Replay vs Cursor: Which AI Offers the Best Error Handling Features for Production (2026)?

TL;DR: Replay's behavior-driven reconstruction, powered by Gemini, provides superior error handling in production code compared to Cursor by understanding user intent from video analysis, leading to more robust and maintainable UI components.

The era of screenshot-to-code is over. Static images can't capture the dynamic nuances of user interaction, leading to brittle, error-prone UI code. In 2026, production-ready code demands an understanding of behavior, not just appearance. We're going to pit Replay against Cursor to see which AI truly delivers on robust error handling.

The Problem: Error-Prone UI Code from Static Images#

Traditional AI code generation tools, including some aspects of Cursor, often rely on static screenshots. This approach fundamentally misunderstands the user's intent. A button looks like a button, but what happens when it's clicked? What data is passed? What state changes occur? Without this behavioral context, the generated code is prone to errors and requires extensive manual debugging.

This is especially true when dealing with complex UI flows, form validation, and asynchronous operations. Static images simply can't capture the dynamic nature of these interactions, leading to code that breaks easily under real-world conditions.

Replay: Behavior-Driven Reconstruction for Robust Code#

Replay takes a different approach. Instead of relying on screenshots, Replay analyzes video recordings of user interactions. This "Behavior-Driven Reconstruction" allows Replay to understand the why behind each action, not just the what. By leveraging Gemini's powerful video understanding capabilities, Replay can reconstruct UI components with a deep understanding of their intended behavior, resulting in code that is significantly more robust and less prone to errors.

Key Advantages of Replay's Approach#

• •Understands User Intent: By analyzing video, Replay grasps the purpose behind each interaction, generating code that reflects the intended behavior.
• •Handles Dynamic State Changes: Replay tracks state changes throughout the video, ensuring that the generated code correctly manages data flow and UI updates.
• •Replicates Complex UI Flows: Multi-page generation allows Replay to reconstruct entire product flows, capturing the intricate relationships between different UI components.
• •Superior Error Handling: By understanding the expected behavior, Replay can generate code that anticipates and handles potential errors gracefully.

Replay vs. Cursor: Error Handling Feature Comparison#

Let's examine a direct comparison of how Replay and Cursor handle common error-prone scenarios.

💡 Pro Tip: When evaluating AI code generation tools, focus on their ability to understand and replicate behavior, not just appearance. This is the key to generating robust and maintainable code.

Code Example: Handling Asynchronous Errors#

Consider a scenario where a user submits a form that triggers an asynchronous API call. The API call might fail due to network issues or server errors.

With a screenshot-based approach (like some aspects of Cursor), it's difficult to infer how the UI should respond to these errors. The generated code might simply crash or display a generic error message.

With Replay, the video recording captures the user's interaction with the error state. For example, the video might show the UI displaying a specific error message or retrying the API call. Replay can then generate code that replicates this behavior, providing a much more user-friendly and robust error handling experience.

Here's an example of how Replay might generate code to handle asynchronous errors in a React component:

typescript
import React, { useState } from 'react';

const MyForm = () => {
  const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false);
  const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null);

  const handleSubmit = async (data: any) => {
    setIsLoading(true);
    setError(null); // Clear previous errors

    try {
      const response = await fetch('/api/submit', {
        method: 'POST',
        body: JSON.stringify(data),
      });

      if (!response.ok) {
        throw new Error(`API Error: ${response.status}`);
      }

      // Handle successful submission
      console.log('Form submitted successfully!');
    } catch (e: any) {
      setError(e.message); // Set error message
    } finally {
      setIsLoading(false);
    }
  };

  return (
    <div>
      {error && <div className="error-message">{error}</div>}
      {isLoading ? (
        <p>Submitting...</p>
      ) : (
        <form onSubmit={(e) => {
            e.preventDefault();
            // Replace with actual form data retrieval
            const formData = { name: "example", email: "test@example.com" };
            handleSubmit(formData);
        }}>
          <button type="submit">Submit</button>
        </form>
      )}
    </div>
  );
};

export default MyForm;

This code includes:

• •Error State: The
  text

  error
  state variable stores any error messages.
• •Loading State: The
  text

  isLoading
  state variable indicates whether the API call is in progress.
• •Error Handling: The
  text

  try...catch
  block handles potential errors during the API call.
• •UI Updates: The UI displays an error message if an error occurs and a loading indicator while the API call is in progress.

Replay can generate this type of code automatically by analyzing the video recording and understanding how the UI should respond to different error states.

Step-by-Step: Building a Robust Form with Replay#

Here's a step-by-step guide to building a robust form with Replay, focusing on error handling:

Step 1: Record the User Interaction#

Record a video of a user interacting with the form, including both successful submissions and error scenarios (e.g., invalid input, API errors).

Step 2: Upload the Video to Replay#

Upload the video to Replay and let it analyze the user behavior.

Step 3: Review the Generated Code#

Review the generated code and ensure that it accurately captures the intended behavior, including error handling logic.

Step 4: Customize and Integrate#

Customize the generated code as needed and integrate it into your application.

📝 Note: Replay's Supabase integration simplifies data management and authentication, further enhancing the robustness of your application.

Style Injection for Visual Error States#

Replay allows for style injection, ensuring that error states are not only functional but also visually clear to the user. Imagine a scenario where a form field turns red and displays an error message when invalid input is detected. Replay can capture these visual cues from the video and generate CSS styles that replicate this behavior.

css
.error-message {
  color: red;
  font-size: 0.8em;
  margin-top: 0.5em;
}

input.error {
  border: 1px solid red;
}

This CSS code defines styles for error messages and input fields with errors, ensuring that they are visually distinct and easily recognizable.

Product Flow Maps for Complex Error Scenarios#

Replay's product flow maps provide a visual representation of the user's journey through the application, including potential error scenarios. This allows developers to quickly identify and address potential error handling gaps.

For example, a product flow map might show that a user can encounter an error when submitting a form, which then redirects them to a specific error page. This information can be used to ensure that the error page provides helpful guidance and allows the user to recover from the error.

⚠️ Warning: Neglecting error handling can lead to a poor user experience, increased support costs, and even lost revenue. Invest in robust error handling strategies to mitigate these risks.

Frequently Asked Questions#

Is Replay free to use?#

Replay offers a free tier with limited usage. Paid plans are available for higher usage and access to advanced features.

How is Replay different from v0.dev?#

While both tools aim to generate code, Replay focuses on understanding behavior from video recordings, leading to more robust and maintainable code. v0.dev primarily relies on text prompts and existing code snippets, which may not capture the nuances of user interaction. Replay's video-to-code engine, powered by Gemini, provides a more comprehensive understanding of user intent.

Can Replay handle complex UI libraries like Material UI or Ant Design?#

Yes, Replay is designed to work with a wide range of UI libraries and frameworks. Its behavior-driven reconstruction approach allows it to accurately capture the behavior of complex UI components.

What kind of videos can Replay process?#

Replay can process any video recording of a user interacting with a UI, including screen recordings, webcam recordings, and mobile device recordings.

Does Replay support backend integration?#

Yes, Replay offers seamless integration with Supabase, allowing you to easily manage data and authentication.

---

Ready to try behavior-driven code generation? Get started with Replay - transform any video into working code in seconds.