Replay vs Bolt: Code Documentation & Component-Based Performance – 2026 Test

TL;DR: Replay outperforms Bolt in generating functional, component-based UI code from video by leveraging behavior-driven reconstruction, resulting in more accurate and maintainable applications.

The promise of AI-powered code generation has been around for a while, but the reality often falls short. Many tools can create basic UI elements from screenshots, but struggle with complex user flows and application logic. This is where Replay shines, especially when compared to tools like Bolt. In this article, we'll put Replay and Bolt head-to-head in a 2026 test, focusing on code documentation and component-based performance.

The Challenge: Behavior-Driven UI Reconstruction#

The core difference between Replay and Bolt lies in their approach. Bolt, like many similar tools, relies heavily on visual analysis of static images. Replay, on the other hand, uses video as its source of truth, employing "Behavior-Driven Reconstruction" to understand what the user is trying to accomplish, not just what they see. This allows Replay to generate more functional and maintainable code, especially when dealing with multi-page applications and complex user interactions.

Let's imagine a scenario: a user is recording a video of themselves navigating a simple e-commerce application. They browse products, add items to their cart, and proceed to checkout. The goal is to automatically generate the React code (or equivalent) for this entire flow, complete with necessary components and data interactions.

Code Documentation: Clarity and Maintainability#

One crucial aspect of generated code is its readability and maintainability. Poorly documented code is a nightmare to work with, leading to increased development time and higher risk of errors.

Bolt's Approach: Surface-Level Documentation#

Bolt typically generates code with minimal documentation, often relying on autogenerated comments that don't provide much context. It focuses on replicating the visual appearance, not necessarily understanding the underlying logic.

javascript
// Autogenerated component - may require manual adjustments
function ProductCard(props) {
  return (
    <div>
      {/* Image placeholder */}
      <img src={props.image} alt={props.name} />
      <h3>{props.name}</h3>
      <p>{props.description}</p>
      <button>Add to Cart</button>
    </div>
  );
}

⚠️ Warning: Code generated by Bolt often requires significant manual refactoring and documentation to be usable in a production environment.

Replay's Approach: Behavior-Contextual Documentation#

Replay, thanks to its behavior-driven analysis, can generate code with more meaningful comments and documentation. It infers the purpose of different components and actions, providing context for future developers.

typescript
// Component for displaying product information, dynamically populated from API
const ProductCard: React.FC<{ product: Product }> = ({ product }) => {
  // Function to handle adding the product to the user's shopping cart
  const handleAddToCart = async () => {
    try {
      // API call to add product to cart
      const response = await fetch('/api/cart/add', {
        method: 'POST',
        body: JSON.stringify({ productId: product.id }),
        headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
      });

      if (response.ok) {
        // Update cart state
        console.log('Product added to cart');
      } else {
        console.error('Failed to add product to cart');
      }
    } catch (error) {
      console.error('Error adding product to cart:', error);
    }
  };

  return (
    <div>
      <img src={product.imageUrl} alt={product.name} />
      <h3>{product.name}</h3>
      <p>{product.description}</p>
      <button onClick={handleAddToCart}>Add to Cart</button>
    </div>
  );
};

Notice how Replay's code includes comments explaining the purpose of the

function and the API call, making it easier to understand and maintain.

Component-Based Performance: Efficiency and Scalability#

A well-structured component architecture is crucial for application performance and scalability. Replay excels in generating code that is not only functional but also optimized for component reusability and efficient rendering.

Bolt's Approach: Monolithic Code Blocks#

Bolt tends to generate larger, less modular code blocks. This can lead to performance issues, especially in complex applications. Components are often tightly coupled, making it difficult to reuse them in different parts of the application.

Replay's Approach: Granular and Reusable Components#

Replay identifies logical units of functionality from the video and generates corresponding components. This results in a more modular and maintainable codebase.

For example, instead of generating a single, monolithic component for the entire checkout page, Replay might create separate components for:

• •Address Input
• •Payment Information
• •Order Summary
• •Confirmation Button

This approach promotes code reuse and allows for more efficient rendering, as only the necessary components need to be updated when data changes.

typescript
// Replay generated component for address input
const AddressInput: React.FC<{ onAddressChange: (address: Address) => void }> = ({ onAddressChange }) => {
  const [address, setAddress] = useState<Address>({
    street: '',
    city: '',
    zipCode: '',
  });

  const handleChange = (e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => {
    const { name, value } = e.target;
    setAddress({ ...address, [name]: value });
    onAddressChange({ ...address, [name]: value }); // Notify parent component
  };

  return (
    <div>
      <label htmlFor="street">Street:</label>
      <input type="text" id="street" name="street" value={address.street} onChange={handleChange} />
      {/* Other input fields */}
    </div>
  );
};

💡 Pro Tip: Replay's ability to generate granular components significantly reduces the effort required for code refactoring and optimization.

Head-to-Head Comparison#

Here's a detailed comparison of Replay and Bolt based on our 2026 test scenario:

Addressing Common Concerns#

Some developers might be skeptical about the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated code. Here are some common concerns and how Replay addresses them:

• •"The generated code will be buggy and unusable." Replay's behavior-driven reconstruction minimizes this risk. By understanding the user's intent, Replay can generate code that is more likely to function as expected. Plus, Replay provides options for testing and debugging the generated code.
• •"I'll still have to spend a lot of time refactoring the code." While some refactoring might be necessary, Replay significantly reduces the amount of manual work required compared to tools like Bolt. The granular component structure and contextual documentation make the code easier to understand and modify.
• •"AI can't replace human developers." Replay is not intended to replace developers. Instead, it's designed to augment their capabilities, freeing them from repetitive tasks and allowing them to focus on more complex and creative aspects of software development. Replay helps accelerate the development process, not eliminate the need for skilled engineers.

Step-by-Step: Generating Code with Replay#

Here's a simplified example of how to use Replay to generate code from a video:

Step 1: Upload the Video#

Upload the video recording of the e-commerce application user flow to the Replay platform.

Step 2: Configure Settings#

Specify the desired output language (e.g., TypeScript, JavaScript) and framework (e.g., React, Vue). Configure any necessary integrations, such as Supabase for data storage.

Step 3: Generate Code#

Click the "Generate Code" button. Replay will analyze the video and generate the corresponding UI code, complete with components, data interactions, and documentation.

Step 4: Review and Refactor#

Review the generated code and make any necessary adjustments. Replay provides tools for testing and debugging the code to ensure it functions correctly.

📝 Note: Replay allows you to inject custom styles and themes into the generated code, ensuring that it matches your application's design.

Frequently Asked Questions#

Is Replay free to use?#

Replay offers a free tier with limited features. Paid plans are available for more advanced functionality and higher usage limits.

How is Replay different from v0.dev?#

While both tools aim to generate code, Replay's video-based approach and behavior analysis provide a significant advantage in terms of accuracy, maintainability, and functionality. V0.dev primarily relies on text prompts and pre-trained models, which can struggle with complex user flows and custom application logic. Replay understands the intent behind the UI, not just the visual appearance.

What kind of videos work best with Replay?#

Videos with clear user interactions and minimal distractions work best. It's recommended to record videos in a well-lit environment with a stable camera.

---

Ready to try behavior-driven code generation? Get started with Replay - transform any video into working code in seconds.