The federal government spends 80% of its IT budget just keeping the lights on for systems written before the engineers maintaining them were born. This isn't just a budgetary line item; it’s a national security risk. When a legacy system in a regulated environment like the SSA or the DoD fails, the "Big Bang" rewrite—the traditional 18-to-24-month overhaul—is usually the first instinct. It is also the most dangerous.
TL;DR: Visual Reverse Engineering allows federal agencies to bypass the "archeology phase" of modernization, reducing the time to extract modern React components and API contracts from legacy screens by 70%.
The Failure of the "Big Bang" Rewrite in Federal IT#
The statistics are sobering: 70% of legacy rewrites fail or significantly exceed their timelines. In the federal sector, these failures aren't just financial—they result in lapsed services for citizens and security vulnerabilities that remain unpatched for years. The $3.6 trillion global technical debt isn't a nebulous number; it is the cost of manual documentation and the "black box" nature of legacy codebases.
Most federal modernization projects stall during the "discovery" phase. Because 67% of legacy systems lack up-to-date documentation, architects are forced into "technical archeology"—manually clicking through screens, reading 20-year-old COBOL or Java snippets, and trying to guess the business logic.
| Approach | Timeline | Risk | Cost | Security Posture |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Bang Rewrite | 18-24 months | High (70% fail) | $$$$ | High Risk (Gap in coverage) |
| Strangler Fig | 12-18 months | Medium | $$$ | Moderate |
| Replay (Visual Extraction) | 2-8 weeks | Low | $ | Enhanced (Documented) |
The "Black Box" Problem: Why Manual Extraction Fails#
When a Senior Enterprise Architect looks at a 15-year-old federal portal, they see a black box. The source code might be available, but the intent is lost. Manual modernization typically requires 40 hours per screen to document, design, and recode. This includes:
- •Identifying all edge cases in the UI.
- •Mapping data fields to backend APIs.
- •Writing E2E tests to ensure parity.
- •Designing a modern React equivalent.
Replay changes this paradigm by using the video of a user workflow as the source of truth. By recording a real user performing a federal task—like processing a claim or updating a record—Replay’s AI Automation Suite extracts the underlying architecture, generates the React components, and maps the API contracts automatically.
💰 ROI Insight: Manual extraction costs approximately $6,000–$10,000 per screen in labor. Replay reduces this to under $1,000 by cutting the time from 40 hours to 4 hours per screen.
Technical Deep Dive: From Video to React#
Visual Reverse Engineering isn't just "screen scraping." It is the process of mapping DOM mutations, network requests, and state changes to a modern component architecture. In a federal context, this means capturing the exact business logic embedded in old JSP or Silverlight forms and transpiling that logic into clean, typed TypeScript.
Step 1: Workflow Recording#
The process begins by recording a subject matter expert (SME) navigating the legacy system. Replay captures not just the pixels, but the metadata of the interaction.
Step 2: Architecture Extraction (Flows)#
Replay’s Flows feature analyzes the recording to generate a visual map of the system's architecture. It identifies:
- •State transitions.
- •API endpoints (even undocumented ones).
- •Conditional logic (e.g., "If checkbox A is selected, show field B").
Step 3: Component Generation (Blueprints)#
Using the Blueprints editor, the system generates production-ready React code. This isn't "spaghetti code"; it follows your organization's specific Design System (managed in the Replay Library).
typescript// Example: Generated React component from a legacy Federal Claims Form // Extracted via Replay Visual Reverse Engineering import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import { TextField, Button, Alert } from '@gov-design-system/core'; import { useClaimsApi } from '@/hooks/useClaimsApi'; interface LegacyFormProps { claimId: string; onSuccess: (data: any) => void; } export const ModernizedClaimsForm: React.FC<LegacyFormProps> = ({ claimId, onSuccess }) => { const [formData, setFormData] = useState({ beneficiaryName: '', ssnLastFour: '', claimType: 'standard' }); // Logic preserved from legacy 'validate_logic.js' (circa 2008) const validateFederalRequirements = (data: typeof formData) => { return data.ssnLastFour.length === 4 && data.beneficiaryName.length > 0; }; const handleSubmit = async () => { if (validateFederalRequirements(formData)) { const response = await useClaimsApi.update(claimId, formData); onSuccess(response); } }; return ( <div className="p-6 space-y-4"> <TextField label="Beneficiary Name" value={formData.beneficiaryName} onChange={(e) => setFormData({...formData, beneficiaryName: e.target.value})} /> <TextField label="SSN (Last 4)" value={formData.ssnLastFour} onChange={(e) => setFormData({...formData, ssnLastFour: e.target.value})} /> <Button onClick={handleSubmit} variant="primary"> Update Federal Record </Button> </div> ); };
⚠️ Warning: Attempting to modernize without preserving the original business logic "quirks" often leads to regression errors that take months to debug in production.
