Modernizing Public Safety Software: High-Stakes UI Extraction for Emergency Services

The average 911 dispatcher interacts with software designed during the Clinton administration. In public safety, "technical debt" isn't just a line item on a balance sheet; it’s a measurable increase in emergency response latency. When you are modernizing public safety systems, the standard "move fast and break things" mantra is a liability. You cannot afford a 70% failure rate—the industry standard for legacy rewrites—when the system in question manages police dispatch, fire telemetry, or EMS routing.

The bottleneck isn't the desire to modernize; it's the archaeology required to understand the existing logic. With 67% of legacy systems lacking any form of up-to-date documentation, enterprise architects are often forced into "black box" migrations where they guess the business logic by clicking through 20-year-old UI screens.

TL;DR: Modernizing public safety software requires moving from "manual archaeology" to visual reverse engineering, reducing screen extraction time from 40 hours to 4 hours while ensuring 100% logic parity.

The High Cost of the "Big Bang" Rewrite#

For decades, the only way to escape a monolithic Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) or Records Management System (RMS) was the "Big Bang" rewrite. You hire a fleet of consultants, spend 18 months documenting requirements, and another 24 months building a replacement that—more often than not—misses the nuanced edge cases of the original system.

In the public safety sector, these edge cases are critical. A specific key-combo in a legacy terminal might be the difference between a 2-second and a 10-second dispatch. If your modernized React-based UI doesn't account for that workflow, the system is a failure regardless of its tech stack.

Modernization Methodology Comparison#

The global technical debt bubble has reached $3.6 trillion, and public safety agencies are disproportionately represented. The fear of breaking a working (albeit ancient) system has led to "modernization paralysis."

From Black Box to Documented Codebase#

The fundamental shift offered by Replay is the transition from manual documentation to automated extraction. Instead of interviewing a retired developer to understand how a 1998 Delphi application handles incident prioritization, you record the workflow.

Replay uses visual reverse engineering to transform video recordings of user workflows into functional React components and technical documentation. It treats the visual output of the legacy system as the "source of truth," capturing every state change, validation rule, and UI nuance.

💰 ROI Insight: Manual extraction of a single complex enterprise screen typically takes 40 hours of engineering and BA time. Replay reduces this to 4 hours, representing a 90% reduction in labor costs for the discovery phase.

Technical Deep Dive: Extracting Logic from the UI#

When we modernize a high-stakes UI, we aren't just taking a screenshot. We are extracting the underlying state machine. For a public safety application, this might involve complex forms with conditional logic (e.g., if "Incident Type" is "Structure Fire," show "Hydrant Proximity" fields).

Below is a conceptual example of how Replay extracts a legacy incident form and converts it into a modern, type-safe React component while preserving the original business logic.

typescript
// Generated by Replay AI Automation Suite
// Source: Legacy CAD Terminal v4.2 (Incident Entry Screen)

import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { useDesignSystem } from '@public-safety/ui-library'; 
import { validateIncidentCode, calculatePriority } from './legacy-logic-bridge';

interface IncidentFormProps {
  onDispatch: (data: IncidentData) => void;
  initialState?: Partial<IncidentData>;
}

export const ModernIncidentEntry: React.FC<IncidentFormProps> = ({ onDispatch, initialState }) => {
  const [formState, setFormState] = useState<IncidentData>(initialState || defaultState);
  const { Input, Select, Button, Grid } = useDesignSystem();

  // Replay extracted this specific validation sequence from the recorded workflow
  const handleFieldChange = (field: keyof IncidentData, value: any) => {
    const updatedState = { ...formState, [field]: value };
    
    if (field === 'incidentCode') {
      updatedState.priority = calculatePriority(value);
      updatedState.requiresHazmat = validateIncidentCode(value).isHazmat;
    }
    
    setFormState(updatedState);
  };

  return (
    <Grid container spacing={2}>
      <Input 
        label="Incident Code"
        value={formState.incidentCode}
        onChange={(v) => handleFieldChange('incidentCode', v)}
        aria-required="true"
      />
      {formState.requiresHazmat && (
        <div className="alert-banner">
          ⚠️ HAZMAT PROTOCOL REQUIRED
        </div>
      )}
      <Button variant="primary" onClick={() => onDispatch(formState)}>
        Commit to Dispatch
      </Button>
    </Grid>
  );
};

