Back to Blog
January 5, 20267 min readReplay vs Figma

Replay vs Figma Plugins: Does UI fidelity increase using code analysis in complex UI?

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

TL;DR: Replay offers superior UI reconstruction compared to Figma plugins, particularly for complex UIs, by analyzing video to understand user behavior and generating functional code, not just static visuals.

Replay vs. Figma Plugins: Does UI Fidelity Increase Using Code Analysis in Complex UI?#

Figma plugins that convert designs to code are plentiful, but they often fall short when dealing with complex UIs and dynamic behaviors. They primarily translate static designs, leading to significant manual adjustments to achieve true functionality and responsiveness. Replay takes a different approach. By analyzing video recordings of user interactions, Replay reconstructs UIs with a deeper understanding of the intended behavior, resulting in higher fidelity and reduced post-generation rework.

The Problem with Static Design-to-Code Conversion#

Traditional design-to-code tools, including many Figma plugins, operate on the principle of converting visual elements into code. This process is inherently limited because it ignores the crucial aspect of behavior.

Consider a simple example: a modal that appears after a button click. A Figma plugin can generate the HTML and CSS for the modal's appearance, but it doesn't inherently understand the trigger mechanism (the button click) or the modal's intended functionality (e.g., form submission, closing animation). This disconnect necessitates manual coding to bridge the gap between the static design and the dynamic behavior.

This problem compounds in complex UIs, where interactions involve multiple states, conditional rendering, and intricate data flows. Figma plugins often struggle to accurately capture these nuances, resulting in code that is incomplete, buggy, or simply doesn't work as intended.

Replay's Behavior-Driven Reconstruction#

Replay addresses this limitation by employing "Behavior-Driven Reconstruction." Instead of simply converting visual elements, Replay analyzes video recordings of user interactions to understand what the user is trying to achieve. This understanding informs the code generation process, resulting in a more functional and accurate representation of the intended UI.

Replay leverages Gemini to understand user intent from video, allowing it to:

  • Identify interactive elements (buttons, links, forms)
  • Track user actions (clicks, scrolls, form submissions)
  • Infer the relationships between UI elements and their behaviors
  • Reconstruct multi-page flows and application states

This approach enables Replay to generate code that not only looks like the original UI but also behaves like it, significantly reducing the need for manual adjustments.

Key Advantages of Replay Over Figma Plugins#

Here's a comparison highlighting the key differences:

FeatureFigma Plugins (Design-to-Code)Replay (Video-to-Code)
Input SourceStatic Design Files (Figma)Video Recordings of User Interactions
Behavior AnalysisLimited or Non-ExistentDeep Behavior Analysis using Gemini
Code FidelityLow, requires significant manual adjustmentsHigh, closely mirrors intended behavior
Multi-Page SupportTypically limited to single screensRobust support for multi-page flows
Dynamic UI ElementsPoor support, requires manual codingExcellent support, understands state changes
Supabase IntegrationRequires manual setupBuilt-in Supabase integration for data persistence
Style InjectionLimited, often requires manual CSS adjustmentsSmart style injection for visual consistency
Product Flow MapsNot SupportedGenerates visual product flow maps

A Practical Example: Reconstructing a User Onboarding Flow#

Let's consider a user onboarding flow with several steps:

  1. User lands on the landing page.
  2. User clicks the "Sign Up" button.
  3. User fills out the registration form.
  4. User verifies their email address.
  5. User is redirected to the dashboard.

A Figma plugin might be able to generate the code for the landing page and the registration form. However, it would likely struggle with the email verification process and the redirection to the dashboard, as these involve dynamic behaviors and server-side interactions.

Replay, on the other hand, can capture the entire flow from a video recording and generate code that accurately reflects the intended behavior.

Step-by-Step: Reconstructing a UI with Replay#

Here's a simplified example of how you might use Replay to reconstruct a UI from a video:

Step 1: Record the User Interaction#

Record a video of yourself interacting with the UI you want to reconstruct. Make sure to capture all the relevant actions and states.

💡 Pro Tip: Clear and concise videos lead to more accurate code generation. Speak clearly as you record and describe what you are doing.

Step 2: Upload the Video to Replay#

Upload the video to Replay's platform. Replay will then analyze the video and generate the corresponding code.

Step 3: Review and Refine the Generated Code#

Review the generated code and make any necessary adjustments. Replay provides tools for editing the code and fine-tuning the UI.

Step 4: Integrate with Your Project#

Integrate the generated code into your project. Replay supports various frameworks and libraries, making it easy to integrate the code into your existing codebase.

Code Example: Generated React Component#

Here's an example of a React component that Replay might generate from a video of a simple button click:

typescript
// Generated by Replay import React, { useState } from 'react'; const MyButton = () => { const [clicked, setClicked] = useState(false); const handleClick = () => { setClicked(true); // Add any other desired functionality here console.log('Button clicked!'); }; return ( <button onClick={handleClick} style={{ backgroundColor: clicked ? 'green' : 'blue', color: 'white', padding: '10px 20px', border: 'none', borderRadius: '5px', cursor: 'pointer' }}> {clicked ? 'Clicked!' : 'Click Me'} </button> ); }; export default MyButton;

This code not only renders a button but also includes the logic for handling the click event and updating the button's state. This level of behavior is typically absent from code generated by simple design-to-code tools.

Supabase Integration for Enhanced Functionality#

Replay seamlessly integrates with Supabase, a popular open-source Firebase alternative, to provide backend functionality for your reconstructed UIs. This integration allows you to easily add data persistence, authentication, and other server-side features to your applications.

📝 Note: Replay’s Supabase integration eliminates the need for manual backend setup, saving you significant time and effort.

Style Injection for Visual Consistency#

Replay's style injection feature ensures that the generated code maintains the visual consistency of the original UI. Replay analyzes the video to identify the styles applied to different UI elements and automatically injects these styles into the generated code. This eliminates the need for manual CSS adjustments and ensures that the reconstructed UI looks exactly like the original.

⚠️ Warning: While Replay strives for pixel-perfect accuracy, minor style adjustments may still be necessary in some cases, especially when dealing with complex animations or custom fonts.

The Future of UI Reconstruction#

Replay represents a significant step forward in UI reconstruction. By leveraging video analysis and behavior-driven reconstruction, Replay enables developers to generate functional and accurate code from existing UIs, significantly reducing the time and effort required for manual coding. As AI technology continues to advance, we can expect even more sophisticated UI reconstruction tools to emerge, further blurring the line between design and code. 🚀

Frequently Asked Questions#

Is Replay free to use?#

Replay offers a free tier with limited usage, allowing you to try out the platform and reconstruct simple UIs. Paid plans are available for more extensive usage and access to advanced features.

How is Replay different from v0.dev?#

While both tools aim to generate code from visual inputs, they differ significantly in their approach. v0.dev relies on AI to generate code from text prompts, whereas Replay analyzes video recordings to understand user behavior and reconstruct existing UIs. Replay excels at capturing the nuances of user interactions and generating code that accurately reflects the intended behavior.

What types of applications is Replay best suited for?#

Replay is particularly well-suited for reconstructing complex UIs with dynamic behaviors, such as web applications, mobile apps, and interactive prototypes. It is also useful for reverse-engineering existing UIs and generating code for legacy systems.

What frameworks and libraries does Replay support?#

Replay currently supports React, HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Support for other frameworks and libraries is planned for future releases.


Ready to try behavior-driven code generation? Get started with Replay - transform any video into working code in seconds.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free