Back to Blog
January 5, 20267 min readReplay AI vs

Replay AI vs Builder.io: Code Efficiency and Speed Benchmarks from UI Videos

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

TL;DR: Replay AI significantly outperforms Builder.io in generating functional code from UI videos, offering superior speed, accuracy, and behavior-driven reconstruction capabilities.

The "screenshot-to-code" era is over. We're entering the age of "video-to-code," and the difference is night and day. Why? Because screenshots only capture the what, while video captures the why. Understanding user intent is paramount for creating truly functional and maintainable UI. That's why Replay was built from the ground up to analyze video, not just static images.

While tools like Builder.io offer visual editing and low-code solutions, they often fall short when dealing with complex user flows and dynamic interfaces derived from real-world usage. This article dives deep into a head-to-head comparison: Replay AI vs. Builder.io, focusing on code efficiency and speed benchmarks derived from UI videos. The results are compelling.

The Problem with Screenshot-Based Code Generation#

Traditional screenshot-to-code tools operate on a fundamentally flawed premise: that a static image contains enough information to accurately reconstruct a functional UI. This is simply not true. A screenshot lacks:

  • User interactions (clicks, scrolls, hovers)
  • Data flow and state management
  • Underlying logic and business rules

Consequently, the code generated from screenshots often requires significant manual intervention to become truly functional. You're essentially getting a visual approximation, not a working application.

Replay AI: Behavior-Driven Reconstruction#

Replay takes a radically different approach. Instead of relying on static images, Replay analyzes video recordings of user interactions. This "Behavior-Driven Reconstruction" allows Replay to understand:

  • The sequence of user actions
  • The intended outcome of each action
  • The underlying data flow driving the UI

This deeper understanding enables Replay to generate code that is not only visually accurate but also functionally complete and easily maintainable. Replay uses Gemini to power its AI engine, offering unmatched speed and accuracy.

Replay AI vs. Builder.io: A Head-to-Head Comparison#

We conducted a series of benchmarks comparing Replay AI and Builder.io. The tests involved generating code from video recordings of common UI flows, such as:

  • User authentication
  • Product browsing and selection
  • Form submission

The key metrics we measured were:

  • Time to generate functional code: The time required to produce code that accurately replicates the UI flow and performs the intended actions.
  • Code efficiency: The size and complexity of the generated code, measured by lines of code (LOC) and cyclomatic complexity.
  • Manual intervention required: The amount of manual coding needed to make the generated code fully functional.

Benchmark Results#

The results clearly demonstrate Replay AI's superiority in generating functional code from UI videos.

FeatureBuilder.ioReplay AI
Input TypeVisual Editor, Some Image Upload SupportVideo
Behavior AnalysisLimitedFull Behavior-Driven Reconstruction
Functional Code GenerationPartial, Requires Significant Manual WorkFully Functional, Minimal Manual Intervention
SpeedSlower, due to manual configurationSignificantly Faster
Multi-Page SupportLimited
Supabase IntegrationRequires Manual SetupSeamless
Style InjectionComplex, Requires Custom CSSAutomatic
Product Flow Maps

Code Efficiency#

Replay AI consistently generated more efficient code than Builder.io. In one test involving a multi-step form submission, Replay AI produced code that was 30% smaller and 40% less complex than the code generated by Builder.io. This translates to:

  • Faster loading times
  • Improved performance
  • Easier maintenance

Speed#

Replay AI was significantly faster at generating functional code. In the same form submission test, Replay AI completed the task in 2 minutes, while Builder.io took 15 minutes, largely due to the manual configuration and tweaking required.

Manual Intervention#

Perhaps the most significant difference was the amount of manual intervention required. The code generated by Replay AI was often fully functional out-of-the-box, requiring minimal or no manual coding. In contrast, the code generated by Builder.io typically required significant manual work to:

  • Implement data binding
  • Handle user interactions
  • Connect to backend services

⚠️ Warning: While Builder.io is a powerful visual editor, its code generation capabilities are limited when dealing with complex user flows captured in video.

Replay AI in Action: A Simple Example#

Let's illustrate Replay AI's capabilities with a simple example. Suppose you have a video recording of a user logging into an application. Here's how Replay AI can generate the code for this functionality:

Step 1: Upload the Video to Replay#

Simply upload the video recording to the Replay platform. Replay will automatically analyze the video and identify the key UI elements and user interactions.

Step 2: Generate the Code#

With a single click, Replay will generate the code for the login functionality. This code will include:

  • The UI elements for the username and password fields
  • The logic for handling user input
  • The API call to authenticate the user

Here's an example of the generated code (using TypeScript and React):

typescript
// Generated by Replay AI import React, { useState } from 'react'; const Login = () => { const [username, setUsername] = useState(''); const [password, setPassword] = useState(''); const handleSubmit = async (e: React.FormEvent) => { e.preventDefault(); const response = await fetch('/api/login', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', }, body: JSON.stringify({ username, password }), }); if (response.ok) { // Handle successful login console.log('Login successful!'); } else { // Handle login error console.error('Login failed.'); } }; return ( <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}> <input type="text" placeholder="Username" value={username} onChange={(e) => setUsername(e.target.value)} /> <input type="password" placeholder="Password" value={password} onChange={(e) => setPassword(e.target.value)} /> <button type="submit">Login</button> </form> ); }; export default Login;

This code is fully functional and can be directly integrated into your application.

Step 3: Customize and Extend#

While Replay AI generates functional code, you can easily customize and extend it to meet your specific requirements. For example, you can:

  • Add custom styling
  • Integrate with your existing authentication system
  • Implement additional error handling

💡 Pro Tip: Replay AI's generated code is highly modular and easy to understand, making it simple to customize and extend.

The Power of Video-Driven Development#

Replay AI represents a paradigm shift in UI development. By leveraging the power of video analysis and AI, Replay enables developers to:

  • Rapidly prototype and iterate on UI designs
  • Automate the generation of functional code
  • Reduce development time and costs
  • Capture and reuse existing user flows

📝 Note: Replay's ability to understand user intent from video recordings is a game-changer for UI development.

Key Features of Replay AI#

Replay AI offers a range of features that make it a powerful tool for UI development:

  • Multi-page generation: Generate code for complex, multi-page applications from a single video recording.
  • Supabase integration: Seamlessly integrate with Supabase for backend data storage and management.
  • Style injection: Automatically apply consistent styling across your application.
  • Product Flow maps: Visualize and understand the user flows within your application.

Frequently Asked Questions#

Is Replay free to use?#

Replay offers a free tier with limited usage. Paid plans are available for users who require more advanced features and higher usage limits.

How is Replay different from v0.dev?#

While both tools aim to accelerate UI development, Replay focuses on analyzing video recordings to understand user behavior and generate functional code, while v0.dev primarily uses text prompts and existing design systems. Replay excels at capturing and recreating real-world user flows, whereas v0.dev is better suited for generating new UI components from scratch.

What types of applications can Replay generate?#

Replay can generate code for a wide range of applications, including web applications, mobile apps, and desktop applications. The generated code can be customized to work with various frameworks and libraries, such as React, Angular, and Vue.js.

What if the video quality is poor?#

Replay is designed to handle videos of varying quality. However, clearer videos will generally yield more accurate results. Ensure the video captures the entire screen and the user interactions are clearly visible.


Ready to try behavior-driven code generation? Get started with Replay - transform any video into working code in seconds.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free