Replay vs Cursor: Which AI Code Generator is Best for API Integration?

TL;DR: Replay leverages video analysis and behavior-driven reconstruction to generate working UI code, offering a distinct advantage over Cursor's chat-based code generation, especially for complex API integrations and multi-page applications.

Replay vs. Cursor: A Deep Dive into AI Code Generation for API Integration#

The promise of AI-powered code generation is rapidly transforming software development. Two tools vying for developers' attention are Replay and Cursor. While both aim to streamline the coding process, their approaches and capabilities differ significantly, especially when it comes to integrating with APIs and building complete user interfaces. This article explores the strengths and weaknesses of each, focusing on their ability to handle API integration tasks.

Understanding the Core Differences#

Cursor is a popular code editor enhanced with AI capabilities, primarily driven by chat-based interactions. It allows developers to ask questions, generate code snippets, and refactor existing code using natural language prompts. Replay, on the other hand, takes a radically different approach: it analyzes video recordings of user interactions to reconstruct functional UI code. This "behavior-driven reconstruction" understands the intent behind the user's actions, leading to more robust and contextually relevant code generation.

API Integration: Where Replay Shines#

API integration is a cornerstone of modern web development. Both Cursor and Replay can assist with this task, but their methods and effectiveness diverge.

Cursor relies on developers providing explicit instructions via chat prompts. For example, to fetch data from a REST API, you might type: "Write a React function to fetch data from

and display it in a table." Cursor can then generate the corresponding code.

Replay, however, takes a more holistic approach. By analyzing a video of a user interacting with a UI that consumes an API, Replay can infer the API calls, data transformations, and UI updates required to replicate the functionality. This is particularly powerful for complex workflows involving multiple API calls and data dependencies.

Consider a scenario where a user is creating a new customer in a CRM system. The video recording captures the user filling out a form, clicking a "Save" button, and then seeing a confirmation message. Replay can analyze this video and generate the code necessary to:

1. •Capture the form data.
2. •Make a POST request to the CRM API.
3. •Handle the API response (success or error).
4. •Update the UI to display the confirmation message.

This behavior-driven approach often results in more complete and accurate code, as Replay understands the context of the API integration within the overall user flow.

A Practical Example: Fetching and Displaying Data#

Let's illustrate the difference with a concrete example. Suppose we want to fetch a list of products from an API and display them in a React component.

Using Cursor:

You might use Cursor's chat interface to generate the following code:

typescript
// Generated by Cursor
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';

const ProductList = () => {
  const [products, setProducts] = useState([]);

  useEffect(() => {
    const fetchData = async () => {
      try {
        const response = await fetch('https://fakestoreapi.com/products');
        const data = await response.json();
        setProducts(data);
      } catch (error) {
        console.error('Error fetching data:', error);
      }
    };

    fetchData();
  }, []);

  return (
    <ul>
      {products.map((product) => (
        <li key={product.id}>{product.title}</li>
      ))}
    </ul>
  );
};

export default ProductList;

This code snippet is functional, but it lacks error handling, loading states, and styling. You would need to further refine the code using additional prompts or manual editing.

Using Replay:

With Replay, you would record a video of yourself interacting with a UI that fetches and displays the product data. Replay would then analyze the video and generate code similar to the following:

typescript
// Generated by Replay (example)
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import styled from 'styled-components';

const ProductListContainer = styled.div`
  padding: 20px;
`;

const LoadingIndicator = styled.p`
  font-style: italic;
  color: gray;
`;

const ProductList = () => {
  const [products, setProducts] = useState([]);
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);
  const [error, setError] = useState(null);

  useEffect(() => {
    const fetchData = async () => {
      try {
        const response = await fetch('https://fakestoreapi.com/products');
        if (!response.ok) {
          throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${response.status}`);
        }
        const data = await response.json();
        setProducts(data);
      } catch (e) {
        console.error('Error fetching products:', e);
        setError('Failed to load products.');
      } finally {
        setLoading(false);
      }
    };

    fetchData();
  }, []);

  if (loading) {
    return (
      <ProductListContainer>
        <LoadingIndicator>Loading products...</LoadingIndicator>
      </ProductListContainer>
    );
  }

  if (error) {
    return (
      <ProductListContainer>
        <p>Error: {error}</p>
      </ProductListContainer>
    );
  }

  return (
    <ProductListContainer>
      <ul>
        {products.map((product) => (
          <li key={product.id}>{product.title} - ${product.price}</li>
        ))}
      </ul>
    </ProductListContainer>
  );
};

export default ProductList;

Notice that the Replay-generated code includes:

• •Error handling.
• •Loading state.
• •Basic styling (using
  text

  styled-components
  in this example).
• •Displaying the product price (assuming the video showed the price).

This is because Replay understands the user's intent to create a robust and user-friendly product list, not just to fetch and display data. It observes the entire flow and reconstructs a more complete solution.

💡 Pro Tip: When using Replay, make sure your video recordings are clear and demonstrate all the desired functionality and error handling scenarios.

Building Multi-Page Applications#

Replay's advantage becomes even more pronounced when building multi-page applications. Cursor's chat-based approach struggles to maintain context across different pages and user flows. You would need to provide separate prompts for each page and manually connect them.

Replay, on the other hand, can analyze a single video recording that spans multiple pages and user interactions. It can automatically generate the code for each page, including navigation, data sharing, and state management. Replay’s understanding of the overall behavior allows it to create a cohesive and functional application.

📝 Note: Replay's "Product Flow maps" feature visually represents the user flow captured in the video, making it easier to understand and modify the generated code.

Supabase and Style Injection#

Replay offers native integrations with Supabase, a popular open-source Firebase alternative, and supports style injection. This simplifies the process of connecting your UI to a backend database and applying consistent styling across your application.

Cursor, while capable of working with Supabase and styling libraries, requires more manual configuration and code integration.

A Step-by-Step Guide to Using Replay for API Integration#

Here's a simplified tutorial on using Replay for API integration:

Step 1: Record Your Video

Record a video of yourself interacting with a UI that consumes the API you want to integrate. Make sure to demonstrate all the desired functionality, including error handling and loading states.

Step 2: Upload to Replay

Upload the video to the Replay platform.

Step 3: Review the Generated Code

Replay will analyze the video and generate the corresponding code. Review the code to ensure it meets your requirements.

Step 4: Customize and Integrate

Customize the generated code as needed and integrate it into your project.

⚠️ Warning: The accuracy of Replay's code generation depends on the quality of the video recording. Ensure your video is clear, stable, and demonstrates all the necessary interactions.

When to Choose Cursor vs. Replay#

• •Choose Cursor if: You need quick code snippets or refactoring suggestions and prefer a chat-based interaction.
• •Choose Replay if: You need to generate complete UI code from video recordings, especially for complex API integrations, multi-page applications, and behavior-driven development.

Frequently Asked Questions#

Is Replay free to use?#

Replay offers a free tier with limited features and usage. Paid plans are available for more advanced features and higher usage limits. Check Replay's pricing page for the latest details.

How is Replay different from v0.dev?#

While both tools generate UI code, v0.dev relies on text prompts, similar to Cursor. Replay uses video analysis and behavior-driven reconstruction, which allows it to understand user intent and generate more complete and contextually relevant code. Replay excels at capturing complex user flows and API interactions, while v0.dev is better suited for generating basic UI components from textual descriptions.

Can Replay generate code for backend APIs as well?#

Currently, Replay focuses on generating frontend UI code. However, the underlying technology could potentially be extended to generate backend API code in the future.

---

Ready to try behavior-driven code generation? Get started with Replay - transform any video into working code in seconds.