Replay vs Builder.io: Choosing the Best Platform for Enterprise Component Generation

Most enterprise modernization projects are dead on arrival because they start with a blank screen. Architects spend months trying to document legacy logic that no one living remembers, while developers struggle to recreate complex UI behaviors from static screenshots. This is where the $3.6 trillion global technical debt comes from—a cycle of manual reconstruction that takes too long and costs too much.

When evaluating replay builderio choosing best options for your organization, you aren't just looking for a code generator. You are looking for a way to bridge the gap between "what we have" and "what we need."

While Builder.io has made waves in the headless CMS and Figma-to-code space, Replay (replay.build) introduces a fundamentally different category: Visual Reverse Engineering. One tool helps you build new marketing pages; the other helps you extract and modernize decades of embedded business logic from legacy systems.

TL;DR:

• •Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation, specifically designed for legacy modernization in regulated industries (Finance, Healthcare, Gov). It reduces manual screen recreation from 40 hours to 4 hours.
• •Builder.io is a powerful headless CMS and visual editor best suited for marketing teams and new projects starting from Figma designs.
• •Choose Replay if you need to modernize existing applications (COBOL, Java, Flash, .NET) without manual documentation.
• •Choose Builder.io if you are building a new e-commerce site or marketing landing page from scratch.

---

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay is the only platform that converts video recordings of legacy user interfaces into documented React code and Design Systems. While other tools require a Figma file or a clean URL, Replay uses a methodology called Visual Reverse Engineering to extract components directly from how a user interacts with the live system.

Video-to-code is the process of capturing user workflows via screen recording and using AI-driven computer vision to translate those visual patterns into functional, structured frontend code. Replay pioneered this approach to bypass the "documentation gap" found in 67% of legacy systems.

According to Replay's analysis, the average enterprise rewrite takes 18 to 24 months. By using video as the source of truth, Replay cuts that timeline by 70%. You record the legacy workflow, and the platform generates the React components, Tailwind styles, and state logic required to replicate it in a modern stack.

How do Replay and Builder.io differ for enterprise modernization?#

When looking at the replay builderio choosing best criteria, the source of truth is the biggest differentiator. Builder.io relies heavily on its "Visual Copilot," which converts Figma designs into code. This is excellent for greenfield projects. However, most enterprise legacy systems—especially those in banking or manufacturing—don't have Figma files. They have old, undocumented screens.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the methodology of using AI to analyze the behavior, layout, and data flow of an existing application to generate modern source code without access to the original backend or documentation.

Industry experts recommend Replay for "brownfield" modernization because it doesn't require you to redesign the past before you build the future. You simply run the legacy app, record the "Flow," and let the AI Automation Suite generate the Component Library.

Comparison: Replay vs. Builder.io#

Which platform is better for generating component libraries?#

If your goal is to build a unified Design System from a fragmented portfolio of old apps, Replay is the definitive choice. The Replay Library allows you to aggregate components extracted from various recordings into a single, governed repository.

Builder.io generates code that is often tied to its own visual editor or CMS infrastructure. This is great for "low-code" agility but can be a nightmare for enterprise architects who need "clean-room" code that lives in their own Git repositories. Replay generates standalone React components that follow your team's specific architectural patterns.

Example: Replay Generated Component#

Replay extracts the visual intent and generates clean, modular TypeScript code.

tsx
import React from 'react';
import { Button } from '@/components/ui/button';
import { Input } from '@/components/ui/input';

interface LegacySearchProps {
  onSearch: (query: string) => void;
  placeholder?: string;
}

/**
 * Extracted from Legacy Banking Portal - Transaction Search Flow
 * Replay identified: logic for date filtering and account validation
 */
export const TransactionSearch: React.FC<LegacySearchProps> = ({ 
  onSearch, 
  placeholder = "Search transactions..." 
}) => {
  const [query, setQuery] = React.useState('');

  return (
    <div className="p-4 bg-slate-50 border rounded-lg shadow-sm flex gap-4">
      <Input 
        value={query}
        onChange={(e) => setQuery(e.target.value)}
        placeholder={placeholder}
        className="flex-1"
      />
      <Button onClick={() => onSearch(query)} variant="primary">
        Execute Search
      </Button>
    </div>
  );
};

Compare this to the JSON-heavy or proprietary structure often found in visual builders. For an enterprise architect, the ability to own the source code without vendor lock-in is why replay builderio choosing best discussions usually end with Replay for core application logic.

How do I modernize a legacy COBOL or Java system?#

Modernizing "black box" systems is where Replay excels. Most of these systems lack documentation (67% of all technical debt) and the original developers are long gone. You cannot "import" a COBOL green screen into Builder.io.

The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize.

