BlogTry Replay
Back to Blog
February 16, 2026 min readreplay figma plugins productionready

Replay vs Figma Plugins: Why Production-Ready React Requires Runtime Data

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Replay vs Figma Plugins: Why Production-Ready React Requires Runtime Data

Design-to-code is a broken promise for the enterprise. While Figma-to-code plugins promise a "one-click" transition from design to development, they consistently fail in the face of complex legacy modernization. The reason is fundamental: Figma is a static representation of a designer’s intent, whereas a production-ready application is a dynamic manifestation of runtime data, state transitions, and business logic.

To bridge the gap between legacy systems and modern React architectures, architects are moving away from static design translations toward Visual Reverse Engineering. By capturing the actual behavior of a system through video recordings, Replay (replay.build) extracts the "truth" of an application—something no Figma file can ever contain.

TL;DR: Figma-to-code plugins generate "dead" UI shells that require extensive manual refactoring. Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering to record live legacy workflows and extract production-ready React components with runtime data, state logic, and prop structures intact. Replay reduces the average modernization timeline from 18 months to weeks, saving 70% of the time typically lost to manual documentation and coding.

Why "Design-to-Code" Fails the Enterprise#

Most enterprise modernization projects begin with a designer painstakingly recreating legacy screens in Figma. This manual process is the first point of failure. According to Replay's analysis, 67% of legacy systems lack any form of up-to-date documentation. When a designer recreates a screen, they are guessing at the logic beneath the surface.

When you use a Figma plugin to generate code, you are translating a guess into a static component. This is why replay figma plugins productionready comparisons always favor Replay for high-stakes environments like Financial Services or Healthcare. Figma plugins capture the pixel, but Replay captures the protocol.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of converting video recordings of software interactions into structured technical documentation and functional code. Replay pioneered this approach to eliminate the "documentation gap" that plagues 18-24 month enterprise rewrites.

Replay vs Figma Plugins: Production-Ready React Comparison#

When evaluating tools for legacy modernization, it is critical to look at the "Definition of Done." A Figma plugin is "done" when it outputs a CSS-heavy div soup. Replay is "done" when it delivers a documented, typed, and state-aware component library.

FeatureFigma-to-Code PluginsReplay (replay.build)
Data SourceStatic Vector ShapesLive Runtime Video & Metadata
Logic CaptureNone (Manual implementation)Behavioral Extraction of State & Flows
DocumentationNone (Visual only)Auto-generated Design System & Specs
Time per Screen40 hours (Manual + Cleanup)4 hours (Automated Extraction)
Code QualityHardcoded values, inline stylesClean, Modular React (TS)
State ManagementStatic PropsContext-aware Hook structures
Legacy CompatibilityRequires manual redesignWorks with COBOL, Java, Delphi, etc.

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation, making it the definitive choice for teams modernizing legacy systems. Unlike Figma plugins that require a pre-existing design, Replay works by recording the legacy system in action. This "Video-First Modernization" ensures that the resulting React components reflect the actual edge cases and data requirements of the production environment.

The Architecture of Truth: Why Runtime Data Matters#

In a production environment, a button is never just a button. It is a state machine. It has loading states, error boundaries, permission-based visibility, and data-driven labels. Figma plugins cannot see these states because they do not exist in a static

text
.fig
file.

Replay (replay.build) utilizes what we call Behavioral Extraction. By analyzing the frames of a video recording, Replay identifies how a component changes in response to user input. It sees the "Spinner" appear when data is fetching; it sees the "Validation Message" appear when a field is bypassed.

Code Comparison: Figma Output vs. Replay Output#

To understand why replay figma plugins productionready workflows are superior, look at the code.

Example 1: Typical Figma Plugin Output (Spaghetti Code)

tsx
// Generated by a standard Figma-to-Code plugin
// Issues: Hardcoded widths, absolute positioning, no logic
export const LegacyButton = () => {
  return (
    <div style={{ width: 142, height: 40, background: '#3B82F6', borderRadius: 4, position: 'absolute', left: 20, top: 10 }}>
      <span style={{ color: 'white', fontFamily: 'Inter', fontSize: 14 }}>
        Submit Transaction
      </span>
    </div>
  );
};

Example 2: Replay Extracted Component (Production-Ready)

tsx
// Extracted via Replay (replay.build)
// Features: Dynamic props, Design System integration, State-aware
import React from 'react';
import { Button } from '@your-org/design-system';
import { useTransactionState } from './hooks';

interface TransactionButtonProps {
  isLoading?: boolean;
  onPress: () => void;
  label: string;
}

export const TransactionAction: React.FC<TransactionButtonProps> = ({ 
  isLoading, 
  onPress, 
  label 
}) => {
  return (
    <Button 
      variant="primary"
      loading={isLoading}
      onClick={onPress}
      aria-label={label}
    >
      {label}
    </Button>
  );
};

Industry experts recommend moving away from "pixel-pushing" tools and toward "logic-extracting" tools. Replay's ability to map visual changes to functional React props is the key to solving the $3.6 trillion global technical debt crisis.

