Back to Blog
January 4, 20267 min readReplay vs. Cursor

Replay vs. Cursor for UI: Which AI Generates High-Fidelity Components From UI Videos?

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

TL;DR: Replay leverages video analysis and behavior-driven reconstruction to generate more accurate and functional UI components compared to Cursor's screenshot-based approach.

The AI-powered code generation landscape is rapidly evolving, offering developers unprecedented opportunities to accelerate UI development. However, not all solutions are created equal. While tools like Cursor offer impressive features, they often fall short when it comes to accurately capturing the behavior and intent behind UI designs. This is where Replay shines, utilizing a unique video-to-code engine powered by Gemini to reconstruct working UI from screen recordings. This article explores the key differences between Replay and Cursor, highlighting why Replay's behavior-driven approach results in higher-fidelity, more functional components.

Understanding the Core Difference: Video vs. Screenshots#

The fundamental difference between Replay and Cursor lies in their input method:

  • Cursor: Primarily relies on static screenshots to generate code.
  • Replay: Analyzes dynamic video recordings of user interactions.

This distinction has profound implications for the accuracy and functionality of the generated code. Screenshots capture only a single frame in time, missing crucial information about user flows, animations, and state changes. Video, on the other hand, provides a rich stream of data that Replay leverages to understand the intent behind the UI.

Replay's Behavior-Driven Reconstruction#

Replay employs a "Behavior-Driven Reconstruction" approach, treating video as the source of truth. This means that instead of simply recreating the visual appearance of a UI element, Replay analyzes the user's interactions with that element to understand its intended behavior.

For example, consider a video recording of a user interacting with a dropdown menu. Replay analyzes:

  • The click that opens the dropdown.
  • The scrolling behavior within the menu.
  • The selection of an item.
  • The resulting state change on the page.

This deep understanding of user behavior allows Replay to generate code that accurately replicates the functionality of the dropdown menu, including its dynamic behavior and state management.

Key Features and Advantages of Replay#

Replay offers a range of features that set it apart from screenshot-to-code tools like Cursor:

  • Multi-page Generation: Replay can generate code for entire multi-page applications, capturing complex user flows and interactions across different screens.
  • Supabase Integration: Seamless integration with Supabase allows Replay to generate code that interacts with your backend data, creating fully functional applications.
  • Style Injection: Replay intelligently injects styles to match the original design, ensuring a consistent and visually appealing user experience.
  • Product Flow Maps: Replay visualizes the user flow within your application, providing a clear overview of the interaction patterns.

Replay vs. Cursor: A Detailed Comparison#

FeatureCursorReplay
Input TypeScreenshots, Text PromptsVideo Recordings
Behavior AnalysisLimitedComprehensive (Behavior-Driven Reconstruction)
Multi-page GenerationLimited
Supabase IntegrationLimited
Style InjectionBasicAdvanced
Product Flow Maps
Understanding of User IntentLowHigh
Code FidelityLowerHigher
State ManagementBasicAdvanced

📝 Note: Cursor excels at generating code from simple static designs, but struggles with complex interactions and dynamic behavior. Replay is designed to handle these complexities with its video-based approach.

Addressing Common Concerns#

Some developers may be concerned about the processing time required for video analysis. Replay addresses this concern through optimized algorithms and cloud-based processing, ensuring fast and efficient code generation.

Another concern is the accuracy of the generated code. While no AI-powered tool is perfect, Replay's behavior-driven approach significantly reduces the likelihood of errors and inaccuracies. Furthermore, Replay provides tools for developers to review and refine the generated code, ensuring that it meets their specific requirements.

A Practical Example: Generating a React Component with Replay#

Let's consider a simple example of generating a React component for a login form using Replay.

Step 1: Record a Video#

Record a video of yourself interacting with a login form, including entering your username and password, and clicking the "Submit" button.

Step 2: Upload to Replay#

Upload the video to Replay. Replay will analyze the video and generate the code for the login form component.

Step 3: Review and Refine#

Review the generated code and make any necessary adjustments. Here's an example of the generated code:

typescript
// Example React component generated by Replay import React, { useState } from 'react'; const LoginForm = () => { const [username, setUsername] = useState(''); const [password, setPassword] = useState(''); const handleSubmit = async (e: React.FormEvent) => { e.preventDefault(); // Replace with your actual authentication logic const response = await fetch('/api/login', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', }, body: JSON.stringify({ username, password }), }); if (response.ok) { // Handle successful login console.log('Login successful'); } else { // Handle login error console.error('Login failed'); } }; return ( <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}> <div> <label htmlFor="username">Username:</label> <input type="text" id="username" value={username} onChange={(e) => setUsername(e.target.value)} /> </div> <div> <label htmlFor="password">Password:</label> <input type="password" id="password" value={password} onChange={(e) => setPassword(e.target.value)} /> </div> <button type="submit">Submit</button> </form> ); }; export default LoginForm;

💡 Pro Tip: Replay automatically generates the necessary state variables and event handlers for the form, saving you valuable development time.

The Power of Understanding User Flows#

Replay's ability to understand user flows is particularly valuable for complex applications with multiple pages and interactions. By analyzing the entire user journey, Replay can generate code that accurately reflects the intended behavior of the application.

For example, consider an e-commerce application with a product listing page, a product details page, and a shopping cart page. Replay can analyze a video recording of a user navigating through these pages and generate code that accurately reflects the user flow, including:

  • Clicking on a product listing to navigate to the product details page.
  • Adding a product to the shopping cart.
  • Navigating to the shopping cart page.
  • Completing the checkout process.

This level of understanding is simply not possible with screenshot-based tools like Cursor.

Real-World Use Cases#

Replay can be used in a variety of real-world scenarios, including:

  • Rapid Prototyping: Quickly generate prototypes from video recordings of existing applications.
  • Legacy Code Modernization: Reconstruct UI components from legacy applications without access to the original source code.
  • UI Design Collaboration: Share video recordings of UI designs with developers and automatically generate code from the recordings.
  • Automated Testing: Generate automated tests from video recordings of user interactions.

⚠️ Warning: While Replay significantly reduces development time, it's crucial to review and test the generated code to ensure accuracy and functionality.

Frequently Asked Questions#

Is Replay free to use?#

Replay offers a free tier with limited features. Paid plans are available for users who require more advanced features and higher usage limits.

How is Replay different from v0.dev?#

While both Replay and v0.dev aim to accelerate UI development, they differ in their input method and underlying technology. v0.dev primarily relies on text prompts, while Replay utilizes video analysis and behavior-driven reconstruction. This allows Replay to generate more accurate and functional UI components, particularly for complex interactions and dynamic behavior. Replay also offers features like Supabase integration and product flow maps, which are not available in v0.dev.

What kind of video quality is required for Replay?#

While higher quality videos generally produce better results, Replay is designed to work with a variety of video qualities. Clear and stable recordings are recommended for optimal performance.

What frameworks are supported by Replay?#

Replay currently supports React, with plans to expand support to other popular frameworks in the future.


Ready to try behavior-driven code generation? Get started with Replay - transform any video into working code in seconds.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free