Security and Compliance in Regulated Environments#
For federal agencies, "cloud-only" is often a non-starter. Modernizing systems that handle PII (Personally Identifiable Information) or PHI (Protected Health Information) requires a platform that respects the boundary of the network.
Replay is built for these constraints:
- •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Ensuring data integrity and privacy.
- •On-Premise Availability: Replay can be deployed entirely within an agency's air-gapped environment or VPC.
- •Technical Debt Audit: Before a single line of code is written, Replay provides a comprehensive audit of the legacy system, identifying security vulnerabilities in the existing API surface.
The Documentation Gap#
One of the primary drivers of federal technical debt is the "Knowledge Silo." When the original developers retire, the system becomes a black box. Replay’s AI Automation Suite generates documentation, API contracts (OpenAPI/Swagger), and E2E tests (Cypress/Playwright) as it extracts the code.
📝 Note: Documentation is not a "nice-to-have" in government tech; it is a regulatory requirement. Replay automates the creation of System Security Plans (SSPs) by providing a clear map of data flow.
Implementation Roadmap: The 30-Day Federal Modernization#
Modernizing a federal system doesn't have to take years. By using Replay, agencies can move from a legacy monolith to a modern micro-frontend architecture in weeks.
Step 1: Assessment and Library Setup#
Define your target design system. If your agency uses the U.S. Web Design System (USWDS), import those components into the Replay Library. This ensures that every component extracted matches federal accessibility (Section 508) and branding standards.
Step 2: Recording "Golden Paths"#
Identify the top 20% of workflows that handle 80% of the agency's traffic. Record these "Golden Paths." Replay will extract the logic and generate the Blueprints.
Step 3: API Contract Generation#
While the UI is being modernized, Replay generates the API contracts required for the backend teams. This allows frontend and backend modernization to happen in parallel, rather than sequentially.
yaml# Generated OpenAPI Spec from Replay Legacy Extraction openapi: 3.0.0 info: title: Federal Benefits API version: 1.0.0 paths: /v1/claims/{id}: get: summary: Retrieve claim details parameters: - name: id in: path required: true schema: type: string responses: '200': description: Successful extraction of legacy data structure content: application/json: schema: $ref: '#/components/schemas/Claim'
Step 4: Automated E2E Testing#
Replay generates E2E tests based on the original recording. This ensures that the new React component behaves exactly like the legacy screen, providing a "safety net" for the migration.
Case Study: Financial Services and Telecom Parallels#
While the focus here is Federal, the results are mirrored in other highly regulated sectors. A major financial services firm used Replay to modernize a legacy clearinghouse system. They reduced their modernization timeline from a projected 18 months to just 3 months, saving millions in developer hours and avoiding the risks associated with manual data mapping.
- •Manual Audit: 6 months
- •Replay Audit: 2 weeks
- •Developer Savings: 70% reduction in "copy-paste" coding.
Frequently Asked Questions#
How does Replay handle complex business logic hidden in the backend?#
Replay focuses on the "Visual Reverse Engineering" of the frontend and the communication layer (APIs). While it cannot "see" into a COBOL mainframe's internal state, it captures the result of that logic through network requests and UI changes. This allows you to create a "Strangler Fig" around the legacy backend by accurately documenting the interface it requires.
Is the code generated by Replay maintainable?#
Yes. Unlike "low-code" platforms that output proprietary XML or obfuscated JavaScript, Replay generates standard React/TypeScript. The code is structured according to your own internal patterns and design system, making it indistinguishable from code written by your senior developers.
How does this fit into a DevSecOps pipeline?#
Replay is designed to be part of the discovery and build phases. The generated API contracts and E2E tests can be checked into Git and run through standard CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that the modernized components meet all security and quality gates.
Can Replay work with air-gapped systems?#
Yes. Replay offers an on-premise deployment model specifically for government and defense agencies where data cannot leave the internal network.
Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.