Modernizing Insurance Claims Processing: From Desktop Forms to React Components

The insurance industry is currently hostage to systems built during the Reagan administration. While the front-end of the business has moved to mobile apps and instant quotes, the back-office claims processing engines—the literal heart of the enterprise—remain trapped in COBOL, VB6, or aging Java applets.

When you decide to tackle modernizing insurance claims systems, you aren't just fighting old code; you are fighting the "Archaeology Problem." With 67% of legacy systems lacking any usable documentation, your senior developers spend 80% of their time acting as digital archaeologists, digging through obfuscated layers of business logic to understand how a simple "Adjuster Approval" workflow actually functions.

The traditional "Big Bang" rewrite is a suicide mission. Statistics show that 70% of legacy rewrites fail or significantly exceed their timelines. In the insurance sector, where a 24-month delay can mean losing a decade of market share to InsurTech startups, the status quo is no longer an option.

TL;DR: Modernizing insurance claims processing no longer requires 24-month manual rewrites; by using visual reverse engineering with Replay, enterprises can extract business logic and UI components from legacy systems in weeks, reducing modernization timelines by 70%.

The High Stakes of Claims Modernization#

In a regulated environment like insurance, claims processing is a complex web of state-specific mandates, policy-level exceptions, and fraud detection triggers. This logic is often "undocumented tribal knowledge" embedded in the code.

When an enterprise architect looks at a legacy claims dashboard, they see a black box. Manual mapping of a single complex screen—including its state transitions, API calls, and validation rules—takes an average of 40 hours per screen. For a standard claims suite with 100+ screens, that is 4,000 hours of manual labor before a single line of React is even written.

The Cost of the "Big Bang" Failure#

The global technical debt burden has ballooned to $3.6 trillion. For a Tier 1 insurance carrier, maintaining a legacy claims system costs millions annually in specialized talent and infrastructure. Yet, the risk of a rewrite often outweighs the cost of maintenance.

Beyond Manual Archaeology: Visual Reverse Engineering#

The future of modernizing insurance claims isn't rewriting from scratch—it’s understanding what you already have by observing it in action. This is where "Visual Reverse Engineering" changes the economics of the enterprise.

Instead of reading millions of lines of dead code, Replay records real user workflows. As a claims adjuster navigates a legacy desktop form, Replay captures the underlying data structures, state changes, and API interactions. It transforms the "video" of the workflow into a documented, functional React codebase.

💰 ROI Insight: Manual screen extraction costs ~$6,000 per screen (based on $150/hr architect rates). Replay reduces this to ~$600 per screen by automating the discovery and component generation phases.

The 3-Step Framework for Modernizing Insurance Claims#

Step 1: Workflow Capture and Discovery#

The first hurdle is the "Black Box." You cannot modernize what you cannot see. By recording actual claims adjusters performing their daily tasks—processing a First Notice of Loss (FNOL), verifying coverage, or issuing a payment—Replay maps the "Flows."

This isn't just a screen recording. It is a deep-packet inspection of the application's behavior. It identifies every hidden field, every validation script that only triggers for Florida residents, and every legacy API endpoint that hasn't been documented since 2008.

Step 2: Component and Logic Extraction#

Once the workflow is captured, the AI Automation Suite within Replay analyzes the recording to generate a structured Design System. It identifies repeating UI patterns and extracts them into a React-based Library.

Crucially for insurance, it preserves the business logic. If a legacy form has a complex calculation for "Depreciated Value," Replay identifies the inputs, the transformation, and the output, generating an API contract that mirrors the legacy behavior perfectly.

Step 3: Blueprinting and Integration#

The extracted components are organized into "Blueprints." This is where the Enterprise Architect takes over. You aren't starting with a blank VS Code window; you are starting with 70% of the work completed. You can now wire these modern React components into your new microservices architecture.

typescript
// Example: Generated React Component from a Legacy Claims Form
// Extracted via Replay Visual Reverse Engineering

import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { TextField, Button, Alert } from '@enterprise-ui/claims-library';

interface ClaimData {
  policyNumber: string;
  incidentDate: string;
  lossType: 'Auto' | 'Property' | 'Liability';
  estimatedDamage: number;
}

export const ClaimsEntryForm: React.FC = () => {
  const [formData, setFormData] = useState<Partial<ClaimData>>({});
  const [validationError, setValidationError] = useState<string | null>(null);