The Three Pillars of Public Safety Modernization#

1. The Library (Design System)#

Public safety operators rely on muscle memory. You cannot change the UI for the sake of "looking modern." Replay’s Library feature allows architects to map legacy UI elements to a modern Design System. This ensures that while the underlying tech is React and TypeScript, the functional layout remains intuitive for the end-user.

2. The Flows (Architecture Mapping)#

In a legacy system, the "Flow" is often hidden in thousands of lines of stored procedures or COBOL logic. By recording the workflow, Replay generates architectural maps that show exactly how data moves from the UI to the backend. This is critical for generating API Contracts that allow the new frontend to talk to the old backend during a phased migration.

3. The Blueprints (Visual Editor)#

The Blueprints editor allows engineers to refine the extracted components. This is where you address technical debt by refactoring the "spaghetti logic" captured during the extraction.

⚠️ Warning: Never attempt to modernize a public safety system without an automated E2E test suite. Replay generates these tests based on the recorded video, ensuring that the new component behaves exactly like the legacy one.

Implementation Roadmap: Modernizing Public Safety Systems in 4 Steps#

Step 1: Visual Audit and Recording#

Identify the high-value workflows (e.g., "Active Incident Entry" or "Unit Status Management"). Using Replay, record a subject matter expert (SME) performing these tasks. This replaces the traditional 6-month discovery phase.

Step 2: Component and Contract Extraction#

Replay's AI Automation Suite processes the video to identify UI components, state transitions, and data requirements. It generates:

• •React/TypeScript components
• •OpenAPI/Swagger specifications for the required backend endpoints
• •Technical documentation for the business logic

Step 3: Technical Debt Audit#

Analyze the generated code for inefficiencies. Legacy systems often have redundant data fetching or unnecessary state loops. Because Replay provides a clean, documented version of the logic, your senior architects can perform a technical debt audit in days rather than months.

Step 4: Phased Deployment (The Strangler Pattern)#

Instead of a "Big Bang" cutover, deploy the modernized screens one by one. Replay-generated components can be embedded into legacy wrappers or served via a modern micro-frontend architecture, reducing the risk of system-wide failure.

📝 Note: For agencies in regulated environments, Replay is built for SOC2 and HIPAA compliance, with On-Premise deployment options to ensure sensitive data never leaves your secure network.

Why Understanding beats Rewriting#

The future of enterprise architecture isn't writing more code; it's understanding the code that's already running. When 70% of rewrites fail, the "rewrite from scratch" approach is no longer a viable strategy for mission-critical infrastructure.

By using Replay, public safety agencies can move from a "black box" state to a fully documented, modern codebase in weeks. You aren't just changing the UI; you are liberating the business logic from its monolithic prison.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take?#

While a full enterprise suite takes months to manually document, Replay can extract functional UI components and logic from a recorded workflow in a matter of hours. Most pilots see a 70% time savings in the first 30 days.

What about business logic preservation?#

Replay doesn't just "look" at the UI; it analyzes the state changes and data flows. By recording the SME's interaction, it captures the conditional logic and validation rules that are often missing from existing documentation.

Can Replay work with terminal-based or Citrix-delivered apps?#

Yes. Because Replay uses visual reverse engineering, it is agnostic to the underlying tech stack. Whether it’s a green-screen terminal, a Delphi desktop app, or a Java applet, if it can be displayed on a screen, it can be extracted.

Is the generated code maintainable?#

Absolutely. Replay generates clean TypeScript and React code that follows modern best practices. It’s not "machine-generated spaghetti"; it’s a structured codebase designed for long-term maintenance by your internal engineering team.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.