Replay vs. Cursor: Which AI Code Generator Delivers Cleaner Code in 2026?

TL;DR: Replay leverages video analysis and behavior-driven reconstruction to generate cleaner, more functional code compared to traditional screenshot-based and LLM-only approaches like Cursor, especially in complex, multi-page applications.

Replay vs. Cursor: Which AI Code Generator Delivers Cleaner Code in 2026?#

The promise of AI-powered code generation is finally becoming a reality. Tools like Cursor and Replay are revolutionizing how developers build applications. But the devil is in the details. While both aim to accelerate development, their underlying approaches lead to drastically different outcomes, particularly when it comes to code quality and maintainability. This article dives deep into the technical differences and demonstrates why Replay, with its innovative video-to-code engine, is positioned to deliver cleaner, more functional code in the long run.

The Problem: Screenshot-to-Code Falls Short#

Screenshot-to-code tools are a dime a dozen. They promise instant UI generation, but often deliver a jumbled mess of static elements that lack interactivity and require significant manual cleanup. The core issue? They only see the visual representation, not the behavior behind it. LLM-based tools like Cursor, while powerful for general code assistance, struggle with accurately translating user intent and complex application flows from a static image.

Replay: Behavior-Driven Reconstruction#

Replay takes a radically different approach. Instead of relying on static screenshots, Replay analyzes video recordings of user interactions. This "behavior-driven reconstruction" allows Replay to understand the intent behind each action, leading to more accurate and functional code generation. This is critical for creating dynamic UIs that respond correctly to user input and maintain state across multiple pages.

How Replay Works: Deep Dive#

Replay uses Gemini, Google's powerful multimodal AI model, to analyze video recordings. The process involves several key steps:

1. •Video Segmentation: Replay breaks down the video into individual frames and identifies key events, such as button clicks, form submissions, and page transitions.
2. •UI Element Recognition: Gemini identifies and classifies UI elements within each frame, including buttons, text fields, images, and more.
3. •Behavioral Analysis: Replay analyzes the sequence of events to understand the user's intent. For example, it can recognize a login flow by identifying the sequence of entering a username and password followed by clicking a "Login" button.
4. •Code Generation: Based on the behavioral analysis, Replay generates clean, functional code that accurately reflects the user's intended interaction.

Replay's Key Features#

• •Multi-page Generation: Replay understands page transitions and can generate code for entire application flows, not just individual screens.
• •Supabase Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Supabase for backend data storage and management.
• •Style Injection: Allows you to easily apply custom styles to the generated code.
• •Product Flow Maps: Visualizes the user flows captured in the video, providing a clear overview of the application's functionality.

Replay vs. Cursor: A Detailed Comparison#

Here's a comparison of Replay and Cursor across key features:

📝 Note: Cursor excels at general code assistance and refactoring, while Replay is specifically designed for generating functional UI code from video recordings.

Code Example: Replay vs. Cursor#

Let's consider a simple example: generating code for a login form.

Cursor (LLM-Based):

A typical Cursor prompt might be: "Generate a React login form with username and password fields and a submit button."

While Cursor can generate the basic form structure, it often lacks the necessary event handling and validation logic. The generated code might look something like this:

typescript
// Generated by Cursor
import React from 'react';

const LoginForm = () => {
  return (
    <form>
      <label>Username:</label>
      <input type="text" name="username" />
      <label>Password:</label>
      <input type="password" name="password" />
      <button type="submit">Login</button>
    </form>
  );
};

export default LoginForm;

This code is incomplete. It's missing:

• •State management for the input fields.
• •Event handling for the submit button.
• •Validation logic to ensure the user enters valid credentials.
• •Integration with an authentication service.

Replay (Video-to-Code):

With Replay, you would simply record a video of yourself interacting with a login form. Replay analyzes the video and generates code that accurately reflects the user's intended interaction.

The generated code from Replay might look like this:

typescript
// Generated by Replay
import React, { useState } from 'react';
import { supabase } from './supabaseClient'; // Assuming Supabase integration

const LoginForm = () => {
  const [username, setUsername] = useState('');
  const [password, setPassword] = useState('');

  const handleSubmit = async (e) => {
    e.preventDefault();

    try {
      const { data, error } = await supabase.auth.signInWithPassword({
        email: username,
        password: password,
      });

      if (error) {
        console.error('Login error:', error.message);
        alert('Invalid credentials');
      } else {
        console.log('Logged in successfully!');
        // Redirect to dashboard or desired page
      }
    } catch (error) {
      console.error('Error:', error.message);
    }
  };

  return (
    <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>
      <label>Username:</label>
      <input
        type="text"
        name="username"
        value={username}
        onChange={(e) => setUsername(e.target.value)}
      />
      <label>Password:</label>
      <input
        type="password"
        name="password"
        value={password}
        onChange={(e) => setPassword(e.target.value)}
      />
      <button type="submit">Login</button>
    </form>
  );
};

export default LoginForm;

This code is significantly more complete and functional. It includes:

• •State management for the input fields using
  text

  useState
  .
• •Event handling for the submit button using
  text

  onSubmit
  .
• •Integration with Supabase for authentication.
• •Error handling and user feedback.

💡 Pro Tip: Replay's generated code is often production-ready, requiring minimal manual modification.

Step-by-Step: Generating Code with Replay#

Here's a step-by-step guide to generating code with Replay:

Step 1: Record Your Interaction

Record a video of yourself interacting with the UI you want to recreate. Make sure to clearly demonstrate the desired behavior.

Step 2: Upload to Replay

Upload the video to Replay. Replay will automatically analyze the video and generate the corresponding code.

Step 3: Review and Refine

Review the generated code and make any necessary adjustments. Replay allows you to easily customize the code to fit your specific needs.

Step 4: Integrate into Your Project

Integrate the generated code into your project. Replay supports various frameworks and libraries, making integration seamless.

⚠️ Warning: The quality of the generated code depends on the clarity and completeness of the video recording. Ensure that the video clearly demonstrates the desired behavior.

The Future of Code Generation: Behavior is Key#

The future of code generation lies in understanding user behavior. Screenshot-to-code and LLM-based approaches are limited by their inability to accurately capture user intent. Replay's video-to-code engine offers a more powerful and accurate solution, leading to cleaner, more functional code. As AI technology continues to evolve, Replay is poised to become the leading platform for behavior-driven code generation.

Benefits of Using Replay#

• •Faster Development: Generate functional UI code in seconds.
• •Higher Code Quality: Replay understands user intent, leading to cleaner and more maintainable code.
• •Reduced Manual Effort: Minimize the need for manual coding and debugging.
• •Improved Collaboration: Easily share video recordings and generated code with your team.
• •Accurate Reconstruction: Replay understands WHAT users are trying to do, not just what they see.

Frequently Asked Questions#

Is Replay free to use?#

Replay offers a free tier with limited features. Paid plans are available for more advanced features and usage. Check the Replay website for the latest pricing information.

How is Replay different from v0.dev?#

v0.dev primarily relies on text prompts and LLMs to generate code. Replay analyzes video recordings to understand user behavior, resulting in more accurate and functional code, especially for complex, multi-page applications. Replay focuses on behavior-driven reconstruction, while v0.dev is more focused on text-based code generation.

What frameworks and libraries does Replay support?#

Replay supports a wide range of popular frameworks and libraries, including React, Vue.js, Angular, and more. Check the Replay documentation for a complete list of supported technologies.

---

Ready to try behavior-driven code generation? Get started with Replay - transform any video into working code in seconds.