  // Business logic preserved from legacy 'ValidatePolicy' routine
  const handleValidation = (data: Partial<ClaimData>) => {
    if (data.lossType === 'Auto' && !data.policyNumber?.startsWith('AUT')) {
      setValidationError('Invalid Policy Prefix for Auto Claim');
      return false;
    }
    return true;
  };

  const handleSubmit = async () => {
    if (handleValidation(formData)) {
      // API Contract automatically generated to match legacy backend
      await fetch('/api/v1/claims/submit', {
        method: 'POST',
        body: JSON.stringify(formData),
      });
    }
  };

  return (
    <div className="p-6 bg-white shadow-lg rounded-lg">
      <h2 className="text-xl font-bold mb-4">Initial Claim Entry</h2>
      {validationError && <Alert type="error">{validationError}</Alert>}
      <TextField 
        label="Policy Number" 
        onChange={(e) => setFormData({...formData, policyNumber: e.target.value})} 
      />
      {/* Additional fields extracted from legacy UI */}
      <Button onClick={handleSubmit}>Process Claim</Button>
    </div>
  );
};

Bridging the Documentation Gap#

One of the most significant risks in modernizing insurance claims is the loss of institutional knowledge. When 67% of systems lack documentation, the code becomes a "load-bearing wall" that no one dares touch.

Replay converts the legacy system into a "living document." It generates:

1. •API Contracts: Exactly what data the legacy system expects and returns.
2. •E2E Tests: Automated tests that ensure the new React front-end behaves exactly like the legacy desktop app.
3. •Technical Debt Audit: A clear view of which parts of the legacy system are redundant and can be retired.

⚠️ Warning: Do not attempt to "clean up" business logic during the extraction phase. First, achieve functional parity (The "Before"). Once the system is modernized in React, use your new agility to refactor logic.

Addressing Security and Compliance in Regulated Industries#

For Financial Services and Insurance, "Cloud-First" often hits a brick wall called Compliance. Moving sensitive PII (Personally Identifiable Information) through a third-party SaaS for reverse engineering is often a non-starter.

Replay is built for these constraints. It offers:

• •On-Premise Deployment: Keep all source code and recordings within your own VPC or data center.
• •SOC2 & HIPAA Readiness: Ensuring that the extraction process meets the highest data privacy standards.
• •PII Masking: Automatically redacting sensitive data from recordings before they are processed by the AI suite.

The Impact on the Enterprise Architecture#

When you reduce the time to modernize a screen from 40 hours to 4 hours, the entire roadmap changes. Projects that were previously "unfundable" due to an 18-month lead time suddenly become quarterly objectives.

Case Study: Tier 2 Property & Casualty Carrier#

A regional P&C carrier had a 25-year-old claims adjudication system. Their manual estimate for modernization was 22 months and $4.2M.

• •With Replay: They recorded 45 core workflows over two weeks.
• •Result: 80% of the UI components were generated automatically. The project was completed in 5 months at a total cost of $1.1M.
• •Savings: $3.1M and 17 months of time-to-market.

📝 Note: The goal isn't just to get to React; it's to get to a state where your architecture is "understandable." Replay turns the black box into a glass box.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How does Replay handle desktop applications that aren't web-based?#

Replay's recording technology captures the visual state and the network/system interactions of the application. Whether it is a Java Swing app, a VB6 form, or a mainframe emulator, Replay can map the user's "Flow" and translate those interactions into modern web equivalents.

Can we preserve the exact business rules buried in the legacy code?#

Yes. By observing the inputs and outputs across thousands of variations in the recording phase, Replay's AI Automation Suite identifies the logic patterns. It generates API contracts and validation schemas that ensure your new React components communicate with your backend exactly as the old system did.

What is the learning curve for our current engineering team?#

Minimal. Replay produces standard React components, TypeScript interfaces, and Jest/Cypress tests. Your team doesn't need to learn a proprietary language; they just need to be able to work with the modern stack they are already moving toward.

How does this fit into a CI/CD pipeline?#

Replay isn't just a one-time extraction tool. The "Library" and "Flows" serve as the source of truth for your documentation. As you continue to modernize, you can use the generated E2E tests to ensure no regressions occur between the legacy and modern environments.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.