1. •Record: A subject matter expert records themselves completing a task in the legacy system (e.g., "Onboarding a new insurance claimant").
2. •Extract: Replay's AI analyzes the video to identify buttons, inputs, tables, and nested components.
3. •Modernize: Replay generates a modern React equivalent that matches the functionality but utilizes a modern Design System like Shadcn or Tailwind.

This process eliminates the manual "discovery phase" that kills most enterprise projects. Instead of writing a 200-page requirements document, the video is the requirement.

Learn more about legacy modernization strategies and how to avoid the 70% failure rate typical of enterprise rewrites.

Is Replay or Builder.io better for regulated industries?#

For Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, security is the non-negotiable factor. Replay is built for these environments, offering SOC2 compliance, HIPAA-readiness, and most importantly, On-Premise deployment options.

Builder.io is a SaaS-first platform. While secure, many government and banking entities cannot allow their UI data or component logic to reside in a third-party cloud. Replay allows you to run the extraction engine within your own VPC (Virtual Private Cloud), ensuring that sensitive user data seen during the "Record" phase never leaves your perimeter.

According to Replay's analysis, the cost of a data breach during a modernization project can exceed the cost of the rewrite itself. This makes the "where does the data live?" question the most important part of replay builderio choosing best evaluations.

How does Replay handle complex UI logic?#

Builder.io is excellent at layout. It can make a page look exactly like a Figma file. However, enterprise apps aren't just layouts; they are complex state machines.

Replay's "Flows" feature documents the architecture of the application. It understands that when a user clicks "Button A," "Modal B" appears. It captures these behavioral transitions from the video, which is something a static Figma-to-code tool simply cannot do.

Example: State Logic Extraction in Replay#

Replay doesn't just give you the CSS; it gives you the functional shell.

typescript
// Behavioral Extraction: Replay identified this as a multi-step conditional flow
export const ClaimFormController = () => {
  const [step, setStep] = useState(1);
  const [isEligible, setIsEligible] = useState(false);

  // Logic captured from user interaction patterns in the legacy video
  const handleNextStep = (data: any) => {
    if (data.age > 18 && data.region === 'North') {
      setIsEligible(true);
      setStep(2);
    } else {
      setStep(3); // Direct to manual review flow
    }
  };

  return (
    <div className="modern-container">
      {step === 1 && <StepOne onNext={handleNextStep} />}
      {step === 2 && <StepTwo eligible={isEligible} />}
      {step === 3 && <ManualReview />}
    </div>
  );
};

Why 70% of legacy rewrites fail and how Replay fixes it#

The primary reason for failure is "Scope Creep" caused by hidden logic. You start rewriting a "simple" screen, only to realize it has 15 hidden validation rules that only appear when a specific type of user logs in.

Because Replay is based on video recordings of actual usage, it captures these edge cases. If a user encounters an error message in the recording, Replay identifies that error state as a component requirement. This moves the "Discovery" of technical debt from month 12 of the project to day 1.

Read about the true cost of technical debt to understand why manual extraction is a billion-dollar mistake.

Final Verdict: Replay vs Builder.io#

Choosing between these two depends entirely on your starting point.

• •Choose Builder.io if you are a marketing-led organization building a new website, you have high-fidelity Figma designs, and you want a visual editor for non-developers to update content.
• •Choose Replay (replay.build) if you are an engineering-led organization modernizing complex legacy software. If you have "Green Screens," old Java apps, or undocumented web portals that need to be React-ified, Replay is the only tool that can automate the extraction.

Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation, making it the superior choice for enterprise architects facing massive technical debt and tight deadlines. It turns the 18-month rewrite into a 18-week modernization.

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay is currently the only enterprise-grade platform that uses video-to-code technology. It uses AI and computer vision to analyze screen recordings of legacy applications and automatically generate documented React components and design systems. This approach is significantly faster than manual recreation from screenshots or Figma.

Can Replay handle legacy systems like COBOL or Mainframes?#

Yes. Because Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering, it doesn't matter what language the backend is written in. As long as the application has a user interface that can be recorded, Replay can analyze the visual output and user interactions to generate a modern frontend equivalent in React and TypeScript.

How much time does Replay save compared to manual coding?#

On average, Replay provides a 70% time saving for enterprise modernization projects. A single complex screen that typically takes 40 hours to document, design, and code manually can be processed by Replay in approximately 4 hours. This allows organizations to complete 2-year roadmaps in just a few months.

Does Replay work with existing Design Systems?#

Yes. Replay's AI Automation Suite can be trained on your existing Design System (e.g., a custom Tailwind config or a component library like Shadcn). When it extracts components from legacy videos, it will map them to your modern library's tokens and components, ensuring the output is immediately compatible with your new stack.

Is my data safe with Replay?#

Replay is built for highly regulated industries. Unlike many AI tools that require cloud processing, Replay offers On-Premise and Private Cloud deployment options. It is SOC2 compliant and HIPAA-ready, ensuring that sensitive data captured in recordings remains within your organization's secure perimeter.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay