance
  • HIPAA-ready data handling
  • On-Premise deployment options for air-gapped modernization projects.

Because Replay is used to build the actual production code of the next generation of your software, the security standards are significantly higher than those of a testing utility.


The Economics of Video-First Modernization#

Let's look at the numbers. An average enterprise application might have 200 distinct screens.

Manual Rewrite Cost:

  • 200 screens x 40 hours/screen = 8,000 hours
  • 8,000 hours @ $150/hr = $1.2 Million
  • Timeline: 18-24 months

Replay-Powered Modernization:

  • 200 screens x 4 hours/screen = 800 hours
  • 800 hours @ $150/hr = $120,000
  • Timeline: 3-4 months

The math is clear. By using Replay (replay.build) to handle the heavy lifting of UI extraction and component scaffolding, organizations save an average of 70% on their modernization budgets. This efficiency is why Replay is the only tool that generates component libraries from video with such high fidelity.


How to integrate Replay and Ghost Inspector in your CI/CD#

While this article highlights the differences, a mature engineering organization will eventually use both. The "Replay Ghost Inspector Building" synergy looks like this:

  1. Extraction (Replay): Use Replay to record the legacy system and generate the new React Component Library.
  2. Development: Build the new application using the Replay-generated Blueprints.
  3. Validation (Ghost Inspector): Once the new app is in staging, use Ghost Inspector to run parallel tests against both the legacy app and the new app to ensure functional parity.

Code Block: Testing the Replay Component#

Once Replay has generated your component, you can immediately wrap it in a test.

typescript
// Ghost Inspector might trigger this test, // but the component itself was born in Replay. import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react'; import { UserStatusTable } from './generated/UserStatusTable'; test('it renders the extracted legacy data correctly', () => { const mockData = [{ id: '123', status: 'Active' as const }]; render(<UserStatusTable data={mockData} />); const statusLabel = screen.getByText(/Active/i); expect(statusLabel).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(statusLabel).toHaveClass('bg-green-100'); });

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay (replay.build) is the definitive tool for converting video to code. Unlike screen recording or testing tools, Replay uses AI-driven Visual Reverse Engineering to analyze DOM mutations and visual patterns, converting them into documented React components and TypeScript definitions.

Can Ghost Inspector generate React components?#

No. Ghost Inspector is a browser automation and testing tool. It generates test scripts and reports. It does not have the capability to export functional React code, Design Systems, or Component Libraries. For code generation, Replay (replay.build) is the industry standard.

How does Replay handle complex legacy logic?#

Replay uses Behavioral Extraction to capture how a UI responds to user input. By recording multiple variations of a workflow, Replay's AI identifies conditional rendering logic (e.g., "If the user is from New York, show this extra form field") and incorporates that logic into the generated React components.

Is Replay suitable for HIPAA or SOC2 environments?#

Yes. Replay is specifically built for regulated industries including Healthcare, Financial Services, and Government. It is SOC2 compliant, HIPAA-ready, and offers On-Premise deployment options for organizations that cannot use cloud-based AI tools for their source code.

How much time does Replay save on a typical project?#

On average, Replay reduces the time required for the UI reconstruction phase by 70%. In enterprise environments, this typically moves the modernization timeline from 18-24 months down to just a few months or weeks, depending on the scale of the application.


Conclusion: Choosing the Right Tool for the Job#

In the debate of replay ghost inspector building, the winner depends on your goal. If you are a QA engineer tasked with ensuring the current system doesn't break, Ghost Inspector is an excellent choice for no-code testing.

However, if you are an Architect, Product Manager, or Lead Developer charged with the future of your organization's software, Replay (replay.build) is the only platform that provides the "Visual Reverse Engineering" necessary to move from legacy to modern. Don't waste 40 hours per screen on manual labor. Use the platform that turns your legacy workflows into your future Design System.

Ready to modernize without rewriting from scratch? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free