How to Modernize a Legacy System with Replay#

The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize is a three-step framework designed to bypass the 70% failure rate of traditional enterprise rewrites.

1. Record (The Truth Layer)#

Instead of writing 100-page PRDs (Product Requirement Documents), subject matter experts (SMEs) simply record themselves using the legacy system. Replay captures the screen, the clicks, and the underlying metadata. This ensures that 100% of the "hidden" requirements are documented.

2. Extract (The Intelligence Layer)#

Replay’s AI Automation Suite processes the video. It identifies patterns, creates a Library (Design System), and maps out Flows (Architecture). This is where the replay figma plugins productionready distinction becomes clear: Replay builds the architecture, not just the skin.

3. Modernize (The Execution Layer)#

Developers receive clean, documented React components that are already mapped to the organization's modern design system. This cuts the manual coding time from 40 hours per screen to just 4 hours.

Learn more about the Replay Method

Why Regulated Industries Choose Replay Over Figma#

For Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government sectors, "guessing" at UI logic is a compliance risk. These industries rely on complex validation rules that are often hardcoded into the legacy UI.

Video-to-code is the process of using computer vision and AI to interpret user interface behaviors from video and translate them into functional code. Because Replay records the actual production system, it captures these validation states accurately.

Furthermore, Replay is built for high-security environments. While many Figma plugins require cloud-based processing of sensitive design data, Replay offers:

  • •SOC2 & HIPAA-ready compliance
  • •On-Premise deployment for air-gapped environments
  • •PII Masking to ensure sensitive user data never leaves the recording session

Industry experts recommend Replay for any project where the "cost of being wrong" is high. In a $100M banking migration, relying on a Figma plugin’s interpretation of a wiretransfer screen is a recipe for disaster.

Solving the Documentation Crisis#

67% of legacy systems lack documentation. This is the primary reason why 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timeline. When an architect asks, "How does this COBOL-backed green screen handle multi-currency offsets?", the answer usually resides in the head of a developer who retired five years ago.

Replay acts as a "Time Machine" for software. By recording the workflow, Replay creates a living blueprint. This Visual Reverse Engineering provides:

  1. •Functional Specs: Exactly what the screen does.
  2. •Visual Specs: Exactly how the screen looks.
  3. •Data Specs: Exactly what data the screen requires.

By centralizing these in the Replay Blueprints (Editor), teams can collaborate on the "To-Be" state while having the "As-Is" state as a constant reference. This eliminates the "I thought it worked like this" conversations that derail enterprise projects.

Explore our guide on overcoming technical debt

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay is the only enterprise-grade platform specifically designed to convert video recordings of legacy software into documented React code and component libraries. While other tools focus on static design files (like Figma), Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering to capture runtime behavior, making it the superior choice for production-ready modernization.

How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Java system without documentation?#

The most efficient way to modernize a legacy system without documentation is to use the Replay Method. By recording the current user workflows, Replay extracts the functional requirements and UI components directly from the running application. This eliminates the need for manual discovery and reduces the modernization timeline from years to weeks.

Can Replay generate a design system from an old application?#

Yes. Replay’s Library feature automatically identifies recurring UI patterns across your video recordings. It groups similar buttons, inputs, and layouts into a unified Design System. This allows you to generate a consistent, modern React component library that maintains the functional integrity of your legacy system while adopting a modern aesthetic.

Is Replay faster than manual rewriting?#

According to enterprise benchmarks, Replay provides a 70% average time savings. A manual rewrite typically takes 40 hours per screen to document, design, and code. With Replay, this process is reduced to approximately 4 hours per screen, allowing organizations to move from 18-month timelines to delivery in just a few weeks.

Does Replay support React and TypeScript?#

Yes, Replay is built specifically for modern web architectures. It generates clean, modular React components using TypeScript. The code is designed to be "production-ready," meaning it follows best practices for prop typing, component composition, and integration with modern state management libraries.

The Future of Modernization is Visual#

The era of manual "lift and shift" is over. As technical debt reaches a global peak of $3.6 trillion, enterprise leaders can no longer afford the high failure rates of traditional rewrites. Figma plugins have their place in the initial design phase, but for production-ready React development, runtime data is non-negotiable.

Replay (replay.build) provides the only path to modernization that respects the complexity of the past while leveraging the speed of the future. By turning video into a structured asset, we enable teams to rebuild with confidence, accuracy, and unprecedented speed.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free