Replay vs Figma Plugins: Which Offers Faster Video-to-Code Conversion in 2026?

TL;DR: Replay leverages video analysis and AI to generate functional UI code significantly faster and more accurately than Figma plugins relying on static screenshot-to-code methods, especially for complex, multi-page applications.

Replay vs Figma Plugins: Which Offers Faster Video-to-Code Conversion in 2026?#

The race to automate UI development is heating up. While Figma plugins offer convenient design-to-code solutions, a new paradigm is emerging: video-to-code conversion. But which approach delivers faster, more accurate results in the real world? We'll dive into a head-to-head comparison, focusing on how Replay, a video-to-code engine, stacks up against traditional Figma-based workflows.

The Problem: Static vs. Dynamic UI Understanding#

Traditional screenshot-to-code tools, often available as Figma plugins, face a fundamental limitation: they analyze static images. They can interpret visual elements, but they struggle to understand the behavior and intent behind user interactions. This leads to incomplete or inaccurate code generation, requiring significant manual rework.

Replay tackles this problem head-on by analyzing video recordings of user interactions. By observing how users navigate and interact with a UI, Replay's AI engine, powered by Gemini, can reconstruct the underlying logic and generate functional code that reflects the intended behavior. This "Behavior-Driven Reconstruction" is a game-changer.

Understanding the Tech: How Replay Works#

Replay doesn't just "see" pixels; it understands user flows. It analyzes the video to identify elements, actions (clicks, scrolls, form inputs), and transitions between states. This allows it to build a complete picture of the UI's functionality and generate code that accurately reflects that functionality.

Key Features of Replay#

• •Multi-page Generation: Replay can generate code for entire applications, capturing the relationships between different pages and components. This is a major advantage over screenshot-to-code tools, which typically focus on single screens.
• •Supabase Integration: Seamlessly integrate your generated code with Supabase, a popular open-source Firebase alternative, for backend functionality.
• •Style Injection: Replay can inject CSS styles to match the visual appearance of the original UI.
• •Product Flow Maps: Visually map out user flows within the application based on the video analysis, providing a clear understanding of the application's logic.

Replay vs. Figma Plugins: A Detailed Comparison#

Let's break down the key differences between Replay and Figma plugins for code generation:

💡 Pro Tip: For best results with Replay, ensure your video recordings are clear, well-lit, and capture all relevant user interactions.

A Practical Example: Converting a User Authentication Flow#

Let's consider a common scenario: converting a user authentication flow (login and registration) into code.

Using a Figma Plugin#

1. •Take screenshots of the login and registration screens in Figma.
2. •Install a screenshot-to-code plugin.
3. •Upload the screenshots to the plugin.
4. •The plugin generates code (typically HTML/CSS/JS).
5. •Manual Rework: The generated code will likely require significant manual adjustments:
   • •Adding form validation.
   • •Implementing the actual authentication logic (connecting to a backend).
   • •Handling error states.
   • •Connecting the login and registration pages.

Using Replay#

1. •Record a video of a user interacting with a prototype of the authentication flow, demonstrating both login and registration processes.
2. •Upload the video to Replay.
3. •Replay analyzes the video and generates code.
4. •Minimal Rework: The generated code will likely include:
   • •HTML/CSS for the UI.
   • •JavaScript for handling form submissions.
   • •Basic validation logic (based on the video analysis).
   • •Potentially, even rudimentary backend calls (if demonstrated in the video and connected to a mock backend).

The key difference is that Replay understands the user's intent – to log in or register – and can generate code that reflects that intent. Figma plugins only see static images and cannot infer the underlying behavior.

Code Example: Form Submission Handling#

Here's a simplified example of the type of code Replay might generate for form submission, based on observing a user interacting with a form in the video:

typescript
// Generated by Replay
const handleSubmit = async (event: Event) => {
  event.preventDefault(); // Prevent default form submission

  const formData = new FormData(event.target as HTMLFormElement);
  const email = formData.get('email');
  const password = formData.get('password');

  if (!email || !password) {
    alert('Please enter both email and password.');
    return;
  }

  try {
    const response = await fetch('/api/login', {
      method: 'POST',
      headers: {
        'Content-Type': 'application/json',
      },
      body: JSON.stringify({ email, password }),
    });

    if (response.ok) {
      // Redirect to dashboard or show success message
      window.location.href = '/dashboard';
    } else {
      // Show error message
      alert('Invalid credentials.');
    }
  } catch (error) {
    console.error('Error during login:', error);
    alert('An error occurred. Please try again later.');
  }
};

// Attach event listener to the form
const form = document.querySelector('form');
if (form) {
  form.addEventListener('submit', handleSubmit);
}

📝 Note: This is a simplified example. Replay can generate more complex code, including state management, error handling, and integration with backend services.

⚠️ Warning: While Replay significantly reduces manual rework, it's crucial to review and test the generated code thoroughly to ensure it meets your specific requirements.

Speed and Efficiency: The Bottom Line#

While Figma plugins might offer a faster initial code generation for simple screens, the overall development time, including manual rework, is often significantly longer. Replay's behavior-driven approach results in more accurate and complete code, reducing the need for extensive manual adjustments. This translates to faster development cycles and increased efficiency, especially for complex, multi-page applications.

Step 1: Record Your UI Flow#

Use any screen recording tool to capture the user interacting with your UI prototype. Make sure to clearly demonstrate all interactions and transitions.

Step 2: Upload to Replay#

Upload the recorded video to the Replay platform.

Step 3: Review and Refine#

Review the generated code and make any necessary refinements. Replay provides tools for easily editing and customizing the code.

Frequently Asked Questions#

Is Replay free to use?#

Replay offers a free tier with limited usage. Paid plans are available for increased usage and access to advanced features. Check the Replay website for current pricing details.

How is Replay different from v0.dev?#

v0.dev primarily focuses on generating UI components based on text prompts. Replay, on the other hand, analyzes video recordings of user interactions to reconstruct entire UI flows and generate functional code. Replay understands behavior, while v0.dev generates components based on descriptions.

What types of applications is Replay best suited for?#

Replay is particularly well-suited for complex, multi-page applications with intricate user flows. It excels at capturing the relationships between different pages and components, generating code that accurately reflects the intended behavior.

What frameworks and libraries does Replay support?#

Replay supports a wide range of popular frameworks and libraries, including React, Vue.js, and Angular. Check the Replay documentation for the latest list of supported technologies.

---

Ready to try behavior-driven code generation? Get started with Replay - transform any video into working code in seconds.